council

Download

council@icann.org

October 2015

27 participants
71 discussions

Re: [council] RE: Letter from GAC regarding advice versus recommendations
by James M. Bladel Sept. 30, 2015

Sept. 30, 2015

Good question(s), Donna. Additionally, I'd like to understand if this response indicates that the GAC believes that the issue of mandatory PICs/Safeguards is still open for ³highly regulated² TLDs. Thanks‹ J. On 9/28/15, 15:37 , "owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org on behalf of Austin, Donna" <owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org on behalf of Donna.Austin(a)neustar.biz> wrote: > >Hi Bruce > >What do you see as the consequence of the GAC's response? > >I found the letter from the Board to the GAC interesting and wondered why >they had taken that approach. The letter from the Board to the GAC >seeking clarification is available here: >https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/crocker-to-schneider- >04sep15-en.pdf > >Donna > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] >On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin >Sent: Sunday, 27 September 2015 6:39 PM >To: council(a)gnso.icann.org >Subject: [council] Letter from GAC regarding advice versus recommendations > >Hello All, > >For information, the Board asked for clarification of the terms >recommendation and advice in the recent GAC Communiqué. > >Attached is a response from the chair of the GAC. > >Regards, >Bruce Tonkin > >

1 0