December 2018 - council - lists.icann.org

FW: Fwd: [Ext] Re: GNSO Council comment - CCWG Auction Proceeds
by Marie Pattullo 04 Dec '18

04 Dec '18

Thanks to both Erika and Marika - no objections from me. Best Marie From: council <council-bounces(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 2:19 PM To: council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: [Ext] Re: GNSO Council comment - CCWG Auction Proceeds Dear All, On behalf of Erika Mann, who is currently traveling, please find hereby the proposed comment from the GNSO Council on the new gTLD Auction Proceeds Initial Report: On behalf of the GNSO Council, one of the chartering organizations, I would like to thank the CCWG for its Initial Report and efforts to date. The GNSO Council will not be providing substantive input at this stage, but has encouraged its Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies to provide input on the Initial Report and its recommendations. The GNSO Council looks forward to receiving the Final Report for its consideration in due time. If you have any comments and/or concerns about this proposed comment, please share this with the list by Friday 7 December at the latest. If no objections are received, this comment will be submitted on behalf of the GNSO Council. Best regards, Marika From: council <council-bounces(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> Date: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 at 14:06 To: "council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>" <council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: [Ext] Re: GNSO Council comment - CCWG Auction Proceeds Dear all, Please note that the public comment period for Initial Report of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/new-gtld-auction-proceeds-initial-201… [icann.org]<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefens…>) has been extended to 11 December. The announcement about this extension is available here: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2018-11-27-en [icann.org]<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefens…>. Can everyone kindly assist in sharing information about this two-week extension to your respective groups? Kind regards, Emily From: council <council-bounces(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Erika Mann <erika(a)erikamann.com<mailto:erika@erikamann.com>> Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 6:17 AM To: "GNSO Council List (council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>)" <council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: [council] Fwd: [Ext] Re: GNSO Council comment - CCWG Auction Proceeds Dear Colleagues, During our wrap up session at ICANN63, I had committed to share with you some further thoughts in relation to whether the Council should consider submitting input to the public comment forum on the Initial Report of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG. Unless there are any specific concerns or issues in the Initial Report that the Council believe should be flagged from a Council perspective, I would like to suggest that the Council submit a short note thanking the CCWG for its efforts, welcoming the Initial Report and noting that GNSO SG/Cs have been encouraged to provide input on the Initial Report. I would be happy to draft something if you would support this course of action. Do note that the public comment forum closes on 27 November so any statement would need to be agreed on via the mailing list as soon as possible. Similarly, the Council discussed the recent Board decision to allocate part of the auction proceeds to the reserve fund. Staff kindly followed up with further information in relation to this decision (https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2018-October/021987.html<https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.…>) as requested. I am not sure whether there is a further desire to discuss this issue and/or consider undertaking potential action, but I would suggest that this is considered separately from the new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG as it is not within its remit to reconsider or change the Board action. I look forward to receiving your feedback, Erika Erika Mann GNSO Council erika(a)erikamann.com<mailto:erika@erikamann.com> +32 498 121354

1 0

FW: FYI please - false statements being made to Council on IGO matter
by Drazek, Keith 04 Dec '18

04 Dec '18

FYI, I received this note from Brian Beckham concerning our ongoing discussions of the IGO-INGO CRP matter and the other emails I had forwarded to the list. In the future, I will collect and package these communications for Council consideration rather than forwarding them individually. Regards, Keith From: BECKHAM, Brian <brian.beckham(a)wipo.int> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 10:19 AM To: Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org>; Drazek, Keith <kdrazek(a)verisign.com>; pam.little(a)alibaba-inc.com; rafik.dammak(a)gmail.com Cc: Jon PASSARO (Jonathan.PASSARO(a)oecd.org) <Jonathan.PASSARO(a)oecd.org>; manal(a)tra.gov.eg; Jorge.Cancio <Jorge.Cancio(a)bakom.admin.ch>; ghislain.de-salins(a)finances.gouv.fr Subject: [EXTERNAL] FYI please - false statements being made to Council on IGO matter Dear Mary, dear Keith, Pam, Rafik, cc Manal, Ghislain, Jorge, Jon, I am sorry to bother you with this, but wanted to express hope that if a moment presents itself, if and as you would consider appropriate, the Council would be made aware of misleading statements being made to it e.g., at: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2018-November/022095.html Statements such as "(i.e. 'GAC' is really just a handful of IGOs within the GAC, i.e. OECD & WIPO)" are inaccurate at best, and arguably intentionally misleading given inter alia information and correspondence provided on a number of occasions by IGOs to the relevant WG. As should be clear from the background documents on this file (of which there are many, so I appreciate that it is easy to get lost!) not only is this not true vis-à-vis the GAC which as you know operates on the basis of UN-defined consensus (a seriously higher bar than the standard ICANN GNSO definition) and has repeatedly stated a public interest in IGO causes, but nor is it true as relates to IGOs. More specifically as to the latter, in a letter from the Assistant Secretary-General for the U.N. Office of Legal Affairs to the ICANN Board, the OECD and WIPO when participating in ICANN discussions are representing some 40 IGOs for the benefit of all IGOs (numbering around 200): https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/mathias-to-board-27jul… I do not wish to add the above clarification merely by way of an incidental reaction to be posted to the GNSO public email list (which I do not request, but leave to your discretion), but thought this a sufficiently important matter to raise to your attention. I also understand the Council is considering a dialogue with the GAC and wish to affirm our willingness to assist this effort. Kind regards, Brian World Intellectual Property Organization Disclaimer: This electronic message may contain privileged, confidential and copyright protected information. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail and all its attachments. Please ensure all e-mail attachments are scanned for viruses prior to opening or using.

1 0

Action Items: GNSO Council meeting 29 November 2018
by Nathalie Peregrine 04 Dec '18

04 Dec '18

Dear Councilors, Please find the action items, as stated during the meeting, below arising from the GNSO Council call held on the 29 November 2018. Please take note of the action items coming out of the Council meeting and the proposed timing for delivering on these actions. Please ensure your wiki logins are up to date as all Action Items have been assigned to councilors and/or staff and posted on the Action Item wiki page here<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…>. If you are logged into the wiki when you go to that page, your name will be highlighted alongside the action item assigned to you. Please refer to this page for the recent status updates on the Action items. ACTION ITEMS FROM THE GNSO COUNCIL MEETING 29 NOVEMBER 2018 Item 2. Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action Items List Action Items: * Council Leadership to consider when to launch call for volunteers for the WHOIS Procedure Implementation Advisory Group (e.g., with publication of EPDP Final Report) * Staff to follow up on Council liaisons, remind Council of the open appointments * Council leadership to propose to Council approach to select permanent GNSO member to Fellowship Program Selection Committee and communicate intentions to Heather Forrest, the current interim member to that committee. * Council leadership to propose Council position and next steps for GNSO relationship with the Cross Community Engagement Group on Internet Governance. Item 3: Consent Agenda Action item: * GNSO Secretariat to communicate to the ICANN Secretary that Keith Drazek, GNSO Chair, will represent the GNSO as the Decisional Participant on the Empowered Community Administration. Removed from Consent Agenda - GNSO Response to the GAC Communique Action item: * Small Drafting Team to seek to finalize GNSO response to the GAC Communique, to seek to take into RySG concerns. Council leadership to subsequently determine best way to approve (e.g., intersessional vote or during December meeting), taking into account the end of January date for the next ICANN Board meeting, during which the Board is expected to consider adoption of its scorecard on the GAC Advice. Item 4: COUNCIL DISCUSSION – IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms Action item: * Council leadership to again present Council options for the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Final Report to consider and discuss with their respective SG/Cs. Item 5: COUNCIL UPDATE – Temporary Specification for Registration Data Expedited Policy Development Process - Recurring Update Action Item: * None Item 6: COUNCIL DISCUSSION – ICANN Reserve Fund Action Item: * Council leadership to initiate discussion on list. Item 7: COUNCIL DISCUSSION – Discussion of the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Policy Status Report Action Item: * Council leadership to send note to Councilors to encourage their respective groups to provide input to the public comment forum, if applicable. Item 8: ANY OTHER BUSINESS Action Item: * None Thank you, Kind regards, Nathalie -- Nathalie Peregrine Manager, Operations Support (GNSO) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: nathalie.peregrine(a)icann.org <nathalie.peregrine(a)icann.org%20> Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<applewebdata://EB3A6F47-9760-400D-A39B-A7EFFC56B467/learn.icann.org/courses…> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gn…>

1 0

ICANN calendar feature
by Nathalie Peregrine 03 Dec '18

03 Dec '18

Dear all, You will shortly be able to find all SO/AC public conference calls and webinar events listed on the ICANN calendar which you can find here: https://features.icann.org/calendar Where meetings are members-only, information will be provided as to where recordings and transcriptions will be posted. This global calendar does not in any way replace respective SO, AC, SG and C calendars but allows an overall view of events which ICANN community members could be interested in and will also contribute to avoiding scheduling conflicts. We hope you find this useful. Kind regards, Nathalie Nathalie Peregrine Manager, Operations Support (GNSO) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: nathalie.peregrine(a)icann.org <nathalie.peregrine(a)icann.org%20> Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<applewebdata://EB3A6F47-9760-400D-A39B-A7EFFC56B467/learn.icann.org/courses…> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gn…>

1 0

Re: [council] Fwd: [Ext] Re: GNSO Council comment - CCWG Auction Proceeds
by Emily Barabas 03 Dec '18

03 Dec '18

Dear all, Please note that the public comment period for Initial Report of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/new-gtld-auction-proceeds-initial-201…) has been extended to 11 December. The announcement about this extension is available here: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2018-11-27-en. Can everyone kindly assist in sharing information about this two-week extension to your respective groups? Kind regards, Emily From: council <council-bounces(a)gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Erika Mann <erika(a)erikamann.com> Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 6:17 AM To: "GNSO Council List (council(a)gnso.icann.org)" <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] Fwd: [Ext] Re: GNSO Council comment - CCWG Auction Proceeds Dear Colleagues, During our wrap up session at ICANN63, I had committed to share with you some further thoughts in relation to whether the Council should consider submitting input to the public comment forum on the Initial Report of the new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG. Unless there are any specific concerns or issues in the Initial Report that the Council believe should be flagged from a Council perspective, I would like to suggest that the Council submit a short note thanking the CCWG for its efforts, welcoming the Initial Report and noting that GNSO SG/Cs have been encouraged to provide input on the Initial Report. I would be happy to draft something if you would support this course of action. Do note that the public comment forum closes on 27 November so any statement would need to be agreed on via the mailing list as soon as possible. Similarly, the Council discussed the recent Board decision to allocate part of the auction proceeds to the reserve fund. Staff kindly followed up with further information in relation to this decision (https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2018-October/021987.html) as requested. I am not sure whether there is a further desire to discuss this issue and/or consider undertaking potential action, but I would suggest that this is considered separately from the new gTLD Auction Proceeds CCWG as it is not within its remit to reconsider or change the Board action. I look forward to receiving your feedback, Erika Erika Mann GNSO Council erika(a)erikamann.com<mailto:erika@erikamann.com> +32 498 121354

2 1