June 2011 - council - lists.icann.org

Fwd: Postponed to Tuesday 14 June 2011 @ 1300 UTC / JAS WG - Board - GAC proposed June 7 meeting
by Stéphane Van Gelder 07 Jun '11

07 Jun '11

Councillors, FYI. This call continues to puzzle me. There has been little reaction on this list to the emails I've sent informing of the call, so I have not pushed this in any way. But this call does make me uncomfortable. JAS is a co-chartered group. It has produced an INTERIM report. Without much consultation with the GNSO, a call is organised by ALAC for the Board and the GAC to ask questions on this interim report. In essence, I don't have any problem with this. I think it's actually very useful for a group like the JAS to explain its interim reports if people have questions. But part of me is thinking that because its an interim report, I am surprised that the Board would want to ask questions at this stage. I hear that the JAS WG is preparing a 3rd milestone report. I don't know if this is true and if this means that there will be a final report after this 3rd MS report (Rafik, can you perhaps shed some light on this please?). If that's the case, then this seems early days to get direct Board involvement. Now of course I realise that this is a special case because there may be implementation aspects that need to be taken care of quickly, as the new gTLD program is about to be launched, but I am also mindful of the process issues. So please let me have your thoughts on this. I am happy to talk to Olivier, the ALAC Chair, and bring any concerns or questions the GNSO may have on this to him. Thanks, Stéphane Début du message réexpédié : > De : ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Date : 7 juin 2011 01:45:41 HAEC > À : ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org>, "Katim S. Touray" <kstouray(a)gmail.com>, Secretary <secretary(a)icann.org> > Cc : Jeremy Beale <jeremy.beale(a)gac.icann.org>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen(a)icann.org>, Stephane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com>, Karla Valente <karla.valente(a)icann.org>, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak(a)gmail.com>, ALAC EXCOM <alac-excom(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com> > Objet : Postponed to Tuesday 14 June 2011 @ 1300 UTC / JAS WG - Board - GAC proposed June 7 meeting > > Dear All, > > Due to short notice and the unavailability of some members, we are re-rescheduling the JAS Working Group Call with members of the Board, GAC and GNSO invited, to next Tuesday, 14 June 2001, at 13:00 UTC. We hope you will be able to make it then, and apologise for the last minute change of schedule. > > The agenda will remain the same. > As a reminder, it would help the JAS WG to better prepare if you could: > Advise on the representatives from the Board and GAC that will be able to attend the teleconference. > Send us any questions or comments on the Milestone Report in advance, if possible. > Kind regards, > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > ALAC Chair > > > From: Microsoft Office User <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:59:03 -0700 > To: "Katim S. Touray" <kstouray(a)gmail.com>, Secretary of the Board <secretary(a)icann.org> > Cc: Jeremy Beale <jeremy.beale(a)gac.icann.org>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen(a)icann.org>, Stephane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com>, Karla Valente <karla.valente(a)icann.org>, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak(a)gmail.com>, ALAC EXCOM <alac-excom(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>, Microsoft Office User <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Subject: Meeting Invitation / JAS WG - Board - GAC proposed June 7 meeting > > Dear Board and GAC Members, > On behalf of the ALAC, I would like to invite you to attend a teleconference on Tuesday June 7 to discuss support to applicants from developing countries with the Joint Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG). > The call will take place at 13:00 UTC. > Please find the dial-in call details below. > As you are aware, the JAS WG has prepared a Second Milestone report (attached for your convenience). The ALAC has approved this report, however, it is still under GNSO consideration. Nevertheless, your feedback about this report is very important. > It would help the JAS WG to better prepare if you could: > 1. Advise on the representatives from the Board and GAC that will be able to attend the teleconference. > 2. Send us any questions or comments on the Milestone Report in advance, if possible. > > PROPOSED AGENDA: > Introduction (5 to 10 minutes) Evan Leibovitch - Highlights Second Milestone Report covering short history how it was developed and specific summary points > Board/GAC questions/comments (30 to 40 minutes) – JAS WG would like to listen to individual feedback and receive questions/suggestions from GAC and Board members > Singapore (5 to 10 minutes) Rafik Dammak/Carlton Samuels – Should there be a public meeting with the JAS WG GAC/Board members during the Singapore ICANN Meeting? > We are looking forward to your participation on Tuesday. > Kind regards, > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > ALAC Chair > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dial-in details: Tuesday 14 June 2011 at 13:00 UTC > > For other places see: > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=JAS+WG&iso=2011060… > > ADOBE CONNECT: > http://icann.adobeconnect.com/jas/ > > Wiki Workspace: > https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/SO-AC+New+gTLD+Applicant+Support+… > > If you require a dial-out, please email staff(a)atlarge.icann.org with you preferred contact number. > ____________________________________________________________________________ > Participant passcode: JAS > > For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call. > ____________________________________________________________________________ > Dial in numbers: > Country Toll Numbers Freephone/Toll Free Number > > ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 > AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 > AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 > AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 > AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 > AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 > AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 > AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 > BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 > BRAZIL 0800-7610651 > CHILE 1230-020-2863 > CHINA* 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 > 10800-120-1670 > COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 > CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 > DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 > ESTONIA 800-011-1093 > FINLAND Land Line: 106-33-203 0-800-9-14610 > FINLAND Mobile: 09-106-33-203 0-800-9-14610 > FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 > FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 > FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 > GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 > GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 > HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 > HUNGARY 06-800-12755 > INDIA 000-800-852-1268 > INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 > IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 > ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 > ITALY 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 > JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7739-4799 0066-33-132439 > JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-5539-5191 0066-33-132439 > LATVIA 8000-3185 > LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 > MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 > MEXICO 001-866-376-9696 > NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 > NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 > NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 > PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065 > PERU 0800-53713 > PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 > POLAND 00-800-1212572 > PORTUGAL 8008-14052 > RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 > SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 > SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 > SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 > SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 > SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 > SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 > SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 > TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 > THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 > UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 > UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 > UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 > UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 > UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 > URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 > USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 > VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 > > *Access to your conference call will be either of the numbers listed, dependent on the participants' local telecom provider. > > Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone. > >

3 6

GNSO Council minutes 19 May 2011 posted on website
by Glen de Saint Géry 07 Jun '11

07 Jun '11

Dear Councillors, The minutes of the Council meeting held on 19 May 2011 have been posted, as approved, on page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar#may And may be directly viewed at: http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-council-19may11-en.htm Thank you. Kind regards. Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Fwd: Meeting Invitation / JAS WG - Board - GAC proposed June 7 meeting
by Stéphane Van Gelder 05 Jun '11

05 Jun '11

Councillors, Please see below the details of the JAS call being arranged by ALAC for next week. Stéphane Début du message réexpédié : > De : ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Date : 4 juin 2011 00:59:03 HAEC > À : "Katim S. Touray" <kstouray(a)gmail.com>, Secretary <secretary(a)icann.org> > Cc : Jeremy Beale <jeremy.beale(a)gac.icann.org>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen(a)icann.org>, Stephane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com>, Karla Valente <karla.valente(a)icann.org>, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak(a)gmail.com>, ALAC EXCOM <alac-excom(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>, ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Objet : Meeting Invitation / JAS WG - Board - GAC proposed June 7 meeting > > Dear Board and GAC Members, > On behalf of the ALAC, I would like to invite you to attend a teleconference on Tuesday June 7 to discuss support to applicants from developing countries with the Joint Applicant Support Working Group (JAS WG). > The call will take place at 13:00 UTC. > Please find the dial-in call details below. > As you are aware, the JAS WG has prepared a Second Milestone report (attached for your convenience). The ALAC has approved this report, however, it is still under GNSO consideration. Nevertheless, your feedback about this report is very important. > It would help the JAS WG to better prepare if you could: > 1. Advise on the representatives from the Board and GAC that will be able to attend the teleconference. > 2. Send us any questions or comments on the Milestone Report in advance, if possible. > > PROPOSED AGENDA: > Introduction (5 to 10 minutes) Evan Leibovitch - Highlights Second Milestone Report covering short history how it was developed and specific summary points > Board/GAC questions/comments (30 to 40 minutes) – JAS WG would like to listen to individual feedback and receive questions/suggestions from GAC and Board members > Singapore (5 to 10 minutes) Rafik Dammak/Carlton Samuels – Should there be a public meeting with the JAS WG GAC/Board members during the Singapore ICANN Meeting? > We are looking forward to your participation on Tuesday. > Kind regards, > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > ALAC Chair > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dial-in details: Tuesday 07 June 2011 at 13:00 UTC > > For other places see: > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=JAS+WG&iso=2011060… > > ADOBE CONNECT: > http://icann.adobeconnect.com/jas/ > > Wiki Workspace: > https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/SO-AC+New+gTLD+Applicant+Support+… > > If you require a dial-out, please email staff(a)atlarge.icann.org with you preferred contact number. > ____________________________________________________________________________ > Participant passcode: JAS > > For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call. > ____________________________________________________________________________ > Dial in numbers: > Country Toll Numbers Freephone/Toll Free Number > > ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 > AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 > AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 > AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 > AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 > AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 > AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 > AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 > BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 > BRAZIL 0800-7610651 > CHILE 1230-020-2863 > CHINA* 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 > 10800-120-1670 > COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 > CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 > DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 > ESTONIA 800-011-1093 > FINLAND Land Line: 106-33-203 0-800-9-14610 > FINLAND Mobile: 09-106-33-203 0-800-9-14610 > FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 > FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 > FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 > GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 > GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 > HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 > HUNGARY 06-800-12755 > INDIA 000-800-852-1268 > INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 > IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 > ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 > ITALY 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 > JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7739-4799 0066-33-132439 > JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-5539-5191 0066-33-132439 > LATVIA 8000-3185 > LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 > MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 > MEXICO 001-866-376-9696 > NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 > NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 > NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 > PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065 > PERU 0800-53713 > PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 > POLAND 00-800-1212572 > PORTUGAL 8008-14052 > RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 > SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 > SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 > SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 > SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 > SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 > SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 > SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 > TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 > THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 > UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 > UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 > UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 > UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 > UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 > URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 > USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 > VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 > > *Access to your conference call will be either of the numbers listed, dependent on the participants' local telecom provider. > > Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone. > >

1 0

ICANN Final Status Report to the GNSO Council on AGP Limits Policy Implementation
by Glen de Saint Géry 03 Jun '11

03 Jun '11

http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-02jun11-en.htm ICANN Final Status Report to the GNSO Council on AGP Limits Policy Implementation 2 June 2011 ICANN today is posting its fifth and final status report<http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/agp-limits-policy-final-report-02jun11-en.pdf> [PDF, 316 KB] to the GNSO on the implementation of its recommendations for the Add Grace Period (AGP) Limits Policy. As noted in prior status reports, the success of the Policy is evidenced by the 99.7% reduction in AGP deletes since the Policy went into effect in April 2009. ICANN committed to analyzing and reporting on the effects of the Policy to the GNSO at six-month intervals for two years after its implementation. The first status report<http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/agp-limits-policy-report-10jun09-en.pdf> [PDF, 41 KB] was issued on 10 June 2009, the second status report<http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/agp-limits-policy-report-14dec09-en.pdf> [PDF, 61 KB] on 14 December 2009, the third status report<http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/agp-limits-policy-report-01jun10-en.pdf> [PDF, 224 KB] on 1 June 2010, and the fourth status report<http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/agp-limits-policy-report-18nov10-en.pdf> [PDF, 312 KB] on 18 November 2010. The purpose of these reports has been "to allow the GNSO to determine when, if ever, these recommendations and any ensuing policy require additional clarification or attention based on the results of the reports prepared by ICANN Staff." Presented in a prior report was that during GNSO calls in April and May 2010, following inquiry from ICANN Staff about whether or not additional Policy work should be considered, the GNSO decided that the success of the Policy and the low number of exemption requests demonstrated that modifications to the Policy were not warranted at that time. Further, since the time of those calls there have not been any additional GSNO discussions about the Policy and the number and frequency of reported exemption requests from registrars has dropped considerably. The results of the AGP Limits Policy illustrate the success of ICANN's consensus-driven, bottom-up policy development process. Community members identified the problem, initiated policy discussions, generated a solution, and now monitor the results. The ICANN practice of encouraging and considering broad community input on policy issues leads to effective results. Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Re: [council] Motion for IRTP-B Final Report and Recommendations
by tim＠godaddy.com 03 Jun '11

03 Jun '11

No. I Just want to open discussion on it. Tim ------Original Message------ From: Stéphane Van Gelder To: Tim Ruiz Cc: GNSO Council Subject: Re: [council] Motion for IRTP-B Final Report and Recommendations Sent: Jun 2, 2011 1:56 PM Thanks Tim. So just to be clear, you are NOT making this motion for our June 9 meeting? Stéphane Le 1 juin 2011 à 23:13, Tim Ruiz a écrit : > A proposed motion for the final report and recommendations of the IRTP-B > WG is attached in both doc and txt formats. > > Thanks to Marika for putting this together. I made a few edits because > my personal opinion is that recommendations 8 and 9 are not fully baked > yet. While I have faith in Staff's ability to do what is asked of it in > those two recommendations, I do not feel it is appropriate. There are > policy aspects of those two recommendations that are yet unaddressed. > Using an implementation plan to flesh them out is not appropriate or > fair to either the community or to Staff. > > As Liaison to this WG I should have caught that sooner, but I am not > sure the WG would have gotten any further with them either way. As a > result I have left them mentioned in Resolve(D) but have not yet had > time to ocnsider how to frame them. > > In any event, the Council has not had opportunity to discuss the report > so voting on this motion during the meeting on the 9th is not practical. > The moton is being presented here to get it on the agenda for discussion > purposes only. I do believe we could be able to vote on it as early as > Singapore. > > Thanks, > Tim > <Motion-IRTP-PartB-Final-Report-and-Recommendations.doc><Motion-IRTP-PartB-Final-Report-and-Recommendations.txt>

2 1

Fwd: Follow-up to the second JAS WG report
by Stéphane Van Gelder 02 Jun '11

02 Jun '11

Councillors, FYI. Stéphane Début du message réexpédié : > De : Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com> > Date : 3 juin 2011 01:09:55 HAEC > À : "Katim S. Touray" <kstouray(a)gmail.com> > Cc : Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>, Karla Valente <karla.valente(a)icann.org>, ICANN AtLarge Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Objet : Rép : Follow-up to the second JAS WG report > > Dear Katim, > > thank you for your patience since my last email. I am happy to say that I have now received a reply from Rafik on behalf of the JAS WG. The suggested date of Tuesday 7th June would be suitable for the call you suggest below. > The suggested starting time was, as noted previously, 13:00 UTC. > > I'll let Seth Green, At-Large staff, arrange to get the ball rolling. In order to maximise usefulness, may I suggest the following: > > - the JAS WG should host the meeting > - The agenda should be set up and adopted jointly before the meeting by the groups attending. Note that Board and GAC members planning to attend should be asked to submit a list of agenda topics (so prior notice of attendees from these groups will be needed). Once the agenda is final, it should be distributed beforehand to the JAS mailing list and all expected attendees. > > I hope this helps and look forward to this call taking place. > > Kind regards, > > Olivier > > > Le 23/05/2011 03:13, Katim S. Touray a écrit : >> >> Dear Olivier and Stéphane, >> >> First, let me congratulate you and your teams, as well as the JAS WG on their second report. I've had the opportunity to go through it, and it's quality work. >> >> To follow on the second JAS WG report, I would like to ask if you'd be interested in organizing a conference call for interested board members and the GNSO, GAC, and At-Large reps to discuss the status and way forward for the recently released JAS WG report. The idea was presented at the recently concluded board retreat in Istanbul that a public meeting on the JAS WG report (with the participation of the board and GAC) will be helpful, and toward this end, it would be useful to have a conference call. Please let me know if this makes sense to you and let me know when you want to have the call, if indeed you want to have it. >> >> Again, thanks to all of you and your teams for the great work you're doing on the issue! I hope we'll all be able to come together to have a useful program we all can be proud of. Have a great week, and best wishes! >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Katim >> >> > > -- > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD > http://www.gih.com/ocl.html

1 0

Increase of the Registrar Accreditation Application Fee and Introduction of Further Due Diligence Background Checks
by Glen de Saint Géry 02 Jun '11

02 Jun '11

http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-01jun11-en.htm ________________________________ Increase of the Registrar Accreditation Application Fee and Introduction of Further Due Diligence Background Checks 1 June 2011 To offset the costs of increased due diligence, the application fee for submitting an ICANN accreditation application will be increased from the current fee of US $2,500 to US $3,500 effective on 1 July 2011. All applications received on or after that date will be subject to a non-refundable US $3,500 application fee. The increased fee will offset the costs for ICANN to conduct additional due diligence checks on applicants during the registrar accreditation application process, including reviews of: * Criminal records; * Credit records; * Financial history and solvency; * Corporate/company structure and ownership. In order to conduct these due diligence checks ICANN will perform inquiries through the use of external resources (including reputable commercial third party information service providers). These steps are the result of community input that called for the strengthening of the requirements for registrar accreditation, and to address changes that have arisen in the registrar marketplace. The associated public comment period can be found at: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201101-en.htm#registr… The ICANN Board of Directors voted to approve the fee increase for these purposes at its meeting on 21 April 2011 (http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-21apr11-en.htm#3). Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

AGP Limits Policy Implementation Report
by Craig Schwartz 02 Jun '11

02 Jun '11

Dear Councilors, Please find attached the fifth and final AGP Limits Policy Implementation Report. This report provides a status update on the implementation of the Policy since it was announced to the community on 17 December 2008. As noted in the report, Staff is available to consult further with the GSNO on this matter at any time. Best, Craig Schwartz Chief gTLD Registry Liaison ICANN

1 0

REMINDER: ICANN FY 12 Security, Stability & Resiliency Framework public comments close on 7 June
by Glen de Saint Géry 01 Jun '11

01 Jun '11

Reminder : http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-02may11-en.htm Public Comment: ICANN FY 12 Security, Stability & Resiliency Framework 2 May 2011 Updated 12 May 2011 ICANN has previously published two Security, Stability and Resiliency (SSR) Plans, in 2009 and 2010. ICANN is today releasing the Fiscal Year 2012 version for public comment in 5 UN languages. This represents a new format for the FY 12 SSR Framework, which is being published to provide for community input prior to the ICANN 41 meeting in Singapore and publication of the FY 12 ICANN Operating Plan and Budget. This Framework is divided into two sections, and is intended to more clearly describe for the community * The foundation of ICANN's role in security, stability and resiliency of the Internet's unique identifiers, * Provide an overview of the Internet ecosystem and ICANN's place in it, * Describe ICANN's operational priorities in SSR for the coming fiscal year commencing in July 2011, and * Distinguish between ICANN's operational priorities, areas in which ICANN is a collaborator and facilitator, and areas in which ICANN is an observer or has awareness on the activities of others in the ecosystem regarding the Internet's unique identifiers At the informal request of the ccNSO, the comment period is being extended to 7 June 2011 23:59 UTC. Comments on the Framework<http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201106-en.htm#ssr-fy12> are welcomed and may be submitted to ssr-fy12(a)icann.org<mailto:ssr-fy12@icann.org> and viewed at http://forum.icann.org/lists/ssr-fy12/. Public comments : http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#ssr-fy12 Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

PDP-WT Final Report
by Marika Konings 01 Jun '11

01 Jun '11

Dear All, On behalf of the PDP-WT, please find attached the PDP-WT Final Report. For your information, the Work Team is scheduled to provide you with an overview of the proposed new GNSO Policy Development Process and answer any questions you may have on Sunday 19 June from 14.45 – 15.40 (local time) at the ICANN meeting in Singapore. With best regards, Marika

4 6