March 2011 - council - lists.icann.org

Latest version of the Board topics
by Stéphane Van Gelder March 13, 2011

March 13, 2011

The role of the GNSO community in addressing any new items that come out of the GAC/BD discussions on new gTLDs. More specifically, to the extent that there are any inconsistencies between the policy advice given by the GNSO and what the ICANN Board agrees to with the GAC, how will those matters be handled. Also, how should the GNSO community factor GAC advice earlier into the policy development process, and should it try to? Volunteer Fatigue/Prioritizing – and how to deal with it. Consumer Choice, Competition and Innovation: context of the Board resolution http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm#6

1 0

Latest list of ccNSO topics
by Stéphane Van Gelder March 13, 2011

March 13, 2011

- A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work. - What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)? - Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value? - An exchange of ideas regarding NTIA notice of inquiry on the IANA functions? Stéphane

1 0

Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
by Stéphane Van Gelder March 13, 2011

March 13, 2011

All, As it was necessary to provide the ccNSO with information on the topics we suggest we might discuss in advance, I have sent the following email to Chris Disspain. Thanks, Stéphane Début du message réexpédié : > De : Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com> > Date : 13 mars 2011 05:26:15 HNEC > À : Chris Disspain <ceo(a)auda.org.au> > Objet : suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow > > Chris, > > The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our joint meeting tomorrow. > > We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO. > > Stéphane > > > - A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work. > > - What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)? > > - Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value? > > - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs? > > - Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV) will accelerate?

2 3

RE: [council] Current draft
by Tim Ruiz March 13, 2011

March 13, 2011

I like it. Tim > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [council] Current draft > From: Mary.Wong(a)law.unh.edu > Date: Sun, March 13, 2011 4:11 pm > To: "council(a)gnso.icann.org GNSO" <council(a)gnso.icann.org>, > "StÃ©phane Van Gelder" <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com> > > > > > > Will something like this work? > > "The GNSO would like to thank the Board and the GAC for the hard work that has been done during the recent and ongoing consultations. The GNSO appreciates these efforts to bring to a close the implementation of the Policy Development Process that it approved by supermajority vote in 2007. > > The GNSO is ready to help the Board and the GAC complete work on the issues that are currently before them and to provide any detail or context that may be needed during those discussions. > > We wish to emphasize the importance of the bottom-up multi-stakeholder approach and request that in formulating any further changes to and new elements for the final version of the Applicant Guidebook, the Board fully consider the input provided by the GNSO. > > We also ask that any resulting modifications to the Applicant Guidebook be carried out in a timely manner and the final version of that Guidebook be published as soon as possible." > > Cheers > Mary > > > > > > Mary W S Wong > Professor of Law > Chair, Graduate IP Programs > UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW > Two White Street > Concord, NH 03301 > USA > Email: mary.wong(a)law.unh.edu > Phone: 1-603-513-5143 > Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php > Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> > > > > > > > > > From: > StÃ©phane Van Gelder > > To: > "council(a)gnso.icann.org GNSO" > > Date: > 3/13/2011 4:50 PM > > Subject: > [council] Current draft > >

1 0

Draft v2
by Stéphane Van Gelder March 13, 2011

March 13, 2011

Stéphane

1 0

wording
by Jaime Wagner - PowerSelf March 13, 2011

March 13, 2011

It is important to maintain any outcomes in line with the bottom up process of which GNSO is an active part. Jaime Wagner <mailto:jaime@powerself.com.br> jaime(a)powerself.com.br Direto (51) 3219-5955 Cel (51) 8126-0916 Geral (51) 3233-3551 DDG: 0800-703-6366 <http://www.powerself.com.br/> www.powerself.com.br

2 1

Discussion Draft: Community gTLD Community Change Request
by Liz Gasster March 13, 2011

March 13, 2011

All, Following is a link to the Discussion Draft: Community gTLD Community Change Request paper that Kurt referred to in today's meeting. http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/explantory-memo-community-change-r… The document can be found here: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-22feb11-en.htm. Thanks, Liz

2 1

RE: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
by Tim Ruiz March 13, 2011

March 13, 2011

Agree. Unfortunately, I may not be able to attend this lunch meeting, but this is the first topic that would make me truly regret it. Tim > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO > Council meeting tomorrow > From: "Andrei Kolesnikov" <andrei(a)cctld.ru> > Date: Sun, March 13, 2011 1:38 pm > To: "'StÃ©phane Van Gelder'" <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com>, > <council(a)gnso.icann.org> > > Yet another topic that might be interesting for discussion: should we exchange ideas regarding NTIA notice of inquiry on the IANA functions? Retirement of the tlds? > > --andrei > > From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stephane Van Gelder > Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 7:28 AM > To: council(a)gnso.icann.org GNSO > Subject: [council] Fwd: suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow > > > > All, > > > As it was necessary to provide the ccNSO with information on the topics we suggest we might discuss in advance, I have sent the following email to Chris Disspain. > > > > Thanks, > > > Stéphane > > > > > > > Début du message réexpédié : > > > > > De : Stéphane Van Gelder > > Date : 13 mars 2011 05:26:15 HNEC > > À : Chris Disspain > > Objet : suggested topics for joint ccNSO/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow > > > Chris, > > > The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our joint meeting tomorrow. > > > > We look forward to meeting with the ccNSO. > > > > Stéphane > > > > > > - A short explanation of how the 2 Councils work. > > - What are the ccNSO currently working on, and which of these projects do you anticipate direct GNSO input/feedback to be useful (if any)? > > - Does the ccNSO see value in meeting with the GNSO Council and if so, how can we maximise that value? > > - There are big changes to the current ICANN landscape coming, with respect to new gTLDs, what would the ccNSO's position be on cc operators that plan to run gTLDs? > > - Is it likely the move from cc to more general purpose (eg. .CO, .ME, .TV) will accelerate? > > > > > > >

1 0

RE: [council] questions for our joint meetings with GAC and ccNSO
by john＠crediblecontext.com March 13, 2011

March 13, 2011

3 2

Fwd: suggested topics for joint GAC/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow
by Stéphane Van Gelder March 13, 2011

March 13, 2011

In the same vein, I have sent the following email to Heather Dryden. Stéphane Début du message réexpédié : > De : Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com> > Date : 13 mars 2011 05:24:22 HNEC > À : Heather Dryden <Heather.Dryden(a)ic.gc.ca> > Objet : suggested topics for joint GAC/GNSO Council meeting tomorrow > > Heather, > > The GNSO Council has put together the following list of questions for our joint meeting tomorrow. > > We look forward to meeting with the GAC. > > Stéphane > > - Would a group of GAC and GNSO Council volunteers to discuss issues of common interest be a good idea? > > - Should we work on finding a new liaison from the GAC to the GNSO ? > > - How can the GNSO assist the GAC and the Board to implement the ATRT recs #12 & #13 recs (i.e. engaging the GAC earlier in the policy development process, and ensuring that the GAC is fully informed as to the policy agenda at ICANN)? Would CWGs be useful in this regard? What is the GAC's views on CWGs and how would the GAC propose such groups' recommendations be processed?

1 0