October 2014 - Ccnso-council

Again!: ccNSO Los Angeles Meeting Survey
by Gabriella Schittek Oct. 22, 2014

Oct. 22, 2014

Dear all, Please, please, please - we do need some more replies to our LA meeting survey! Only you can help us to improve, so please, do take a few minutes to give us your input https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/VD2FDKX The survey will close by the end of Friday, 24 October. Many thanks to all of you who already have submitted your thoughts! Gabi > >On 15/10/14 23:52, "Gabriella Schittek" <gabriella.schittek(a)icann.org> >wrote: > >>Dear all, >> >>As always, on behalf of the ccNSO Programme Working Group, I would be >>grateful if you could take a few minutes to fill in following short >>survey >>on the quality of the two ccNSO meeting days: >> >>https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/VD2FDKX >> >>Your input is essential to the Programme Working Group to find out what >>you >>wish to hear at coming meetings, what was good and what we can improve. >> >>As you may know, we have also started providing feedback on your feedback >>(see London meeting feedback: >>http://london50.icann.org/en/schedule/ccnso-feedback-comments-25sep14-en. >>p >>df >>), so that you know what has happened to your input. >> >>So, please, do write down your thoughts they are invaluable to us! >> >>Kind regards, >> >>Gabi >> >> >> >> >>

1 0

52-2014: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D Policy Development Process (PDP) Recommendations
by Gabriella Schittek Oct. 21, 2014

Oct. 21, 2014

Dear Councillors, Please, can you review Triage recommendation to request for input 52-2014: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D Policy Development Process (PDP) Recommendations. In case you do not agree with the suggested recommendation, please notify the list by Thursday, 23 October. Kind regards, Gabi > > == > Topic: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D Policy Development > Process (PDP) Recommendations > > Originator: GNSO > > Summary of request: Obtain community input on the 18 recommendations of the > GNSO PDP on changes to the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D, > prior to consideration for adoption by the ICANN Board. > https://www.icann.org/public-comments/irtp-d-recommendations-2014-10-20-en > > Date received: 21 October 2014 > > Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 10 November 2014 > > Recommended action, if any: No Action > > Expertise needed, if any: Legal > > Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: Low > > >

1 0

Interim Adoption of Framework of Interpretation Working Group Final Report
by Kristina Nordstrom Oct. 20, 2014

Oct. 20, 2014

Dear all, Please find herewith a link to the resolution of the ccNSO Council Interim Adoption of Framework of Interpretation Working Group Final Report<http://ccnso.icann.org/node/46455> at the Council meeting in Los Angeles on 15 October. Kind regards, Kristina

1 0

FW: GNSO activity report
by Gabriella Schittek Oct. 20, 2014

Oct. 20, 2014

Forwarded on behalf of Patrick Myles.

1 0

FW: To be forwarded to the ccNSO Council
by Gabriella Schittek Oct. 20, 2014

Oct. 20, 2014

Dear all, Forwarded on behalf of Ron Sherwood: > > ICA Tells ICANN: > <http://www.internetcommerce.org/ica-tells-icann-withdraw-bylaws-proposal-to… > ive-governments-more-power/> > Withdraw Bylaws Proposal to Give Governments More Power > <http://www.internetcommerce.org/ica-tells-icann-withdraw-bylaws-proposal-to… > ive-governments-more-power/>

1 0

Report from the Universal Acceptance Session
by Don Hollander Oct. 18, 2014

Oct. 18, 2014

Dear Council participants: At the ccNSO-Council prep day I committed to provide feedback to the ccNSO Council on what happened at the Universal Acceptance session - which coincided with the ccNSO Council meeting. There is an action item for the ccNSO council to make sure that papers that it has approved are monitored on a regular basis as they flow through the rest of the ICANN community. Here’s my report which will be in the APTLD report on the ICANN51 meeting: — Universal Acceptance At the Universal Acceptance session we heard that ICANN has started development work on a roadmap with some ideas, but no execution. Their plans include: · Developing some presentation decks and related collateral that different members of the community can use locally. · Going to software development conferences to raise the issue. · Planning for a help-desk where problems associated with Universal Access can be received, recorded, and forwarded to the relevant party. None of these initiatives are actually in place. Mozilla has maintained a Public Suffice List for some time. This list is used by many applications to validate top and 2nd level domain space. IANA appears to be providing a CSV file with a copy of TLDs for validation. While ICANN update this four times a day, Mozilla – which maintains the Public Suffix List through a volunteer effort – keeps their file update once a month or so as volunteer time becomes available. We also heard how the JIG report, which was a cooperative agreement between the ccNSO and the gNSO, remains unadopted by the Board. The comment that ICANN was looking to raise Universal Acceptance to the same level as IPv6 and DNSSEC was met with alarm – because both those initiatives have been underway for nearly two decades. There is a group outside of ICANN who are keen to see Universal Acceptance sorted and APTLD will be building a ‘coalition of the willing’ to identify paths to solution – with a possible meeting in Morocco in conjunction with ICANN52. ------ Don Don Hollander General Manager gm(a)aptld.org

1 0

New GAC Chair and vice-Chairs
by Gabriella Schittek Oct. 16, 2014

Oct. 16, 2014

Dear all, The GAC has elected its new Chair and vice-Chairs: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2014-10-16-en Kind regards, Gabi

1 0

GAC Communiqué Los Angeles
by Gabriella Schittek Oct. 16, 2014

Oct. 16, 2014

Dear all, The Los Angeles GAC Communiqué has now been posted at: https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/Governmental+Advisory+Committee Kind regards, Gabi

1 0

ccNSO Los Angeles Meeting Survey
by Gabriella Schittek Oct. 15, 2014

Oct. 15, 2014

Dear all, As always, on behalf of the ccNSO Programme Working Group, I would be grateful if you could take a few minutes to fill in following short survey on the quality of the two ccNSO meeting days: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/VD2FDKX Your input is essential to the Programme Working Group to find out what you wish to hear at coming meetings, what was good and what we can improve. As you may know, we have also started providing feedback on your feedback (see London meeting feedback: http://london50.icann.org/en/schedule/ccnso-feedback-comments-25sep14-en.pdf ), so that you know what has happened to your input. So, please, do write down your thoughts they are invaluable to us! Kind regards, Gabi

1 0

Agenda and Draft Resolutions Council meeting 15 October
by Bart Boswinkel Oct. 15, 2014

Oct. 15, 2014

Dear all, Please find included the agenda and draft resolutions for todays meeting. The secretariat wil also provide paper copies, Kind regards, BArt

1 0