March 2014 - Ccnso-council - lists.icann.org

Reminder: ccNSO Meeting Survey Singapore
by Gabriella Schittek March 31, 2014

March 31, 2014

Dear all, This is just a reminder to all of you who attended the ccNSO meeting in Singapore, to fill in our short ccNSO Singapore Meeting Survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/HKXN9WR Many thanks to all of you who already filled it in! Kind regards, Gabi On 26/03/14 05:58, "Gabriella Schittek" <gabriella.schittek(a)icann.org> wrote: >Dear all, > >As always, the Programme Working Group would like to hear your thoughts on >the ccNSO meeting days. Your input is very valuable and helps us improving >the ccNSO meetings. > >Please, could you therefore take a few minutes to provide us with your >feedback by filling in this very short survey: >https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/HKXN9WR > >Kind regards, > >Gabi > >

1 0

GAC communiqué Singapore
by Gabriella Schittek March 28, 2014

March 28, 2014

Dear all, The GAC communiqué is now available at: https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27132037/Final%20Communique%20 -%20Singapore%202014.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1395925159241&api=v2 Kind regards, Gabi

1 0

19-2014: 2013 RAA Data Retention Specification Data Elements and Legitimate Purposes for Collection and Retention
by Gabriella Schittek March 27, 2014

March 27, 2014

Dear Councillors, Please, email this email list by 31 March in case you do not agree with the Triage recommendation on the 2013 RAA Data Retention Specification Data Elements and Legitimate Purposes for Collection and Retention. Thanks, Gabi > > == > > Topic: 2013 RAA Data Retention Specification Data Elements and Legitimate > Purposes for Collection and Retention > > Originator: ICANN > > Summary of request: Some Registrars are seeking an exemption from certain > collection and/or retention requirements under the Data Retention > Specification (the "Specification") of the 2013 RAA. Section 2 of the Data > Retention Specification sets forth requirements regarding the written > materials a Registrar must submit in support of its good faith determination > that the collection and/or retention of any data element specified in the > Specification violates applicable law, and provides that following notice to > ICANN of the Waiver Request, ICANN and the applicable Registrar shall discuss > the matter in good faith in an effort to reach a mutually acceptable > resolution of the matter. > > Date received: 22 March 2014 > > Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 21 April 2014 > > Recommended action, if any: Post to community for information > > Expertise needed, if any: Legal, managerial > > Date of submission to Council: 26 March > > Last date of Council decision: 28 March > > Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: Low > >

2 1

Proposed statement
by Byron Holland March 27, 2014

March 27, 2014

Dear Councillors, Attached is a soft copy of the draft text I handed out yesterday. It is my intention to make this statement at the open session later today. As noted yesterday, if you have any suggestions, please advise my noon today. All the best, Byron

7 9

Input sought on 2013 RAA Data Retention Specification Data Elements and Legitimate Purposes for Collection and Retention
by Gabriella Schittek March 27, 2014

March 27, 2014

Dear all, Some Registrars are seeking an exemption from certain collection and/or retention requirements under the Data Retention Specification (the "Specification") of the 2013 Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA). In response to these requests from some Registrars, ICANN has posted a document seeking to clarify what is meant by certain data elements described in the Data Retention Specification and describing potentially legitimate purposes for collection and retention of those data elements. Input is welcome until 21 April 2014: http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-3-21mar14-en.htm Kind regards, Gabi

1 0

20-2014: Notice of Preliminary Determination To Grant Registrar Data Retention Waiver Request for NAMEWEB BVBA
by Gabriella Schittek March 27, 2014

March 27, 2014

Dear Councillors, Please, email this email list by 31 March in case you do not agree with the Triage recommendation on the Notice of Preliminary Determination To Grant Registrar Data Retention Waiver Request for NAMEWEB BVBA. Thanks, Gabi > > === > > Topic: Notice of Preliminary Determination To Grant Registrar Data Retention > Waiver Request for NAMEWEB BVBA > > Originator: ICANN > > Summary of request: ICANN has made a preliminary determination that it is > prepared to grant a data retention waiver request submitted by Registrar > NAMEWEB BVBA under the 2013 Registrar Accreditation Agreement (the "2013 > RAA"). According to set rules, a public comment period must be held. > > Date received: 22 March 2014 > > Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 21 April 2014 > > Recommended action, if any: None > > Expertise needed, if any: Legal > > Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: Low > >

1 0

18-2014: Proposal for the Use of Mandatory Policy Advisory Boards for Regulated Industry Sector and Consumer-Trust-Sensitive New gTLD Strings
by Gabriella Schittek March 27, 2014

March 27, 2014

Dear Councillors, Please, email this email list by 31 March in case you do not agree with the Triage recommendation on the ALAC Proposal for the Use of Mandatory Policy Advisory Boards for Regulated Industry Sector and Consumer-Trust-Sensitive New gTLD Strings. Thanks, Gabi > > == > > Topic: Proposal for the Use of Mandatory Policy Advisory Boards for Regulated > Industry Sector and Consumer-Trust-Sensitive New gTLD Strings > > Originator: ALAC > > Summary of request: A proposal on the use of mandatory Policy Advisory Boards > (PABs) for a subset of new Generic Top-Level Domains (gTLDs) which are > targeted at regulated industry sectors and other consumer-trust-sensitive > fields. These PABs are supposed to be able to address what are perceived to be > substantial public-interest deficiencies in the current implementation of > ICANN's gTLD expansion programme. > > Date received: 22 April 2014 > > Last day for Comments/input/response, if any: 16 April 2014 > > Recommended action, if any: None > > Expertise needed, if any: Managerial > > Impact on ccNSO/ccTLDs: Low > > >

1 0

FW: DomainWire Stat Report (March 2014) Available
by Gabriella Schittek March 26, 2014

March 26, 2014

Dear all, Forwarded on behalf of Patrick Myles, CENTR. Kind regards, Gabi > > > > The latest edition of CENTR¹s quarterly DomainWire Stat Report¹ is now > available. The report gives an overview of the status of global Top Level > Domains with a focus on European ccTLDs. > > You can find the report at > https://centr.org/news/03-26-2014/domainwire-march-2014-available > > Feel free to share this report among your communities. > > Regards > > Patrick Myles > Information Manager | CENTR > Belliardstraat 20, 1040 Brussels, Belgium > tel +32 2 627 5550 - fax +32 2 627 5559 > www.centr.org <http://www.centr.org/> twitter: centrnews > >

1 0

A goodbye - of sorts
by Roelof Meijer March 26, 2014

March 26, 2014

Dear fellow councilors, This will be my last email on this list. Just before the start of our meeting here in Singapore, I would like to thank you for the very fruitful and pleasant collaboration and the trust you have had in me during my tenure in the ccNSO Council. It has been a memorable and educating experience. I wish you all the best in your continuing work both inside and outside the Council and I am sure we will continue to collaborate on ccTLD issues. My special thanks go to Gabriella and Kristina: ladies, you're the best! Best regards, Roelof A. Meijer CEO SIDN | Meander 501 | 6825 MD | P.O. Box 5022 | 6802 EA | ARNHEM | The Netherlands | T +31 (0)26 352 55 00 | M +31 (0)6 11 39 57 75 | F +31 (0)26 352 55 05 roelof.meijer(a)sidn.nl | www.sidn.nl Sent through my mobile device

2 1

Updated Final agenda and preparatory material
by Bart Boswinkel March 26, 2014

March 26, 2014

Dear all, Please find included the updated agenda and associated background material. The agenda will also be printed. Changes in comparison first agenda: Agenda item added 3.3 : proposal to establish ccNSO Coordination Committee IANA Transition process Agenda item 10: Work plan * Update monthly Work plan * Next steps rolling forward Workplan Agenda item 12: Assignment of Roles and responsibilities Agenda item Implementation Recommendations Study Group Quorum Rule has been deferred to the April 2014 meeting, Kind regards, Bart

1 1