April 2015 - Ccnso-council - lists.icann.org

GNSO activity update
by Patrick Myles April 22, 2015

April 22, 2015

Hi councillors, Attached is the GNSO activity update for your reference. Regards Patrick Myles

1 0

Recording Informal Council Call 17 April
by Kristina Nordstrom April 20, 2015

April 20, 2015

Dear all, Please find below the recording of the informal Council Call on 17 April: http://audio.icann.org/ccnso/ccnso-council-call-17apr15.mp3 Kind regards, Kristina

2 1

Dial in details Council call 23 April 12:00 UTC
by Kristina Nordstrom April 20, 2015

April 20, 2015

Dear all, The next ccNSO Council call will take place this week on 23 April 12:00 UTC. Please find the dial in details below and let me know as soon as possible if you need dial out assistance for this call. Dial in numbers: http://www.adigo.com/icann/ Conference ID: 5258 Adobe Room: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/ccnsocouncil/ Two-way audio will be available in the Adobe Room. Kind regards, Kristina

1 0

Preparatory material ccNSO Council meeting 23 April 2015
by Bart Boswinkel April 17, 2015

April 17, 2015

Dear all, Please find included material in preparation of the upcoming Council meeting. Material is related to items 3, 4 and 8 on the agenda Please note that material related to item 4, is in flux, following the developments of the CWG IANA and CCWG Accountability. I have included the notes from todays informal Council meeting for those who were not able to attend. Kind regards, Bart

1 0

SECIR: Summary conference call Apr 10, 2015
by Gabriella Schittek April 17, 2015

April 17, 2015

Dear all, The summary below is sent on behalf of the SECIR Working Group Chair Cristian Hesselman. === Summary SECIR Conference Call #13 The ccNSO working group ³Secure Email Communication for cccTLD Incident Response² (SECIR) held its thirteenth conference call on Fri Apr 10. We discussed the following topics: (1) TLD-OPS status. The number of ccTLDs that have subscribed to the TLD-OPS list has grown to 97 from 77 since our last conference call on Mar 20. The ccNSO Secretariat has been inviting ccTLDs in batches since ICANN52 and has now invited everyone. The WG will ramp up its outreach activities to get ccTLDs on board who have not managed to respond to their invitation yet (see point 3). (2) TLD-OPS leaflet. We OK¹ed the leaflet we created to help ccTLDs subscribe to the TLD-OPS list (see attachment). The leaflet is for distribution within the ccTLD community only, either by email or through hardcopies at relevant community meetings. (3) Outreach activities. We discussed various outreach activities we¹ll be undertaking until ICANN53 to get even more ccTLDs on the list, such as the announcement of the 100th ASCII ccTLD subscriber and a short presentation at the ccNSO Members Day in Buenos Aires to update the community. Our next conference call will take place in the week of May 11. TLD-OPS homepage: http://ccnso.icann.org/resources/tld-ops-secure-communication.htm SECIR homepage: http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/secir.htm SECIR members: Erwin Lansing (.dk), Jacques Latour (.ca), Frederico Neves (.br), Abibu Ntahigiye (.tz), Geng-Da Tsai (.tw), and Cristian Hesselman (.nl, chair) Cristian Hesselman Manager SIDN Labs

1 0

Notes from informal ccNSO Council call 17 April
by Bart Boswinkel April 17, 2015

April 17, 2015

Dear all, Please find included the notes from todays informal Council call Notes Informal Council call 17 April 2015 On Audio only: Becky, Nigel, Lise Aplogies: Abibu, Leonid, Carolina No changes to agenda CWG IANA update ( Lise) Intense Wg days Conclusion of DT Focus on one model: Intenal model with legal separation of IANA Function Operator as affiliate And light weight board ( operational) Meeting with whole group. Finalise draft. On monday commetns from group to finalise draft for publi comment of 4 Areas for CCWg to look at: CCWG asked more details Jonathan Robinsom and Lise to particpate in CCWG meeting to discuss Webinar CWG 14.00 and 16.00 UTC Actual draft finalised, RFP 1, 2 and 3 RFP 4 and 5, Legat team to investigate RFP 4 and 5 CWG deliverable conditional on some aspects of CCWG work * IANA Budget * Community empowerment * Redress and review * Appeal Mechanism ( ccTLD delegation and redelgation excluded from appeal) : ccNSO should work on this at later stage. Will be mentioned in proposal. If more emphaises is needed ccNSO should indicate so Public comment duration 28 days, to allow for a more fullsome report 10 days to work on proposal Keith questions: given the large size of the group is their solid consensus? Lise: most of DT work is consnesus based. Hesitant re CSC. Issues around role with regard to role of CSC. Goal is to make it a technical group. Also need for a group that handles complaints. Direction of travel CSC will handle complaints, but not substively Another one is SLE work ( DTA ). Need for another SLA. IANA is performing much much better than current SLA To date no real objection to current model under discussion. Compomise between the differnt views and models discussed at earlier stage. In general no real objections Update CCWG Accountability (Mathieu) State of play CCWG working on WS 1 proposals. Porposal rely on 4 building blocks as described and presented during Singpaore meeting - Powers of community - Mission and vcore values of ICANN ( core principles against which - Board - Enhancement of IRP CCWG is evolving a full list of stress test ( contigencies/risk and evolving mitigating measures) CCWG now in phase, concrete proposals. Focus will be on requirements Public comments in a few weeks. Legal advise rasing additional issues Next week CCWG Intense working days Intention is to publish for public comment in week 27 April BA used to check findings, and changes if feasible Post BA second public comments round WS 1 ccNSO endorsement for WS 1 needs to happen after BA meeting. Unclear whether intersessionaly or at f-2-f meeting Not clear yet, whether consensus within WG Note: within ccTLD CCWG members. consistent opposition by one of the ccNSO appointed members Keith: Both CCWG and CWG are comprised diverse viewpoints, so if consnesus can be achieved. Keith: What could cause to recall the Board? Is their still a mechanism envisioned Mathieu: Mechanism is still on the tabel, but with high level thresholds to initiate, and high threshold to trigger (due to expected impact) Not a lot of push-back on pronciple as such, but focused on conditions: what could lead to Board recall. Avoid that mechanisms can be gamed. Becky: Notion that ccNSO would be able to recall its appointed Board members, Ibidem other SOs. Leaves issue around NomCom members Mathieu: two spearate processes: - recall of SO appointed Board mebers - Recall of full Board ( with other, differnt and higher triggeers and conditions) Interdependy of proposal CWG and CCWG interdepency (see above) ICG needs to look into potential interdependency between the 3 proposal Mathieu: Lise outlined the items that are necessary. In addition: confidence tha tCWG request will be taken on as requirements in WS1. Additional complexity, ccNSO Council needs to take into account in its decision making process these interdepencies. co-chairs are very willing to discuss with Council Lise: Echo MAthieu's point around coordination between the two groups, in particular around the proposals In addition: CWG mimicking the other two proposals to make it easier for ICG to compare the proposals. Lise: Important to know what are the expectations. from Keith: Outcome of this meeting will inform the meeting of Council. Letter of Council Mathieu: Council from March 27. List criteria. In particular need for broad consensus. Some may read into this that unanimity of ccNSO appointed members or consensus Nigel: interesting situation to be in. Matter for formal Council meeting Keith: Will be part of the call Letter was written to help CWG and CCWG NTIA Test is Consensus Nigel agrees with approach: important part is community Whatever comes foward needs strong consensus from ccTLD comunity Keith: while the ccNSO is fomal entity, only acting on behalf of ccTLD community. Mathieu: this a matter for Council. Stresses point that all are striving for consensus at different levels and in different circles. However Council needs to be aware this point in letter raised attention, both within CCWG and with other communities. Important to clarify position. Need for Outreach Keith: Question need for addiotnal resource? Further to be discussed at Council call AOB No other update Defer item 3 point 4 to council call

1 0

Draft Agenda Council Call 23 April 12.00 UTC
by Gabriella Schittek April 16, 2015

April 16, 2015

Dear all, Please, find the draft agenda for next week¹s Council call attached. If you wish to add any item, please, let me know as soon as possible. Kind regards, Gabi

1 0

Informal Council Call 17th of April 12:00 UTC
by Bart Boswinkel April 16, 2015

April 16, 2015

Dear all, In preparation of the meeting of the informal meeting please find included the agenda: 1. Welcome 2. Update CWG IANA, with focus on: * Current state of play CWG, what will be presented for public comment * Timelines: anticipated public comment period (opening, closure), next steps, anticipated time frame decision-making SO and AC * Expected involvement of the ccNSO leading up to BA, during BA meeting 3. Update CCWG Accountability with focus on: * Current State of play, what will be presented for public comment * Timelines: anticipated public comment period (opening, closure), next steps, anticipated time frame decision-making SO and AC * Expected involvement of the ccNSO leading up to BA, during BA meeting * Any action expected on concerns raised by Eberhard and Roelof on pace of work? ( Included in document) 4. Interdependency of proposals 5. Letter ccNSO Council to co-chairs CWG /CCWG (included for reference: http://ccnso.icann.org/about/holland-et-al-to-lise-et-al-26mar15-en.pdf ) * Clarification on what is meant with interpretation of" broad support needed of proposals by membership of CWG or CCWG,, in particular ccTLD members: Does this imply unanimity or consensus support? 6. Outreach and engagement to ccTLD community * Need to reach-out to ccTLD community, to familiarise broader ccTLD with proposals and seek feed-back from community on proposals (initial draft action plan for CWG included, for informational purposes) * Expectations of CWG and CCWG re outreach and engagement of ccTLD community during ccNSO decision making 7. AOB From: Kristina Nordstrom <kristina.nordstrom(a)icann.org<mailto:kristina.nordstrom@icann.org>> Date: Thursday 16 April 2015 13:27 To: "ccnso-council(a)icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>" <ccnso-council(a)icann.org<mailto:ccnso-council@icann.org>>, Lise Fuhr <lise.fuhr(a)difo.dk<mailto:lise.fuhr@difo.dk>>, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill(a)afnic.fr<mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr>> Subject: [ccnso-council] Reminder: Dial in details Informal Council Call 17th of April 12:00 UTC Dear all, Please find below the dial in details for the informal Council Call on Friday 17th April 12:00 UTC. Dial in numbers: http://www.adigo.com/icann/ Conference ID: 5258 Adobe Room: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/ccnsocouncil/ Two-way audio will be available in the Adobe Room. Kind regards, Kristina

1 0

Reminder: Dial in details Informal Council Call 17th of April 12:00 UTC
by Kristina Nordstrom April 16, 2015

April 16, 2015

Dear all, Please find below the dial in details for the informal Council Call on Friday 17th April 12:00 UTC. Dial in numbers: http://www.adigo.com/icann/ Conference ID: 5258 Adobe Room: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/ccnsocouncil/ Two-way audio will be available in the Adobe Room. Kind regards, Kristina

1 0

ICG Publishes Update to Process Timeline
by Gabriella Schittek April 14, 2015

April 14, 2015

Dear all, The IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG) has published an update to the group's Process Timeline:https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/icg-process-timeline-13 apr15-en.pdf See also: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-04-13-en Kind regards, Gabi

1 0