January 2017 - Ccnso-council

Re: DEADLINE EXTENSION - ICANN is seeking volunteers to serve on the second review of Registration Directory Service
by Joke Braeken Jan. 17, 2017

Jan. 17, 2017

Dear all, We would like to inform you of a deadline extension: Applications to be appointed to the Registration Directory Service (RDS) Review Team are due on 20 January 2017, 23:59 UTC. More information on the application procedure, time commitment, responsibilities, skills and experience, methodology, budget & support can be found here https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2017-01-11-en and here: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-12-06-en Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org From: Joke Braeken <joke.braeken(a)icann.org> Date: Tuesday 20 December 2016 at 10:03 To: "ccnso-council(a)icann.org" <ccnso-council(a)icann.org>, "ccnso-members(a)icann.org" <ccnso-members(a)icann.org>, "ccTLDcommunity(a)cctld-managers.org" <ccTLDcommunity(a)cctld-managers.org> Subject: ICANN is seeking volunteers to serve on the second review of Registration Directory Service Dear All. ICANN is seeking volunteers to serve on the second review of Registration Directory Service (formerly known as the WHOIS Review). Candidates are asked to submit their application materials by 13 January 2017, 23:59 UTC. More information on the application procedure, time commitment, responsibilities, skills and experience, methodology, budget & support can be found here: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-12-06-en Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org

1 0

IANA Functions Customer Survey Results Available
by Joke Braeken Jan. 17, 2017

Jan. 17, 2017

Dear all, ICANN published the results of an annual survey that measures the perception of satisfaction among IANA functions customers regarding the services they receive. In the 2016 survey, which accounts for transactions completed between September 2015 and August 2016, 94 percent of respondents reported being "satisfied" or "very satisfied." View Customer Survey Findings[iana.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.iana.org_reports_2…> [PDF, 2.15 MB]. The IANA Functions Customer Survey measures satisfaction in relation to documentation quality, process quality, transparency, timeliness, accuracy, reporting and courtesy. ICANN commissioned Ebiquity, a global reputation consultancy, to administer the survey. Those who make IANA functions transactions – top-level domain operators, protocol parameter and regional Internet registry managers, RFC authors, Internet Engineering Steering Group members, DNSSEC KSK ceremony participants and .INT domain registrants – were invited to take the survey. This year, ICANN issued 4,286 invitations and 10 percent of customers responded. Read more here: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2017-01-11-en[icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_news_ann…> Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org

1 0

Apply Now for ICANN Leadership Positions: Deadline Is 21 March 2017
by Joke Braeken Jan. 17, 2017

Jan. 17, 2017

Dear all, The ICANN Nominating Committee (NomCom) invites interested individuals to submit applications and/or recommend candidates for ICANN's key leadership positions. The NomCom is an independent committee tasked with selecting eight members of the Board of Directors and other key positions within ICANN's structure. Selected individuals will have a unique opportunity to work with accomplished colleagues from around the globe to help shape the Internet's technical coordination and policy development. ICANN is inviting applications and recommendations for the following positions: * Two members of the ICANN Board of Directors * Three representatives to the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) – one each from Africa, Asia/Australia/Pacific Islands and Latin America/Caribbean regions * Two members of the Council of the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) * One member of the Council of the Country-Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) Currently, the eight NomCom-selected Board members are: Maarten Botterman<https://www.icann.org/profiles/maarten-botterman-9ec855dd-5ee8-4528-a180-5c…>, Cherine Chalaby<https://www.icann.org/profiles/cherine-chalaby>, Steve Crocker<https://www.icann.org/profiles/steve-crocker>, Asha Hemrajani<https://www.icann.org/profiles/asha-hemrajani>, Rafael Lito Ibarra<https://www.icann.org/profiles/rafael-lito-ibarra>, Khaled Koubaa<https://www.icann.org/profiles/khaled-koubaa>, George Sadowsky<https://www.icann.org/profiles/george-sadowsky> and Lousewies Van der Laan<https://www.icann.org/profiles/lousewies-van-der-laan>. For full consideration, ICANN must receive applications by 21 March 2017, 23:59 Universal Coordinated Time (UTC). For more information regarding the NomCom, the required qualifications, the application process and more, consult https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2017-01-11-en Best regards. Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org

1 0

FY17 Q2 Stakeholder Call will take place on 15 February 2017 at 15:00 UTC
by Joke Braeken Jan. 17, 2017

Jan. 17, 2017

Dear All, ICANN has announced its FY17 Q2 Stakeholder Call, which will take place on 15 February 2017 at 15:00 UTC. The call will focus on how ICANN has implemented community policy for the quarter ending 31 December 2016. The call will also provide an Africa and Middle East update, as part of a new format aimed at spotlighting regional activities. Please click here[docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_forms_…> to register for the call and to receive joining instructions. If you are unable to access the form, pleaseemail us<mailto:icann.communications@icann.org> to register with your full name and an email address. The call is open for all to attend and live interpretation is offered in Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Portuguese, Russian and Spanish. There will be a Questions & Answers (Q&A) session and all materials (recordings, transcripts and presentations) will be archived and made available on the ICANN website[icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resource…>. These calls were set up to enhance ICANN's accountability and transparency efforts, and are a great way for you to stay informed on what the organization has done in line with ICANN's mission of keeping the Internet secure, stable and interoperable. More information: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2017-01-12-en Please visit the Reporting page[icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resource…> on the ICANN website for more information, including recordings of previous calls. The presentation will be posted 24-48 hours in advance. Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org

1 0

Item for AOB - running out of time
by Nigel Roberts Jan. 16, 2017

Jan. 16, 2017

About a year ago, we had some informal discussions with Xavier that was aimed at understanding the requirements on the Council for the allocation of resources for funding Council members and others to ICANN meetings. Strangely (to me) this turned out to not be predicated on on a budget, but on 'per seat' basis. Two questions arise from this answer :- - what requirement (e.g. from Finance or ICANN Board) is there on the ccNSO to allocate funds differentially between different classes of members - where does the differential between ccNSO number of seats and (e.g.) ALAC and GAC come from? This inquiry fell by the wayside. I wish to suggest a small informal meeting in CPH including Chair or one of the Vice-Chairs, and myself (since I've been doing the research) and one other Council Member (perhaps from LAC or Africa?). Situation has worked, by-and-large, this last few years, largely becuase of the support given from large registries who do not need travel support for their elected Councillors. But I can see it could inhibit good candidates from developing regions and also small registries in other regions. On the assumption Council continues to approve of this line of inquiry, I shall see if I can arrange something. Council is asked if it objects to this further inquiry

6 6

ccNSO Members Meeting ICANN58: seeking candidate presenters (ccTLD News Session)
by Joke Braeken Jan. 13, 2017

Jan. 13, 2017

Dear All, The next ccNSO Members’ Meeting takes place on Tuesday 14 and Wednesday 15 March 2017 in Copenhagen, Denmark. The latest version of the ccNSO Members’ Meeting schedule for ICANN58 has been published here: https://ccnso.icann.org/meetings/copenhagen58 (draft schedule – subject to changes!) If your registry would like to give a presentation at the ICANN58 ccNSO Member Days, please contact Joke Braeken (joke.braeken(a)icann.org)<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org)>. Currently we are only looking for presentations to be held during the ccTLD News Session, covering for instance recent developments, ccTLD activities, ccTLD management, experiences worth sharing (what worked, and what did not?), etc. Candidate presenters are invited to send the following information to Joke Braeken (joke.braeken(a)icann.org)<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org)>, at their earliest convenience - no later than Tuesday 24 January 2017: · Session relevant for your presentation: ccTLD news · Exact title of your presentation: · Full name of the presenter · company/ccTLD of the presenter: · Short summary of your presentation (2-3 sentences): · Estimated time needed to present: This information is crucial for the Programme Working Group, to be able to plan the schedule. The summary of your presentation will be published online, prior to the meeting. Depending on the amount of proposals, the Programme Working Group cannot always guarantee a slot to all volunteers. Your summary will be very helpful in the selection process. No interpretation services will be provided during the ccNSO Members meeting, therefore please take in consideration that the presentation are held in English. We look forward to your feedback. Thank you! Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org

1 1

organizational review of the ccNSO - call for volunteers for a Working Party
by Joke Braeken Jan. 13, 2017

Jan. 13, 2017

Dear all, During the ccNSO council call of 12 Jan 2017, the next preliminary steps of the process and schedule of the second organizational review of the ccNSO were discussed. One of the topics discussed was the need to appoint a Working Party, post ICANN58 (Copenhagen meeting), and the need to start organizing the activities leading up to the review now, which includes a briefing call with relevant ICANN staff and a conversation with the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the ICANN Board. At the 12 Jan call, the Council agreed that ultimately the working party should include: 5 Councillors appointed by the ccNSO members; 1 (former) NomCom appointed Councillor; 5 members form the broader ccTLD community - to be included post Copenhagen. So at this stage, and as agreed: * The ccNSO councilors are requested to nominate one member on a regional basis (one per region) * The NomCom appointed councilors are requested to nominate a (former) NomCom appointed Councillor. To that end Jordi Iparraguirre, Celia Lerman Friedman and Hong Xue are included in this email. If you could work out among yourself per group who will participate/ has an interest that would be much appreciated. Please inform the ccNSO Secretariat (ccnsosecretariat(a)icann.org)<mailto:ccnsosecretariat@icann.org)> , no later than Thursday 19 January 2017, 23:59 UTC, who from your region and who of the (former) NomCom appointed Councillors will be participating. Next steps: Once the (former) Council members have put their names forward, the secretariat will organize a webinar between members and ICANN staff, in week 5 (between 30 January and 03 February), prior to the next Council call scheduled for 9 February. The purpose of this webinar is to explain the scope of the review, the process itself, the anticipated roles of the Council and Working Party and Independent Reviewer. We will launch a doodle poll to determine the preferred date of this webinar. In Copenhagen, the following activities will be organized: · Meeting with the OEC and relevant ICANN staff. For that meeting the ccNSO appointed ICANN Board members will be invited as well. · Session during the ccNSO Member Meeting, to engage the community. Current the session is scheduled at Tuesday 14 March, between 15:15 and 15:45 local time. Background: According to ICANN Bylaws section 4.4 (a) Section 4.4(a), calls for a periodic review “of the performance and operation of each Supporting Organization, each Supporting Organization Council, ….by an entity or entities independent of the organization under review.” As per the Bylaws, the goal of these reviews shall be “to determine: (i) whether that organization, council or committee has a continuing purpose in the ICANN structure, (ii) (if so, whether any change in structure or operations is desirable to improve its effectiveness and (iii) whether that organization, council or committee is accountable to its constituencies, stakeholder groups, organizations and other stakeholders”. These Organizational Review “shall be conducted no less frequently than every five years, based on feasibility as determined by the Board. Each five-year cycle will be computed from the moment of the reception by the Board of the final report of the relevant review Working Group.” The Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the Board (OEC), previously known as the Structural Improvements Committee (SIC), is engaged in the process from the Board side. It is the understanding that the 2nd ccNSO review will be kicked off at its earliest in July 2017. For further information see: https://www.icann.org/resources/reviews/org For Information on the 1st review see: https://www.icann.org/resources/reviews/org/ccnso Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org

1 0

Selection ALAC liaison
by Bart Boswinkel Jan. 13, 2017

Jan. 13, 2017

Dear all, Per Council decision, the secretariat is initiating the selection process for the position ccNSO Liaison to ALAC. Please find included: · Description of the nomination procedure (see below) · Information regarding the two candidates (was already included in material for the 12 January Council meeting) You are requested to submit the name of your preferred candidate either to the ccNSO secretariat (ccNSOsecretariat(a)icann.org)<mailto:ccNSOsecretariat@icann.org)> or to me directly ( bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org<mailto:bart.boswinkel@icann.org> ), with subject line: Selection ALAC liaison. PLEASE SEND YOUR EMAIL BY THURSDAY 19 JANUARY 23.59 UTC Thank you and kind regards, Bart Selection Process Introduction As decided on the most recent Council meeting (12 January) you are requested, to select the ccNSO appointed liaison to ALAC. As agreed the selection will be done using the standard selection process. The applicants The list of applicant and their application letters etc. are included again. As none of the applicants is a member of Council, all Councillors are eligible to participate in the nomination process, you are all requested to send the name of your preferred candidate. Selection and procedure Based on the material provided, you are requested to assess which candidate you find most suited as liaison to ALAC. To assist you in your assessment the description of liaisons role as included in the call for volunteers is included (see below. Once you completed your assessment you are requested to mail your preference to Bart (bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org<mailto:bart.boswinkel@icann.org> , or the ccNSO secretariat (ccNSOsecretariat(a)icann.org)<mailto:ccNSOsecretariat@icann.org)> with subject line: Selection ALAC liaison PLEASE SEND YOUR EMAIL BY THURSDAY 19 JANUARY 2017 23.59 UTC Administrative Procedure After we received your email, we will acknowledge receipt and include a ballot number and date of receipt. On 20 JANUARY 2017 we will circulate an email to the list, which will include an overview in the following format: - Ballot number, - Date ballot was received, - preferred candidate per ballot. This email will also include the total level of preference per candidate. As agreed by Council resolution and in accordance with the relevant ccNSO Guideline the candidate receiving most supportive votes, is selected. In the event the two candidates are equally preferred run-off selection will be needed. Roles and responsibilities of the ccNSO Liaison to the ALAC * To participate diligently and actively in the meetings and activities of the ALAC on an ongoing and longterm basis * To communicate and advocate the positions of the ccNSO to the ALAC; * To report to the ccNSO on current and upcoming activities of the ALAC that may be of relevance to the ccNSO and broader ccTLD community. * If feasible and considered relevant ask to the ccNSO for advance guidance, if any, on matters that are going to be discussed by ALAC. * Participate in ALAC-ccNSO Council meetings agenda committee to prepare the f-2-f meetings, if any.

1 0

NOTES: ccNSO Council Meeting, 12 January 2017, 19.00 UTC
by Joke Braeken Jan. 13, 2017

Jan. 13, 2017

Dear All, Please find below the notes from the ccNSO Council Meeting from 12 January 2017, 19.00 UTC Best regards. Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> Follow @ccNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ccNSO Follow the ccNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ccnso/ http://ccnso.icann.org<http://ccnso.icann.org/> 1) Welcome and Apologies happy New Year by the chair ==>Administrative Topics 2) Minutes and Actions Minutes circulated on 6 Jan. No comments received. All action items complete. Any questions/comments? Feel free to jump in. 3) Overview inter-meeting Council decisions SSR2: top 3 members appointed to review team. If there is the need by other SO/AC chairs to fill additional slots, the other candidates are also put forward. (to be discussed under item 7 as well) Katrina to inform staff and chair about our selection. Byron: logistics/timing - timing and process going forward from here? Katrina: your question will be addressed under item 7. 4) Appointments and call volunteers 4.1 Appointment ccNSO Liaison to ALAC 2 candidates: Wafa & Ben. Their application material was presented to the council. We need to select one of them by the end of next week. Secretariat to launch the process tomorrow. Deadline to submit preference: end next week. 4.2 Appointment Volunteers Ethos Awards Committee Nigel & Margarita put their names forward. Thank you. Movers? Ching Seconders? Byron / Alejandra Against? no-one Abstentions? no-one 4.3 Appointment (interim) co-chair CCWG Auction Proceeds Mathieu, Peter, Ching: asked for their opinion on the interim chair. Do we need one? If yes, who volunteers? Ching volunteered to be interim co-chair, Mathieu supported him. Peter objects for the ccNSO to appoint a co-chair to this CCWG. Peter: I am not against someone from ccNSO as co-chair. just a warning. It is about funds that do not come from our members, but organisations under the umbrella of the GNSO. However, it is already in archives of GNSO: there is already a reference to Ching as co-chair. Would be wrong to change our minds now. This is an interim co-chair, we might reconsider our position later. Ching: Mathieu and I agree on the caution Peter warned us for. I shared this concern with Jonathan Robertson (co-chair). He is aware. Positive sign that ccNSO wants to send its voice to this WG. Katrina: we already agreed to participate. at this point we have an interim co-chair. we could perhaps revisit this in Johannesburg. We could decide either not to have a co-chair, or to remove the "interim" from the title. 4.4 Call for volunteers ccNSO liaison to GNSO Patrick Myles will step down. Needs to be replaced. Movers? Nigel Seconded? Alejandra Any comments/questions? Acknowledgement of good job Patrick did by Ching and Barrack ==> Substantive topics 5) Adoption Final report and closure WG EPSRP, submission of Final report to the ICANN Board of Directors WG prepared a report for public comment. Support from ALAC, GAC, Verisign. Critical document submitted by SSAC. Discussions in HYD resulted in an updated report by SSAC. WG asked to adjust its report, if deemed necessary. They adjusted the report indeed. Added conservatism principle, and RFC6912 requirements should be taken into account. Minor further tweaks. The updated report by the WG was submitted to the council. Mover? Stephen Seconder? Byron Against ? none Abstentions? none All in favour Hiro was on this WG. Thank you. 6) Organizational review ccNSO and timeline. We need to undergo this review, done by independent examiner. We need to have a working party: 1 councilor from each region + 1 NomCom Council member. Working Party to be in place by the end of next week. Peter Van Roste: I am invited to the RIPE roundtable in BRU on 24/01. Discussing accountability of different communities. Also GAC reps there. They asked me to talk about accountability and organisational reviews in ccTLDs. Jean-Jacques Sahel is covering accountability reviews. Might be good to update them on the ccNSO review. Are any slides available? Bart: on previous call we shared some slides we received from ICANN staff. This is public. On the ICANN website there is a high level overview of reviews. First step: council members who will participate need to get up to speed, then we can have a meeting with the board committee (OECD). Doubt we could organise a call before the 24th. This meeting with OECD will define the scope of the review itself. We are well ahead of the curve at this stage. 7) Clarification processes and procedures Specific Reviews answering Byron's question: Katrina will submit names of 3 selected candidates + the additional 3. The process is not clear. This is a problem. Supposed to be described in Operating Standards, but these are not in place yet. Katrina tried to ask for more info on the current status from Karen. She was OOO this week. The call for volunteers to join SSR2 was launched under the old bylaws. The selection process and all upcoming steps are supposed to be handled according to the new bylaws, and this is where we need to operating standards. a second call was launched: registry directory services (old WHOIS). Some candidates already sought ccNSO endorsement. We already speak about the content of the work, whereas the process itself is not clear. Bart: I will pass the bit from the old bylaws on the operating standards. It is not just the nomination and selection process that is guided by the OS, but also the mode of working. SSR review and the directory services will take place for a year, in parallel. Then the next 4/5 years nothing will happen in this area. Both reviews are in a "frameless world". Byron: question answered, thank you. 8) Updates CSC, RZERC and EC AC 8.1 Update CSC – Byron Holland Byron: we have just received the most recent report from PTI. Very recent. They have met their SSLA to 99,4% CSC will meet on Monday, for a follow up with PTI. Nothing negative to report from a daily operating perspective. Annual survey: needs to meet the need of the community. Mandate requires us to focus on next set of items on our agenda. Update in CPH to broader ccNSO and other groups We get what we need from staff in a timely manner. Adequately/promptly attended to our requests. Answer to question from Stephen: CSC has not commented on the budget as a group. but individual members did. We will discuss the budget in the meeting with PTI on Monday. 8.2 Update EC AC/ GRC related work – Stephen Deerhake did outreach to ECA reps. Reached out to John Jeffrey and Xavier Calvez. no formal actions taken by ECA. no requests received from any other SO/AC. Annex D. Guideline to be split into several different guidelines (as specified in Annex D) GRC agreed to focus immediately on the Rejection Decision Guideline. PTI FY18 budget development is well under way. ccNSO needs to be able to react. Concerns: - timelines imposed by bylaws require us to adjust our decision-making process - ECA needs to self-organise. - Lack of communication between ECA decisional Support members Questions? Katrina: lack of communication between members: do we have enough support from ICANN staff? Byron, Demi and Katrina could raise this in the call with Göran tomorrow. Stephen: Mailing list needed. need to self-organise sooner rather than later. The FY18 PTI budget will pop up, and the EC will be asked for objections. Concern is that communities are not ready to react. Default: ICANN prevails, unless community acts within the timeframe and acts under requirements of Annex D. We are not ready yet to do so. Please nudge ICANN. I hope to hear back from GNSO in next couple of days. We need to push on this hard before CPH. Katrina: To be discussed in CPH as well, and during all the meetings with other SO/ACs (ALAC, GNSO) 8.3 RZERC No update (no change since previous meeting) 9) WG updates 9.1 Update CCWGs o CCWG Accountability (written update Mathieu Weill, will be send over the course of the week) o CCWG Use of country and territory names (written update) o CCWG Internet Governance (Young Eum Lee) 9.2 Update GRC (Katrina Sataki) 9.3 Update Programme WG (Alejandra Reynoso) short update. Last week meeting with ICANN meeting team. GAC raised a concern to have HITS on Wednesday: because that is when they have their drafting session (GAC submitted 2 HIT proposals) Alejandra tried to avoid conflict with Tech Day. Tech Day scheduled - during block 3 - a DDOS session. Alejandra liaising with Eberhard whether this HIT is a conflict with Tech Day or not. Underserved regions: not a HIT. Council meeting: on Wednesday block 5, unless something changes to the main ICANN block schedule. HIT by ccNSO & GNSO on Thursday morning, block 1. Session leaders have not yet confirmed their availability for Thursday morning. Maybe we can move it back to Wednesday? 10) Council Updates 10.1 Chair Update 10.2 Vice-Chair Update 10.3 Councilors Update 10.4 Regional Organizations Update to be submitted to the mailing list. We are running out of time. 11) Liaison Updates 11.1 GNSO Update (Patrick Myles). 11.2 ALAC Update (Interim: Maureen Hilyard, circulated). 12) Next meetings • 9 February 2017, 11:00 UTC (not noon, was a mistake) • Copenhagen meetings o Sunday, 12 March 2017, Workshop and prep meeting f-2-f meeting, Copenhagen ICANN 58, noon local time, lunch included. ♣ Workshop to discuss: • Roles and responsibilities ccNSO Councilors, includes prep chair and vice – chairs election, membership standing committees • Annual Work Plan ♣ Prep meeting: Prep discussions and assignment of leads on core topics meeting. o ALAC-ccNSO Council meeting (tentatively) Sunday 12 March 17.00 local) o ccNSO-GNSO Councils meeting, Monday 13 March, 12.15-13.45 local time (lunch meeting). o Board- ccNSO meeting TBC’ed. o ccNSO-GAC meeting, tentatively Tuesday 14 March. • Council meeting 15 March 17.00 Local time, alternatively Thursday 16 March 9 am local time. Meetings for the rest of the year to be fixed as well. Overlap with RO meetings to be avoided. 13) AOB Nigel: will send an email. 14) Closure Thank you.

1 0

CCWG IG updates
by Bart Boswinkel Jan. 12, 2017

Jan. 12, 2017

Dear all, Please find included the CCWG IG provided by Young Eum, Kind regards, Bart

1 0