- Ccnso-council - lists.icann.org

FW: UPDATED FOR YOUR REVIEW: Terms of Reference for Community Representatives Group to nominate the IRP Standing Panel
by Katrina Sataki Oct. 14, 2020

Oct. 14, 2020

Dear Colleagues, Please find attached the updated ToR for IRP SP Thank you! ]{atrina From: Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 13 October 2020 at 02:51 To: Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard(a)gmail.com>, "Donna(a)registry.godaddy" <Donna(a)registry.godaddy> Cc: Susie Johnson <susie.johnson(a)icann.org>, KEITH DRAZEK <kdrazek(a)verisign.com>, Fred Baker <fred(a)isc.org>, Rod Rasmussen <rod(a)rodrasmussen.com>, "aheineman(a)godaddy.com" <aheineman(a)godaddy.com>, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin(a)mail.utoronto.ca>, Elizabeth Le <elizabeth.le(a)icann.org>, Amy Stathos <amy.stathos(a)icann.org>, Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli(a)gmail.com>, Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns(a)gmail.com>, David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org>, Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner(a)icann.org>, "katrina(a)nic.lv" <katrina(a)nic.lv>, "aftab.siddiqui(a)gmail.com" <aftab.siddiqui(a)gmail.com>, "oscar(a)lacnic.net" <oscar(a)lacnic.net>, "claudia.selli(a)intl.att.com" <claudia.selli(a)intl.att.com>, "haforrestesq(a)gmail.com" <haforrestesq(a)gmail.com>, "wuknoben(a)gmail.com" <wuknoben(a)gmail.com>, "pablo(a)nic.pr" <pablo(a)nic.pr>, "joankerr(a)fbsc.org" <joankerr(a)fbsc.org>, Manal Ismail <manal(a)tra.gov.eg>, "Julie Hammer @Bigpond" <julie.hammer(a)bigpond.com>, Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes(a)icann.org>, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org>, Steve Chan <steve.chan(a)icann.org>, Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich(a)icann.org>, Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth(a)icann.org>, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng(a)icann.org> Subject: UPDATED FOR YOUR REVIEW: Terms of Reference for Community Representatives Group to nominate the IRP Standing Panel Dear community leaders, I apologize for adding to the number of emails you are no doubt receiving as we move into the ICANN69 Community Week. However, we thought you would prefer to receive this update sooner rather than later, so that you can inform your respective groups and factor in the need to initiate your internal processes to select members for the Community Representatives Group into your overall planning and current activities. Please therefore find attached the updated, proposed Terms of Reference (ToR) that will guide the work of the Community Representatives Group to select a slate of nominees for the Independent Review Process (IRP) Standing Panel. We have included the additional criteria suggested by Donna as well as cleaned up the document to reflect previous feedback from various groups. As the first action will involve constituting the Community Representatives Group, I will also highlight the fact that we have noted your collective preference that the Group be kept small, comprise an odd number (at least 7, but not more than 15, members), be as diverse as is feasible, and possess certain skillsets in the aggregate. The updated ToR also notes that the Group will seek to act by consensus, select its own Chair, and maintain confidentiality of its deliberations while maintaining as much transparency as is practicable (e.g. publication of the final ToR, the Group members’ Statements of Interest and other relevant documents). Assuming that the updated ToR reflects your understanding of the agreements reached and general expectations of the role and tasks for the Group, we suggest issuing a call for Expressions of Interest for potential Group members soon. I will be happy to assist with drafting that call, and if appropriate can send you a draft for your approval before ICANN69 concludes. Thank you all again for your very helpful feedback and time. Best regards, Mary (on behalf of the ICANN org team assisting with this effort) From: Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard(a)gmail.com> Date: Monday, September 28, 2020 at 15:03 To: "Donna(a)registry.godaddy" <Donna(a)registry.godaddy> Cc: Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org>, Susie Johnson <susie.johnson(a)icann.org>, KEITH DRAZEK <kdrazek(a)verisign.com>, Fred Baker <fred(a)isc.org>, Rod Rasmussen <rod(a)rodrasmussen.com>, "aheineman(a)godaddy.com" <aheineman(a)godaddy.com>, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin(a)mail.utoronto.ca>, Elizabeth Le <elizabeth.le(a)icann.org>, Amy Stathos <amy.stathos(a)icann.org>, Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli(a)gmail.com>, Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns(a)gmail.com>, David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org>, Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner(a)icann.org>, "katrina(a)nic.lv" <katrina(a)nic.lv>, "aftab.siddiqui(a)gmail.com" <aftab.siddiqui(a)gmail.com>, "oscar(a)lacnic.net" <oscar(a)lacnic.net>, "claudia.selli(a)intl.att.com" <claudia.selli(a)intl.att.com>, "haforrestesq(a)gmail.com" <haforrestesq(a)gmail.com>, "wuknoben(a)gmail.com" <wuknoben(a)gmail.com>, "pablo(a)nic.pr" <pablo(a)nic.pr>, "joankerr(a)fbsc.org" <joankerr(a)fbsc.org>, Manal Ismail <manal(a)tra.gov.eg> Subject: [Ext] Re: Follow up: Community Representatives Group for nominating IRP Standing Panel I like Donna's additions. Maureen On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 9:00 AM Donna(a)registry.godaddy <Donna(a)registry.godaddy> wrote: Hi Mary Sorry for being late with my input. I support the proposal as captured as a result of our last call and add a few criteria for consideration. Proposal for final community leaders’ discussion and decision: The Community Representatives Group should be a small, lightweight, odd-numbered group of between 7-15 members, who [in the aggregate] have [the following agreed] expertise and who, as far as possible, represents a diversity of stakeholders and interests across the ICANN community. The size of the group is less important than the skillsets/expertise of the members on the group. Suggested non-exhaustive list of expertise which the Group should possess in the aggregate: (1) experience in selecting Board members (or similar officers or appointees with fiduciary duties) or service on a nominating committee for such selections (note: does not have to be ICANN’s Nominating Committee; experience in academic departments could meet this expertise); (2) experience working with recruitment firms and managing vendors; (3) relevant organizational and process experience (i.e. ability to understand and evaluate the standing panelist criteria and responses, which includes legal and arbitration experience) and (4) understanding of the Independent Review Process and its role as an ICANN accountability mechanism/relationship to ICANN bylaws (something like that) (5) ability to work in a small team across multiple timezones (6) must be able to commit considerable time and effort to the selection process over a short but concentrated time period Thanks Donna From: Mary Wong [mailto:mary.wong@icann.org] Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 4:44 PM To: Donna Austin <Donna(a)registry.godaddy>; Susie Johnson <susie.johnson(a)icann.org>; 'KEITH DRAZEK' <kdrazek(a)Verisign.com>; Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard(a)gmail.com>; Fred Baker <fred(a)isc.org>; Rod Rasmussen <rod(a)rodrasmussen.com>; Ashley Heineman <aheineman(a)godaddy.com>; Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin(a)mail.utoronto.ca>; Elizabeth Le <elizabeth.le(a)icann.org>; Amy Stathos <amy.stathos(a)icann.org>; Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli(a)gmail.com>; Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns(a)gmail.com>; David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org>; Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner(a)icann.org>; katrina(a)nic.lv; aftab.siddiqui(a)gmail.com; oscar(a)lacnic.net; claudia.selli(a)intl.att.com; haforrestesq(a)gmail.com; wuknoben(a)gmail.com; pablo(a)nic.pr; oscar(a)lacnic.net; joankerr(a)fbsc.org; Manal Ismail <manal(a)tra.gov.eg> Subject: Follow up: Community Representatives Group for nominating IRP Standing Panel Notice: This email is from an external sender. Dear community leaders, Thank you for your time and input during the calls and regarding the draft Terms of Reference circulated previously, concerning the formation of a Community Representatives Group to select a slate of nominees for the IRP Standing Panel. Please find attached the following for your further consideration: Updated draft Terms of Reference, incorporating input received to date (most recently from the GAC) as well as two comments from ICANN org on the GAC’s questions about the role of the Empowered Community and document disclosure – basically: · while the EC may be a Claimant in an IRP, the formation and selection of the Standing Panel is not an EC action; and · requests for document disclosure will be handled in accordance with ICANN org’s Documentary Information Disclosure Policy (DIDP). Notes from the 2 September call where the composition and criteria for appointment to the Community Representatives Group as well as a possible timeline were discussed. The list of criteria and requirements for IRP panelists that were published along with the call for Expressions of Interest. Next steps as captured in the action items from 2 September For community leaders: Please review and provide comments on: The proposal that emerged on the call, as regards the Community Representatives Group (viz. “The Community Representatives Group should be a small, lightweight, odd-numbered group of between 7-15 members, who [in the aggregate] have [the following agreed] expertise and who, as far as possible, represents a diversity of stakeholders and interests across the ICANN community. The size of the group is less important than the skillsets/expertise of the members on the group”; and The type of expertise which the Community Representatives Group should possess in the aggregate (three of which, identified on the call, have been captured in the notes). If your group wishes to provide input or additional comments on the draft Terms of Reference, we will be grateful if you are able to do so by 18 September if at all possible. For ICANN org: Following receipt of additional input on the updated Terms of Reference (if any), we will prepare and circulate a consolidated and updated document and timeline. Once a draft Statement of Work (SOW) is available as regards appointment of the external expert, we will circulate the draft SOW to this group as well. Thank you. Please let me, Sam (Eisner) and Liz (Le) know if you have any questions. We look forward to your continued discussions and will be happy to assist in any way we can to facilitate your decisions. Cheers Mary From: Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, September 11, 2020 at 20:26 To: "Donna(a)registry.godaddy" <Donna(a)registry.godaddy>, Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org>, Susie Johnson <susie.johnson(a)icann.org>, 'KEITH DRAZEK' <kdrazek(a)Verisign.com>, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard(a)gmail.com>, Fred Baker <fred(a)isc.org>, Rod Rasmussen <rod(a)rodrasmussen.com>, "aheineman(a)godaddy.com" <aheineman(a)godaddy.com>, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin(a)mail.utoronto.ca>, Elizabeth Le <elizabeth.le(a)icann.org>, Amy Stathos <amy.stathos(a)icann.org>, Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli(a)gmail.com>, Bruna Martins dos Santos <bruna.mrtns(a)gmail.com>, David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org>, Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner(a)icann.org>, "katrina(a)nic.lv" <katrina(a)nic.lv>, "aftab.siddiqui(a)gmail.com" <aftab.siddiqui(a)gmail.com>, "oscar(a)lacnic.net" <oscar(a)lacnic.net>, "claudia.selli(a)intl.att.com" <claudia.selli(a)intl.att.com>, "haforrestesq(a)gmail.com" <haforrestesq(a)gmail.com>, "wuknoben(a)gmail.com" <wuknoben(a)gmail.com>, "pablo(a)nic.pr" <pablo(a)nic.pr>, "oscar(a)lacnic.net" <oscar(a)lacnic.net>, "joankerr(a)fbsc.org" <joankerr(a)fbsc.org> Cc: Manal Ismail <manal(a)tra.gov.eg>, GACLEADERSHIP <gac-leadership(a)icann.org> Subject: GAC Comments Regarding Draft Terms of Reference for the Community Representatives Group on the Establishment of the ICANN Independent Review Process Standing Panel Dear All, On behalf of the GAC Chair, Manal Ismail, attached please find GAC comments regarding the draft Terms of Reference for the Community Representatives Group on the Establishment of the ICANN Independent Review Process Standing Panel. Best, Rob ----- Robert Hoggarth Vice President, Policy Development and GAC Relations Washington, D.C.

1 0

Change Article 10 Bylaws to include IDNccTLDs in the ccNSO
by Bart Boswinkel Oct. 14, 2020

Oct. 14, 2020

Dear Katrina, all, Please find included a document from ICANN legal (in copy) for further conversation on the change of Article 10 of the ICANN bylaws to allow the inclusion of IDNccTLD Managers in the ccNSO. In the document you’ll find some questions where further clarification may be needed. Next steps regarding the Bylaw change is included on the draft agenda for the upcoming regular Council meeting, which will be circulated later today. Kind regards, Bart

1 0

ccNSO-related sessions at ICANN69 | Wednesday 14 October
by Kimberly Carlson Oct. 13, 2020

Oct. 13, 2020

Dear all, Here are Wednesday’s ccNSO-related sessions at ICANN69: Wednesday, 14 October 2020 * IGLC | 10:00 UTC * Members meeting: Covid-19 | 12:00 UTC (2 parts) Please find the ccNSO ICANN69 Schedule here: https://community.icann.org/x/SQC-C And Tech Day agenda: https://community.icann.org/x/WgC-C IMPORTANT: In order to access the ICANN69 schedule, you must first register for ICANN69 here: https://events.icann.org/icann69-agm/registration. Once you have registered, you will be able to access the schedule here: https://69.schedule.icann.org/, sign-up for the sessions of interest and create your agenda. Please note that participation links will only be published one day prior to the sessions for security purposes. How to Export the Schedule: If you would like to export your agenda to your personal calendaring tool, sign in on your desktop computer and complete the following steps: * Once signed in > Click on "Schedule" tab > "Full Agenda" or "My Agenda". * Select "Export" > "Export Full Agenda (ics)" or "Export My Agenda (ics)". * A file download will begin and save as "meetings.ics". * Find the downloaded file> Right click on the file, select "Open-as" > Select the calendar program you wish to save these meetings to. * Once the calendar file opens, click "Save". You should now see all your sessions on your calendar program in your preferred time zone. On mobile devices, simply open the mobile app to see your personal schedule. NOTE: Calendar invites will not include remote participation links, but do include a link to the session details page containing the participation links. Participation links will be posted 24-hours prior to the session start times for security purposes. For sessions with Interpretation, to hear the additional languages, aside from the language spoken in Zoom, you will need to download the Congress Rental Network (CRN)<https://urlgeni.us/ICANN69-GETAPP> application from the app store on your mobile device. Participation instructions can be found here<https://icann69.pathable.co/participation-tools>. How to attend virtual meetings video help<https://vimeo.com/407668610>.

1 0

ICANN69 ccNSO Members Meeting: today's session (Wednesday, 14 October 2020)
by Joke Braeken Oct. 13, 2020

Oct. 13, 2020

Hello everyone, Here is an overview of today’s ccNSO Members Meeting session, scheduled for Wednesday, 14 October 2020. You are warmly invited to participate. The impact of COVID-19: the ccTLD experience [cid:image001.png@01D6A185.BE6FD250]<https://69.schedule.icann.org/meetings/CZyQuevz78ZnM5KDz> Wed, 14 Oct | part 1: 12:00-13:30 UTC<https://69.schedule.icann.org/meetings/ykYkPNFc6joGhe8KY> [cid:image001.png@01D6A185.BE6FD250]<https://69.schedule.icann.org/meetings/CZyQuevz78ZnM5KDz> Wed, 14 Oct | part 2: 14:00-15:00 UTC<https://69.schedule.icann.org/meetings/MDGC4wzB8oGpXaFyC> Session Chair: Yuri Takamatsu (.jp) | Moderator: Irina Danelia (.ru) This session will focus on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the business side of ccTLDs. The main topic of part 1 will be (regional) ccTLD domain name registration trends. Presenters include Patrick Myles (CENTR), followed by contributions from Alex Corenthin (.sn), David Curtin (.ie), Ai-Chin Lu (.tw) and Alejandra Reynoso (.gt). The goal of part 2 is to have a moderated panel discussion around the various factors that drive these trends. IMPORTANT – Zoom link: In order to access the ICANN69 schedule, you must first register for ICANN69 here: https://events.icann.org/icann69-agm/registration . Once you have registered, you will be able to access the schedule here: https://69.schedule.icann.org where you can find the zoom link to join the meeting. It might take up to 30 minutes before you are able to access the ICANN69 schedule, after having registered for the meeting, so please make sure to register well ahead of the session start. Zoom participation links will only be published on the ICANN69 schedule 24 hours prior to the sessions for security purposes. If you previously registered for ICANN69, you will be able to find the zoom participation link here: [cid:image001.png@01D6A185.BE6FD250]<https://69.schedule.icann.org/meetings/CZyQuevz78ZnM5KDz> Wed, 14 Oct | part 1: 12:00-13:30 UTC<https://69.schedule.icann.org/meetings/ykYkPNFc6joGhe8KY> [cid:image001.png@01D6A185.BE6FD250]<https://69.schedule.icann.org/meetings/CZyQuevz78ZnM5KDz> Wed, 14 Oct | part 2: 14:00-15:00 UTC<https://69.schedule.icann.org/meetings/MDGC4wzB8oGpXaFyC> Please check the schedule before the session for the latest information. All sessions are being recorded, and the recordings will be posted on the ICANN69 schedule, within 24 hours after completion of the session. Simply go to the individual session, and look for the heading “session recordings”. Consult the agenda of the ICANN69 ccNSO Members Meeting here: https://community.icann.org/x/awG-C Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org

1 0

Join today's Joint Meeting: ICANN Board and ccNSO Council (Tue, 13 Oct | 14:00-15:00 UTC)
by Joke Braeken Oct. 13, 2020

Oct. 13, 2020

Hello everyone. Included below please find information about today’s Joint Meeting: ICANN Board and ccNSO Council [cid:image001.png@01D6A16D.301DE0E0]<https://69.schedule.icann.org/meetings/CZyQuevz78ZnM5KDz> Tue, 13 Oct | 14:00-15:00 UTC<https://69.schedule.icann.org/meetings/aMYyauMND93Tf2Ynr> Note: Registration is now required<https://events.icann.org/icann69-agm/registration> to view the ICANN69 schedule<https://69.schedule.icann.org/>. Session Participation links will be published 24 hours in advance of the session. Please check the schedule before the session for the latest information. Agenda The ICANN Board of Directors and the ccNSO aim to have an open discussion, around the following topics, chosen by the Board and the ccNSO respectively: * The Board has chosen the following topic : Enhancing the effectiveness of the Multistakeholder model: key issues and opportunities for acceleration. Background: The results of the most recent public consultation, and work that has progressed with dependencies to enhancing the effectiveness of the MSM (such as the ATRT3 report and work on prioritization and budgeting). * The topic chosen by the ccNSO: Changes necessary to sustain ICANN’s model. Background: Considering that travel restrictions may last for several years, what would need to change in the board, the staff and the various SOs and ACs? Even when international travel becomes possible again, should one or more of the ICANN meetings remain virtual to i) reduce carbon emissions and ii) improve accessibility and participation as time/ expense to travel to a physical meeting? Thank you. Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org

3 2

Apols for Board-Council mtg today
by Jordan Carter Oct. 13, 2020

Oct. 13, 2020

Kia ora everyone My humble apologies, but I will not make it along to our meeting with the ICANN Board today. It would be 3am for me, and we are in the middle of our two-day national IGF, NetHui <https://2020.nethui.nz/>. Sorry to miss, look forward to hearing what happens, and 'see you round the place' over the next week and a bit...! Jordan -- *Jordan Carter* Group Chief Executive *InternetNZ | Ipurangi Aotearoa*

1 0

Making ICANN Public Meetings Work for You: please respond to the survey
by Joke Braeken Oct. 13, 2020

Oct. 13, 2020

Hello everyone, ICANN org is seeking community feedback, to assess: * the effectiveness of our virtual Public Meetings, * the improvements that the org should make to its support for the community's work at meetings, and * any other aspects that should be integrated into our in-person meeting strategy going forward. ICANN org’s rapid transition to virtual Public Meetings has allowed to continue the work as productively as possible under the circumstances. What has this adjustment meant for your ability to do your work and accomplish your meeting goals? = = = = = Please respond this survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/meetingstrategy_CCNSO<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.surveymonkey.com/r/meetingstrategy_C…> The deadline for this is 5 November 2020 (23:59 UTC) = = = = = Background Göran Marby, ICANN President & CEO, recently published a blog post, entitled “Making ICANN Public Meetings Work for You” Read the blog post here: https://www.icann.org/news/blog/making-icann-public-meetings-work-for-you ICANN69 * The Board will also host a session at ICANN69<https://69.schedule.icann.org/meetings/kb9Kiajq5oG7XNits> to continue the conversation with the community about ICANN org’s meeting strategy, on 19 October 2020, 12:30 UTC * The joint meeting between the ccNSO and the ICANN Board will be held on Tuesday, 13 October 2020 (14:00-15:00 UTC). Consult the agenda here: https://community.icann.org/x/awG-C Thank you. Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org

1 0

DRAFT PTI and IANA FY22 Operating Plan and Budgets
by Joke Braeken Oct. 13, 2020

Oct. 13, 2020

Hello everyone, Focusing on ICANN's commitment to the multistakeholder model, the ICANN organization seeks Public Comment on the operating plan and budgets for delivering the IANA functions. This is comprised of two components: * the Draft FY22 Public Technical Identifiers (PTI) Operating Plan and Budget * the Draft FY22 IANA Operating Plan and Budget. The PTI Operating Plan and Budget outlines the activities to deliver the core IANA functions and associated operational activities to enhance systems and processes. The IANA Operating Plan and Budget is comprised of these PTI activities, plus additional programs and costs associated with overseeing and delivering the IANA functions performed by ICANN in its role as the IANA Functions Operator that are not borne directly by PTI. ICANN seeks structured feedback on the plans described in these documents to inform these Operating Plans and Budgets being presented to ICANN and PTI Boards. Close date: 30 November 2020 Read more: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2020-10-08-en Best regards. Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org

1 0

Re: [ccnso-council] [Ext] Re: current draft agenda for the ICANN69 joint meeting by the ccNSO and GNSO Councils
by Joke Braeken Oct. 13, 2020

Oct. 13, 2020

Hello Stephen, Thanks for the questions. The ccNSO Guidelines Review Committee has been preparing guidelines pertaining to Empowered Community Mechanisms in Annex D of the ICANN Bylaws. Currently the committee is working on a ccNSO Guideline regarding a recall of the ICANN Board, or the NomCom appointed Councillors. The timelines foreseen in Annex D cause concerns regarding how to match the deadlines with the internal rules of the ccNSO and the role of the ccNSO membership and Council respectively. The ccNSO Council understood that other SO/ACS are struggling with those timelines as well, and would like to consult with the GNSO Council, in a preliminary manner. Some time ago James (Gannon?) also suggested to Katrina the need to work together on possible bylaws changes. The meeting at ICANN69 could be a start for that conversation. Best regards. Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org From: "Stephen Deerhake @ ASNIC" <sdeerhake(a)nic.as> Date: Monday, 12 October 2020 at 21:52 To: Joke Braeken <joke.braeken(a)icann.org>, ccnso-council <ccnso-council(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [ccnso-council] current draft agenda for the ICANN69 joint meeting by the ccNSO and GNSO Councils Hi Joke, Item 4 is rather broad; is there some specific subset of the EC Mechanisms in Annex D that is the focus of this Agenda item? Best Regards, /Stephen From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Joke Braeken <joke.braeken(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 11:19 To: ccnso-council <ccnso-council(a)icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] current draft agenda for the ICANN69 joint meeting by the ccNSO and GNSO Councils Dear Councillors. Below is the current draft agenda for the ICANN69 joint meeting by the ccNSO and GNSO Councils, scheduled to be held for 90 minutes on Wed, 21 October 2020 (12:30 UTC) 1. Welcome 2. IDNs * ccNSO PDP4 * GNSO IDNs Operational Track 1 & Policy Track 2 3. FY21 Budget and Ops Plan coordination 4. Empowered Community Mechanisms in Annex D of the ICANN Bylaws 5. AOB 6. Closure Topics 2.a and 4 were suggested by the ccNSO leadership, however a discussion on the ccPDP4 was also on the GNSO’s wishlist. Are there any additional topics you would like to discuss? Please reply to this email by the end of Monday, 12 October (23:59 UTC) Thank you. Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org

1 0

Re: [ccnso-council] current draft agenda for the ICANN69 joint meeting by the ccNSO and GNSO Councils
by Stephen Deerhake ＠ ASNIC Oct. 12, 2020

Oct. 12, 2020

Hi Joke, Item 4 is rather broad; is there some specific subset of the EC Mechanisms in Annex D that is the focus of this Agenda item? Best Regards, /Stephen From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Joke Braeken <joke.braeken(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 11:19 To: ccnso-council <ccnso-council(a)icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] current draft agenda for the ICANN69 joint meeting by the ccNSO and GNSO Councils Dear Councillors. Below is the current draft agenda for the ICANN69 joint meeting by the ccNSO and GNSO Councils, scheduled to be held for 90 minutes on Wed, 21 October 2020 (12:30 UTC) 1. Welcome 2. IDNs * ccNSO PDP4 * GNSO IDNs Operational Track 1 & Policy Track 2 3. FY21 Budget and Ops Plan coordination 4. Empowered Community Mechanisms in Annex D of the ICANN Bylaws 5. AOB 6. Closure Topics 2.a and 4 were suggested by the ccNSO leadership, however a discussion on the ccPDP4 was also on the GNSO’s wishlist. Are there any additional topics you would like to discuss? Please reply to this email by the end of Monday, 12 October (23:59 UTC) Thank you. Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org

1 0