June 2021 - Ccnso-council - lists.icann.org

ccNSO Council Meeting at ICANN71 | 17 June | 1230-1400 UTC
by Kimberly Carlson June 7, 2021

June 7, 2021

Dear all, The ccNSO Council Meeting at ICANN71 has been scheduled for 17 June | 1230-1400 UTC. Thursday, 17 June 2021 ccNSO Council<https://71.schedule.icann.org/meetings/7cXTWpLH3wFmWJEaY#/?limit=10&sortByF…> | 1230-1400 UTC | Block 4 The ICANN71 Virtual Policy Forum (14-17 June 2021) public schedule has been published: https://71.schedule.icann.org/ * Requires a completed registration to view the schedule. * Please note that participation links will only be published one day prior to the sessions for security purposes. * Sessions during ICANN71 will be held during regular working hours in The Hague, Netherlands (CEST / UTC+2, Amsterdam/Paris) * ZOOM MEETING & WEBINAR | VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION TOOL<https://71.schedule.icann.org/participation-tools> – Please take some time to familiarize yourself with these resources. * Instructions on “How to Export the Schedule” can be found at the bottom of this email An overview of the ccNSO-related sessions at ICANN71 is available here: https://community.icann.org/x/WIG1CQ Thank you, Ki

1 0

Your action is required: CSC member selection
by Joke Braeken June 7, 2021

June 7, 2021

Dear Councillors, The ccNSO secretariat is now initiating the selection process whereby the ccNSO Councillors are required to select a candidate to become a member of the Customer Standing Committee (CSC), which ensures the satisfactory performance of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) naming function. You are now expected to review the applications and rank the candidates, based on how well the candidates meet the set of requirements as listed in the call for expression of interest. Further instructions are included below. = = = Your action is required by Monday, 14 June 2021 (23:59 UTC) = = = Please find the additional materials as submitted by the candidates attached, as well as the information they submitted in the application form (see excel file enclosed). 3 candidates applied to become a CSC member (in chronological order): * Paulos B Nyirenda (.mw) – AF region * Javier Perez Sandoval (.co) – LAC region * Frederico Augusto de Carvalho Neves (.br) – LAC region Background The ccNSO Council issued a call for expressions of interest targeted at candidates from either the African, Asia-Pacific, Latin American And Carribean or North African region to become a member of the Customer Standing Committee (CSC) for the remainder of Alejandra's term (ending 30 September 2021 at 23.59 UTC). The call for volunteers closed Friday, 4 June 2021 (23:59 UTC). Read the call for EoI here: https://ccnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-07may21-en.htm The selection happens according to the ccNSO Guideline: ccNSO Appointment Procedures as published on https://ccnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/field-attached/guidelines-ccnso… INSTRUCTIONS Please review the application material and select your preferred candidate – taking into account the candidate qualification requirements – by sending an email to joke.braeken(a)icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> , no later than Monday, 14 June 2021 (23:59 UTC) !!! Your most preferred candidate should receive three (3) points, the second candidate two (2) points, and the third and least preferred candidate one (1) point. If you believe a candidate does not meet the criteria: please assign zero (0) points. !!! A kind reminder that the ccNSO Secretariat will track and publish for each council member its participation in the selection process. Go to https://community.icann.org/display/ccNSOCWS/Council+vote+tracker+-+2021 Based on each of the individual Councillor’s rankings, the Secretariat will prepare the overall ranking of all candidates and report the ranking to the ccNSO Council on Tuesday, 15 June 2021. Selection Process After closure of the call for volunteers, the materials submitted will be sent to the ccNSO Councillors eligible to select the members for the roles of CSC member. Based on each of the individual Councillor’s rankings, the Secretariat will prepare the overall ranking of all candidates and report the ranking to the ccNSO Council on Tuesday, 15 June 2021. Candidate qualification requirements ccNSO candidates are expected to have the support of a ccTLD manager (whether members or non-member of the ccNSO). CSC members will be selected based on how well they meet the following set of skills and experience: * Direct experience and knowledge of the IANA naming function * Analytical skills, ability to interpret quantitative and qualitative evidence, and capacity to draw conclusions purely based on evidence. * Experience in managing and/or participating in committees (e.g. meeting coordination, reporting, and escalation) in order to contribute meaningfully to CSC processes * Demonstrated ability in relationship management to support diplomatic discussion, consensus driven decision making, and productive negotiation * Excellent communication skills in order to represent ccTLD interests and to keep the ccNSO and broader ccTLD community informed on progress * Ability to work and communicate in written and spoken English. Further a candidate: * Should commit to actively participate in the activities of the CSC on an on-going basis * Should be employed or have active backing by a ccTLD manager and should demonstrate the support by the ccTLD manager in respect to the required time commitment to participate actively in the CSC. In addition, and in accordance with the charter of the CSC, only if a candidate is considered to meet the above criteria the following diversity criteria should be taken into account: * Geographic regions; * Gender diversity; * Type, experience and size of ccTLD manager. The Customer Standing Committee (CSC) is comprised of representatives with direct experience and knowledge of IANA naming functions. Please refer to the CSC Candidates Qualification Requirements<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/csc-skill-set-matrix-members-li…> for details about candidate selection or the CSC Charter<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/csc-charter-amended-27jun18-en.…> for the full text of the CSC scope and responsibilities. About the Customer Standing Committee (CSC) The CSC ensures the satisfactory performance of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) naming function. The CSC is responsible for monitoring Public Technical Identifier's (PTI) performance of the IANA naming function against the service level expectations in the IANA Naming Function Contract. The CSC analyzes performance reports provided by PTI and publishes its findings. The CSC is authorized to undertake remedial action to address poor performance of the IANA naming function, and if performance issues are not remedied, may escalate the issues to the ccNSO and GNSO. Thank you. Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org

1 0

Announcement: ccNSO Council has adopted the resolution to split the third ccNSO Policy Development Process
by Kimberly Carlson June 4, 2021

June 4, 2021

Today, 4 June 2021, the ccNSO Council has adopted the resolution to split the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, each following its own timeline independently of the other. After this resolution becomes effective ( 11 June 2021), the ccPDP on the Retirement of ccTLD will enter its final decision- making phase: First the ccNSO Council will have to adopt the proposed retirement policy, and after adoption, the ccNSO members will have to adopt it. The other part - on a review mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation and retirement of ccTLDs – is still at its development phase and the Review Mechanism Working Group continues its work. The Council resolution is published here<https://ccnso.icann.org/en/about/council/decisions-resolutions/2021> and the background material is available at: https://community.icann.org/x/187RAw Best, Kim

1 0

Re: [ccnso-council] [Request for Advice] Participation in ALAC session at ICANN 71
by Alejandra Reynoso June 4, 2021

June 4, 2021

Dear Irina Yes, it was planned at the same time of our Q&A, but I was told that it was going to be moved to one block before, Tuesday 15 June at 08:30-10:00 UTC. This way we can all attend the session *:)* Best regards, Alejandra -- [image: Photograph] *Alejandra Reynoso*Investigación & Desarrollo | Dominios .gt *P:* +502 23688565 *E:* alejandra.reynoso(a)cctld.gt 18 Ave. 11-95 Zona 15, V.H. III. (A-109) Guatemala, Guatemala www.gt On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 3:56 AM Irina Danelia <i.danelia(a)cctld.ru> wrote: > Dear Alejandra and all > > > > I fully agree that ccNSO should be presented at the session > > The only issue is that it conflicts with ccNSO ccTLD-related Board Members > Questions and Answer Session > > So we need to plan who’s going to attend each of these 2 sessions > > > > Irina > > > > *From:* Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces(a)icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Alejandra > Reynoso via Ccnso-council > *Sent:* Thursday, June 3, 2021 11:32 PM > *To:* Jordan Carter <jordan(a)internetnz.net.nz> > *Cc:* ccNSO Council <ccnso-council(a)icann.org> > *Subject:* Re: [ccnso-council] [Request for Advice] Participation in ALAC > session at ICANN 71 > > > > Hi Jordan > > > > Regarding the message, yes indeed it was delivered. > > > > For clarity: > > - Apparently there was an internal miscommunication on who was > supposed to contact us and in the end nobody did (thinking the other person > was doing it already). > - Regarding the time for coordination, at first it was proposed to > have a full ccTLDs models presentation and we explained that we had already > done something similar in the past and that it took no less than two months > for proper preparation. Therefore, we couldn't commit to doing something > similar with such short notice. Afterwards it was suggested to have a > summary of that previous session, which is doable. > > Also, it was added that it wasn't advisable to prepare a session in a rush. > > > > Best, > > Alejandra > > > > -- > > > > [image: Рисунок удален отправителем. Photograph] > > > > > > *Alejandra Reynoso* > Investigación & Desarrollo | Dominios .gt > > > > *P:* +502 23688565 > *E:* alejandra.reynoso(a)cctld.gt > > > > 18 Ave. 11-95 Zona 15, V.H. III. (A-109) > Guatemala, Guatemala > > > > www.gt > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 1:39 PM Jordan Carter <jordan(a)internetnz.net.nz> > wrote: > > Hello Alejandra, colleagues > > > > In the substance of this session I don’t see any problems. It may be that > hearing these perspectives from the removed perspective of ALAC can be > interesting for us. > > > > I do think the strong message of ‘nothing about us without us’ and the > need to discuss sessions such as this with the ccnso well in advance has > been truly heard now by ALAC staff and officers? > > > > Cheers > > Jordan > > > > On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 05:17, Alejandra Reynoso via Ccnso-council < > ccnso-council(a)icann.org> wrote: > > Dear all, > > Yesterday I met with ALAC representatives to express my concern about a > session they intended to have on ccTLDs. The session was titled "Policy > Session 3: Public Interest: Is the commercialization of ccTLDs a threat?" > > The session was an attempt to explore if commercialization of ccTLD > registries affects Internet end users. Trying to understand the possible > impacts of commercialization on consumer protection, competition, the > stability of the DNS and, in a broader sense, on the public interest. After > an introduction to the history of ccTLD policy, the intention was to answer > two questions: 1) What is the impact of ccTLD registries commercialization > on consumer protection, competition, and the stability of the DNS? 2) Does > the commercialization of ccTLD registries affect Internet end users? > > > As a result of the discussion, the topic and the goal of the session > changed to: "ccTLD Governance Models - Testimonies from At-Large end > users". In principle it builds on and uses the ccTLD models session from > ICANN68 (Not-for profit, for profit, government, and academia run ccTLDs) > and previous work we have done with ALAC on the different ccTLD Governance > models. As this is an ALAC session, they will look at some people within > their community who each have experience with one of the models from an > end-user perspective. Potentially there will be a follow-up during ICANN72, > but that depends on a lot of variables. > > Before committing to anything, I told them I would circle back to you to > find out whether you agree that we participate in the re-focused session. > If so, I want to ask Katrina to provide the overview of the models, as she > did all the preparation for the previous sessions. > > Please advise, preferably by tomorrow. > > Best regards, > > Alejandra > > > > -- > > > > [image: Рисунок удален отправителем. Photograph] > > > > > > *Alejandra Reynoso* > Investigación & Desarrollo | Dominios .gt > > > > *P:* +502 23688565 > *E:* alejandra.reynoso(a)cctld.gt > > > > 18 Ave. 11-95 Zona 15, V.H. III. (A-109) > Guatemala, Guatemala > > > > www.gt > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ccnso-council mailing list > Ccnso-council(a)icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccnso-council > _______________________________________________ > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your > personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance > with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and > the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You can > visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or > configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or > disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. > > -- > > Jordan Carter > Group Chief Executive, InternetNZ > > +64-21-442-649 -|- jordan(a)InternetNZ.net.nz > > Sent on the run, apologies for brevity > >

1 0

Voting Resolution on separation of ccPDP3 Part 1 and Part 2
by Bart Boswinkel June 4, 2021

June 4, 2021

Dear all, Per last Council meeting ( 20 May 2021) the Note on separation of part 1 and part 2 of ccPDP3 was circulated to you on 25 May 2021. To date no questions or comments were received. As said, after closure of the comment period the secretariat will start the Council email voting on the separation. As discussed on the call you are now asked to vote explicitly to support, abstain or object to the resolution below by Friday 4 June 2021, at noon UTC . For your reference, I have included the note again as well. Kind regards, Bart ----------------- Draft Resolution Background In February 2021 the ccNSO Working Group on Retirement of country code Top-Level Domains(ccTLDs) concluded its work by unanimously supporting the policy recommendations pertaining to the retirement of ccTLDs. This policy development effort is part of the third ccNSO Policy Development Process, which was initiated in 2017 to develop policy recommendations on the Retirement of ccTLDs (Part 1) and to develop policy recommendations for a Review Mechanism for decisions pertaining to the delegation, transfer, revocation, and retirement of ccTLDs (Part 2). In accordance with its 2017 Charter, the Chair of the Retirement WG conveyed the Final Paper of the Working Group to the Issue Manager of ccPDP3 to be included in the Initial Report of the ccPDP. The ccPDP3 Retirement WG believes - after extensive consultation of the ccTLD community and the ccNSO Council - that parting the Proposed Retirement Policy from the Review Mechanism would be beneficial to the process for the following reasons: * The originally anticipated dependency between the retirement process as will be proposed and recommended and the Review Mechanism - which is under development – has proven to be very limited and the area of interdependency is addressed in the proposed Retirement Policy. * The anticipated time saving of at least 3 months to make the Review Mechanism available to the community and to simplify the process by Combining Part 1 and Part 2 has been overtaken by events. * Deferring the decision-making on the Proposed Retirement Policy by the ccNSO Council and ccNSO Membership, will have an adverse effect on the decision-making process. Decision To expedite the ccNSO decision-making on the proposed recommended policy for the Retirement of ccTLDs, Part 1 of the third (3rd) ccNSO Policy Development Process (ccPDP3), shall be further treated separately and independently from Part 2 of ccPDP3 on developing a Review Mechanism and now follow the steps required under ICANN Bylaws Annex B, starting with section 9.c. Part 2 of ccPDP3, on review mechanism will continue according to the timeline and Annex B of the ICANN Bylaws. The Secretariat is requested to publish the Council decision as soon as possible after conclusion of the voting. The decision will become effective 7 days after publication.

15 19

[Request for Advice] Participation in ALAC session at ICANN 71
by Alejandra Reynoso June 4, 2021

June 4, 2021

Dear all, Yesterday I met with ALAC representatives to express my concern about a session they intended to have on ccTLDs. The session was titled "Policy Session 3: Public Interest: Is the commercialization of ccTLDs a threat?" The session was an attempt to explore if commercialization of ccTLD registries affects Internet end users. Trying to understand the possible impacts of commercialization on consumer protection, competition, the stability of the DNS and, in a broader sense, on the public interest. After an introduction to the history of ccTLD policy, the intention was to answer two questions: 1) What is the impact of ccTLD registries commercialization on consumer protection, competition, and the stability of the DNS? 2) Does the commercialization of ccTLD registries affect Internet end users? As a result of the discussion, the topic and the goal of the session changed to: "ccTLD Governance Models - Testimonies from At-Large end users". In principle it builds on and uses the ccTLD models session from ICANN68 (Not-for profit, for profit, government, and academia run ccTLDs) and previous work we have done with ALAC on the different ccTLD Governance models. As this is an ALAC session, they will look at some people within their community who each have experience with one of the models from an end-user perspective. Potentially there will be a follow-up during ICANN72, but that depends on a lot of variables. Before committing to anything, I told them I would circle back to you to find out whether you agree that we participate in the re-focused session. If so, I want to ask Katrina to provide the overview of the models, as she did all the preparation for the previous sessions. Please advise, preferably by tomorrow. Best regards, Alejandra -- [image: Photograph] *Alejandra Reynoso*Investigación & Desarrollo | Dominios .gt *P:* +502 23688565 *E:* alejandra.reynoso(a)cctld.gt 18 Ave. 11-95 Zona 15, V.H. III. (A-109) Guatemala, Guatemala www.gt

5 5

Thursday, 3 June 2021
by ICANN Community Leadership Digest June 3, 2021

June 3, 2021

Thursday, 3 June 2021 ICANN Community Leadership Digest The ICANN org Policy Development Support function publishes this twice-weekly digest to help ICANN community leaders track requests and follow updates. Table of Contents ICANN71 Resources Registration Schedule Virtual Backgrounds Participation Guides Policy Outlook Report GNSO Briefing Information Sharing ENDS TODAY: ICANN71 Prep Week TODAY: Join ITI Session on Upcoming Improvements to Public Comment NEW: Designation of ICANN Board Seat 9 NEW: Call for Expressions of Interest: Chair of the EPDP on IDNs NEW: Participate or Observe: EPDP on IDNs NEW: ICANN71 Virtual Meeting Improvements & Updates REMINDER: Call for Expressions of Interest: ICANN 2022 NomCom Chair and Chair-Elect Public Comment CLOSES TUESDAY: Maximal Starting Repertoire Version 5 (MSR-5) Draft North America Engagement Plan FY21-25 ICANN71 Resources Registration Participation Guides Policy Outlook Report Schedule Virtual Backgrounds GNSO Briefing Information Sharing ENDS TODAY: ICANN71 Prep Week ICANN announced the ICANN71 Prep Week schedule of nine sessions to prepare the ICANN community for the ICANN71 Virtual Policy Forum. Read more. TODAY: Join ITI Session on Upcoming Improvements to Public Comment The Information Transparency Initiative (ITI) team is preparing to release enhancements to the ICANN Public Comment feature in August 2021. The ITI team is hosting an ICANN71 Prep Week session to demonstrate these improvements and solicit your feedback. Read more. NEW: Designation of ICANN Board Seat 9 On 2 June 2021, the Address Supporting Organization (ASO) notified the Empowered Community (EC) Administration of its selection of Mr. Alan Barrett for Seat 9 of the ICANN Board. Sections 7.2(a) and 7.8(c) of the ICANN Bylaws specifically require the EC Administration to "promptly notify the Secretary in writing" and "promptly provide the Secretary (with a copy to the Decisional Participants) with written notice of the designation of those ICANN Board Directors" nominated by the Nominating Committee, a Supporting Organization, and the At Large community. Read more. NEW: Call for Expressions of Interest: Chair of the EPDP on IDNs The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council announced that it is seeking Expressions of Interest for a chair of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) team that will address issues related to Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs). Candidates interested in serving in this role should review the Expression of Interest document before submission. The document details the role, required skills and experience, and the selection process. The deadline to submit an Expression of Interest is Friday, 25 June 2021 at 23:59 UTC. All submissions should be sent to gnso-secs(a)icann.org. Read more. NEW: Participate or Observe: EPDP on IDNs The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) Team on Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) welcomes anyone to join as a participant or an observer. Please contact gnso-secs(a)icann.org to sign up as a participant or an observer. Read more. NEW: ICANN71 Virtual Meeting Improvements and Updates The shift to virtual meetings over the past year has given ICANN the opportunity to expand and improve the virtual meeting format. With ICANN70 under our belts and ICANN71 just around the corner, we would like to highlight some of the recent updates and enhancements that have been implemented for ICANN Public Meetings through some ICANN org platforms. Learn more. REMINDER: Call for Expressions of Interest: ICANN 2022 NomCom Chair and Chair-Elect ICANN is seeking Expressions of Interest for the Chair and Chair-Elect of the 2022 Nominating Committee (NomCom). Expressions of Interest, which will be maintained as confidential, should be sent to nomcomchair2022(a)icann.org no later than 23 June 2021. A suggested form for submitting an Expression of Interest is available here. Read more. Public Comment CLOSES TUESDAY: Maximal Starting Repertoire Version 5 (MSR-5) Close Date: Tuesday, 8 June 2021 Draft North America Engagement Plan FY21-25 Close Date: Friday, 2 July 2021 Volume 3, Issue 41 | Archive | Next Issue: Monday, 7 June 2021 ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Unsubscribe ccnso-council(a)icann.org Update Profile | Constant Contact Data Notice Sent by david.olive(a)icann.org powered by Try email marketing for free today!

1 0

Notes and presentation First SO/AC Chairs Roundtable with ICANN CEO and Chair and vice -chair of the Board
by Bart Boswinkel June 3, 2021

June 3, 2021

Dear all, Please find included the notes and presentation on implementation of WS 2 recommendations from the latest SO/AC roundtable. Kind regards, Bart

1 0

We seek volunteers: CSC and NomCom (calls for expressions of interest closing soon)
by Joke Braeken June 3, 2021

June 3, 2021

Hello all, This is a reminder about 2 ongoing calls for volunteers. Both will close soon, respectively on 4 and 9 June 2021 (23:59 UTC) Firstly, the Council is seeking a candidate who wishes to become a member of the Customer Standing Committee (CSC). The candidate should be from either the African, Asia-Pacific, Latin American And Carribean or North African region. The Customer Standing Committee (CSC) has been established to ensure the satisfactory performance of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) naming function. Read more about the call for Expressions of Interest here: https://ccnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-07may21-en.htm This call for volunteers closes tomorrow, Friday 4 June 2021 (23:59 UTC) Secondly, the ccNSO Council is looking for one (1) volunteer to serve on the 2022 ICANN Nominating Committee (NomCom) on behalf of the ccNSO. This call for volunteers closes Wednesday, 9 June 2020 (23:59 UTC). Read more here: https://ccnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-26may21-en.htm Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org

1 0

ICANN org Public Meeting Survey: Community Interest in Face-to-Face Meetings
by Joke Braeken June 2, 2021

June 2, 2021

Dear All, ICANN org is now conducting a survey to determine individual comfort and tolerance for gatherings amongst ICANN Meeting participants and investigate the possibility of organizing ICANN72 as a hybrid meeting with virtual and in-person attendance in Seattle. We want to hear what you think. Please click below to participate in the survey. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7MBJPFY Kindly note that there is a session on the ICANN71 Public meeting agenda, entitled “The Post-Pandemic Future of ICANN Public Meetings”. This session is scheduled to be held on Thursday, 17 June 2021 at 14:30 UTC ID# 12486<https://71.schedule.icann.org/meetings/RNuzXkchehrLxha9F> You must be registered and signed in to view the ICANN71 schedule and participation details. Sign up today to join us for ICANN71<https://events.icann.org/icann71/registration>. All public sessions during the ICANN Meeting will have a Zoom Meeting 'virtual room' link posted in the session description on the schedule page<https://71.schedule.icann.org/>. The participation links will not post until 24-hours prior to the session start time. Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org

1 0