- Ccnso-council - lists.icann.org

REMINDER | Your action is required: CSC member selection
by Joke Braeken June 10, 2021

June 10, 2021

Dear All, This is an urgent reminder regarding the request to rank the CSC candidates. Instructions on how to do so can be found below. The deadline for this is Monday, 14 June 2021 (23:59 UTC) To date, 5 out of 18 councilors voted. The list can be found here: https://community.icann.org/display/ccNSOCWS/Council+vote+tracker+-+2021 Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org From: Ccnso-council <ccnso-council-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of ccnso-council <ccnso-council(a)icann.org> Reply to: Joke Braeken <joke.braeken(a)icann.org> Date: Monday, 7 June 2021 at 12:19 To: ccnso-council <ccnso-council(a)icann.org> Subject: [ccnso-council] Your action is required: CSC member selection Dear Councillors, The ccNSO secretariat is now initiating the selection process whereby the ccNSO Councillors are required to select a candidate to become a member of the Customer Standing Committee (CSC), which ensures the satisfactory performance of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) naming function. You are now expected to review the applications and rank the candidates, based on how well the candidates meet the set of requirements as listed in the call for expression of interest. Further instructions are included below. = = = Your action is required by Monday, 14 June 2021 (23:59 UTC) = = = Please find the additional materials as submitted by the candidates attached, as well as the information they submitted in the application form (see excel file enclosed). 3 candidates applied to become a CSC member (in chronological order): * Paulos B Nyirenda (.mw) – AF region * Javier Perez Sandoval (.co) – LAC region * Frederico Augusto de Carvalho Neves (.br) – LAC region Background The ccNSO Council issued a call for expressions of interest targeted at candidates from either the African, Asia-Pacific, Latin American And Carribean or North African region to become a member of the Customer Standing Committee (CSC) for the remainder of Alejandra's term (ending 30 September 2021 at 23.59 UTC). The call for volunteers closed Friday, 4 June 2021 (23:59 UTC). Read the call for EoI here: https://ccnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-07may21-en.htm [ccnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/ccnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announc…> The selection happens according to the ccNSO Guideline: ccNSO Appointment Procedures as published on https://ccnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/field-attached/guidelines-ccnso… [ccnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/ccnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/fiel…> INSTRUCTIONS Please review the application material and select your preferred candidate – taking into account the candidate qualification requirements – by sending an email to joke.braeken(a)icann.org<mailto:joke.braeken@icann.org> , no later than Monday, 14 June 2021 (23:59 UTC) !!! Your most preferred candidate should receive three (3) points, the second candidate two (2) points, and the third and least preferred candidate one (1) point. If you believe a candidate does not meet the criteria: please assign zero (0) points. !!! A kind reminder that the ccNSO Secretariat will track and publish for each council member its participation in the selection process. Go to https://community.icann.org/display/ccNSOCWS/Council+vote+tracker+-+2021 Based on each of the individual Councillor’s rankings, the Secretariat will prepare the overall ranking of all candidates and report the ranking to the ccNSO Council on Tuesday, 15 June 2021. Selection Process After closure of the call for volunteers, the materials submitted will be sent to the ccNSO Councillors eligible to select the members for the roles of CSC member. Based on each of the individual Councillor’s rankings, the Secretariat will prepare the overall ranking of all candidates and report the ranking to the ccNSO Council on Tuesday, 15 June 2021. Candidate qualification requirements ccNSO candidates are expected to have the support of a ccTLD manager (whether members or non-member of the ccNSO). CSC members will be selected based on how well they meet the following set of skills and experience: * Direct experience and knowledge of the IANA naming function * Analytical skills, ability to interpret quantitative and qualitative evidence, and capacity to draw conclusions purely based on evidence. * Experience in managing and/or participating in committees (e.g. meeting coordination, reporting, and escalation) in order to contribute meaningfully to CSC processes * Demonstrated ability in relationship management to support diplomatic discussion, consensus driven decision making, and productive negotiation * Excellent communication skills in order to represent ccTLD interests and to keep the ccNSO and broader ccTLD community informed on progress * Ability to work and communicate in written and spoken English. Further a candidate: * Should commit to actively participate in the activities of the CSC on an on-going basis * Should be employed or have active backing by a ccTLD manager and should demonstrate the support by the ccTLD manager in respect to the required time commitment to participate actively in the CSC. In addition, and in accordance with the charter of the CSC, only if a candidate is considered to meet the above criteria the following diversity criteria should be taken into account: * Geographic regions; * Gender diversity; * Type, experience and size of ccTLD manager. The Customer Standing Committee (CSC) is comprised of representatives with direct experience and knowledge of IANA naming functions. Please refer to the CSC Candidates Qualification Requirements<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/csc-skill-set-matrix-members-li…> for details about candidate selection or the CSC Charter<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/csc-charter-amended-27jun18-en.…> for the full text of the CSC scope and responsibilities. About the Customer Standing Committee (CSC) The CSC ensures the satisfactory performance of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) naming function. The CSC is responsible for monitoring Public Technical Identifier's (PTI) performance of the IANA naming function against the service level expectations in the IANA Naming Function Contract. The CSC analyzes performance reports provided by PTI and publishes its findings. The CSC is authorized to undertake remedial action to address poor performance of the IANA naming function, and if performance issues are not remedied, may escalate the issues to the ccNSO and GNSO. Thank you. Best regards, Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org

1 0

Announcement: Final report on the retirement of ccTLDs
by Kimberly Carlson June 9, 2021

June 9, 2021

Dear all, Following the ccNSO Council decision to separate of Part 1 (Retirement of ccTLDs) and Part 2 (Review Mechanism), and each part to continue according to its own timeline, the Issue Manager has submitted the Final Report on the retirement of ccTLDs to the Chair of the ccNSO Council. The Final Report is available here<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=64081623&preview=/…>. The ccNSO Council is expected to consider and decide on the proposed policy for the retirement of ccTLDs at its upcoming meeting during ICANN71 on Thursday 17 June 2021. Assuming the ccNSO Council adopts the Final Report and the recommended policy on the retirement of ccTLDs, the ccNSO Members will have the opportunity to provide to vote on the policy (starting 7 July 2021 until 28 July 2021) Wednesday, 16 June 2021 * ccNSO Policy Session<https://71.schedule.icann.org/meetings/4A6vJLvW3GREPnpYf#/?limit=10&sortByF…> | 1030-1200 UTC | Block 3 Thursday, 17 June 2021 * ccNSO Council<https://71.schedule.icann.org/meetings/7cXTWpLH3wFmWJEaY#/?limit=10&sortByF…> | 1230-1400 UTC | Block 4 All ccNSO sessions are open to observers. Calendar notices will be sent to individual working group/committee members and to those who request one. An overview of the ccNSO-related sessions is available here: https://community.icann.org/x/WIG1CQ

1 0

Strategic and Operational Planning Standing Committee (SOPC) at ICANN71 | 17 June | 7:00-8:00 UTC
by Kimberly Carlson June 9, 2021

June 9, 2021

Dear all, The community is invited and encouraged to attend the Strategic and Operational Planning Standing Committee (SOPC) session at ICANN71 on 17 June | 7:00-8:00 UTC. All ccNSO sessions are open to observers. An overview of the ccNSO-related sessions at ICANN71 is available here: https://community.icann.org/x/WIG1CQ Thursday, 17 June 2021 * Strategic and Operational Planning Standing Committee<https://71.schedule.icann.org/meetings/qLu5gNQYt9hd8F89q#/?limit=10&sortByF…> | 700-800 UTC | Block 1 Draft Agenda: 1. Welcome & Roll call 2. Exercise. Brainstorm improving the preference list survey/ordering by SOPC and SCBO (Giovanni to lead, 20 minutes). 3. Introduction ICANN Prioritization efforts & Framework (20 Minutes, ICANN Planning to lead) 4. What’s in the pipeline: what can community i.e. the SOPC expect over the next couple of months? (ICANN Planning) 5. AOB 6. Next meeting 7. Closure The ICANN71 Virtual Policy Forum (14-17 June 2021) public schedule has been published: https://71.schedule.icann.org/ * Requires a completed registration to view the schedule. * Please note that participation links will only be published one day prior to the sessions for security purposes. * Sessions during ICANN71 will be held during regular working hours in The Hague, Netherlands (CEST / UTC+2, Amsterdam/Paris) * ZOOM MEETING & WEBINAR | VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION TOOL<https://71.schedule.icann.org/participation-tools> – Please take some time to familiarize yourself with these resources. * Instructions on “How to Export the Schedule” can be found at the bottom of this email Thank you, Kim

1 0

May Council minutes for review
by Kimberly Carlson June 9, 2021

June 9, 2021

Dear Council, Please find the May Council minutes attached for review. Best, Kim

1 0

Final Report ccPDP3 retirement
by Bart Boswinkel June 8, 2021

June 8, 2021

Dear Alejandra, I am pleased that in accordance with section Annex B, 9 c of the ICANN Bylaws, I - in my capacity as Issue Manager of ccPDP3 Retirement - can submit to you the Final Report on the development of a policy with respect to the retirement of ccTLDs for consideration and adoption by the ccNSO Council at its upcoming meeting, 17 June 2021. The policy as developed by the working is included in the Annex A of this Report (the Final Paper of the working group) section 1 through 5. Kind regards, Bart Boswinkel Issue Manager ccPDP3 retirement of ccTLDs

1 0

NOTES | ccNSO Council ICANN71 Prep Meeting | 8 June 2021 (18.00 UTC)
by Joke Braeken June 8, 2021

June 8, 2021

ACTION ITEMS Action item #1 Kim will circulate a calendar invite to Council for the At Large Policy Session. (completed) Action item #2: Secretariat and Stephen to invite Eberhard to the June Council meeting. Action item #3 1.Secretariat to create Triage Skype group 2.Secretariat to set up a meeting for the Triage Committee, post ICANN71 Action item #4 Secretariat to create single location for written WG updates, with focus on past and future achievements of their respective working groups. Councillors who where appointed as WG Liaisons to assist in terms of content. NOTES Welcome by Alejandra 1. Upcoming Roundtable CEO- SO/AC chairs: ICANN71 and a Preview of SOAC Activities Update. What should we mention/discuss? Note item 5 of the included Roundtable agenda. Any comments from Councillors? Link to the ICANN org survey can be found at the bottom of the page: https://71.schedule.icann.org/ i. In light of the preliminary survey results, what level of global representation do you think is necessary in order to go forward with a hybrid meeting? Stephen: yes to hybrid meeting. Hopefully the pandemic situation improves even more. Irina: agrees Alejandra: any concerns regarding remote participation? If remote participation is as good as it is now Stephen: it creates unbalance. But that has always been the case Alejandra: we learned a lot with remote participation Global representation? Just the same. Timezone rotation. What we cannot have is a different experience for remote and on-site Irina: ICANN should go for hybrid meeting If icann introduces rules on who can attend, they should be equal. If all vaccinated people can attend, then any vaccine accepted by local gvts should be accepted. Fair treatment for all Sebastien: we did many meetings with attendance and remote participation at the same time, now is the inverse. Not what we used to do, and not what we do now. Whole days like we used to do is not easy. Heard from several larger companies that there are no travel budgets for the rest of the year. Nick: Planning travel and accommodation is going to be the difficult thing - it's impossible at the moment and quarantine requirements etc could change any time. So I think it will be US vs the RoW if it's hybrid I would love to go to Seattle and I will if it's at all possible, but at present it's impossible and we won't know for sure until later on in the summer. Stephen: non-North Americans have more difficulties attending Jordan: hybrid meeting does not work. Makes it worse. Most people will not be able to travel yet. Would rather wait a bit longer. Too soon. Most people cannot travel yet, have no budgets etc Pablo: time we meet face to face. But understands the concerns by Jordan and Nick. not easy for non-North American residents. Remote participants already had disadvantages and they will most likely be the ones that have even more challenges with the hybrid format. Javier: I understand all stated concerns. But my position is to start meeting in person as soon as possible. That will also help the subsequent meeting after the first. Irina: the biggest challenges from Russia is the US Visa. american embassy has cut down the number of employees. Only visas for diplomats. Simply to submit a visa application is not possible at the moment in Moscow. Happy to help. Will look for other opportunities. Help from ICANN is appreciated. Nick: guess if ICANN are able to say with a high degree of confidence at the time they make the decision that say more than 50% of the usual participants will be able to attend then they should consider it ii. What will you and your various session chairs need to run your meetings in a hybrid format, especially if you (or another session leader/moderator) cannot travel to the US or wish not to do so? Alejandra: equal experience for both remote and on site participants iii. What will be the likely impacts (e.g. on effectiveness) on your groups, if some attendees that may otherwise need to be there in person (e.g. Council members or session leaders) are not physically present? What can be done to mitigate any potentially negative impacts? No comments from Council iv. Is there any specific type of feedback that is not covered by the survey but that you think we should try to draw out (if possible) during the ICANN71 session on this topic? Alejandra: good questions in the survey Nick: They really need a good story about why access and participation between the US and everyone else is on an equal footing, that's going to be really difficult Biyi: Different countries have different restrictions and many are easing the restrictions depending on their country's peculiar experiences. I think a hybrid would work. We need to start getting our lives back Jenifer: I vote yes Seattle in person meeting. It’s been a long year. Now, as we walk, cautiously, back into the “real world” we need to continue with our work. Laura: If we don't try we will never know if and how it works Sean: , I am more concerned about the drop off of people in the US taking vaccines vs RoW Pablo: ICANN72 will serve as a test-bed and will pay close attention to identify the experienced challenges given Puerto Rico will experience similar difficulties. . As host of the ICANN73 meeting we will work closely with the State Department to find ways to help individuals experiencing challenges with their visas. 2. Result Roundtable 1 on WS2 Implementation: support proposal? Concerns, if any, with proposal (see slides as circulated and summary notes). Jordan: few people who paid attention to WS2. cross-community WG with knowledgeable people, might be useful. Do not reinvent the wheel. Help coordinate the implementation work and make sure icann keeps implementing Alejandra: few people that would qualify. High effort. See where other SO/AC chairs are with implementation. We need more details. But we would be inclined to participate 3. Latest ccNSO review, prep for decision. Letter form Larisa Gurnick was circulated to the Council separately. The ccNSO Council will be asked to confirm the status of the implementation work contained in the overview. As stated in the letter, after the ccNSO Council has confirmed the status the overview will be forwarded to the Board Organizational Effectiveness Committee for their consideration. Irina made comments about certain parts being outdated Alejandra: we need to confirm we agree with the document. Does not make sense to update. Will be outdated soon again. 4. Preparation ALAC session on ccTLD Governance sessions Invite community to attend https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Meetings+-+Tuesday%2C+… Link to the public schedule with details for that session: https://71.schedule.icann.org/meetings/j9rqscxSNsvWGneez#<https://71.schedule.icann.org/meetings/j9rqscxSNsvWGneez> Here is the link to the ICANN68 Governance Session: https://68.schedule.icann.org/meetings/qeFv9gaJhJ2NAQnWa Alejandra recommends Councillors to attend the session. Katrina will be presenting. Have a look at the questions from the audience and be ready to provide feedback. The intention by At Large is to potentially have a follow-up at ICANN72. Action item #1 Kim will circulate a calendar invite to Council for the At Large Policy Session. 5. Preparation Council meeting: Thanks for the voting on the seperation. 18 votes in favour. 7 days will be over on Friday. Tomorrow, final report will be sent to Alejandra, with Council in copy. Alejandra will need to inform GAC and ask their opinion and advice. Will be part of the Council meeting agenda on 17 June. Draft resolution will be one single recommendation to adopt the final report, and recommend the Board to adopt the policy as included in final paper of the working group. Does council want to invite the chair and vice chair of the WG to speak to this? Policy session will include a section on the retirement PDP to alert the community the members vote is coming See heads up to members here: https://ccnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-03jun21-en.htm Quorum requirement, and minimum amount of members that need to vote in favour, as stated in the bylaws. Stephen: thanks for unanimous support of the separation part 1 from part 2 in ccPDP3 Alejandra: no objections to invite chair and vice chairs. Important milestone. In favour Bart: 5 min introduction, all aware what Council is voting on. Action item #2: Secretariat and Stephen to invite Eberhard to the June Council meeting. a. Decision-making on ccPDP3 Retirement: what can you expect? b. Decision-making on work plan: what can you expect Baseline of what will happen in coming 2 years. June meeting: go over the baseline doc again, and suggested is that Council adopts the work plan. Quarterly work plan. Triage to develop its procedures and inform council on progress of the various groups Jordan: agrees. Secretariat will help to set up skype group, and set up a meeting after ICANN71. Bart: Updated version to be expected by end of this week, early next week Action item #3 · Secretariat to create Triage Skype group · Secretariat to set up a meeting for the Triage Committee, post ICANN71 6. GRC 2.0: How to organize the continuous organizational improvement process. What do you expect the GRC to do? What is role of Council? Expansion of GRC mandate to include: a. working with other committees to discuss implications of those committees work on the guidelines, and how the ccNSO has organized its work. Is mandate of the group still relevant, appropriate, needs improvement? b. review with the council and make suggestions on an annual basis c. perform such additional duties as delegated to the GRC from the council Next steps: provide Direction to GRC & review GRC charter? Alejandra: potentially review of the GRC charter needed. Sean: stalled situation. Looking at activities of GRC, the 3 bullets are a clarity what the GRC does. Not so much an innovation. Do not create overlap. Not same people do the work in all the groups. Hopefully new people to be interested and involved in the work of the groups (triage, oisc, grc). Get more support from the ccTLD community, less overlap in membership. Alejandra: do you agree in this evolved role of the GRC? Stephen: council needs to review its standing Council agrees with green ticks 7. CSC Effectiveness review: scope, and next steps 8. AOB * ICANN org prep week Irina compliments Alejandra on her participation in the UA-session * Written WG updates Sean likes the format. You need to prepare ahead of time, and can address concerns during the meeting Get written updates out sooner, to have more time to Councillors to read them Irina and Jordan agreed with the written format Laura: Useful too and they make us optimize the meetings, knowing we have them by email Alejandra: one location where we have them all? Laura and Jordan agree Alejandra: focus on what the groups did, and what they are planning to do See how council can help Action item #4 · Secretariat to create single location for written WG updates, with focus on past and future achievements by the WGs. Liaisons to assist in terms of content. Joke Braeken ccNSO Policy Advisor joke.braeken(a)icann.org

1 0

Topic list prep meeting ccNSO Council 8 June 2021 - 18.00 UTC
by Bart Boswinkel June 8, 2021

June 8, 2021

Dear all, Please find included the topic list for today’s prep meeting, Kind regads, Bart ccNSO Council Prep meeting topics 8 June 2021 18.00 UTC 1. Upcoming Roundtable CEO- SO/AC chairs: ICANN71 and a Preview of SOAC Activities Update. What should we mention/discuss? Note item 5 of the included Roundtable agenda. Any comments from Councillors? Agenda of the Roundtable 1. Welcome (David Olive) (2 mins) 2. Introductory Remarks (Goran Marby & Maarten Botterman) (8 mins) 3. Tour de Table – SOAC priorities and expected outcomes from ICANN71 (SOAC Chairs) (35 mins) 4. Overview of Preliminary Survey Results on Returning to In-Person Meetings (Nick Tomasso & David Olive) (10 mins) 5. Questions for Open Discussion (All) (15 mins) i. In light of the preliminary survey results, what level of global representation do you think is necessary in order to go forward with a hybrid meeting? ii. What will you and your various session chairs need to run your meetings in a hybrid format, especially if you (or another session leader/moderator) cannot travel to the US or wish not to do so? iii. What will be the likely impacts (e.g. on effectiveness) on your groups, if some attendees that may otherwise need to be there in person (e.g. Council members or session leaders) are not physically present? What can be done to mitigate any potentially negative impacts? iv. Is there any specific type of feedback that is not covered by the survey but that you think we should try to draw out (if possible) during the ICANN71 session on this topic? 1. Interface for the community to talk about IG and legal proposal (3 mins) 2. Next Steps & Closing (Goran Marby, Maarten Botterman & David Olive) (2 mins) 1. Result Roundtable 1 on WS2 Implementation: support proposal? Concerns, if any with proposal (see slides as circulated and summary notes). 1. Latest ccNSO review, prep for decision. Letter form Larisa Gurnick was cirrcualted to the Council separately. The ccNSO Council will be asked to confirm the status of the implementation work contained in the overview. In summary it states: Of the 14 recommendations issued by the Independent Examiner, the ccNSO proposes: · No further action required (either implemented or about to be fully implemented): · 11 recommendations - numbers 1, 2 (a,b), 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13 · Action required by ICANN org: 2 recommendations, numbers 8 ( translation) and 11 (update website) · Deferred/pertains to a future Review: 1 recommendation, number 14 ( granting access to email lists to next Independent reviewer) As stated in the letter, after the ccNSO Council has confirmed the status the overview will be forwarded to the Board Organizational Effectiveness Committee for their consideration. 1. Preparation ALAC session on ccTLD Governance sessions Invite community to attend 1. Preparation Council meeting: * Decision-making on ccPDP3 Retirement: what can you expect? * Decision-making on work plan: what can you expect 1. GRC 2.0: How to organize the continuous organizational improvement process. What do you expect the GRC to do? What is role of Council? Expansion of GRC mandate to include: * working with other committees to discuss implications of those committees work on the guidelines, and how the ccNSO has organized its work. Is mandate of the group still relevant appropriate, needs improvement? * review with the council and make suggestions on an annual basis * perform such additional duties as delegated to the GRC from the council Next steps: provide Direction to GRC & review GRC charter? 1. CSC Effectiveness review: scope, and next steps

4 3

At-Large Policy Session 2: ccTLD Governance Models - Testimonies from At-Large End Users session at ICANN71 | 15 June @8:30 UTC
by Kimberly Carlson June 8, 2021

June 8, 2021

Dear Council, As discussed on today’s call, here are the details for the At-Large session on ccTLD Governance Models: At-Large Policy Session 2: ccTLD Governance Models - Testimonies from At-Large End Users<https://71.schedule.icann.org/meetings/j9rqscxSNsvWGneez#/?limit=10&sortByF…> session at ICANN71. 15 June 2021 | 8:30-10:00 UTC Agenda: https://community.icann.org/x/ZwbQCQ Best, Kim

1 0

Questions for our directors
by Jordan Carter June 8, 2021

June 8, 2021

Hello fellow council members On Tuesday 15th at 10.30 UTC we have our session with our ccNSO related directors. Do you have any questions you’d like me to raise? I’ll ask the directors too, and the members list, but council input very welcome. Many thanks in advance Jordan -- Jordan Carter Group Chief Executive, InternetNZ +64-21-442-649 -|- jordan(a)InternetNZ.net.nz Sent on the run, apologies for brevity

1 0

FW: [ccNSO2-Review] ccNSO Review - Table of Recommendations and ccNSO Actions
by Bart Boswinkel June 8, 2021

June 8, 2021

Dear all, Please find included letter form Larisa Gurnick on current status of ccNSO Review Review. The ccNSO Council will be asked to confirm the status of the implementation work contained in the overview. In summary it states: Of the 14 recommendations issued by the Independent Examiner, the ccNSO proposes: * No further action required (either implemented or about to be fully implemented): * 11 recommendations - numbers 1, 2 (a,b), 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13 * Action required by ICANN org: 2 recommendations, numbers 8 ( translation) and 11 (update website) * Deferred/pertains to a future Review: 1 recommendation, number 14 ( granting access to email lists to next Independent reviewer) As stated in the letter, after the ccNSO Council has confirmed the status the overview will be forwarded to the Board Organizational Effectiveness Committee for their consideration. Kind regards, Bart From: Larisa B. Gurnick Date: Monday, 7 June 2021 at 20:32 To: "alejandra.reynoso(a)cctld.gt" <alejandra.reynoso(a)cctld.gt> Dear Alejandra, I hope that this email finds you well. I am writing to follow up on the correspondence from Avri Doria on 13 May<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/doria-to-reynoso-13may…>. As Avri mentioned, we understand the ccNSO has done substantial additional implementation work since the Feasibility and Implementation Plan<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccnso-review-faiip-07jul20-en.p…> was published. To make sure the ICANN Board is considering up-to-date information, the OEC has asked for ICANN org to compare the latest status of recommendations provided in the letter from Katrina Sataki<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/sataki-to-doria-26feb2…> (the Chair of the ccNSO at that time) on 26 February with the one in the Feasibility and Implementation Plan<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccnso-review-faiip-07jul20-en.p…>. ICANN org compiled the input from both documents into a single new document, which includes a table of recommendations and ccNSO actions. Please see the attached document. We hope this format will make it easier for the ccNSO to confirm whether the compiled information reflects the ccNSO assessment of the progress made and the remaining implementation work. If the ccNSO agrees with the compilation of this new document, it will serve as the basis on which the OEC will consider the current status of the implementation work, considering that the Feasibility and Implementation Plan has been overtaken by events since its publication in July 2020, including substantial implementation work. Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions to clarify or improve the attached document. Thank you very much, Larisa Gurnick VP, Review Support and Accountability Department

2 1