- Ccnso-council - lists.icann.org

Corrected link - : Call for IDN ccPDP Working Group 1 members
by Gabriella Schittek April 14, 2009

April 14, 2009

Dear all, The link in the email below was incorrect. The correct link is: http://www.ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/resolutions-initiation-idn-ccpdp-0… My apologies, Gabi / ccNSO Secretariat -----Original Message----- From: Gabriella Schittek [mailto:gabriella.schittek@icann.org] Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 3:56 PM To: ccnso-members(a)icann.org; cctld-discuss(a)wwtld.org Cc: ccNSO Council Subject: [cctld-discuss] Call for IDN ccPDP Working Group 1 members Dear all, The IDN ccPDP has now formally been launched (see http://www.ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/geographical-names-ccnso-09apr09.p…) As outlined in the PDP document, two Working Groups need to be formed in order to proceed with the work. Working Group 1 to is to report on and identify a feasible policy for the selection and delegation of IDN ccTLDs associated with the territories listed in the ISO 3166-1 (IDN ccTLDs) within the framework of the IDN ccPDP. (Working Group 2 will deal with the changes to Article IX and relevant Annexes in the Bylaws and will not be formed until October 2009). The ccNSO is therefore now seeking membership for Working Group 1. The Working Group is foreseen to have 10 members in total + the ccNSO Chair. Two ccTLD managers - or their nominees - from each of the five ICANN Geographic Regions are needed to form this group. If there are less than two ccTLD nominations from a geographic region, the vacancy can be filled by a nominee from another geographic region (to be selected by the ccNSO Council). In the even that there are three or more ccTLD nominations from the same Geographic Region, the ccNSO Council will decide which nominees shall be appointed to the Working Group. If you are interested in participating in IDN ccPDP Working Group 1, please let me know by email until the 24th April 2009. Your ccTLD does not need to be a ccNSO member in order to participate. Kind regards, Gabi / ccNSO Secretariat

1 0

ccNSO IDN PDP
by Chris Disspain April 14, 2009

April 14, 2009

Patrick, Attached please find the Issues Report on the PDP for IDN ccTLDs. I confirm that in accordance with the recommendations if the report, the ccNSO has resolved to launch the PDP. You will note that the Issues Report recommends the formation of 2 Working Groups (see Issues Report section 4 Methodology and Annex B Charter Working Group 1). WG 1 is in the process of being formed I would be grateful if you would represent the technical community on the WG. Cheers, Chris Disspain Chair ccNSO Council

1 0

ccNSO IDN PDP
by Chris Disspain April 14, 2009

April 14, 2009

Gentlemen, Attached please find the Issues Report on the PDP for IDN ccTLDs. I confirm that in accordance with the recommendations if the report, the ccNSO has resolved to launch the PDP. As the PDP will be conducted without the use of a task force, clause 8 Annex B of the ICANN bylaws applies (http://www.icann.org/en/general/bylaws.htm#AnnexB) In accordance with sub-clause A thereof, please take this email as a formal request for each of you to arrange for an appointment of a representative to solicit the views from your respective region on the issues. Further, you will note that the Issues Report recommends the formation of 2 Working Groups (see Issues Report section 4 Methodology and Annex B Charter Working Group 1). WG 1 is in the process of being formed and in accordance with its Charter I request that the each of you nominate 1 observer to the WG. Finally, FYI, as I do not appear to have an email address for AfTLD's Eric Akumiah, I will ask Gabi to forward this email to him. Cheers, Chris Disspain Chair - ccNSO Council __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4005 (20090413) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com

1 0

ccNSO PDP on IDN ccTLDs
by Chris Disspain April 14, 2009

April 14, 2009

Steve, Attached please find the Issues Report on the PDP for IDN ccTLDs. I confirm that in accordance with the recommendations if the report, the ccNSO has resolved to launch the PDP. You will note that the Issues Report recommends the formation of 2 Working Groups (see Issues Report section 4 Methodology and Annex B Charter Working Group 1). WG 1 is in the process of being formed and in accordance with its Charter I request that the SSAC nominate 1 member to the WG as soon as possible. Chris Disspain Chair - ccNSO Council

1 0

FW: ccNSO PDP on IDN ccTLDs
by Chris Disspain April 14, 2009

April 14, 2009

From: Chris Disspain [mailto:ceo@auda.org.au] Sent: Tuesday, 14 April 2009 13:57 To: Cheryl Langdon-Orr Subject: ccNSO PDP on IDN ccTLDs Cheryl, Attached please find the Issues Report on the PDP for IDN ccTLDs. I confirm that in accordance with the recommendations if the report, the ccNSO has resolved to launch the PDP. You will note that the Issues Report recommends the formation of 2 Working Groups (see Issues Report section 4 Methodology and Annex B Charter Working Group 1). WG 1 is in the process of being formed and in accordance with its Charter I request that the ALAC nominate 2 members to the WG as soon as possible. Chris Disspain Chair - ccNSO Council __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4005 (20090413) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com

1 0

ccNSO PDP on IDN ccTLDs
by Chris Disspain April 14, 2009

April 14, 2009

Avri, Attached please find the Issues Report on the PDP for IDN ccTLDs. I confirm that in accordance with the recommendations if the report, the ccNSO has resolved to launch the PDP. You will note that the Issues Report recommends the formation of 2 Working Groups (see Issues Report section 4 Methodology and Annex B Charter Working Group 1). WG 1 is in the process of being formed and in accordance with its Charter I request that the gNSO nominate 2 members to the WG as soon as possible. Cheers, Chris Disspain Chair - ccNSO Council

1 0

ccNSO PDP on IDN ccTLDs
by Chris Disspain April 14, 2009

April 14, 2009

Janis, Attached please find the Issues Report on the PDP for IDN ccTLDs. I confirm that in accordance with the recommendations if the report, the ccNSO has resolved to launch the PDP. As the PDP will be conducted without the use of a task force, clause 8 Annex B of the ICANN bylaws applies (http://www.icann.org/en/general/bylaws.htm#AnnexB) In accordance with sub-clause C thereof, please take this email as a formal request to you as Chair of the GAC to offer opinion and/or advice in respect to the PDP. Further, you will note that the Issues Report recommends the formation of 2 Working Groups (see Issues Report section 4 Methodology and Annex B Charter Working Group 1). WG 1 is in the process of being formed and in accordance with its Charter I request that the GAC nominate 2 members to the WG. I appreciate tat this may be difficult for the GAC given its way of working and look forward to discussing an acceptable method of ensuring GAC participation in the WG. Cheers, Chris Disspain Chair- ccNSO Council __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4005 (20090413) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com

1 0

Call for IDN ccPDP Working Group 1 members
by Gabriella Schittek April 10, 2009

April 10, 2009

Dear all, The IDN ccPDP has now formally been launched (see http://www.ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/geographical-names-ccnso-09apr09.p…) As outlined in the PDP document, two Working Groups need to be formed in order to proceed with the work. Working Group 1 to is to report on and identify a feasible policy for the selection and delegation of IDN ccTLDs associated with the territories listed in the ISO 3166-1 (IDN ccTLDs) within the framework of the IDN ccPDP. (Working Group 2 will deal with the changes to Article IX and relevant Annexes in the Bylaws and will not be formed until October 2009). The ccNSO is therefore now seeking membership for Working Group 1. The Working Group is foreseen to have 10 members in total + the ccNSO Chair. Two ccTLD managers - or their nominees - from each of the five ICANN Geographic Regions are needed to form this group. If there are less than two ccTLD nominations from a geographic region, the vacancy can be filled by a nominee from another geographic region (to be selected by the ccNSO Council). In the even that there are three or more ccTLD nominations from the same Geographic Region, the ccNSO Council will decide which nominees shall be appointed to the Working Group. If you are interested in participating in IDN ccPDP Working Group 1, please let me know by email until the 24th April 2009. Your ccTLD does not need to be a ccNSO member in order to participate. Kind regards, Gabi / ccNSO Secretariat

1 0

Recording up
by Gabriella Schittek April 8, 2009

April 8, 2009

Dear all, The recording of yesterday's Council call is now up at http://www.ccnso.icann.org/calendar/ Gabi

1 0

travel funding request
by Chris Disspain April 8, 2009

April 8, 2009

All, As you know we have submitted to ICANN 13 people who will be funded to travel to Sydney. We had an allocation of 18 to be used by the end of June 2009 and therefore have not taken up 5. I have been approached by the GAC Chair, Janis Karklins, who says: "As you may be aware, the GAC is currently working through mechanisms to ensure least and less developed country participation and securing financial support for their participation through the ICANN operational and budget planning process. As this processes and a proposed approach is for the next fiscal year, we are faced with some attendees needing support for the ICANN Sydney meeting. Would the ccNSO have space through its travel support from ICANN and if so, would it be willing to share its unused travel support for 3 to 4 government representatives from developing or least developed countries? The GAC stands ready to discuss with ccNSO or ICANN staff the administrative details in case of your favorable response." I have checked with Doug Brent and Theresa Swinehart who say that we would not 'share' any unused support but rather we would simply confirm to ICANN that we have no objection to them reallocating our unused support to some nominees put forward by the GAC. I think we should do this in the spirit of cooperation. Does anyone object? Cheers, Chris Disspain CEO - auDA au Domain Administration Ltd <mailto:ceo@auda.org.au> ceo(a)auda.org.au <http://www.auda.org.au/> www.auda.org.au Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email.

5 5