- Ccnso-council - lists.icann.org

GNSO Observer
by Gabriella Schittek Dec. 17, 2008

Dec. 17, 2008

Dear Councillors, Pierre Bonis, .fr received most votes for the GNSO Observer position. Gabi

1 0

new adress for L root
by Olivier.Guillard＠nic.fr Dec. 15, 2008

Dec. 15, 2008

ICANN L root server now knows about IPv6: $ dig . ns > ... L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 68936 IN A 199.7.83.42 L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 586923 IN AAAA 2001:500:3::42 > ... It sounds that this happened saterday. Note this date: 13th of december 2008 ... Champagne ! -- Olivier

2 1

cooments on geographic names
by Chris Disspain Dec. 14, 2008

Dec. 14, 2008

Please see attached comments from ccNSO WG on geo names endorsed by ccNSO Council. Chris Disspain CEO - auDA Australia's Domain Name Administrator <mailto:ceo@auda.org.au> ceo(a)auda.org.au <http://www.auda.org.au/> www.auda.org.au Important Notice - This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email. __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3688 (20081212) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com

1 0

Vote on candidates for GNSO Observer position
by Gabriella Schittek Dec. 13, 2008

Dec. 13, 2008

Dear Councillors, Another outcome from today's Council call was to launch a vote between the two candidates for the GNSO Observer position. The two candidates are: Pierre Bonis, .fr and Alioune Badara Traore', .ml Attached are the bios of both candidates. Please, let me have your vote by the 16th December 2008. Many thanks, Gabi

3 2

Vote on Introducing new gTLDs document
by Gabriella Schittek Dec. 13, 2008

Dec. 13, 2008

Dear Councillors, Once again I'm attaching the input from the WG on the mechanism for protection of Geographical names as proposed in the Draft Applicant Guidebook for new gTLDs http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-23oct08-en.htm. On today's council call it was agreed that it would send a strong signal if the ccNSO Council would endorse the WG report and submit it as a ccNSO Council document. Therefore, we must launch a quick vote amongst the Councillors on this. If you are in favor of endorsement and submission please vote in favour. If you object or abstain, make that clear as well. The last date to submit this document as input is the 15th December. To enable this we would need to have your vote no later than 14 December, but preferably today. Kind regards, Gabi -----Original Message----- From: Annebeth Lange [mailto:annebeth.lange@uninett.no] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 3:43 PM To: Chris Disspain Cc: 'Hilde Margrethe Thunem'; Gabriella Schittek; roelof.meijer(a)sidn.nl; Martin.Boyle(a)nominet.org.uk Subject: Re: Introducing new gTLDs - view from Norid Hi Chris, Hilde and I have now finished the input from the WG on Protection on Geographical Names (enclosed). Alas, the input from the other participants in the WG were not overwhelming, but comments from Roelof and Martin were welcome and are incorporated in the document. We send it on the ccNSO mailing list today, with the information that it will constitute our submission under the new gTLD process (New gTLD Applicant Guidebook). The comment period closes 15th December (extended), so any further comments from members in the ccNSO must be in our hands at the latest Friday 13th at noon, our time. Provided no wild protests arise, we will submit the final document to ICANN Friday afternoon. To answer your question below, we would be grateful if you could send this document to the council and possibly mention it during your council meeting tomorrow. Views and hopefully support from the council will be most welcome. Best regards, Annebeth Chris Disspain wrote: > Annebeth, Hilde, > > Do you need anything from me at this stage or are you progressing with > a small WG?? > > Let me know. > > Cheers, > > Chris Disspain > CEO - auDA > Australia's Domain Name Administrator > ceo(a)auda.org.au > www.auda.org.au > > Important Notice - This email may contain information which is > confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for > the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended > recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. > If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender > and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment > before printing this email. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Annebeth Lange [mailto:annebeth.lange@uninett.no] > > Sent: Monday, 24 November 2008 20:31 > To: Roelof Meijer > Cc: > Hilde Margrethe Thunem; Chris Disspain > Subject: Re: Introducing new > gTLDs - view from Norid > > Thanks, Roelof! It's a starting point, > at least. When Hilde and I stick > our heads together, we have many > years experience to fulfill each others > input. > > > > Best regards, > > Annebeth > > > > Roelof Meijer wrote: > > > Dear Annabeth, > > > > > > Good piece of work, very sorry for the extremely late reaction. > > > See some remarks in attached version > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > Roelof Meijer > > CEO SIDN > > > > roelof.meijer(a)sidn.nl > > > www.sidn.nl > > T: +31 26 3525500 > > M: +31 611 395775> > -----Original Message----- > >> From: Annebeth Lange > [mailto:annebeth.lange@uninett.no] > > >> Sent: woensdag 5 november 2008 11:54 > >> To: Chris Disspain > > >> Cc: Ørnulf Storm; Roelof Meijer; Martin.Boyle(a)nominet.org.uk; Peter > Van > >> Roste > >> Subject: Introducing new gTLDs - view from Norid > > >> > >> Dear colleagues, > >> > >> We enclose a revised version > of the document regarding the protection > >> of geographical names > (countries and territories) with some suggestions > >> for > implementation. > > >> > > >> Please comment back if you have more input to give us before we > share > >> it with others. > > >> > > >> Chris, which way would be most useful to move forward? > > >> > > >> Best regards, > > >> > > >> Hilde and Annebeth >

6 5

recording of today's council call
by Gabriella Schittek Dec. 12, 2008

Dec. 12, 2008

Dear Councillors, The recording of today's council call is now posted at http://www.ccnso.icann.org/calendar/ Gabi

2 2

答复: [ccnso-council] Vote on Introducing new gTLDs document
by zhangjian Dec. 12, 2008

Dec. 12, 2008

In favor. Jian -----邮件原件----- 发件人: owner-ccnso-council(a)icann.org [mailto:owner-ccnso-council@icann.org] 代表 Gabriella Schittek 发送时间: 2008年12月11日 21:55 收件人: ccnso-council(a)icann.org 主题: [ccnso-council] Vote on Introducing new gTLDs document 重要性: 高 Dear Councillors, Once again I'm attaching the input from the WG on the mechanism for protection of Geographical names as proposed in the Draft Applicant Guidebook for new gTLDs http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-23oct08-en.htm. On today's council call it was agreed that it would send a strong signal if the ccNSO Council would endorse the WG report and submit it as a ccNSO Council document. Therefore, we must launch a quick vote amongst the Councillors on this. If you are in favor of endorsement and submission please vote in favour. If you object or abstain, make that clear as well. The last date to submit this document as input is the 15th December. To enable this we would need to have your vote no later than 14 December, but preferably today. Kind regards, Gabi -----Original Message----- From: Annebeth Lange [mailto:annebeth.lange@uninett.no] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 3:43 PM To: Chris Disspain Cc: 'Hilde Margrethe Thunem'; Gabriella Schittek; roelof.meijer(a)sidn.nl; Martin.Boyle(a)nominet.org.uk Subject: Re: Introducing new gTLDs - view from Norid Hi Chris, Hilde and I have now finished the input from the WG on Protection on Geographical Names (enclosed). Alas, the input from the other participants in the WG were not overwhelming, but comments from Roelof and Martin were welcome and are incorporated in the document. We send it on the ccNSO mailing list today, with the information that it will constitute our submission under the new gTLD process (New gTLD Applicant Guidebook). The comment period closes 15th December (extended), so any further comments from members in the ccNSO must be in our hands at the latest Friday 13th at noon, our time. Provided no wild protests arise, we will submit the final document to ICANN Friday afternoon. To answer your question below, we would be grateful if you could send this document to the council and possibly mention it during your council meeting tomorrow. Views and hopefully support from the council will be most welcome. Best regards, Annebeth Chris Disspain wrote: > Annebeth, Hilde, > > Do you need anything from me at this stage or are you progressing with > a small WG?? > > Let me know. > > Cheers, > > Chris Disspain > CEO - auDA > Australia's Domain Name Administrator > ceo(a)auda.org.au > www.auda.org.au > > Important Notice - This email may contain information which is > confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for > the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended > recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. > If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender > and delete this message immediately. Please consider the environment > before printing this email. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Annebeth Lange [mailto:annebeth.lange@uninett.no] > > Sent: Monday, 24 November 2008 20:31 > To: Roelof Meijer > Cc: > Hilde Margrethe Thunem; Chris Disspain > Subject: Re: Introducing new > gTLDs - view from Norid > > Thanks, Roelof! It's a starting point, > at least. When Hilde and I stick > our heads together, we have many > years experience to fulfill each others > input. > > > > Best regards, > > Annebeth > > > > Roelof Meijer wrote: > > > Dear Annabeth, > > > > > > Good piece of work, very sorry for the extremely late reaction. > > > See some remarks in attached version > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > Roelof Meijer > > CEO SIDN > > > > roelof.meijer(a)sidn.nl > > > www.sidn.nl > > T: +31 26 3525500 > > M: +31 611 395775> > -----Original Message----- > >> From: Annebeth Lange > [mailto:annebeth.lange@uninett.no] > > >> Sent: woensdag 5 november 2008 11:54 > >> To: Chris Disspain > > >> Cc: Ørnulf Storm; Roelof Meijer; Martin.Boyle(a)nominet.org.uk; Peter > Van > >> Roste > >> Subject: Introducing new gTLDs - view from Norid > > >> > >> Dear colleagues, > >> > >> We enclose a revised version > of the document regarding the protection > >> of geographical names > (countries and territories) with some suggestions > >> for > implementation. > > >> > > >> Please comment back if you have more input to give us before we > share > >> it with others. > > >> > > >> Chris, which way would be most useful to move forward? > > >> > > >> Best regards, > > >> > > >> Hilde and Annebeth >

1 0

Nomination and Election Report 09
by Gabriella Schittek Dec. 12, 2008

Dec. 12, 2008

Dear Councillors, Attached is the nomination and election report for the nominations/elections to the Council which will take seat in March 2009. Kind regards, Gabi

1 0

Re: [ccnso-council] text reg. ccTLD update session
by Oscar A. Robles-Garay Dec. 12, 2008

Dec. 12, 2008

I fully support Lesley's words. Maybe we should try to accomodate more presentations like this (ccTLD update sessions) and less non-value-perceived discussions in other issues, I think we could find many supporters. When times come to discuss really, really relevant policy issues, then it will be obvious that we need to. Oscar At 08:19 a.m. 28/11/2008, lesley(a)nominet.org.uk wrote: >Hi Gabi, > >I have a strong concern that the proposed text gives the impression that >we are seeking to limit this aspect of the ccNSO work. > >As many Councillors will recall, a number of the recommendations on their >way from the Participation WG (when I find the capacity to finish the >final report) are about improving the value of the ccNSO and ccNSO >meetings to ccTLD managers. > >Providing an improved structure for this information exchange is good, but >by only allocating 50 minutes for this (which is what your email seems to >suggest) would not seem to be so good. > >Regards, > >Lesley > >owner-ccnso-council(a)icann.org wrote on 28/11/2008 08:34:47: > > > > > Dear Councillors, > > > > Below is some text which I was planning to send out to the members > > list regarding the ccTLD update session during the ccNSO meetings. > > Should you have any objections or concerns, please, let me know by > > Tuesday, 2nd December. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gabi > > > > -- > > > > Dear all, > > > > The ccTLD Update session is an important part of the ccNSO meeting > > agenda where the participants have a chance to learn more about > > ccTLDs from around the world. However, as we have more and more > > interested speakers for this session, we felt that we need to give > > it a slight structure. > > > > For the upcoming ccNSO meeting in Mexico and following ccNSO > > meetings, we are therefore suggesting following format: > > > > - Presentations from ccTLDs which have something to report on new > > developments within their registry will be prioritised, but we can > > only allow for three such presentations. > > - "Status update" presentations will be limited to a maximum of two > > speakers per meeting. Preference will be given to registries that > > have not given any update within the last 12 months. > > - Each presenter will have 10 minutes for their presentation. > > > > We regret that we need to put a limit on the number of > > presentations, however, we hope you understand that these changes > > are necessary in order to be able to use the meeting time as > > efficiently as possible. > >

5 5

RE: [ccnso-council] Vote on Introducing new gTLDs document
by Young Eum Lee Dec. 12, 2008

Dec. 12, 2008

1 0