May 2012 - lac-discuss-es - lists.icann.org

???? = Windows-1252 q = Webcast 3A_May_17_ = 93Building_T == windows-1252 q = rust_in_Cloud_Computing 94_Summit_2012 =
by cintra.sooknanan＠gmail.com May 16, 2012

May 16, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto:???? = Windows-1252 q = Webcast 3A_May_17_ = 93Building_T == windows-1252 q = rust_in_Cloud_Computing 94_Summit_2012 = De: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com Queridos todos, ** [Imagen: ISOC-HK] <http://www.isoc.hk/> El jueves 17 de mayo 2012 en Internet Sociedad de la difusión por Internet Canal <http://www.livestream.com/internetsocietychapters> fluirá Viva la Internet Society Capítulo de Hong Kong (ISOC-HK) caso * "Construyendo Confianza en Cloud Computing" Cumbre 2012 <http://www.isoc.hk/2012/04/building-trust-in-cloud-computing-summit-2012.ht…> *, Que inaugurará la Cloud Security Alliance - Hong Kong y Macao Capítulo < https://chapters.cloudsecurityalliance.org/hongkongmacau/>. será uno de los eventos de seguridad más prominentes nube nunca en el sur China, y cuenta con ponentes destacados de la CSA, el NIST, Intel, y el Gobierno de Hong Kong. * Qué: * "Generando confianza en Cloud Computing" Cumbre 2012 * Cuándo: * Jueves 17 de mayo 2012 de 9.30 a 17:00 HKT | 0130-1300UTC | 2130 (casados)-0500EDT * Donde: * Cyberport, Hong Kong * Webcast: * http://www.livestream.com/internetsocietychapters * Facebook: * https://www.facebook.com/events/296406053774243/ * Twitter: * isochk < https://twitter.com/#!/search/isochk> Alianza < https://twitter.com/#!/search/cloud%20security%20alliance> # Nube < https://twitter.com/#!/search/%23isochk> Comentario <http://isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=3432#respond> Ver todos comentarios <http://isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=3432#comments> * Dificultad para hacer clic * Copia y pega este URL en su navegador? http://isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=3432 Saludos Cintra Sooknanan _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1baae8606e.html --]]

1 0

Re: RECORDATORIO: Solicitud de Comentarios: Proyecto de At-Large Declaraci�n de la Visi�n - Fecha l�mite para observaciones 17 de mayo
by cintra.sooknanan＠gmail.com May 16, 2012

May 16, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: RECORDATORIO: Solicitud de Comentarios: Proyecto de At-Large Declaración de la Visión - Fecha límite para observaciones 17 de mayo De: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com Hola a todos, Gracias por hacer circular este proyecto de Declaración de la Visión. Me hubiera gustado que ver a un lenguaje claro y sencillo y fácil de traducir la visión. Frases al igual que "aporta su voz a tener en todos los asuntos de la ICANN" son vagos en mi opinión. Declaraciones de visión debe tener un mecanismo de medición en cuanto a si se están cumpliendo o no y por lo tanto debe ser precisa. También me parece que es inepto para el ALAC a ser la primera estructura mencionada en el En una declaración de visión grande. Tal vez la intención es la mezcla de los dos? Pero Yo aconsejaría en contra de esta ruta, y en su lugar sugieren proporcionar una visión Declaración del ALAC por separado. Mi propuesta modificada de At-Large Declaración de la Visión es: * La comunidad At-Large, cataliza y facilita incluyente, tangible e participación significativa de los usuarios finales de Internet en todo el mundo en materia de ICANN, en particular mediante su trabajo en el fortalecimiento de las Organizaciones regionales de alcance, su la representación por el ALAC y su selección de la ICANN At-Large Junta Miembro. Saludos cordiales Cintra Sooknanan El mar, 15 de mayo de 2012 a 18:12, de la ICANN At-Large Personal < staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> escribió: > Dear All, > > > > A friendly reminder that the comment period for the proposed At-Large > Vision > Statement closes on Thursday, 17 May. > > > > The proposed At-Large Vision Statement is: > > * The ALAC and At-Large community catalyzes and facilitates > inclusive, > meaningful participation of Internet end-users world-wide, aggregates > their input and brings their voice to bear in all ICANN matters. > > > > Please use the comments function on this > <https://community.icann.org/x/esPbAQ> wiki page to add any suggestions or > send your comments to At-Large Staff at: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. > > > > Regards, > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie > Peregrine > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > From: ICANN At-Large Staff [mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org] > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 2:10 PM > To: alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > 'afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org'; apralo; Discussion for At-Large > Europe; LACRALO discussion list; 'lac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org'; > NARALO Discussion List > Cc: 'Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond'; 'Cheryl Langdon-Orr'; ICANN At-Large Staff > Subject: COMMENTS REQUESTED: Proposed At-Large Vision Statement > > > > Dear All, > > > > The ALAC Improvements Review WG Final Report included a recommendation that > "the ALAC should develop strategic and operational planning processes > (including performance criteria and cost information) as part of ICANN's > planning process." (Recommendation 5 > <https://community.icann.org/display/Improve/Recommendation+5> ). > > > > As part of the implementation of this recommendation, the At-Large > Improvements Implementation Work Team C created an action item to > "articulate ALAC's and At-Large's vision and mission." > > > > The At-Large Improvements Taskforce developed a proposed At-Large Vision > Statement during their meeting at the 43rd ICANN Meeting in Costa Rica. > > > > The proposed At-Large Vision Statement is: > > . The ALAC and At-Large community catalyzes and facilitates > inclusive, meaningful participation of Internet end-users world-wide, > aggregates their input and brings their voice to bear in all ICANN > matters. > > > > > Olivier Crepin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, and Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Chair of > the At-Large Improvements Taskforce, have outlined the following next steps > for the proposed At-Large Vision Statement: > > . 4-17 May 2012 - This proposed At-Large Vision statement is open > for comments between 4-17 May 2012. Please use the comments function on > this > wiki page <https://community.icann.org/x/esPbAQ> to add any suggestions > or > send your comments to At-Large Staff at: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. > > . 21 May 2012 - The At-Large Improvements Taskforce will review and > incorporate comments received during their 21 May meeting. > > . 22 May 2012 - The ALAC will review the proposed At-Large Vision > Statement during their 22 May ALAC meeting and vote whether to ratify it. > > > > Regards, > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie > Peregrine > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9863c2acbb.html --]]

1 0

Security, Stability & Resiliency of the DNS Review Team (SSR RT) Webinars
by Fatima Cambronero May 15, 2012

May 15, 2012

Estimados, Para quienes no pudieron participar del Webinar de Seguridad, Estabilidad y Resiliencia del DNS del Review Team la semana pasada, en este enlace puden escuchar el audio de la llamada: http://audio.icann.org/ssr-webinar-session2-1900-20120511-en.mp3 Y en este enlace pueden ver la presentación de diapositivas que se realizó: http://bit.ly/JgBZO8 Desde LACRALO participamos haciendo comentarios públicos sobre este asunto. Esperemos que sean de utilidad. Ahora tenemos material como para ir analizando hasta que esté listo el Reporte Final y podamos hacer nuevos comentarios desde nuestra región. Saludos cordiales, Fatima -- *Fatima Cambronero* Abogada-Argentina Directora de Investigaciones *AGEIA DENSI Argentina* http://ar.ageiadensi.org/ *@facambronero* *Join the LACRALO/ICANN discussions:* https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es

2 1

Re: GigaOM art�culo: Louis Vuitton pide SOPA-como la incautaci�n de cientos de sitios web
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com May 14, 2012

May 14, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: GigaOM artículo: Louis Vuitton pide SOPA-como la incautación de cientos de sitios web De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Gracias por este prog. En el lado positivo, estos hombres están tomando medidas en los tribunales y el uso de las leyes aplicables de EE.UU. no, los sumarios extrajudiciales convulsiones de la Patria Seguridad / ICE. Un tercero tiene que estar convencido de los méritos del caso. Se invoca disposiciones de Lanham, 15 USC 1125 (d), a saber: "(D) * * Prevención ciberpiratería (1) (A) Una persona será responsable de una acción civil por el titular de una marca, incluyendo el nombre del personal que está protegido como marca en virtud de esta sección, si, sin tener en cuenta los bienes o servicios de las partes, esa persona (I) tiene una intención de mala fe para sacar provecho de esa marca, incluyendo un personal nombre que está protegido como marca en virtud de esta sección, y (Ii) los registros, trafique, o utiliza un nombre de dominio que (I) en el caso de una marca que es distintivo en el momento del registro del nombre de dominio es idéntico o confusamente similar a la marca; (II) en el caso de una marca famosa que es conocida en el momento de el registro del nombre de dominio es idéntico o confusamente similar o de dilución de esa marca, o (III) es una marca, palabra o nombre protegido por razón de la sección 706 <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/706> de título 18 <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18> o sección 220506 <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/36/220506> de el título 36 <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/36> . Ellos oran por Â«resoluciÃ³n de todos los cargos, asÃ como" alivio * equitativa en contra de * acusados \u200b\u200b".La respuesta del juez a la segunda parte va a ser profundamente observaba. Si bien los recuentos podrÃan ser errÃ³neamente confunden y en detrimento de la ICANN, sÃ³lo una (1) de los cuatro (4) alegÃ³ es realmente germano a los intereses de ICANN; Cuente III: Reclamo para el alivio de ciberocupaciÃ³n. Esto es lo que el recurso de mandamus ora con respecto a los 381 dominios: "B. La entrada de una orden que exija a los nombres de dominio de materias, y cualquier otros nombres de dominio utilizados por los acusados \u200b\u200bde participar en el negocio de comercializaciÃ³n de bienes, se ofrece a vender y / o venta de falsificaciones y teniendo las infracciones de los Louis Vuitton Marca que se desactive y / o inmediatamente transferidos por los Demandados, sus secretarios y / o registros de los a Louis Vuitton controlar lo que ya no puede ser usada para fines ilegales. c. La entrada de una Orden que, a Louis Vuitton solicitud, el nivel mÃ¡s alto de dominio (TLD) Registros de Nombres de Dominio de motivos y sus Los administradores de colocar los nombres de dominio en cuestiÃ³n sobre el estado de retenciÃ³n del registro, por lo tanto sacarlos de los archivos de zona TLD mantenidos por los Registros que vincular los nombres de dominio Sin perjuicio de las direcciones IP donde el asociado sitios web estÃ¡n alojados. d.La entrada de una Orden que, a peticiÃ³n de Louis Vuitton, los que tengan una coparticipaciÃ³n en el con los demandados y los que tienen la notificaciÃ³n de la medida cautelar, incluyendo cualquier Buscadores de Internet, servicios de alojamiento web, registradores de nombres de dominio y registros de nombres de dominio o de sus administradores que se proporcionan con la notificaciÃ³n de la medida cautelar, dejar de facilitar el acceso a cualquiera o todos de dominio nombres y sitios web a travÃ©s del cual los acusados \u200b\u200bse dedican a la venta de la falsificaciÃ³n y las mercancÃas infractoras que utilizan las marcas de Louis Vuitton. e. La entrada de un orden que, a peticiÃ³n de Louis Vuitton, la Internet CorporaciÃ³n para la AsignaciÃ³n de Nombres y NÃºmeros (ICANN) tomarÃ¡ todas las medidas necesarias para asegurar que los registradores y los registros de dominio de nivel superior o sus administradores responsables de la transferencia de dominio de reserva de nombres, cambiar el registrador de datos del registro, y / o desactivar los nombres de dominio como Asunto dirigido por el Tribunal. " Vamos a ver quÃ© pasa ahora. - Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A MÃ³vil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, PlanificaciÃ³n, Gobierno, EvaluaciÃ³n y plazos * ============================= El viernes, 11 de mayo 2012 a las 9:57 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee(a)gmail.com> escribiÃ³: > GigaOM article : Louis Vuitton asks for SOPA-like seizure of hundreds > of websites > > http://gigaom.com/2012/05/11/louis-vuitton-asks-for-sopa-like-seizure-of-hu… > > The injunction order filed in the Florida court > http://www.scribd.com/doc/93228219/Louis-Vuittion-Complaint > > lists the 381 domains and the filed injunction includes "..Entry of an > order that, upon Louis Vuittons request, the Internet Corporation for > Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) shall take all actions necessary > to ensure that the Registrars and the top level domain Registries or > their administrators responsiblefor the Subject Domain Names transfer, > change the Registrar of Record, and/or disable the Subject Domain > Names as directed by the Court." > > --- > > Dev Anand Teelucksingh > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/47b89a60ef.html --]]

1 0

Nuevo grupo At-Large de revisión sobre los Nuevos GTLD - "At-Large new GTLD Review Group "
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org May 12, 2012

May 12, 2012

Estimados miembros de LACRALO: Para su consideración: Como fue comunicado anteriormente cada una de las regiones de ALAC debe recomendar 2 miembros para integrar este nuevo grupo de revisión. Y una tercera persona como "voluntario" que el ALAC escogerá de la región aunque no necesita ser necesariamente un miembro de una ALS o de la región "puede ser cualquier persona que ALAC elija lo que será una oportunidad de mostrar nuestra transparencia al mundo, si así lo decidimos" (En breve el Staff estará haciendo un llamado para esta tercera persona voluntaria) Los miembros serán evaluados por el ALAC y seleccionados como miembros participantes de dicho grupo. El fecha para las nominaciones y/o auto-nominaciones terminó el 8 de mayo. En LACRALO hubo 4 auto-nominaciones, pero por motivos personales ahora tenemos 2 auto-nominaciones: 1) Dev Anand Teelucksingh 2) Marcelo Telez Como no tenemos más voluntarios, podemos considerarlos como "los recomendados por la región" a no ser que alguien se oponga. Los CV de los candidatos serán publicados en breve en la WIKI. Los mismos serán estudiados minuciosamente para evitar cualquier tipo de conflicto de interese. Sin más, y a la espera de comentarios .... Sylvia ___________________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org Secretaria LACRALO-ICANN/ 2012-2013

1 0

periodo de monetarios publicos
by Presidencia Internauta May 11, 2012

May 11, 2012

Estimados compañeros de LACRALO: Hay abiertos varios periodos de comentarios públicos que estan en fecha limite de cierre, los cuales pueden ver en ( http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-10may12-en.htm ), el vencimiento de los mismos transcurre entre el 10 a 20 mayo 2012: Para la comodidad de ustedes, he incluido enlaces directos a continuación a los comentarios que pronto se cerrarán. Tengan en cuenta que las observaciones presentadas después del cierre publicado de fecha / hora no están garantizado para ser considerado en cualquier resumen final, análisis, informes o toma de decisiones que tiene lugar una vez que el periodo termine. Para obtener más información, consulte la página de comentarios públicos de ICANN en: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment *Seguridad, Estabilidad y Flexibilidad del Equipo de Revisión de DNS (SSR RT) - Proyecto de Informe * http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/ssrt-draft-report-15mar12-en.htm extendido al 15 de abril de 2012 [23:59] extendido al 14 de mayo de 2012 [23:59] *Renovación de falsos avisos Informe * http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/fake-renewal-notices-report-21m…<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/fake-renewal-notices-report-21m…> 20 de abril 2012 [23:59] 11 de mayo de 2012 [23:59] *. Registro com Acuerdo de Renovación * http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/com-renewal-27mar12-en.htm 26 abril de 2012 [23:59] 17 de mayo de 2012 [23:59] . *Posterior Acuerdo de Enmienda * http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/post-amendment-2012-09apr12-en.… 09 de mayo 2012 [23:59] 30 de mayo de 2012 [23:59] Saludos cordiales -- *Sergio Salinas Porto Presidente Internauta Argentina Asociación Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar>/CTA <http://www.ctamdq.org.ar> FLUI- Federación Latinoamericana de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.fuilain.org/> facebook:salinasporto twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819*

1 0

GigaOM art�culo: Louis Vuitton pide SOPA-como la incautaci�n de cientos de sitios web
by devtee＠gmail.com May 11, 2012

May 11, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: GigaOM artículo: Louis Vuitton pide SOPA-como la incautación de cientos de sitios web De: devtee(a)gmail.com GigaOM artículo: Louis Vuitton pide SOPA-como la incautación de cientos de sitios web http://gigaom.com/2012/05/11/louis-vuitton-asks-for-sopa-like-seizure-of-hu… La orden de interdicto presentada en el tribunal de la Florida http://www.scribd.com/doc/93228219/Louis-Vuittion-Complaint~~V listas de los 381 dominios y el requerimiento presentado incluye ".. La entrada de un para que, a petición de Louis Vuitton, la Corporación de Internet para Asignación de Nombres y Números (ICANN) tomará todas las medidas necesarias para asegurarse de que los registradores y los registros de dominio de nivel superior o sus administradores responsablede el dominio de reserva de transferencia de los nombres, cambiar el registrador de datos del registro, y / o deshabilitar el dominio de reserva Nombres como se indica por el Tribunal. " --- Dev Anand Teelucksingh _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e1d8934879.html --]]

1 0

Informe del Grupo Especial sobre las TIC y los peque�os Estados insulares @ TIC para el desarrollo 2012 Conferencia
by cintra.sooknanan＠gmail.com May 11, 2012

May 11, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Informe del Grupo Especial sobre las TIC y los pequeños Estados insulares @ TIC para el desarrollo 2012 Conferencia De: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com De interés para nuestra región. Saludos cordiales Cintra ---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- De: THAKUR Dhanaraj <dhanaraj.thakur(a)uwimona.edu.jm> Fecha: Miércoles, 9 de mayo de 2012 17:12 Asunto: Informe del Grupo Especial sobre las TIC y los pequeños Estados insulares @ TIC para el desarrollo 2012 Conferencia Para: Hola a todos, Como solicitantes de registro en línea de nuestro panel de la TIC y los pequeños Estados insulares (12 de marzo de 2012), Le envío el informe de las presentaciones del panel. Varios de ustedes han tenido preguntó acerca de un resumen y esperamos que encuentre útil. Siéntase libre de compartirlo con los colegas. El documento se encuentra alojado en la islandvulnerability.org web y el enlace es: http://www.islandvulnerability.org/docs/marcelleetal.2012.pdf Tenemos la intención de construir sobre este trabajo y gracias por su participación y interés. ten cuidado, Dhanaraj Thakur - Dhanaraj Thakur Profesora del Departamento de Gobierno La Universidad de las Indias Occidentales, Mona Kingston 7, Jamaica. Tel.: (876) 977-5935 Fax: (876) 977-1809 _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/381fc2abdb.html --]]

2 1

CIERRE CHAT INFORMAL LACRALO 2012 (ESPAÑOL)
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org May 11, 2012

May 11, 2012

POR EL PRESENTE COMUNICO QUE EL CHAT INFORMAL LLAMADO LACRALO 2012 (ESPAÑOL), que yo he creado y por el cual asumo la responsabilidad DEJARÁ DE EXISTIR a partir de ahora. Sin más, sylvia ___________________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org Secretaria LACRALO-ICANN/ 2012-2013 sylvia_leite=Skype Descrição: Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil

9 8

Aclaracion Final de Chat !!!
by José Francisco Arce May 10, 2012

May 10, 2012

Estimados todos, Tal cual lo explico Sylvia, el chat denominado “LACRALO 2012 (Español)” no es un canal oficial de LACRALO. Este chat fue creado en Costa Rica y después se siguió usando con fines comunicativos y con la intensión de que aquellos que no hablan Ingles puedan sacarse las dudas de muchas cosas de la región. Si bien el fin es noble, desde la presidencia y con Dev cuando era Secretario se empezaron gestiones muy importantes para abordar este tema y que continúan ahora con Sylvia. Pero hasta nuevo aviso, ese chat NO ES OFICIAL DE LACRALO. Grupo inclusive, al que yo no pertenezco. Lo que vi es que este medio tuvo aceptación, por lo que estamos tratando de institucionalizar algo parecido, que les estaremos avisando en breve. Saludos !!!! José Arce.-

1 0

Fwd: Fwd: Aprobadas resoluciones de la Junta | Reuni�n Ordinaria de la Junta directiva de ICANN | ICANN
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com May 8, 2012

May 8, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Fwd: Fwd: Aprobadas resoluciones de la Junta | Reunión Ordinaria de la Junta directiva de ICANN | ICANN De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Para tu información. ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos * ============================= http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm Aprobó las Resoluciones de la Junta | Reunión Ordinaria de la Junta directiva de ICANN <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm#> ** 06 de mayo 2012 1. Consentimiento del orden del día <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm#1> - 1.Ratificación de Propuesta de Política Global de Post ASOfor Agotamiento IPv4 mecanismos de asignación de theIANA <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm#1…> - * Justificación de la Resolución 2012.05.06.01 <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm#1…> * - 2. . CAT RSEPRequest para permitir el Whois Los cambios <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm#1…> - * Justificación de la Resolución 2012.05.06.02 <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm#1…> * - 3. Retribuciones Carta <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm#1…> - * Justificación de la Resolución 2012.05.06.03 <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm#1…> * - 4. CompensaciÃ³n Total Marco <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm#1…> - * JustificaciÃ³n de la ResoluciÃ³n 2012.05.06.04 <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm#1…> * - 5.IRTP Parte B, la RecomendaciÃ³n 8 <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm#1…> - * JustificaciÃ³n de la ResoluciÃ³n 2012.05.06.05 <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm#1…> * - 6. APROBACIÃN DE ESTRATÃGICO PLAN DE <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm#1…> - * JustificaciÃ³n de la ResoluciÃ³n 2012.05.06.06 <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm#1…> * - 7. CONFLICTO DE INTERESES EXAMEN <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm#1…> - * JustificaciÃ³n de la ResoluciÃ³n 2012.05.06.07 <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-06may12-en.htm#1…> * ** Enviado desde mi iPhone David A. Oliva _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c93b7c522e.html --]]

1 0

Re: RECORDATORIO: Convocatoria de ingreso en At-Large nuevo Grupo de Revisi�n de gTLD
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org May 7, 2012

May 7, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: RECORDATORIO: Convocatoria de ingreso en At-Large nuevo Grupo de Revisión de gTLD De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Hola Dev, Gracias por su interés en el Grupo de Revisión de los nuevos gTLD. Hemos añadido a su nombrar a la lista de nominados para este grupo. Un cordial saludo, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisela Gruber, y Nathalie Halcón peregrino El personal de ICANN política en apoyo de ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org ----- Mensaje original ----- De: lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Dev Anand Teelucksingh Enviado el: Lunes, 07 de mayo 2012 13:22 Para: ICANN At-Large Personal Cc: Lista de discusión de LACRALO Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RECORDATORIO: Convocatoria de ingreso en At-Large nueva Grupo de Revisión de gTLD Queridos todos, Sólo tener en cuenta que deseo ser incluido en el RG gTLD. Saludos cordiales, Dev Anand Teelucksingh El sábado, 5 de mayo de 2012 a 24:53, de la ICANN At-Large Personal <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> escribió: > Dear All, > > > > This is a friendly reminder that the RALOs have been asked to make > their recommendations for membership to the At-Large new gTLD Review > Group to the ALAC by Tuesday, 8 May 2012, so the ALAC can vote on these > > > > The details of the requirements for membership are outlined in the > message below. > > > > Regards, > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and > Nathalie Peregrine > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > From: ICANN At-Large Staff [mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 3:58 PM > To: alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > 'afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org'; apralo; Discussion for > At-Large Europe; 'LACRALO discussion list'; > 'lac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org'; > NARALO Discussion List > Cc: 'Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond'; ICANN At-Large Staff > Subject: Call for Membership in At-Large new gTLD Review Group > > > > Dear All, > > > > The following call for membership of the At-Large new gTLD Review > Group is sent on behalf of Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC. > > > > ** > > > > Dear All, > > > > Background > > The At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) has approved the procedure by > which At-Large and ALAC can submit public comments on and file > objections to new gTLD applications as proposed by the At- > > Large new gTLD Working Group (ANgWG - > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs) This procedure > forms the basis of the work of the At-Large new gTLD Review Group > (gTLD RG - > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+New+gTLD+Review+G > roup+W > orkspace# > <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+New+gTLD+Review+ > Group+ > Workspace> ). The gTLD RG needs to be in place and ready to work by > Workspace> the > date when applications are revealed and the comment period is set. > > > > Therefore, we are asking the RALOs to make their recommendations to > the ALAC by 8 May 2012, so the ALAC can vote on these recommendations. > The RG should be in place and up to speed by 14 May 2012 (being the > approximate commencement date of the 60 day Application Comment Period > and the 7 month Objection Period of the First Round). > > > > The gTLD RG is tasked with: > > * receiving the comments from At-Large either directly via email > or indirectly via RALO conference calls; > * creating/updating the new gTLD wiki comment pages; > * giving status updates of which new gTLD received comments each > week; > * informing RALOs of deadlines for comments during the ACP, and > for objection statements during the objection period; > * reviewing the comments/objections received and giving ALAC its > recommendations on them; > * composing the final draft of the comments/objections agreed on > in close cooperation with their original authors. > > > > gTLD RG term > > The gTLD RG term period finishes with the end of the objection period > of the whole first round. > > > > gTLD RG Composition > > The ANgWG had determined that, at least initially, the gTLD RG be > composed > of: > > - 2 members to be recommended by each of the RALOs > > - 1 member volunteer from each region > > All members being determined by the ALAC. > > Should the work load require adding people to the gTLD RG at a later > time, that decision can be made by the gTLD RG itself in consultation > with the ANgWG. > > > > gTLD RG Requirements > > Members of the gTLD RG are required to: > > A. understand the approved ALAC procedure > (https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Proposal+for+the > +ALAC+ > > ations+2012+Workspace) by which At-Large and the ALAC can submit > ations+2012+public > comments on and file objections to new gTLD applications > > B. be able to use the At-Large wiki to create/edit/update wiki pages > > C. be able to work in English > > D. have an understanding of ICANN's Applicant Guidebook (AGB; > http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/guidebook-full-11jan12-en. > pdf) which describes the application process for new gTLDs from start > to finish > > E. be able to give a flexible commitment of time. It is estimated that > on the average, 2-3 hours per week would be needed and there would be > bi-weekly conference calls over the 7 month objection period. However, > in such processes, it is typical that the majority of both comments > and objection requests will occur towards the end of the 60 day > comment period and 7 month objection period, so the workload will likely > Presuming no changes to the Applicant Guidebook regarding comments and > objections, it is anticipated that the duration of the gTLD RG tasks > will be up to 1 year for this first round. > > F. make a Statement of Interest (SOI) in which they: > > a. declare that they have no Conflicts of Interest (COI); or > > b. disclose any possible or existing COI. > > > > A COI is defined as having an immediate past (previous 6 months), > current or predetermined interest (being financial or other) in a New > gTLD Applicant or any other party that is involved in any manner > whatsoever with an applicant or the proposed registry. In determining > COI, reference should be made to Section 2.4.3.1 at page 84 of the AGB > which details some COI Guidelines. All members and RALOs will be > informed of any changes in the gTLD RG's COI policy. > > Please note, the specific RALO the member belongs to will be asked to > confirm this SOI to the best of its ALS representatives' knowledge, > information and belief. > > Both the SOI and RALO confirmation will be reviewed by the ALAC to vet > the declarations, with final approval to join the gTLD RG being > determined by ALAC vote. In some instances it may be necessary for the > ALAC to interview the member. SOIs of approved members of the gTLD RG > will be posted on the Working Group's wiki page. > > It is recognized that during the course of the new gTLD Objection > period, a COI possibly may occur and in such cases the member is > required to promptly disclose such COIs to the gTLD RG. In any event, > the SOI will be periodically reviewed by the gTLD RG, either monthly > or prior to each gTLD RG call (whichever is more frequent). > > > > Kind regards, > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD > > http://www.gih.com/ocl.html > > > > > > ** > > > > Regards, > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and > Nathalie Peregrine > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/81b5c61811.html --]]

1 0

Re: RECORDATORIO: Convocatoria de ingreso en At-Large nuevo Grupo de Revisi�n de gTLD
by devtee＠gmail.com May 7, 2012

May 7, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: RECORDATORIO: Convocatoria de ingreso en At-Large nuevo Grupo de Revisión de gTLD De: devtee(a)gmail.com Queridos todos, Sólo tener en cuenta que deseo ser incluido en el RG gTLD. Saludos cordiales, Dev Anand Teelucksingh El sábado, 5 de mayo de 2012 a 24:53, de la ICANN At-Large Personal <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> escribió: > Dear All, > > > > This is a friendly reminder that the RALOs have been asked to make their > recommendations for membership to the At-Large new gTLD Review Group to the > ALAC by Tuesday, 8 May 2012, so the ALAC can vote on these recommendations. > > > > The details of the requirements for membership are outlined in the message > below. > > > > Regards, > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie > Peregrine > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > From: ICANN At-Large Staff [mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 3:58 PM > To: alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > 'afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org'; apralo; Discussion for At-Large > Europe; 'LACRALO discussion list'; 'lac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org'; > NARALO Discussion List > Cc: 'Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond'; ICANN At-Large Staff > Subject: Call for Membership in At-Large new gTLD Review Group > > > > Dear All, > > > > The following call for membership of the At-Large new gTLD Review Group is > sent on behalf of Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC. > > > > ** > > > > Dear All, > > > > Background > > The At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) has approved the procedure by which > At-Large and ALAC can submit public comments on and file objections to new > gTLD applications as proposed by the At- > > Large new gTLD Working Group (ANgWG - > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs) This procedure forms > the basis of the work of the At-Large new gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG - > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+New+gTLD+Review+Group+W > orkspace# > <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+New+gTLD+Review+Group+ > Workspace> ). The gTLD RG needs to be in place and ready to work by the > date when applications are revealed and the comment period is set. > > > > Therefore, we are asking the RALOs to make their recommendations to the ALAC > by 8 May 2012, so the ALAC can vote on these recommendations. The RG should > be in place and up to speed by 14 May 2012 (being the approximate > commencement date of the 60 day Application Comment Period and the 7 month > Objection Period of the First Round). > > > > The gTLD RG is tasked with: > > * receiving the comments from At-Large either directly via email or > indirectly via RALO conference calls; > * creating/updating the new gTLD wiki comment pages; > * giving status updates of which new gTLD received comments each week; > * informing RALOs of deadlines for comments during the ACP, and for > objection statements during the objection period; > * reviewing the comments/objections received and giving ALAC its > recommendations on them; > * composing the final draft of the comments/objections agreed on in > close cooperation with their original authors. > > > > gTLD RG term > > The gTLD RG term period finishes with the end of the objection period of the > whole first round. > > > > gTLD RG Composition > > The ANgWG had determined that, at least initially, the gTLD RG be composed > of: > > - 2 members to be recommended by each of the RALOs > > - 1 member volunteer from each region > > All members being determined by the ALAC. > > Should the work load require adding people to the gTLD RG at a later time, > that decision can be made by the gTLD RG itself in consultation with the > ANgWG. > > > > gTLD RG Requirements > > Members of the gTLD RG are required to: > > A. understand the approved ALAC procedure > (https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Proposal+for+the+ALAC+ > to+submit+public+comments+on+and+file+possible+objections+to+new+gTLD+Applic > ations+2012+Workspace) by which At-Large and the ALAC can submit public > comments on and file objections to new gTLD applications > > B. be able to use the At-Large wiki to create/edit/update wiki pages > > C. be able to work in English > > D. have an understanding of ICANN's Applicant Guidebook (AGB; > http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/guidebook-full-11jan12-en.pdf) > which describes the application process for new gTLDs from start to finish > > E. be able to give a flexible commitment of time. It is estimated that on > the average, 2-3 hours per week would be needed and there would be bi-weekly > conference calls over the 7 month objection period. However, in such > processes, it is typical that the majority of both comments and objection > requests will occur towards the end of the 60 day comment period and 7 month > objection period, so the workload will likely be heavier at those times. > Presuming no changes to the Applicant Guidebook regarding comments and > objections, it is anticipated that the duration of the gTLD RG tasks will be > up to 1 year for this first round. > > F. make a Statement of Interest (SOI) in which they: > > a. declare that they have no Conflicts of Interest (COI); or > > b. disclose any possible or existing COI. > > > > A COI is defined as having an immediate past (previous 6 months), current or > predetermined interest (being financial or other) in a New gTLD Applicant or > any other party that is involved in any manner whatsoever with an applicant > or the proposed registry. In determining COI, reference should be made to > Section 2.4.3.1 at page 84 of the AGB which details some COI Guidelines. All > members and RALOs will be informed of any changes in the gTLD RG's COI > policy. > > Please note, the specific RALO the member belongs to will be asked to > confirm this SOI to the best of its ALS representatives' knowledge, > information and belief. > > Both the SOI and RALO confirmation will be reviewed by the ALAC to vet the > declarations, with final approval to join the gTLD RG being determined by > ALAC vote. In some instances it may be necessary for the ALAC to interview > the member. SOIs of approved members of the gTLD RG will be posted on the > Working Group's wiki page. > > It is recognized that during the course of the new gTLD Objection period, a > COI possibly may occur and in such cases the member is required to promptly > disclose such COIs to the gTLD RG. In any event, the SOI will be > periodically reviewed by the gTLD RG, either monthly or prior to each gTLD > RG call (whichever is more frequent). > > > > Kind regards, > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD > > http://www.gih.com/ocl.html > > > > > > ** > > > > Regards, > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie > Peregrine > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/393cb24fb7.html --]]

1 0

evento LACNIC XVII
by cintra.sooknanan＠gmail.com May 7, 2012

May 7, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: evento LACNIC XVII De: cintra.sooknanan(a)gmail.com Para su información ---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- Hola a todos, Sólo quiero informar que hoy en día el evento LACNIC XVII en Quito, Ecuador se ha iniciado. El orden del día se encuentra en: http://lacnic.net.uy/en/eventos/lacnicxvii/site/flip6.html y hay la difusión por Internet disponible en: http://lacnic.net.uy/en/eventos/lacnicxvii/ El Foro Latinoamericano de IPv6 comienza a las 14:00 (GMT -5). Este es el extracto de la orden del día: 14:00 - Apertura y resumen - Alejandro Acosta, Presidente del Foro 14:10 - Orador principal: Educar a IPv6 y desmontaje de IPv4 - Fred Baker (Cisco Systems) 15:00 - Seguridad en el primer salto IPv6 - Fernando Gont 3,30 a 4,00 pm - Pausa para el café 16:00 - IPv6 en el Ecuador - Augusto Espín (Ecuador Vice-Ministro de Telecomunicaciones) 16:30 - Resumen de la Semana de IPv6 - Antonio Moreiras (NIC.br) 16:50 - Estudio y análisis del estado actual del despliegue de IPv6 en Ecuador, ISP - Carlos Egas (Escuela Politcnica Nacional de Quito) 17:10 - RIPE 501 - Antonio Moreiras (NIC.br) 17:30 - IPv6 a nivel de gobierno y los resultados - Jordi Palet (Consulintel/6Deploy) _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/06c420064f.html --]]

1 0

Rv: Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] ICANN ANNOUNCEMENT: ICANN News Alert -- Security, Stability & Resiliency of the DNS Review Team (SSR RT) Public Webinars on Draft Report
by Juan Manuel Rojas May 7, 2012

May 7, 2012

Hola a todos! Reenvìo la informacion del Webinar sobre SSR RT que se realizará este 11 de mayo a las 11 UTC y las 19 UTC, si ustedes quieren participar solo envien un mail a alice.jansen(a)icann.org indicando la hora a la que pueden. Creo que es importante que participemos ya que estuvimos muy activos en ese tema como región. Abajo encontrarán el mail original JUAN MANUEL ROJAS Comunicador Social Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia Twitter: @JmanuRojas Unete a LACRALO: https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Date: 2012/5/4 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] ICANN ANNOUNCEMENT: ICANN News Alert -- Security, Stability & Resiliency of the DNS Review Team (SSR RT) Public Webinars on Draft Report To: "alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Dear All, Please find below an ICANN Announcement regarding the Security, Stability & Resiliency of the DNS Review Team (SSR RT) Public Webinars on the Draft Report. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, and Nathalie Peregrine ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> From: ICANN News Alert <communications(a)icann.org<mailto:communications@icann.org>> To: Matt Ashtiani <matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org<mailto:matt.ashtiani@icann.org>> Subject: ICANN News Alert -- Security, Stability & Resiliency of the DNS Review Team (SSR RT) Public Webinars on Draft Report [http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> News Alert http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-02may12-en.htm ________________________________ Security, Stability & Resiliency of the DNS Review Team (SSR RT) Public Webinars on Draft Report Friday, 11 May 2012 at 11:00 UTC and again at 19:00 UTC 2 May 2012 On 15 March 2012, the Security, Stability & Resiliency of the DNS Review Team (SSR RT), constituted under the Affirmation of Commitments<http://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/aoc/affirmation-of-commitments-30s…> (AoC), published its Draft Report and Recommendations<http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/ssr/draft-report-15mar12-en.pdf> [PDF, 2 MB] for public comment<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/ssrt-draft-report-15mar12-en.htm> to inform their work in producing a Final Report. Translations of the report are available: * العربية<http://www.icann.org/ar/about/aoc-review/ssr/draft-report-15mar12-ar.pdf> [PDF، 721 كيلو بايت] * 简体中文<http://www.icann.org/zh/about/aoc-review/ssr/draft-report-15mar12-zh.pdf> [PDF, 751 KB] * English<http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/ssr/draft-report-15mar12-en.pdf> [PDF, 2 MB] * Español<http://www.icann.org/es/about/aoc-review/ssr/draft-report-15mar12-es.pdf> [PDF, 683 KB] * Français<http://www.icann.org/fr/about/aoc-review/ssr/draft-report-15mar12-fr.pdf> [PDF, 821 KB] * Русский<http://www.icann.org/ru/about/aoc-review/ssr/draft-report-15mar12-ru.pdf> [PDF, 926 KB] Consistent with its initial announcement, the SSR Review Team now invites the Community to participate in a public webinar with a view to presenting its draft report and recommendations and soliciting the Community's feedback on its findings and conclusions. The public webinar will take place on Friday, 11 May 2012. Two sessions will be scheduled to accommodate different timezones i.e. at 11:00 UTC and 19:00 UTC. The sessions are expected to last 60 minutes. They are duplicates and will be conducted in English only. The meeting will be run in an Adobe Connect room with a slide presentation along with a dial-in conference bridge for audio. Participants will have the opportunity to ask questions at the end of each session. During the course of the webinar, questions may be submitted using the chat function of Adobe Connect. If you are not able to participate in either of the live sessions, the recording of the session will be made available shortly after the meeting. Staff is always available to answer any questions that you email to alice.jansen(a)icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>. In order to participate, please RSVP via email to alice.jansen(a)icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org> by Thursday, 10 May – 23:59 UTC to receive the call details. Please indicate which call you would like to join, Friday at 11.00 UTC or Friday at 19.00 UTC (to convert those times into your local time, see: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedform.html) We will send you an e-mail reminder before the event with log-in and dial-in details. Please DO NOT RSVP to any other ICANN staff members e-mail address. For more information on the Security, Stability & Resiliency of the DNS Review Team (SSR RT), please refer to: http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/ssr This message was sent to matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org<mailto:matt.ashtiani@icann.org> from: ICANN | 4676 Admiralty Way Suite 330 | Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6601 Email Marketing by [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> Manage Your Subscription <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=22532894&l=6333&s=RBLI&m=88…> _______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org

1 0

RECORDATORIO: Convocatoria de ingreso en At-Large nuevo Grupo de Revisi�n de gTLD
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org May 7, 2012

May 7, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: RECORDATORIO: Convocatoria de ingreso en At-Large nuevo Grupo de Revisión de gTLD De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Queridos todos, Este es un recordatorio de que las RALO ha pedido para hacer su recomendaciones para la adhesión a la At-Large nuevo Grupo de Revisión de gTLD a la ALAC por el Martes, 08 de mayo 2012, por lo que el ALAC puede votar en estas recomendaciones. Los detalles de los requisitos para ser miembro se describen en el mensaje a continuación. Un cordial saludo, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisela Gruber, y Nathalie Halcón peregrino El personal de ICANN política en apoyo de ALAC E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org~~V De: ICANN At-Large Personal [mailto: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org] Enviado el: Martes, 01 de mayo 2012 15:58 Para: alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; 'Afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org'; APRALO; de debate para At-Large Europa, "lista de discusión de LACRALO ';' lac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org '; NARALO Lista de Discusión CC: 'Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond ", de la ICANN At-Large Personal Asunto: Convocatoria de ingreso en At-Large nuevo Grupo de Revisión de gTLD Queridos todos, La siguiente llamada a la adhesión de la At-Large nuevo Grupo de Revisión de gTLD es enviado en nombre de Olivier Crpin-Leblond, Presidente de la ALAC. ** Queridos todos, Fondo El ComitÃ© Asesor At-Large (ALAC) ha aprobado el procedimiento por el cual At-Large y del ALAC puede presentar comentarios pÃºblicos sobre y presentar objeciones a la nueva solicitudes de gTLD propuesto por el At- Grande de los nuevos gTLD Grupo de Trabajo (ANgWG - https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs) la base de la labor de la At-Large de nuevos gTLD Grupo de RevisiÃ³n (RG gTLD - https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+New+gTLD+Review+Group+W orkspace # < https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+New+gTLD+Review+Group+ Espacio de trabajo>). El RG gTLD debe estar en su lugar y listo para trabajar por el la fecha cuando las aplicaciones se revelan y el perÃodo de comentarios se establece. Por lo tanto, estamos pidiendo a las RALO para hacer sus recomendaciones a la ALAC el 8 de mayo de 2012, por lo que el ALAC puede votar en estas recomendaciones. El RG debe estar en su lugar y al dÃa 14 de mayo de 2012 (siendo la aproximaciÃ³n fecha en que comenzarÃ¡ el periodo de solicitud de comentarios de 60 dÃas y el mes 7 ObjeciÃ³n de PerÃodo de la primera ronda). El RG gTLD se encarga de: * Recibir los comentarios de At-Large, ya sea directamente a travÃ©s de correo electrÃ³nico o indirectamente a travÃ©s de llamadas de conferencia RALO; * Crear / actualizar los nuevos gTLD pÃ¡ginas wiki comentario; * Dando actualizaciones de estado de los nuevos gTLD, que recibieron los comentarios de cada semana; * Informar RALO de los plazos para comentarios durante la ACP, y para las declaraciones de objeciÃ³n durante el perÃodo de objeciÃ³n; * Revisar los comentarios / recibido objeciones y dando su ALAC recomendaciones sobre Ã©stos; * Que componen el proyecto final de las observaciones y objeciones acordado en una cooperaciÃ³n estrecha con sus autores originales. RG plazo de gTLD El perÃodo de RG plazo gTLD termina con el final del perÃodo de oposiciÃ³n de la primera ronda conjunto. ComposiciÃ³n RG gTLD El ANgWG habÃa determinado que, al menos inicialmente, el RG gTLD se compondrÃ¡ de: - 2 miembros que se recomienda por cada una de las RALO - 1 miembro voluntario de cada regiÃ³n Todos los miembros estÃ¡n determinados por el ALAC. Si la carga de trabajo requieren la adiciÃ³n de la gente a la RG gTLD en un momento posterior, que la decisiÃ³n puede ser tomada por la RG gTLD sÃ en consulta con el ANgWG. Requisitos de gTLD RG Los miembros de la RG gTLD estÃ¡n obligados a: A. entender el procedimiento aprobado por ALAC ( https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Proposal+for+the+ALAC+ a + + + public enviar comentarios + el + y + archivo + posible + objeciones + a + nuevo + + gTLD Aplic ciones 2012 + Ã¡rea de trabajo) por el cual At-Large y el ALAC puede enviar pÃºblica comentarios y objeciones sobre los archivos a las nuevas solicitudes de gTLD B. poder utilizar el wiki de At-Large para crear / editar / actualizar las pÃ¡ginas wiki C.ser capaz de trabajar en InglÃ©s D. tener una comprensiÃ³n de la GuÃa del solicitante de la ICANN (AGB; http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/guidebook-full-11jan12-en.pdf) que describe el proceso de solicitud para los nuevos gTLD de principio a fin E. poder dar un compromiso flexible de la jornada. Se estima que en la media, 2-3 horas por semana serÃa necesario y no habrÃa bisemanal llamadas de conferencia durante el perÃodo de objeciÃ³n de 7 meses. Sin embargo, en tales procesos, es tÃpico que la mayorÃa de los dos comentarios y objeciÃ³n las solicitudes se producirÃ¡ a finales del perÃodo de 60 dÃas y 7 meses perÃodo de objeciones, por lo que la carga de trabajo es probable que sea mÃ¡s pesado en esos momentos. Suponiendo que no hay cambios en la GuÃa del solicitante con respecto a los comentarios y objeciones, se prevÃ© que la duraciÃ³n de las tareas RG gTLD serÃ¡ hasta 1 aÃ±o para esta primera ronda. F. hacer una DeclaraciÃ³n de InterÃ©s (SOI) en el que: una. declaran que no tienen ningÃºn conflicto de intereses (COI), o b. revelar cualquier COI posible o existente. Un COI se define por tener un pasado inmediato (Ãºltimos 6 meses), actual o interÃ©s predeterminado (que es financiera o de otro tipo) en un solicitante de nuevos gTLD o cualquier otra parte que interviene en forma alguna con el solicitante o el registro propuesto. En la determinaciÃ³n de CDI, se debe hacer referencia a SecciÃ³n 2.4.3.1 en la pÃ¡gina 84 de la AGB, que detalla algunas directrices COI. Todo miembros y las RALOs serÃ¡n informados de cualquier cambio en la COI de la RG gTLD polÃtica. Tenga en cuenta que la RALO especÃfica el miembro pertenece a se le pedirÃ¡ que confirmar esta SOI para el mejor conocimiento de su representantes ALS, saber y entender. Tanto el SOI y la confirmaciÃ³n de RALO serÃ¡ revisado por el ALAC para investigar la declaraciones, con la aprobaciÃ³n final para unirse a la RG gTLD estÃ¡ determinado por ALAC voto. En algunos casos puede ser necesario para el ALAC para entrevistar el miembro. IOS de los miembros autorizados de la RG gTLD se publicarÃ¡n en el PÃ¡gina del Grupo de Trabajo de wiki. Se reconoce que durante el curso del perÃodo de Protesta nuevo gTLD, una COI posiblemente se puede producir y en tales casos el miembro se requiere con prontitud divulgar tales COIs a la RG gTLD.En cualquier caso, el SOI serÃ¡ revisado periÃ³dicamente por la RG gTLD, ya sea mensual o antes de cada gTLD RG llamada (lo que es mÃ¡s frecuente). Saludos cordiales, Olivier MJ Crpin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html ** Un cordial saludo, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisela Gruber, y Nathalie HalcÃ³n peregrino El personal de ICANN polÃtica en apoyo de ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/09bae7bf37.html --]]

2 1

Escuelas y organizaciones: propuesta de At-Large Declaraci�n de la Visi�n
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org May 4, 2012

May 4, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Escuelas y organizaciones: propuesta de At-Large Declaración de la Visión De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Queridos todos, El ALAC mejoras Revisión del Informe Final Grupo de Trabajo incluye una recomendación para que "El ALAC debería desarrollar procesos de planificación estratégica y operativa (Incluidos los criterios de desempeño e información de costos) como parte de la ICANN proceso de planificación. "(Recomendación N º 5 < https://community.icann.org/display/Improve/Recommendation+5> Como parte de la aplicación de esta recomendación, el At-Large Mejoras en la ejecución del trabajo del equipo C creó un elemento de acción para "Articular ALAC y At-Large de la visión y misión." Las mejoras de At-Large grupo de trabajo desarrolló una propuesta de At-Large Visión Declaración durante su reunión en la 43 ª reunión de ICANN en Costa Rica. La propuesta de At-Large Declaración de la Visión es: .La comunidad de ALAC y At Large-cataliza y facilita la la participación incluyente y significativa de los usuarios finales de Internet en todo el mundo, agregados a su entrada y aporta su voz a tener en todos los asuntos de la ICANN. Olivier Crepin-Leblond, Presidente de la ALAC, y Cheryl Langdon-Orr, presidente de las mejoras de At-Large grupo de trabajo, han delineado los próximos pasos siguientes para la Declaración de la Visión propuesta de At-Large: . 4-17 mayo, 2012 - Esta propuesta de At-Large declaración de visión es abierta para comentarios entre 4 a 17 mayo 2012. Por favor, use la funciÃ³n de comentarios en este pÃ¡gina wiki < https://community.icann.org/x/esPbAQ> EnvÃe sus comentarios a At-Large Personal en: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. . 21 de mayo 2012 - Las mejoras de At-Large grupo de trabajo revisarÃ¡ y incorporar las observaciones recibidas durante su reuniÃ³n del 21 de mayo. . 22 de mayo 2012 - El ALAC revisarÃ¡n la propuesta de At-Large VisiÃ³n DeclaraciÃ³n durante su reuniÃ³n de 22 de mayo de ALAC y el voto sea a que lo ratifiquen. Un cordial saludo, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisela Gruber, y Nathalie HalcÃ³n peregrino El personal de ICANN polÃtica en apoyo de ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6d58933322.html --]]

1 0

Re: Di�logo Regional de Banda Ancha (CEPAL) - Comisi�n Econ�mica para Am�rica Latina y el Caribe
by andrespiazza＠gmail.com May 4, 2012

May 4, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Diálogo Regional de Banda Ancha (CEPAL) - Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe De: andrespiazza(a)gmail.com Nosotros (LACNIC), están trabajando en estrecha colaboración con la CEPAL en esta materia. Fernando Rojas será uno de los oradores de nuestra reunión en Quito, el próximo semanas. http://lacnic.net/en/eventos/lacnicxvii/~~V La participación a distancia está disponible. Andrs 04/05/2012 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > Read and see: > > http://www.eclac.org/cgi-bin/getProd.asp?xml=/socinfo/noticias/noticias/9/4… > > > - Carlton > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > * Andres Piazza * www.andrespiazza.com _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c1d705c5df.html --]]

1 0

Di�logo Regional de Banda Ancha (CEPAL) - Comisi�n Econ�mica para Am�rica Latina y el Caribe
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com May 4, 2012

May 4, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Diálogo Regional de Banda Ancha (CEPAL) - Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Lea y vea: - Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos * ============================= _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f20326d6a8.html --]]

1 0

Discurso de la se�ora Reding a la APD europeas
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com May 3, 2012

May 3, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Discurso de la señora Reding a la APD europeas De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com ... En su conferencia de primavera. Ella se refirió a algunas cuestiones pertinentes a la nueva iniciativa de reforma de la UE sobre protección de datos de privacidad, los objetivos, la percepción de los cambios en el régimen regulatorio y el rol de la Europea Junta de Protección de Datos. [El antiguo artículo 29 Grupo de Trabajo]. Ella quiere ver la iniciativa de reforma aprobada en 2013. Véase el discurso aquí: - Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos * ============================= _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/868948cf6f.html --]]

1 0

Resultados de las Elecciones de la Secretar�a de LACRALO t�rmino de un a�o de 04 de mayo 2012
by devtee＠gmail.com May 3, 2012

May 3, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Resultados de las Elecciones de la Secretaría de LACRALO término de un año de 04 de mayo 2012 De: devtee(a)gmail.com Queridos todos, La votación en línea para elegir a la Secretaría de LACRALO por un período de un año del 4 de mayo 2012 ha concluido y sigue los resultados como como: 31 de un total de 40 ALS en LACRALO participaron en la elección, que es 77,5% del electorado. Los resultados BigPulse de los votos emitidos por cada votante puede ver en https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=2392ZDHAu9k7q64VaWfq7pJw Los votos para los candidatos han sido contabilizados según la regla 12.9 de la RP (cada voto se pondera con un coeficiente de país), y el resultado por el candidato de la votación ponderado es como sigue: Roosevelt Rey (BANGO): 13,32% Sylvia Herlein-Leite: 57,49% Usted puede encontrar la hoja de cálculo que muestra el cálculo del voto ponderado en el https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ao5dV8HXW3JzdFM0SUV4UUI0N3NTOV… o http://db.tt/4h1WyqAR Con 57,49%, Sylvia Herlein-Leite ha sido elegido como el LACRALO Secretaría por un período de un año 04 de mayo 2012. Un agradecimiento especial a Roosevelt y felicitaciones a Sylvia Herlein-Leite. Saludos cordiales, Dev Anand Teelucksingh LACRALO Secretaría -------------------------------------------------- ---- Estimados miembros de LACRALO, El voto en línea párr Elegir al estilo de la Secretaría de LACRALO Por Un ao DESDE El 4 de Mayo del 2012 ha concluído y los Resultados hijo de los Siguientes: 31 de 40 ALS en LACRALO participaron en la eleccin, los cuales representan el 77,5% del electorado. Los Resultados de los votos de BigPulse Por Cada personaje Que voto pueden en el verso https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=2392ZDHAu9k7q64VaWfq7pJw Los votos de los Candidatos Han Sido computados de acuerdo al estilo de Regla 12.9 de las Reglas de Procedure (Cada voto es valorado de acuerdo Por una ONU Coeficiente PAS), y El Resultado pÃ¡rr El candidato de acuerdo al voto valorado Es El Siguiente: Roosevelt Rey (BANGO): 13,32% Sylvia Herlein-Leite: 57,49% You can ENCONTRAR EL hoja de cÃ¡lculo mostrando El calculo del voto en https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ao5dV8HXW3JzdFM0SUV4UUI0N3NTOV… o http://db.tt/4h1WyqAR Con 57,49%, Sylvia Herlein-Leite ha Sido Elegida Como la SecretarÃa de LACRALO Por Un ao empezando El 4 de Mayo del 2012. Mi Agradecimiento especial y un Roosevelt felicitaciones uno Sylvia Herlein-Leite. Saludos cordiales, Dev Anand Teelucksingh LACRALO SecretarÃa _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/09ffa7b460.html --]]

4 3

Re: Resultados de la Elecci�n de la Secretar�a de LACRALO t�rmino de un a�o de 04 de mayo 2012
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org May 3, 2012

May 3, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados de la Elección de la Secretaría de LACRALO término de un año de 04 de mayo 2012 De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Querida Silvia, Felicidades por su elección a la Secretaría de LACRALO de At-Large Personal! Estamos deseando trabajar con usted en su nueva posición de LACRALO Secretaría! Un cordial saludo, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisela Gruber, y Nathalie Halcón peregrino El personal de ICANN política en apoyo de ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org ----- Mensaje original ----- De: lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Dev Anand Teelucksingh Enviado el: Martes, 01 de mayo 2012 17:53 Para: lista de discusión de LACRALO Asunto: [lac-discuss-es] Resultados de la Elección de la Secretaría de LACRALO plazo de un año a partir de 04 de mayo 2012 Queridos todos, La votación en línea para elegir a la Secretaría de LACRALO por un período de un año a partir 04 de mayo 2012 ha concluido y sigue los resultados como como: 31 de un total de 40 ALS en LACRALO participaron en la elección, que es 77,5% del electorado. Los resultados BigPulse de los votos emitidos por cada votante puede ver en https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=2392ZDHAu9k7q64VaWfq7pJw Los votos para los candidatos han sido contabilizados según la regla 12.9 de la ROP (Cada voto se pondera con un coeficiente de país), y el resultado para el candidato del voto ponderado es como sigue: Roosevelt Rey (BANGO): 13,32% Sylvia Herlein-Leite: 57,49% Usted puede encontrar la hoja de cÃ¡lculo que muestra el cÃ¡lculo del voto ponderado en el https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ao5dV8HXW3JzdFM0SUV4UUI0N3NTOVh zT05TUnhIeEE o http://db.tt/4h1WyqAR Con 57,49%, Sylvia Herlein-Leite ha sido elegido como el LACRALO SecretarÃa por un perÃodo de un aÃ±o 04 de mayo 2012. Un agradecimiento especial a Roosevelt y felicitaciones a Sylvia Herlein-Leite. Saludos cordiales, Dev Anand Teelucksingh LACRALO SecretarÃa -------------------------------------------------- ---- Estimados miembros de LACRALO, El voto en lÃnea pÃ¡rr Elegir al estilo de la SecretarÃa de LACRALO Por Un ao Desde El 4 de Mayo del 2012 ha concluÃdo y los Resultados hijo de los Siguientes: 31 de 40 ALS en LACRALO participaron en la eleccin, los cuales representan el 77,5% del electorado. Los Resultados de los votos de BigPulse Por Cada personaje Que voto pueden en el verso https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=2392ZDHAu9k7q64VaWfq7pJw Los votos de los Candidatos Han Sido computados de acuerdo al estilo de Regla 12.9 de las Reglas de Procedure (Cada voto es valorado de acuerdo la ONU Coeficiente Por PAS), y El Resultado pÃ¡rr El candidato de acuerdo al voto valorado Es El Siguiente: Roosevelt Rey (BANGO): 13,32% Sylvia Herlein-Leite: 57,49% You can ENCONTRAR EL hoja de cÃ¡lculo mostrando El calculo del voto en https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ao5dV8HXW3JzdFM0SUV4UUI0N3NTOVh zT05TUnhIeEE o http://db.tt/4h1WyqAR Con 57,49%, Sylvia Herlein-Leite ha Sido Elegida Como SecretarÃa de LACRALO Por Un ao empezando El 4 de Mayo del 2012. Mi Agradecimiento especial y un Roosevelt felicitaciones uno de Sylvia Herlein-Leite. Saludos cordiales, Dev Anand Teelucksingh LACRALO SecretarÃa _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e26af7a89a.html --]]

3 2

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Resultados Electorales Comentarios
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com May 2, 2012

May 2, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados Electorales Comentarios De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Estimado José A.: Veo un intento sincero para que sea equilibrada, pero lamentablemente aquí, lo haré excepto yo. Sería bueno si su advertencia de no criticar es compartida por todos. Pero la evidencia está en contra de usted. Y tal vez sería necesario a intervenir más a menudo con esta lección. Definitivamente malinterpretar mis palabras con respecto a la profesión de abogado. Nada de lo que dijo "menospreciado" la profesión. Por el contrario, expresaron su preocupación sobre la capacidad de * * un miembro en el contexto del profundo conocimiento los procedimientos de que suele atribuirse a los miembros de la profesión jurídica. La mía fue una respuesta directa a las publicaciones en el hilo de correo electrónico. * ** En mi * opinión, la referencia a la elección no caso de San José mostró una insuficiencia demostrable de que el escritor entender las reglas básicas de procedimiento. Y a partir de la evidencia, no es el único en este sentido. Sí, podría haber repetido el nombre del contribuyente, pero está ahí ya.Tal vez yo podría haber dicho algo como que no contrataría a - o recomendar la contratación - que arregle un billete de cruzar la calle! Pero que sería descortés. Es una elección. Por último, presidió las elecciones. Las normas que le ayuden a reconocer todos los movimientos, así como el proponente de las mociones. Así que, usted sabe - o debería saber! - La identidad del miembro que propuso llamar a elecciones en SJO. Me atrevería a decir que no debería estar entre los confundidos. He optado por utilizar "parlamentario" lenguaje de aquÃ. Debido a que todos GA los asistentes que - o deberÃa - por ahora sabemos los nombres de las personas que han puesto relacionadas con las elecciones movimientos en SJO. Sin embargo, si a su juicio se lleva la necesidad de una mayor claridad, es muy buena idea ampliar mis comentarios y compartir el nombre del miembro. Saludos cordiales, - Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A MÃ³vil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, PlanificaciÃ³n, Gobierno, EvaluaciÃ³n y plazos * ============================= On Wed, 2 de mayo de 2012 a las 5:35 pm, JosFrancisco Arce < > josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com escribiÃ³: > Dear Carlton: with all due respect, I want to share my vision with you. > > > There is a saying in English: 'Where ignorance is bliss, it is folly to be > wise'. > > There is another one: "the law is too important to leave to lawyers". > > I do not know their equivalencies in Spanish and a word by word translation > would be inadequate. Our LACRALO machine translation will be crude, at > best. Nevertheless, I shall not attempt one here. > > We have always known that there is a reservoir of ignorance of LACRALO > > rules. More to point, ignorance of how they apply is really acute. The sad > fact is this ignorance is demonstrated by some of our colleagues who, by > virtue of their profession, one would least expect. > > I do not like saying, because is better speak or write directly, so in > this way people can understand better what you are trying to say, even more > if many of them do not speak English. > > I see your words as a disparagement of others or for some profession > (there is a common mistake in people and > > that is to put forward a profession by the person), and that is not the > vision that has to have a leader of the region, because we are all pairs, > some people has more experience than others, some work more than others, > some of them find it more difficult than others, and the Key is not to > criticize, the key is to build cooperative and collaborative dialogues. > > We have to ask ourselves What we did to be at this point? What we did to > fix it? What we plan to overcome the difficulties? > > > Without any fear of contradiction I now make this declaration: Any LACRALO > election in San Jose would have been illegal for lack of proper notice. > > In my part of the world, notice is a pre-requisite for democratic > elections. This is because they are processes, not just one event. Take any > junta of the kind we witness time and again in the LAC region and I can > demonstrate that even they know this. > > Your part of the world is my part of the world too (we have only one > world). And without fear I say that I share with you the meaning of > democratic. > > > I know for certain that our democratically-elected friend, Hugo, knows > this. [To the chagrin of his opponents! :-)] > > Notice typically has three elements; time, duration and content. A > violation of any element condemns the notice. > > The attempt to call an immediate LACRALO election at San Jose by invoking > the full UNGA Rules as authority [and allowed under LACRALO rules!] would > have also been in violation. > > Not only for the violation of the notice period. But the process by which > the voting event would have been taken on the agenda would not have saved > the day. That would have had one effect, to add the matter to the agenda. > A notice period plus candidates are still necessary for the election. > > In addition to all that, the member on whose behalf the attempt to hasten > the election is being executed VOLUNTARILY withdrew HIS element of notice > from the Agenda. > > In other words, the member, maybe unwittingly, fouled his own pool. Those > of us opposed to the barefaced violation of the rules would not have to do > anything more. > > Dear Carlton I would like to ask you to mention manes in your lines. > Because your lines bring more confusion than clarification. We should speak > clear, because this is not the right way to refer to someone. This is not > the communication that I want for the region. A person could say anything, > with name and surname, and if there is with respect there is nothing to say. > > > So now, let's speak to the concerns for poor use of ICANN funds raised in > this thread. Here is a phrase that works here: 'La historia me absolvera'. > > I do not share your opinion about the poor use of IANN funds. For me the > all events were successful, but is only my personal view. And I remember > your word in Skype chat of ALAC saying after the fiasco talking about the > GA, be careful because we create what we say and you are part of that. I > read only negative word in your last email, I read many, but few with > initiatives. > > Is not only important to know how to do something, but more important is > know how to teach. To this I invite you all Carlos Aguirre, Carlton, Vanda, > Alejandro, the region need your support, your experience. > > > Most of you would probably not know but ever since 2006, there has been an > enduring nucleus of opposition for ICANN travel support to the At-Large > attending ICANN meetings. This opposition is largely from North America, > among persons associated with the placeholder ALAC the new RALO included > structure replaced. > > The most corrosive criticism alleged that At-Large participants who > received travel support for ICANN meetings were really tourists first. > Their involvement in the At-Large agenda at the meetings was secondary. > > This criticism was leveled at the At-Large in general but to my mind, > sharply directed at members from LAC and Africa. > > Several recorded observations placed members from LACRALO at the centre of > these criticisms. To be brutally frank, one of our members was the THE > poster boy for this abuse. > > I share your opinion regarding tourist and is one of my most important > concern, and we have to work together to find the way to overcome this. > > Again, say names are the right way to express, and you give others the > opportunity to replicate. > > > I have, in good nature, endured severe personal criticism because I opposed > any attempt to publicly censure those deemed guilty. Some of my colleagues > interpreted my opposition as protecting a certain LACRALO member - who > shall remain nameless here. More thoughtful others recognized it for what > it was; defense of a principle rather than personalities. > > All that aside, this member has enjoyed my support for other At-large > duties. Yes, you guessed right. This member actually solicited my support > for other positions. And yes, because of the larger strategic interests, I > gave it. > > By now, some of you might have also guessed my loathing for hypocrisy and > all its works. One is supposed to celebrate conversion, as it were, to 'the > one true faith'. At least, that is the Christian tradition. > > Count me as a reliable skeptic. Because to be frank, this latest conversion > we witness is really over the top. It is nothing more than a rancid > example of enlightened self-interest. > > That is the word. > > > I do not want you take this personally, because I do not support Jose > OvidioŽs words. My commitment is with the region. > > My finally message is be careful on what we say, because words are > power, begin to think as a group, that is the key for the growth of the > region. > > > Dear Carlton, I really appreciate your lines, because sharing our vision > is the way to create the LACRALO that we all want. > > My admiration for your work > > > > Kind Regards > > > > José Arce.- > > > > > 2012/5/2 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > >> Bro Carlos: >> You are right on fact as well as strategy. I cannot disagree with you >> here. >> >> With the greatest respect and affection. >> >> - Carlton >> >> ============================== >> Carlton A Samuels >> Mobile: 876-818-1799 >> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* >> ============================= >> >> >> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:57 PM, carlos dionisio aguirre < >> carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> > My Dear Bro. We have coincidence in almost 90% of your words. I know >> what >> > do you want to say, I feel and live like you in many things, And you >> know >> > that my position is the true that I believe, more than some strategies >> or >> > diferences in the political positions. >> > But when is needed to be clear, sometimes we must be rude. I think is >> this >> > in where our positions dont find coincidence. Your words were very >> strong, >> > but without names, and I felt that we needed names also in your words. >> We >> > need to start to say names. Because in a contrary case all in the region >> > are involved, and many of them being not guilty for that. It my humble >> > thought. >> > >> > My permanent enormous affectionate >> > >> > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre >> > NCA GNSO Council - ICANN >> > former ALAC member by LACRALO >> > Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios >> > Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - >> > *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 >> > http://ar.ageiadensi.org >> > >> > >> > > From: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com >> > > Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 13:12:21 -0500 >> > > To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Election Results Comments >> > >> > > >> > > There is a saying in English: 'Where ignorance is bliss, it is folly >> to >> > be >> > > wise'. >> > > >> > > There is another one: "the law is too important to leave to lawyers". >> > > >> > > I do not know their equivalencies in Spanish and a word by word >> > translation >> > > would be inadequate. Our LACRALO machine translation will be crude, at >> > > best. Nevertheless, I shall not attempt one here. >> > > >> > > We have always know that there is a reservoir of ignorance of LACRALO >> > > rules. More to point, ignorance of how they apply is really acute. The >> > sad >> > > fact is this ignorance is demonstrated by some of our colleagues who, >> by >> > > virtue of their profession, one would least expect. >> > > >> > > Without any fear of contradiction I now make this declaration: Any >> > LACRALO >> > > election in San Jose would have been illegal for lack of proper >> notice. >> > > >> > > In my part of the world, notice is a pre-requisite for democratic >> > > elections. This is because they are processes, not just one event. >> Take >> > any >> > > junta of the kind we witness time and again in the LAC region and I >> can >> > > demonstrate that even they know this. >> > > >> > > I know for certain that our democratically-elected friend, Hugo, knows >> > > this. [To the chagrin of his opponents! :-)] >> > > >> > > Notice typically has three elements; time, duration and content. A >> > > violation of any element condemns the notice. >> > > >> > > The attempt to call an immediate LACRALO election at San Jose by >> invoking >> > > the full UNGA Rules as authority [and allowed under LACRALO rules!] >> would >> > > have also been in violation. >> > > >> > > Not only for the violation of the notice period. But the process by >> which >> > > the voting event would have been taken on the agenda would not have >> saved >> > > the day. That would have had one effect, to add the matter to the >> agenda. >> > > A notice period plus candidates are still necessary for the election. >> > > >> > > In addition to all that, the member on whose behalf the attempt to >> hasten >> > > the election is being executed VOLUNTARILY withdrew HIS element of >> notice >> > > from the Agenda. >> > > >> > > In other words, the member, maybe unwittingly, fouled his own pool. >> Those >> > > of us opposed to the barefaced violation of the rules would not have >> to >> > do >> > > anything more. >> > > >> > > So now, let's speak to the concerns for poor use of ICANN funds >> raised in >> > > this thread. Here is a phrase that works here: 'La historia me >> > absolvera'. >> > > >> > > Most of you would probably not know but ever since 2006, there has >> been >> > an >> > > enduring nucleus of opposition for ICANN travel support to the >> At-Large >> > > attending ICANN meetings. This opposition is largely from North >> America, >> > > among persons associated with the placeholder ALAC the new RALO >> included >> > > structure replaced. >> > > >> > > The most corrosive criticism alleged that At-Large participants who >> > > received travel support for ICANN meetings were really tourists first. >> > > Their involvement in the At-Large agenda at the meetings was >> secondary. >> > > >> > > This criticism was leveled at the At-Large in general but to my mind, >> > > sharply directed at members from LAC and Africa. >> > > >> > > Several recorded observations placed members from LACRALO at the >> centre >> > of >> > > these criticisms. To be brutally frank, one of our members was the THE >> > > poster boy for this abuse. >> > > >> > > I have, in good nature, endured severe personal criticism because I >> > opposed >> > > any attempt to publicly censure those deemed guilty. Some of my >> > colleagues >> > > interpreted my opposition as protecting a certain LACRALO member - who >> > > shall remain nameless here. More thoughtful others recognized it for >> what >> > > it was; defense of a principle rather than personalities. >> > > >> > > All that aside, this member has enjoyed my support for other At-large >> > > duties. Yes, you guessed right. This member actually solicited my >> support >> > > for other positions. And yes, because of the larger strategic >> interests, >> > I >> > > gave it. >> > > >> > > By now, some of you might have also guessed my loathing for hypocrisy >> and >> > > all its works. One is supposed to celebrate conversion, as it were, to >> > 'the >> > > one true faith'. At least, that is the Christian tradition. >> > > >> > > Count me as a reliable skeptic. Because to be frank, this latest >> > conversion >> > > we witness is really over the top. It is nothing more than a rancid >> > > example of enlightened self-interest. >> > > >> > > That is the word. >> > > >> > > - Carlton Samuels >> > > >> > > ============================== >> > > Carlton A Samuels >> > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 >> > > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* >> > >> > > ============================= >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:18 PM, <cveraq(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] >> > > > >> > > > Subject: Re: =? Windows-1252? Q? Resultados_de_la_Elecci = F3n_de_? >> == >> > > > Windows-1252? Q? = 09L = 09a_Secretar = EDa_de_LACRALO_t = >> > E9rmino_de_un_? >> > > > == Windows-1252? Q? A = F1o_ = 09de_04_de_ = 09mayo_2012 ? = >> > > > From: cveraq(a)gmail.com >> > > > >> > > > Incredible .. And those are the people demanding commitment and >> demand >> > .. >> > > > # Prohibidoolvidar >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > While we are not transparent, conscious of our responsibilities and >> > > > understand that not everything revolves around our personal >> interests, >> > the >> > > > region will continue dependent. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Today we strongly believe in a good team without conditions. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Carlos Vera >> > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> > > > From: "Alberto Soto" <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> >> > > > Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 00:11:41 >> > > > To: <salgueiro.jo(a)gmail.com> ; <cveraq(a)gmail.com> ; 'LACRALO >> Spanish' >> > < >> > > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >> > > > Cc: <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >> > > > Subject: RE: [lac-discuss-en] Results of the choice of l >> > > > trmino LACRALO to secrete a year of 04 >> > > > May 2012 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > I agree with the view of the precious time lost in Costa Rica, in >> > addition >> > > > ICANN payment of money, just for personal interests that harm us >> > > > all. A general assembly can not be lost completely only two >> > > > people present. ICANN is a lot of money and OUR, and long >> > > > staff of each of us invested. >> > > > Best Regards >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Alberto Soto >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> > > > From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > > [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf >> Of >> > > > Jose >> > > > Ovidio Salgueiro A. >> > > > Posted on: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 11:09 pm >> > > > To: cveraq(a)gmail.com; LACRALO Espaol >> > > > CC: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Results of the election of the >> secrete of >> > > > LACRALO trmino of one year from May 4, 2012 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Congratulations to Sylvia by Josy strong result. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > This leads me to think that the ridiculous we did in the Assembly in >> > San >> > > > Josfue unnecessary since this result was the same as hubiramos >> > > > all obtained. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > The Caribbean was not able or San Josni now to put a candidate with >> the >> > > > capacity for a votacin important. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > I hope that now if you can work as expected in our organization >> > > > and without the narrow interests that previously demonstrated >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > JosSalgueiro >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Sent from my BlackBerry Movistar >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > lac-discuss-en mailing list >> > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> lac-discuss-en mailing list >> lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en >> > > > > -- > Ab. Arce, Jose Francisco > + 54 9 351 6788920 > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ad85c34511.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Resultados Electorales Comentarios
by josefranciscoarce＠gmail.com May 2, 2012

May 2, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados Electorales Comentarios De: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com Querido Carlton: con todo respeto, quiero compartir mi visión con usted. Hay un dicho en Inglés: "Cuando la ignorancia es felicidad, es una locura para ser sabios '. No hay otra: "la ley es demasiado importante para dejarla a los abogados". No sé sus equivalencias en español y una palabra por la traducción de una palabra sería insuficiente. Nuestra traducción automática LACRALO será crudo, a mejor. Sin embargo, no voy a intentar una aquí. Siempre hemos sabido que hay una reserva de la ignorancia de LACRALO reglas. Más al punto, el desconocimiento de cómo se aplican es muy aguda. El triste hecho es que esta ignorancia se demuestra en algunos de nuestros colegas que, por virtud de su profesión, uno menos lo espera. No me gusta decir, porque es mejor hablar o escribir directamente, por lo que en de esta manera la gente puede entender mejor lo que estás tratando de decir, aún más si muchos de ellos no hablan Inglés. Veo sus palabras como un menosprecio de otros, o por alguna profesión (no Es un error común en las personas y que es proponer una profesión de la persona), y que no es el visión que tiene que tener un líder de la región, porque todos somos pares, algunas personas tiene más experiencia que otros, algunos trabajos más que otros, algunos de ellos les resulta más difícil que otros, y la clave no es critican, la clave es la construcción de diálogos de cooperación y colaboración. Tenemos que preguntarnos qué hemos hecho para estar en este momento? Â¿QuÃ© hemos hecho para arreglarlo? Lo que va a superar las dificultades? Sin ningÃºn temor a la contradicciÃ³n que ahora hacen esta declaraciÃ³n: Cualquier LACRALO las elecciones en San JosÃ© hubiera sido ilegal por falta de la debida notificaciÃ³n. En mi parte del mundo, la notificaciÃ³n es un requisito previo para la democracia las elecciones. Esto se debe a que son procesos, no sÃ³lo un evento. Tome cualquier junta de la clase somos testigos de una y otra vez en la regiÃ³n de AmÃ©rica Latina y puedo demostrar que ni siquiera ellos lo saben. Su parte del mundo es mi parte del mundo tambiÃ©n (sÃ³lo tenemos una mundo).Y sin temor digo que quiero compartir con ustedes el significado de democrÃ¡tico. SÃ© a ciencia cierta que nuestro elegido democrÃ¡ticamente amigo, Hugo, sabe esto. [Para disgusto de sus oponentes! :-)] Aviso general consta de tres elementos, el tiempo, duraciÃ³n y contenido. A violaciÃ³n de cualquier elemento de condena de la notificaciÃ³n. El intento de convocar a elecciones LACRALO inmediato en San JosÃ© mediante la invocaciÃ³n de las reglas completas AGNU como autoridad [y permitido por las reglas de LACRALO!] lo harÃa TambiÃ©n ha habido una violaciÃ³n. No sÃ³lo por la violaciÃ³n del plazo de preaviso. Sin embargo, el proceso mediante el cual el caso de la votaciÃ³n que se han tomado en la agenda no se ha guardado el dÃa. Eso habrÃa tenido un efecto, para aÃ±adir el asunto al orden del dÃa. Un perÃodo de notificaciÃ³n, mÃ¡s los candidatos siguen siendo necesarios para la elecciÃ³n. AdemÃ¡s de todo esto, el miembro en cuyo nombre el intento de acelerar la la elecciÃ³n se estÃ¡ ejecutando retirÃ³ voluntariamente su elemento de aviso del orden del dÃa. En otras palabras, el miembro, tal vez sin darse cuenta, engatusÃ³ a su propia piscina. Aquellos que nos oponemos a la violaciÃ³n descarada de las normas no tendrÃa que hacer nada mÃ¡s. Querido Carlton me gustarÃa pedirle que mencione melenas en sus lÃneas. Debido a que sus lÃneas de traer mÃ¡s confusiÃ³n que aclaraciÃ³n. Debemos hablar claro, porque este no es el camino correcto para referirse a alguien. Esto no es la comunicaciÃ³n que quiero para la regiÃ³n. Una persona podÃa decir nada, con nombre y apellido, y si no es con respecto no hay nada que decir. AsÃ que ahora, vamos a hablar con la preocupaciÃ³n por el mal uso de los fondos de la ICANN se plantean en este hilo. AquÃ hay una frase que trabaja aquÃ: "La historia me absolverÃ¡". No comparto tu opiniÃ³n sobre el mal uso de los fondos de Iann. Para mÃ, el todos los eventos fueron exitosos, pero es sÃ³lo mi opiniÃ³n personal. Y recuerdo tu palabra en el chat de Skype de ALAC diciendo despuÃ©s del fiasco de hablar de la GA, tenga cuidado porque creemos lo que decimos y que son parte de eso. Yo de sÃ³lo lectura palabra negativa en su Ãºltimo correo electrÃ³nico, he leÃdo muchos, pero pocos con iniciativas. No sÃ³lo es importante saber cÃ³mo hacer algo, pero lo mÃ¡s importante es saben cÃ³mo enseÃ±ar. Para ello invito a todos Carlos Aguirre, Carlton, Vanda, Alejandro, la regiÃ³n necesita su apoyo, su experiencia. La mayorÃa de ustedes probablemente no sÃ©, pero desde 2006, ha habido un nÃºcleo permanente de la oposiciÃ³n de apoyo a los viajes a la ICANN At-Large asistir a las reuniones de la ICANN. Esta oposiciÃ³n es en gran parte de AmÃ©rica del Norte, entre las personas asociadas con el marcador de posiciÃ³n del ALAC RALO incluye el nuevo estructura sustituido. La crÃtica mÃ¡s corrosiva alegÃ³ que At-Large participantes que apoyo recibido de viaje para las reuniones de ICANN fueron realmente los primeros turistas. Su participaciÃ³n en el programa At-Large en las reuniones era secundario. Esta crÃtica se nivelÃ³ en el At-Large en general, pero en mi opiniÃ³n, fuertemente dirigida a los miembros de ALC y Ãfrica. Varias observaciones registradas colocado miembros de LACRALO en el centro del estas crÃticas. Para ser brutalmente franco, uno de nuestros miembros fue la LA afiche de este abuso. Comparto su opiniÃ³n en cuanto a turismo y es uno de mis mÃ¡s importante preocupaciÃ³n, y tenemos que trabajar juntos para encontrar la manera de superar esto. Una vez mÃ¡s, dicen que los nombres son la forma correcta de expresarse, y dar a otros la oportunidad de replicar. He, de buena naturaleza, objeto de criticas personales graves, porque me he opuesto a cualquier intento de censurar pÃºblicamente a las personas consideradas culpables. Algunos de mis colegas interpretado mi oposiciÃ³n como la protecciÃ³n de un determinado miembro de LACRALO - que deberÃ¡ permanecer en el anonimato aquÃ. Otros mÃ¡s reflexivos se reconoce por lo era, la defensa de un principio en lugar de las personalidades. Todo eso de lado, este miembro ha disfrutado de mi apoyo a otros At-Large funciones. SÃ, lo adivinÃ³. Este miembro de hecho solicitÃ³ mi apoyo para otras posiciones. Y sÃ, debido a los grandes intereses estratÃ©gicos, que se lo dio. Por ahora, algunos de ustedes tambiÃ©n han adivinado mi repugnancia por la hipocresÃa y la todas sus obras. Uno se supone que para celebrar la conversiÃ³n, por asÃ decirlo, a "la una fe verdadera ". Al menos, esa es la tradiciÃ³n cristiana. Cuenten conmigo como un escÃ©ptico fiable. Porque para ser sinceros, esta Ãºltima de conversiÃ³n somos testigos es realmente sobre la parte superior. Es nada mÃ¡s que un rancio ejemplo de su propio interÃ©s. Esa es la palabra. Yo no quiero que te tomes como algo personal, porque no son compatibles con JosÃ© Ovidios palabras.Mi compromiso es con la regiÃ³n. Mi Ãºltimo mensaje es tener cuidado en lo que decimos, porque las palabras son el poder, empezar a pensar como un grupo, que es la clave para el crecimiento de la regiÃ³n. Querido Carlton, realmente aprecio sus lÃneas, ya que compartir nuestra visiÃ³n es la manera de crear la LACRALO que todos queremos. Mi admiraciÃ³n por su trabajo Saludos cordiales JosArce. - 05/02/2012 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > Bro Carlos: > You are right on fact as well as strategy. I cannot disagree with you > here. > > With the greatest respect and affection. > > - Carlton > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > > > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:57 PM, carlos dionisio aguirre < > carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > My Dear Bro. We have coincidence in almost 90% of your words. I know > what > > do you want to say, I feel and live like you in many things, And you know > > that my position is the true that I believe, more than some strategies > or > > diferences in the political positions. > > But when is needed to be clear, sometimes we must be rude. I think is > this > > in where our positions dont find coincidence. Your words were very > strong, > > but without names, and I felt that we needed names also in your words. We > > need to start to say names. Because in a contrary case all in the region > > are involved, and many of them being not guilty for that. It my humble > > thought. > > > > My permanent enormous affectionate > > > > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > > NCA GNSO Council - ICANN > > former ALAC member by LACRALO > > Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios > > Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - > > *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 > > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > > > > > > From: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com > > > Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 13:12:21 -0500 > > > To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Election Results Comments > > > > > > > > There is a saying in English: 'Where ignorance is bliss, it is folly to > > be > > > wise'. > > > > > > There is another one: "the law is too important to leave to lawyers". > > > > > > I do not know their equivalencies in Spanish and a word by word > > translation > > > would be inadequate. Our LACRALO machine translation will be crude, at > > > best. Nevertheless, I shall not attempt one here. > > > > > > We have always know that there is a reservoir of ignorance of LACRALO > > > rules. More to point, ignorance of how they apply is really acute. The > > sad > > > fact is this ignorance is demonstrated by some of our colleagues who, > by > > > virtue of their profession, one would least expect. > > > > > > Without any fear of contradiction I now make this declaration: Any > > LACRALO > > > election in San Jose would have been illegal for lack of proper notice. > > > > > > In my part of the world, notice is a pre-requisite for democratic > > > elections. This is because they are processes, not just one event. Take > > any > > > junta of the kind we witness time and again in the LAC region and I can > > > demonstrate that even they know this. > > > > > > I know for certain that our democratically-elected friend, Hugo, knows > > > this. [To the chagrin of his opponents! :-)] > > > > > > Notice typically has three elements; time, duration and content. A > > > violation of any element condemns the notice. > > > > > > The attempt to call an immediate LACRALO election at San Jose by > invoking > > > the full UNGA Rules as authority [and allowed under LACRALO rules!] > would > > > have also been in violation. > > > > > > Not only for the violation of the notice period. But the process by > which > > > the voting event would have been taken on the agenda would not have > saved > > > the day. That would have had one effect, to add the matter to the > agenda. > > > A notice period plus candidates are still necessary for the election. > > > > > > In addition to all that, the member on whose behalf the attempt to > hasten > > > the election is being executed VOLUNTARILY withdrew HIS element of > notice > > > from the Agenda. > > > > > > In other words, the member, maybe unwittingly, fouled his own pool. > Those > > > of us opposed to the barefaced violation of the rules would not have to > > do > > > anything more. > > > > > > So now, let's speak to the concerns for poor use of ICANN funds raised > in > > > this thread. Here is a phrase that works here: 'La historia me > > absolvera'. > > > > > > Most of you would probably not know but ever since 2006, there has been > > an > > > enduring nucleus of opposition for ICANN travel support to the At-Large > > > attending ICANN meetings. This opposition is largely from North > America, > > > among persons associated with the placeholder ALAC the new RALO > included > > > structure replaced. > > > > > > The most corrosive criticism alleged that At-Large participants who > > > received travel support for ICANN meetings were really tourists first. > > > Their involvement in the At-Large agenda at the meetings was secondary. > > > > > > This criticism was leveled at the At-Large in general but to my mind, > > > sharply directed at members from LAC and Africa. > > > > > > Several recorded observations placed members from LACRALO at the centre > > of > > > these criticisms. To be brutally frank, one of our members was the THE > > > poster boy for this abuse. > > > > > > I have, in good nature, endured severe personal criticism because I > > opposed > > > any attempt to publicly censure those deemed guilty. Some of my > > colleagues > > > interpreted my opposition as protecting a certain LACRALO member - who > > > shall remain nameless here. More thoughtful others recognized it for > what > > > it was; defense of a principle rather than personalities. > > > > > > All that aside, this member has enjoyed my support for other At-large > > > duties. Yes, you guessed right. This member actually solicited my > support > > > for other positions. And yes, because of the larger strategic > interests, > > I > > > gave it. > > > > > > By now, some of you might have also guessed my loathing for hypocrisy > and > > > all its works. One is supposed to celebrate conversion, as it were, to > > 'the > > > one true faith'. At least, that is the Christian tradition. > > > > > > Count me as a reliable skeptic. Because to be frank, this latest > > conversion > > > we witness is really over the top. It is nothing more than a rancid > > > example of enlightened self-interest. > > > > > > That is the word. > > > > > > - Carlton Samuels > > > > > > ============================== > > > Carlton A Samuels > > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > > > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > > > > > ============================= > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:18 PM, <cveraq(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: =? Windows-1252? Q? Resultados_de_la_Elecci = F3n_de_? > == > > > > Windows-1252? Q? = 09L = 09a_Secretar = EDa_de_LACRALO_t = > > E9rmino_de_un_? > > > > == Windows-1252? Q? A = F1o_ = 09de_04_de_ = 09mayo_2012 ? = > > > > From: cveraq(a)gmail.com > > > > > > > > Incredible .. And those are the people demanding commitment and > demand > > .. > > > > # Prohibidoolvidar > > > > > > > > > > > > While we are not transparent, conscious of our responsibilities and > > > > understand that not everything revolves around our personal > interests, > > the > > > > region will continue dependent. > > > > > > > > > > > > Today we strongly believe in a good team without conditions. > > > > > > > > > > > > Carlos Vera > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Alberto Soto" <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> > > > > Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 00:11:41 > > > > To: <salgueiro.jo(a)gmail.com> ; <cveraq(a)gmail.com> ; 'LACRALO > Spanish' > > < > > > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > > > Cc: <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > > > Subject: RE: [lac-discuss-en] Results of the choice of l > > > > trmino LACRALO to secrete a year of 04 > > > > May 2012 > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with the view of the precious time lost in Costa Rica, in > > addition > > > > ICANN payment of money, just for personal interests that harm us > > > > all. A general assembly can not be lost completely only two > > > > people present. ICANN is a lot of money and OUR, and long > > > > staff of each of us invested. > > > > Best Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > Alberto Soto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf > Of > > > > Jose > > > > Ovidio Salgueiro A. > > > > Posted on: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 11:09 pm > > > > To: cveraq(a)gmail.com; LACRALO Espaol > > > > CC: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Results of the election of the secrete > of > > > > LACRALO trmino of one year from May 4, 2012 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Congratulations to Sylvia by Josy strong result. > > > > > > > > > > > > This leads me to think that the ridiculous we did in the Assembly in > > San > > > > Josfue unnecessary since this result was the same as hubiramos > > > > all obtained. > > > > > > > > > > > > The Caribbean was not able or San Josni now to put a candidate with > the > > > > capacity for a votacin important. > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope that now if you can work as expected in our organization > > > > and without the narrow interests that previously demonstrated > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JosSalgueiro > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry Movistar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > lac-discuss-en mailing list > > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > Ab. Arce, JosÃ© Francisco + 54 9 351 6788920 _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3b47828855.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Resultados Electorales Comentarios
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com May 2, 2012

May 2, 2012

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados Electorales Comentarios De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Fray Carlos: Tienes razón en los hechos así como la estrategia. No puedo estar en desacuerdo con usted aquí. Con el mayor respeto y afecto. - Carlton ============================== Carlton Samuels A Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos * ============================= On Wed, 2 de mayo de 2012 a 3:57 PM, Carlos Dionisio Aguirre < > carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com escribió: > My Dear Bro. We have coincidence in almost 90% of your words. I know what > do you want to say, I feel and live like you in many things, And you know > that my position is the true that I believe, more than some strategies or > diferences in the political positions. > But when is needed to be clear, sometimes we must be rude. I think is this > in where our positions dont find coincidence. Your words were very strong, > but without names, and I felt that we needed names also in your words. We > need to start to say names. Because in a contrary case all in the region > are involved, and many of them being not guilty for that. It my humble > thought. > > My permanent enormous affectionate > > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre > NCA GNSO Council - ICANN > former ALAC member by LACRALO > Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios > Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - > *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 > http://ar.ageiadensi.org > > > > From: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com > > Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 13:12:21 -0500 > > To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Election Results Comments > > > > > There is a saying in English: 'Where ignorance is bliss, it is folly to > be > > wise'. > > > > There is another one: "the law is too important to leave to lawyers". > > > > I do not know their equivalencies in Spanish and a word by word > translation > > would be inadequate. Our LACRALO machine translation will be crude, at > > best. Nevertheless, I shall not attempt one here. > > > > We have always know that there is a reservoir of ignorance of LACRALO > > rules. More to point, ignorance of how they apply is really acute. The > sad > > fact is this ignorance is demonstrated by some of our colleagues who, by > > virtue of their profession, one would least expect. > > > > Without any fear of contradiction I now make this declaration: Any > LACRALO > > election in San Jose would have been illegal for lack of proper notice. > > > > In my part of the world, notice is a pre-requisite for democratic > > elections. This is because they are processes, not just one event. Take > any > > junta of the kind we witness time and again in the LAC region and I can > > demonstrate that even they know this. > > > > I know for certain that our democratically-elected friend, Hugo, knows > > this. [To the chagrin of his opponents! :-)] > > > > Notice typically has three elements; time, duration and content. A > > violation of any element condemns the notice. > > > > The attempt to call an immediate LACRALO election at San Jose by invoking > > the full UNGA Rules as authority [and allowed under LACRALO rules!] would > > have also been in violation. > > > > Not only for the violation of the notice period. But the process by which > > the voting event would have been taken on the agenda would not have saved > > the day. That would have had one effect, to add the matter to the agenda. > > A notice period plus candidates are still necessary for the election. > > > > In addition to all that, the member on whose behalf the attempt to hasten > > the election is being executed VOLUNTARILY withdrew HIS element of notice > > from the Agenda. > > > > In other words, the member, maybe unwittingly, fouled his own pool. Those > > of us opposed to the barefaced violation of the rules would not have to > do > > anything more. > > > > So now, let's speak to the concerns for poor use of ICANN funds raised in > > this thread. Here is a phrase that works here: 'La historia me > absolvera'. > > > > Most of you would probably not know but ever since 2006, there has been > an > > enduring nucleus of opposition for ICANN travel support to the At-Large > > attending ICANN meetings. This opposition is largely from North America, > > among persons associated with the placeholder ALAC the new RALO included > > structure replaced. > > > > The most corrosive criticism alleged that At-Large participants who > > received travel support for ICANN meetings were really tourists first. > > Their involvement in the At-Large agenda at the meetings was secondary. > > > > This criticism was leveled at the At-Large in general but to my mind, > > sharply directed at members from LAC and Africa. > > > > Several recorded observations placed members from LACRALO at the centre > of > > these criticisms. To be brutally frank, one of our members was the THE > > poster boy for this abuse. > > > > I have, in good nature, endured severe personal criticism because I > opposed > > any attempt to publicly censure those deemed guilty. Some of my > colleagues > > interpreted my opposition as protecting a certain LACRALO member - who > > shall remain nameless here. More thoughtful others recognized it for what > > it was; defense of a principle rather than personalities. > > > > All that aside, this member has enjoyed my support for other At-large > > duties. Yes, you guessed right. This member actually solicited my support > > for other positions. And yes, because of the larger strategic interests, > I > > gave it. > > > > By now, some of you might have also guessed my loathing for hypocrisy and > > all its works. One is supposed to celebrate conversion, as it were, to > 'the > > one true faith'. At least, that is the Christian tradition. > > > > Count me as a reliable skeptic. Because to be frank, this latest > conversion > > we witness is really over the top. It is nothing more than a rancid > > example of enlightened self-interest. > > > > That is the word. > > > > - Carlton Samuels > > > > ============================== > > Carlton A Samuels > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > > > ============================= > > > > > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:18 PM, <cveraq(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > > > > > Subject: Re: =? Windows-1252? Q? Resultados_de_la_Elecci = F3n_de_? == > > > Windows-1252? Q? = 09L = 09a_Secretar = EDa_de_LACRALO_t = > E9rmino_de_un_? > > > == Windows-1252? Q? A = F1o_ = 09de_04_de_ = 09mayo_2012 ? = > > > From: cveraq(a)gmail.com > > > > > > Incredible .. And those are the people demanding commitment and demand > .. > > > # Prohibidoolvidar > > > > > > > > > While we are not transparent, conscious of our responsibilities and > > > understand that not everything revolves around our personal interests, > the > > > region will continue dependent. > > > > > > > > > Today we strongly believe in a good team without conditions. > > > > > > > > > Carlos Vera > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Alberto Soto" <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> > > > Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 00:11:41 > > > To: <salgueiro.jo(a)gmail.com> ; <cveraq(a)gmail.com> ; 'LACRALO Spanish' > < > > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > > Cc: <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > > Subject: RE: [lac-discuss-en] Results of the choice of l > > > trmino LACRALO to secrete a year of 04 > > > May 2012 > > > > > > > > > I agree with the view of the precious time lost in Costa Rica, in > addition > > > ICANN payment of money, just for personal interests that harm us > > > all. A general assembly can not be lost completely only two > > > people present. ICANN is a lot of money and OUR, and long > > > staff of each of us invested. > > > Best Regards > > > > > > > > > Alberto Soto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of > > > Jose > > > Ovidio Salgueiro A. > > > Posted on: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 11:09 pm > > > To: cveraq(a)gmail.com; LACRALO Espaol > > > CC: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Results of the election of the secrete of > > > LACRALO trmino of one year from May 4, 2012 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Congratulations to Sylvia by Josy strong result. > > > > > > > > > This leads me to think that the ridiculous we did in the Assembly in > San > > > Josfue unnecessary since this result was the same as hubiramos > > > all obtained. > > > > > > > > > The Caribbean was not able or San Josni now to put a candidate with the > > > capacity for a votacin important. > > > > > > > > > I hope that now if you can work as expected in our organization > > > and without the narrow interests that previously demonstrated > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JosSalgueiro > > > > > > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry Movistar > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-en mailing list > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ea416fb36d.html --]]

1 0