November 2015 - lac-discuss-es

AUTO: Melody Palmer est� fuera de la oficina. (Volviendo lun 09/02/2013)
by Melody_Palmer＠heart-nta.org 22 Jan '24

22 Jan '24

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: AUTO: Melody Palmer está fuera de la oficina. (Volviendo lun 09/02/2013) Desde: Melody_Palmer(a)heart-nta.org Estoy fuera de la oficina de lunes 08/19/2013 hasta el lunes 09/02/2013. Voy a responder a su mensaje rápidamente cuando vuelva. Nota: Esta es una respuesta automática a su mensaje "Re: [lac-discuss-es] =? Windows 1252? Q? RECORDATORIO_Invitaci = F3n_Reuni? == Windows 1252? Q? = F3n_/_LACRALO_agosto_/_Lunes_19_de_agosto_2013_a? == Windows 1252? Q? _las_23 = 3A00_UTC? = "Enviado el 19/08/2013 11:09:24 AM. Esta es la única notificación que recibirá mientras esta persona está ausente. _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/886ca5e725.html --]]

2 1

FW: [latinoamericann] Internet Stakeholders Urge the United Nations to Safeguard Key Principles for the Future of the Internet
by Vanda Scartezini 30 Nov '15

30 Nov '15

Como es de conocimiento, en los próximos dias 15/16 de Diciembre tenemos la reunion de las naciones unidades sobre WSIS + 10. Vean el email abajo y si de acuerdo firmen. Los valores fundamentales de la Internet son muy relevantes para los usuarios y necesitan ser reafirmados. Abrazos Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. On 11/25/15, 1:46 PM, "Sebastian Bellagamba" <latinoamericann(a)dgroups.org on behalf of bellagamba(a)isoc.org> wrote: >Estimados, > >Les comparto una declaración conjunta sobre el proceso de WSIS+10 y la necesidad de preservar los valores fundamentales de Internet en vista de la reunión del 15-16 de diciembre en Nueva York. La declaración esta disponible aquí: https://www.openwsis2015.org. >Más de 200 individuos y organizaciones han apoyado este documento, dándole su firma. En el mismo sitio, si así lo desean, pueden agregar su propia firma a esta declaración. > >Por favor, difundir > >Saludos > >Sebastián Bellagamba >bellagamba(a)isoc.org >------------------------------- >Director - Oficina Regional para América Latina y el Caribe >Regional Bureau Director for Latin America and the Caribbean >================== >Internet Society >www.internetsociety.org > > > > > >__________ >You are receiving this message because you're a member of the community LatinoamerICANN. > >View this contribution on the web site https://dgroups.org/_/h3r3y90p > > >A reply to this message will be sent to all members of LatinoamerICANN. >To reply to sender, send a message to bellagamba(a)isoc.org. >To unsubscribe, send an email to leave.latinoamericann(a)dgroups.org

1 0

(INVITACIÓN) Webinar-CCWG Accountability | 11:00 UTC | Wednesday, 2 December / Webinar-CCWG Accountability | 20:00 UTC | Wednesday, 2 December
by Harold Arcos 30 Nov '15

30 Nov '15

Estimados Les anexo la invitación correspondiente al próximo webinar abierto del CCWG Accountability con el fin de poder acceder a información actualizada sobre este importante tema. Se trata del mismo webinar con dos posibilidades de horario para asistir. Estos webinar son abiertos, de forma tal que considero pertinente invitar a conectarse a nuestro equipos de trabajo dentro de cada ALS para nutrirnos y actualizarnos todos en la región. ** Webinar-CCWG Accountability | 11:00 UTC | Wednesday, 2 December* ** Webinar-CCWG Accountability | 20:00 UTC | Wednesday, 2 December* *Time zone converter **here* <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CCWG-Accountabilit…> *Adobe Connect:* *https://icann.adobeconnect.com/si-webinar* <https://icann.adobeconnect.com/si-webinar> Audio language in Adobe Connect Room: English The dial-in details are below - *please let **acct-staff(a)icann.org* <acct-staff(a)icann.org> *know if you require a dial-out.* *Conference Phone numbers:* 1. U.S. / Canada Dial-In: *1-800-550-6865 <1-800-550-6865>* 2. International Dial-In Access Numbers: *http://adigo.com/ICANN/* <http://adigo.com/ICANN/> *The webinar will be conducted in English. * *Live interpretation services are available in Arabic, Chinese , French, Spanish and Portuguese.* *Conference ID:* (*select language of your choice*) *ENGLISH* Conference ID: *9001* *FRENCH* Conference ID: *9002* *SPANISH* Conference ID: *9003* *CHINESE* Conference ID: *9004* *RUSSIAN* Conference ID:* 9005* *ARABIC* Conference ID: *9006* *PORTUGUESE* Conference ID: *9007* La invitación pública también la encontrarán pronto en la página de ICANN *aquí* <https://www.icann.org/news/announcements> saludos Harold Arcos

1 0

Re: FW: solicitud de comentarios: At-Large Proyecto de Carta Partido de Trabajo de Revisión
by aidanoblia＠gmail.com 27 Nov '15

27 Nov '15

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: FW: solicitud de comentarios: At-Large Proyecto de Carta Partido de Trabajo de Revisión De: aidanoblia(a)gmail.com Carlos no sabia de la Experiencia Pero estoy de acuerdo Con Mas Que Razón eso Dębe reflejarse En algún documento. SUPONGO Que En Este Que se està Analizando Ahora podria caber Alguna cláusula al RESPECTO. Si al grupo de Trabajo La Inquietud Si Se Está De Acuerdo en eso. Besos El 27 de noviembre de 2015, 11:36, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> escribio: > Gracias por tus comentarios Aida, > > en el GNSO council tuvimos una MUY MALA experiencia con unos expertos > externos (Westland) que fueron âgenerosamente" contratados para hacer un > estudio cuyo resultado ha sido de muy baja aceptaciÃ³n. Tenemos que evitar > a toda costa que sea una decisiÃ³n exclusiva del Staff y comentarios como > los tuyos DEBEN REFLEJARSE EXPLICITAMENTE EN LOS TERMINOS DE REFERENCIA > (Charter & RFP). > > Saludos > > Carlos RaÃºl GutiÃ©rrez > _____________________ > > email: crg(a)isoc-cr.org > Skype: carlos.raulg > +506 8837 7176 (cel) > +506 4000 2000 (home) > +506 2290 3678 (fax) > _____________________ > Apartado 1571-1000 > San Jose, COSTA RICA > > > > > > > > > On Nov 27, 2015, at 6:54 AM, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Comparto las dos propuestas de Vanda en cuanto a que el Experto > Independiente debe tener un conocimiento de las vivencias en los diferentes > paÃses y no solo un conocimiento teÃ³rico . Sin conocer el contexto > interno y la idiosincracia de las personas en cada paÃs le serÃ¡ muy difÃcil > tener idea clara del significado real de ciertos hechos, acciones e > incluso palabras, ya que el mismo lenguaje tiene a veces expresiones o > palabras que pueden no ser comprendidas en su contexto. > TambiÃ©n comparto lo dicho respecto a que es necesaria la experiencia en > ICANN, que es un Organismo bastante complejo y requiere tiempo y dedicaciÃ³n > para conocerlo. > > Me preocupa la pregunta de Carlos, no se me ocurre respuesta y me parece > una pregunta esencial. > > El hecho de que los expertos reÃºnan las condiciones adecuadas para su > cargo va a depender de lo que se establezca como requisitos necesarios > para su nombramiento y tambiÃ©n de los criterios y mÃ©todos de designaciÃ³n > que tengan las personas que lo designan. > > > Saludos a todos. > > > > 2015-11-25 20:03 GMT-03:00 Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org>: > >> Gracias Vanda, >> >> es un punto muy importante. De igual manera me gustarÃa saber QUIEN >> escoge al experto. >> >> >> Saludos cordiales >> >> Carlos RaÃºl GutiÃ©rrez >> ISOC Costa Rica Chapter >> skype carlos.raulg >> +506 8837 7176 (New Phone number!!!!) >> ________ >> Apartado 1571-1000 >> COSTA RICA >> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda(a)scartezini.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Estimados colegas >>> >>> Como parte de esto grupo de trabajo les pido que miren los puntos >>> levantados iniciales para la escoja de la organizaciÃ³n que deberÃ¡ ser >>> contractada como expert. Yo personalmente he hecho algunos comentarios que >>> estÃ¡n en la wiki acerca de: >>> >>> 1. el punto de diversidad que para mi es necesario que los >>> expertos contrastados tengan vivencia en diversos paÃses no solo clientes >>> en estos paÃses y >>> 2. La experiencia en ICANN. A mi lo relevante es que tipo de >>> experiencia en ICANN â participar en el mercado no es necesariamente lo >>> recomendado, tampoco experiencia en la comunidad de propiedad intelectualâ¦ >>> para mi debÃa tener experiencia como participante en la comunidad de >>> preferencia como simples atendente para una vision mÃ¡s amplia de todo el >>> complejo de ICANN >>> >>> Si tienen puntos que les parezcan relevantes, agradezco sus comentarios, >>> en nuestra lista o en la WIKI. >>> Abrazos >>> *Vanda Scartezini* >>> *Polo Consultores Associados* >>> *Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004* >>> *01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil* >>> *Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 <%2B55%2011%203266.6253>* >>> *Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 <%2B%2055%2011%2098181.1464> * >>> *So**rry for any typos. * >>> >>> >>> From: <lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of >>> ICANN Staff >>> Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 5:43 PM >>> To: LACRALO list >>> Subject: [lac-discuss-en] CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Review Working >>> Party Draft Charter >>> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> The At-Large Review Working Party is calling for comments across the >>> At-Large Community for its Draft Charter: >>> https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw. To provide your input, please log >>> in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment function >>> by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC. See the At-Large Review background >>> information below. >>> >>> == >>> >>> ICANN Bylaws require independent reviews of its organisationsal >>> effectiveness to reinforce its various accountability mechanisms to the >>> community. The first review of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) >>> <https://community.icann.org/x/NxAnAw> was held from 2008 to 2012. The >>> focus of that review was on ALAC itself because the Regional At-Large >>> Organisations (RALOs) and their At-Large Structures (ALSs) were newly >>> established and it would have been inappropriate to review them at that >>> time. >>> >>> The current At-Large Review <https://community.icann.org/x/Y5MQAw> is >>> underway. The focus of this Review is to examine organizational >>> effectiveness of the At-Large community, with the focus on the five RALOs >>> and the nearly 200 ALSs. This review is scheduled to begin approximately in >>> April 2016 and be carried out by an Independent Examiner. Involvement of >>> the At-Large community as well as input and participation from the broader >>> community are important components of this review process. >>> >>> As discussed in ALAC Meetings, the Organizational Effectiveness >>> Committee of the Board >>> <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/organizational-effectiveness-committe…> has >>> requested that an At-Large Review Working Party >>> <https://community.icann.org/x/aZMQAw> be assembled to function as a >>> liaison between the ALAC/At-Large community, the Independent Examiner and >>> the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the Board to provide input on >>> review criteria and the At-Large assessment, coordinate interviews and >>> objectively supply clarification and responses to the preliminary findings >>> and recommendations. Once a final report is issued and the Board takes >>> action on it, as appropriate, the At-Large Working Party is expected to >>> coordinate with the At-Large community to prepare an Implementation Plan >>> and champion implementation of improvement activities. >>> >>> The draft charter of the At-Large Review Working Party was reviewed in >>> its teleconference on November 23, 2015 >>> <https://community.icann.org/x/kcJYAw>. The draft charter is now open >>> for comments from RALO members.* You may download and review the draft >>> charter from this wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw >>> <https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw>*. To provide your input, please >>> log in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment >>> function *by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC**.* If you donât have a >>> login or have other issue using the wiki, kindly contact >>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie >>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew >>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >>> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >>> Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> >>> atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> >>> Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge >>> <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lac-discuss-es mailing list >>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >>> >>> http://www.lacralo.org >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lac-discuss-es mailing list >> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> >> http://www.lacralo.org >> > > > > -- > Aida Noblia > > > Aida Noblia [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/cf9a2f448e.html --]]

1 0

FW: [lac-discuss-en] CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Review Working Party Draft Charter
by Vanda Scartezini 27 Nov '15

27 Nov '15

Estimados colegas Como parte de esto grupo de trabajo les pido que miren los puntos levantados iniciales para la escoja de la organización que deberá ser contractada como expert. Yo personalmente he hecho algunos comentarios que están en la wiki acerca de: 1. el punto de diversidad que para mi es necesario que los expertos contrastados tengan vivencia en diversos países no solo clientes en estos países y 2. La experiencia en ICANN. A mi lo relevante es que tipo de experiencia en ICANN – participar en el mercado no es necesariamente lo recomendado, tampoco experiencia en la comunidad de propiedad intelectual… para mi debía tener experiencia como participante en la comunidad de preferencia como simples atendente para una vision más amplia de todo el complejo de ICANN Si tienen puntos que les parezcan relevantes, agradezco sus comentarios, en nuestra lista o en la WIKI. Abrazos Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. From: <lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org>> on behalf of ICANN Staff Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 5:43 PM To: LACRALO list Subject: [lac-discuss-en] CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Review Working Party Draft Charter Dear All, The At-Large Review Working Party is calling for comments across the At-Large Community for its Draft Charter: https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw. To provide your input, please log in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment function by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC. See the At-Large Review background information below. == ICANN Bylaws require independent reviews of its organisationsal effectiveness to reinforce its various accountability mechanisms to the community. The first review of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)<https://community.icann.org/x/NxAnAw> was held from 2008 to 2012. The focus of that review was on ALAC itself because the Regional At-Large Organisations (RALOs) and their At-Large Structures (ALSs) were newly established and it would have been inappropriate to review them at that time. The current At-Large Review<https://community.icann.org/x/Y5MQAw> is underway. The focus of this Review is to examine organizational effectiveness of the At-Large community, with the focus on the five RALOs and the nearly 200 ALSs. This review is scheduled to begin approximately in April 2016 and be carried out by an Independent Examiner. Involvement of the At-Large community as well as input and participation from the broader community are important components of this review process. As discussed in ALAC Meetings, the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the Board<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/organizational-effectiveness-committe…> has requested that an At-Large Review Working Party<https://community.icann.org/x/aZMQAw> be assembled to function as a liaison between the ALAC/At-Large community, the Independent Examiner and the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the Board to provide input on review criteria and the At-Large assessment, coordinate interviews and objectively supply clarification and responses to the preliminary findings and recommendations. Once a final report is issued and the Board takes action on it, as appropriate, the At-Large Working Party is expected to coordinate with the At-Large community to prepare an Implementation Plan and champion implementation of improvement activities. The draft charter of the At-Large Review Working Party was reviewed in its teleconference on November 23, 2015<https://community.icann.org/x/kcJYAw>. The draft charter is now open for comments from RALO members. You may download and review the draft charter from this wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw. To provide your input, please log in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment function by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC. If you don’t have a login or have other issue using the wiki, kindly contact staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

3 4

Re: FW: solicitud de comentarios: At-Large Proyecto de Carta Partido de Trabajo de Revisi�n
by crg＠isoc-cr.org 27 Nov '15

27 Nov '15

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: FW: solicitud de comentarios: At-Large Proyecto de Carta Partido de Trabajo de Revisión De: crg(a)isoc-cr.org Gracias por tus comentarios Aida, en consejo el GNSO tuvimos MALA MUY Una experiencia con UNOS Expertos Externos (Westland) Que fuerón CONTRATADOS "generosamente" Para Hacer ONU estudio Cuyo resultado m ha Sido de muy baja aceptación. TENEMOS Que Evitar A Toda mar Que costa Una decisión Exclusiva del Estado Mayor y comentarios Como los tuyos DEBEN REFLEJARSE EXPLICITAMENTE EN LOS TERMINOS DE REFERENCIA (Charter y RFP). Saludos Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez _____________________ correo electrónico: crg(a)isoc-cr.org Skype: carlos.raulg +506 8837 7176 (cel) +506 4000 2000 (casa) +506 2290 3678 (fax) _____________________ Apartado 1571-1000 San José, COSTA RICA > On Nov 27, 2015, at 6:54 AM, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Comparto las dos propuestas de Vanda en cuanto a que el Experto Independiente debe tener un conocimiento de las vivencias en los diferentes paÃses y no solo un conocimiento teÃ³rico . Sin conocer el contexto interno y la idiosincracia de las personas en cada paÃs le serÃ¡ muy difÃcil tener idea clara del significado real de ciertos hechos, acciones e incluso palabras, ya que el mismo lenguaje tiene a veces expresiones o palabras que pueden no ser comprendidas en su contexto. > TambiÃ©n comparto lo dicho respecto a que es necesaria la experiencia en ICANN, que es un Organismo bastante complejo y requiere tiempo y dedicaciÃ³n para conocerlo. > > Me preocupa la pregunta de Carlos, no se me ocurre respuesta y me parece una pregunta esencial. > > El hecho de que los expertos reÃºnan las condiciones adecuadas para su cargo va a depender de lo que se establezca como requisitos necesarios para su nombramiento y tambiÃ©n de los criterios y mÃ©todos de designaciÃ³n que tengan las personas que lo designan. > > > Saludos a todos. > > > > 2015-11-25 20:03 GMT-03:00 Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org <mailto:crg@isoc-cr.org>>: > Gracias Vanda, > > es un punto muy importante. De igual manera me gustarÃa saber QUIEN escoge al experto. > > > Saludos cordiales > > Carlos RaÃºl GutiÃ©rrez > ISOC Costa Rica Chapter > skype carlos.raulg > +506 8837 7176 <tel:%2B506%208837%207176> (New Phone number!!!!) > ________ > Apartado 1571-1000 > COSTA RICA > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda(a)scartezini.org <mailto:vanda@scartezini.org>> wrote: > Estimados colegas > > Como parte de esto grupo de trabajo les pido que miren los puntos levantados iniciales para la escoja de la organizaciÃ³n que deberÃ¡ ser contractada como expert. Yo personalmente he hecho algunos comentarios que estÃ¡n en la wiki acerca de: > el punto de diversidad que para mi es necesario que los expertos contrastados tengan vivencia en diversos paÃses no solo clientes en estos paÃses y > La experiencia en ICANN. A mi lo relevante es que tipo de experiencia en ICANN â participar en el mercado no es necesariamente lo recomendado, tampoco experiencia en la comunidad de propiedad intelectualâŠ para mi debÃa tener experiencia como participante en la comunidad de preferencia como simples atendente para una vision mÃ¡s amplia de todo el complejo de ICANN > Si tienen puntos que les parezcan relevantes, agradezco sus comentarios, en nuestra lista o en la WIKI. > Abrazos > Vanda Scartezini > Polo Consultores Associados > Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 > 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil > Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 <tel:%2B55%2011%203266.6253> > Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 <tel:%2B%2055%2011%2098181.1464> > Sorry for any typos. > > > From: <lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org>> on behalf of ICANN Staff > Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 5:43 PM > To: LACRALO list > Subject: [lac-discuss-en] CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Review Working Party Draft Charter > > Dear All, > > The At-Large Review Working Party is calling for comments across the At-Large Community for its Draft Charter: https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw <https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw>. To provide your input, please log in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment function by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC. See the At-Large Review background information below. > > == > > ICANN Bylaws require independent reviews of its organisationsal effectiveness to reinforce its various accountability mechanisms to the community. The first review of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) <https://community.icann.org/x/NxAnAw> was held from 2008 to 2012. The focus of that review was on ALAC itself because the Regional At-Large Organisations (RALOs) and their At-Large Structures (ALSs) were newly established and it would have been inappropriate to review them at that time. > > The current At-Large Review <https://community.icann.org/x/Y5MQAw> is underway. The focus of this Review is to examine organizational effectiveness of the At-Large community, with the focus on the five RALOs and the nearly 200 ALSs. This review is scheduled to begin approximately in April 2016 and be carried out by an Independent Examiner. Involvement of the At-Large community as well as input and participation from the broader community are important components of this review process. > > As discussed in ALAC Meetings, the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the Board <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/organizational-effectiveness-committe…> has requested that an At-Large Review Working Party <https://community.icann.org/x/aZMQAw> be assembled to function as a liaison between the ALAC/At-Large community, the Independent Examiner and the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the Board to provide input on review criteria and the At-Large assessment, coordinate interviews and objectively supply clarification and responses to the preliminary findings and recommendations. Once a final report is issued and the Board takes action on it, as appropriate, the At-Large Working Party is expected to coordinate with the At-Large community to prepare an Implementation Plan and champion implementation of improvement activities. > > The draft charter of the At-Large Review Working Party was reviewed in its teleconference on November 23, 2015 <https://community.icann.org/x/kcJYAw>. The draft charter is now open for comments from RALO members. You may download and review the draft charter from this wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw <https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw>. To provide your input, please log in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment function by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC. If you donât have a login or have other issue using the wiki, kindly contact staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>. > > Regards, > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> > Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es> > > http://www.lacralo.org <http://www.lacralo.org/> > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es> > > http://www.lacralo.org <http://www.lacralo.org/> > > > > -- > Aida Noblia [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8a85a23960.html --]]

1 0

Re: FW: solicitud de comentarios: At-Large Proyecto de Carta Partido de Trabajo de Revisión
by aidanoblia＠gmail.com 27 Nov '15

27 Nov '15

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: FW: solicitud de comentarios: At-Large Proyecto de Carta Partido de Trabajo de Revisión De: aidanoblia(a)gmail.com Comparto las dos Propuestas de Vanda en Cuanto una cola el Experto Independiente Dębe Tener un Conocimiento De Las Vivencias En Los Diferentes Países y no solo teórico Conocimiento ONU. Sin el contexto conocer interno y la idiosincracia de las Personas En Cada País le Será muy Difícil Tener idea clara del SIGNIFICADO verdadero de Ciertos Hechos, Acciones e Palabras INCLUIDO, ya Que El lenguaje Mismo Tiene A Veces Expresiones o Palabras que pueden no Ser comprendidas en su contexto. También comparto lo DICHO RESPECTO una cola es Necesaria la Experiencia en ICANN, Que Es Un Organismo Bastante Complejo y Requiere Tiempo y dedicación conocerlo párr. Me preocupa la PREGUNTA de Carlos, no se me ocurre Respuesta y me parece Una PREGUNTA Esencial. El Hecho De Que los Expertos reunan las Condiciones adecuadas párr su carga va a depender de lo Que se establezca Como Requisitos Necesarios párrafo Do nombramiento por y también de los Criterios y Métodos de DESIGNACION Que Tengan Las Personas Que designan lo. Saludos a todos. 11.25.2015 20:03 GMT-03: 00 Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> : > Gracias Vanda, > > es un punto muy importante. De igual manera me gustarÃa saber QUIEN escoge > al experto. > > > Saludos cordiales > > Carlos RaÃºl GutiÃ©rrez > ISOC Costa Rica Chapter > skype carlos.raulg > +506 8837 7176 (New Phone number!!!!) > ________ > Apartado 1571-1000 > COSTA RICA > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda(a)scartezini.org> > wrote: > >> Estimados colegas >> >> Como parte de esto grupo de trabajo les pido que miren los puntos >> levantados iniciales para la escoja de la organizaciÃ³n que deberÃ¡ ser >> contractada como expert. Yo personalmente he hecho algunos comentarios que >> estÃ¡n en la wiki acerca de: >> >> 1. el punto de diversidad que para mi es necesario que los expertos >> contrastados tengan vivencia en diversos paÃses no solo clientes en estos >> paÃses y >> 2. La experiencia en ICANN. A mi lo relevante es que tipo de >> experiencia en ICANN â participar en el mercado no es necesariamente lo >> recomendado, tampoco experiencia en la comunidad de propiedad intelectualâ¦ >> para mi debÃa tener experiencia como participante en la comunidad de >> preferencia como simples atendente para una vision mÃ¡s amplia de todo el >> complejo de ICANN >> >> Si tienen puntos que les parezcan relevantes, agradezco sus comentarios, >> en nuestra lista o en la WIKI. >> Abrazos >> *Vanda Scartezini* >> *Polo Consultores Associados* >> *Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004* >> *01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil* >> *Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 <%2B55%2011%203266.6253>* >> *Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 <%2B%2055%2011%2098181.1464> * >> *So**rry for any typos. * >> >> >> From: <lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of >> ICANN Staff >> Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 5:43 PM >> To: LACRALO list >> Subject: [lac-discuss-en] CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Review Working >> Party Draft Charter >> >> Dear All, >> >> The At-Large Review Working Party is calling for comments across the >> At-Large Community for its Draft Charter: >> https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw. To provide your input, please log >> in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment function >> by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC. See the At-Large Review background >> information below. >> >> == >> >> ICANN Bylaws require independent reviews of its organisationsal >> effectiveness to reinforce its various accountability mechanisms to the >> community. The first review of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) >> <https://community.icann.org/x/NxAnAw> was held from 2008 to 2012. The >> focus of that review was on ALAC itself because the Regional At-Large >> Organisations (RALOs) and their At-Large Structures (ALSs) were newly >> established and it would have been inappropriate to review them at that >> time. >> >> The current At-Large Review <https://community.icann.org/x/Y5MQAw> is >> underway. The focus of this Review is to examine organizational >> effectiveness of the At-Large community, with the focus on the five RALOs >> and the nearly 200 ALSs. This review is scheduled to begin approximately in >> April 2016 and be carried out by an Independent Examiner. Involvement of >> the At-Large community as well as input and participation from the broader >> community are important components of this review process. >> >> As discussed in ALAC Meetings, the Organizational Effectiveness >> Committee of the Board >> <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/organizational-effectiveness-committe…> has >> requested that an At-Large Review Working Party >> <https://community.icann.org/x/aZMQAw> be assembled to function as a >> liaison between the ALAC/At-Large community, the Independent Examiner and >> the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the Board to provide input on >> review criteria and the At-Large assessment, coordinate interviews and >> objectively supply clarification and responses to the preliminary findings >> and recommendations. Once a final report is issued and the Board takes >> action on it, as appropriate, the At-Large Working Party is expected to >> coordinate with the At-Large community to prepare an Implementation Plan >> and champion implementation of improvement activities. >> >> The draft charter of the At-Large Review Working Party was reviewed in >> its teleconference on November 23, 2015 >> <https://community.icann.org/x/kcJYAw>. The draft charter is now open >> for comments from RALO members.* You may download and review the draft >> charter from this wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw >> <https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw>*. To provide your input, please >> log in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment >> function *by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC**.* If you donât have a login >> or have other issue using the wiki, kindly contact >> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. >> >> Regards, >> >> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie >> Peregrine and Terri Agnew >> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> >> atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> >> Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge >> <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lac-discuss-es mailing list >> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> >> http://www.lacralo.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > Aida Noblia [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/113b9db7d2.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Próxima reunión de ICANN en nuestra Región
by DIEGO ALFONSO ACOSTA BASTIDAS 26 Nov '15

26 Nov '15

Estimado Alberto A la orden desde Ecuador para lo que estime necesario Lía. Atte Diego Acosta Bastidas El 31 de octubre de 2015, 6:47, Sergio Salinas Porto < presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> escribió: > Muy buenas noticias Alberto, nos ponemos a dispocision de Lia para lo que > necesite! > > *Sergio Salinas Porto**Presidente Internauta Argentina**Asociación Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar/>/FeTIA <http://www.fetia.org.ar/>/CTA <http://ctamdq.org.ar/>**FLUI- Federación Latinoamericana de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.fuilatin.org/>**facebook:salinasporto <http://www.facebook.com/salinasporto> & sergiosalinasII <http://www.facebook.com/sergiosalinasII>**twitter:sergiosalinas <http://twitter.com/sergiosalinas>**Google+: Sergio Salinas Porto <https://plus.google.com/104639152443153592254/posts>**Hangout:presidencia@internauta.org.ar <Hangout%3Apresidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> /**Pixelhub: salinasporto <http://pixelhub.me/salinasporto>**Youtube: salinasporto <http://www.youtube.com/salinasporto>**Skype:internautaargentina**Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819**"Ojalá podamos ser desobedientes, cada vez que recibimos órdenes que humillan nuestra conciencia o violan nuestro sentido común" Eduardo Galeano* > > > El 30 de octubre de 2015, 10:38, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> > escribió: > >> Estimado, la próxima reunión de iCANN en nuestra Región, se realizará en >> la ciudad de Panamá entre el 27 y 30 de Junio de 2016. >> >> Estando en Dublín ya hemos coordinado con Lia Patricia Hernández Perez, >> del Instituto Panameño de Derecho y Nuevas Tecnologías, nuestra ALS en >> Panamá. >> >> Ella ya tiene en su poder, una presentación guía, para realizar varias >> reuniones que servirán para difusión de LACRALO y ICANN, previas al meeting >> de ICANN. >> >> La primera probablemente se realice en la Universidad Tecnológica de >> Panamá. Seguimos coordinando este tema. >> >> Saludos cordiales >> >> >> >> Alberto Soto >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >> >> El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en >> busca de virus. >> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lac-discuss-es mailing list >> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> >> http://www.lacralo.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org >

1 0

Re: FW: solicitud de comentarios: At-Large Proyecto de Carta Partido de Trabajo de Revisi�n
by alan.greenberg＠mcgill.ca 26 Nov '15

26 Nov '15

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: FW: solicitud de comentarios: At-Large Proyecto de Carta Partido de Trabajo de Revisión De: alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca El experto está seleccionado de un grupo compuesto en gran parte del personal de la ICANN de acuerdo con los criterios que especifique. Este similar a cualquier otro peticiones públicas de propuestas que los temas de ICANN, incluyendo otra comentarios) Ver https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/rfps-en para una lista de esas solicitudes). Las discusiones están aún en curso en cuanto a exactamente quién va a estar en este Comité de Selección. Alan A 25/11/2015 18:06, crg(a)isoc-cr.org escribió: > Likewise I wonder who picks the expert. > > Best regards > > Carlos Raul Gutierrez > Chapter ISOC Costa Rica > skype carlos.raulg > +506 8837 7176 (New Phone number !!!!) > ________ > Section 1571-1000 > COSTA RICA [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2d6d3b371d.html --]]

1 0

Re: FW: solicitud de comentarios: At-Large Proyecto de Carta Partido de Trabajo de Revisi�n
by crg＠isoc-cr.org 25 Nov '15

25 Nov '15

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: FW: solicitud de comentarios: At-Large Proyecto de Carta Partido de Trabajo de Revisión De: crg(a)isoc-cr.org Gracias Vanda, Es Un Importante muy punto. De igual Manera me gustaria saber QUIEN Escoge al experto. Saludos cordiales Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez ISOC Costa Rica Capítulo skype carlos.raulg +506 8837 7176 (número nuevo teléfono !!!!) ________ Apartado 1571-1000 COSTA RICA El Miércoles, 25 de noviembre 2015 a las 1:52 de la tarde, Vanda <vanda(a)scartezini.org> escribió: > Estimados colegas > > Como parte de esto grupo de trabajo les pido que miren los puntos > levantados iniciales para la escoja de la organizaciÃ³n que deberÃ¡ ser > contractada como expert. Yo personalmente he hecho algunos comentarios que > estÃ¡n en la wiki acerca de: > > 1. el punto de diversidad que para mi es necesario que los expertos > contrastados tengan vivencia en diversos paÃses no solo clientes en estos > paÃses y > 2. La experiencia en ICANN. A mi lo relevante es que tipo de > experiencia en ICANN â participar en el mercado no es necesariamente lo > recomendado, tampoco experiencia en la comunidad de propiedad intelectualâŠ > para mi debÃa tener experiencia como participante en la comunidad de > preferencia como simples atendente para una vision mÃ¡s amplia de todo el > complejo de ICANN > > Si tienen puntos que les parezcan relevantes, agradezco sus comentarios, > en nuestra lista o en la WIKI. > Abrazos > *Vanda Scartezini* > *Polo Consultores Associados* > *Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004* > *01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil* > *Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 <%2B55%2011%203266.6253>* > *Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 <%2B%2055%2011%2098181.1464> * > *So**rry for any typos. * > > > From: <lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of ICANN > Staff > Date: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 5:43 PM > To: LACRALO list > Subject: [lac-discuss-en] CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Review Working > Party Draft Charter > > Dear All, > > The At-Large Review Working Party is calling for comments across the > At-Large Community for its Draft Charter: > https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw. To provide your input, please log > in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment function > by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC. See the At-Large Review background > information below. > > == > > ICANN Bylaws require independent reviews of its organisationsal > effectiveness to reinforce its various accountability mechanisms to the > community. The first review of the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) > <https://community.icann.org/x/NxAnAw> was held from 2008 to 2012. The > focus of that review was on ALAC itself because the Regional At-Large > Organisations (RALOs) and their At-Large Structures (ALSs) were newly > established and it would have been inappropriate to review them at that > time. > > The current At-Large Review <https://community.icann.org/x/Y5MQAw> is > underway. The focus of this Review is to examine organizational > effectiveness of the At-Large community, with the focus on the five RALOs > and the nearly 200 ALSs. This review is scheduled to begin approximately in > April 2016 and be carried out by an Independent Examiner. Involvement of > the At-Large community as well as input and participation from the broader > community are important components of this review process. > > As discussed in ALAC Meetings, the Organizational Effectiveness Committee > of the Board > <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/organizational-effectiveness-committe…> has > requested that an At-Large Review Working Party > <https://community.icann.org/x/aZMQAw> be assembled to function as a > liaison between the ALAC/At-Large community, the Independent Examiner and > the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the Board to provide input on > review criteria and the At-Large assessment, coordinate interviews and > objectively supply clarification and responses to the preliminary findings > and recommendations. Once a final report is issued and the Board takes > action on it, as appropriate, the At-Large Working Party is expected to > coordinate with the At-Large community to prepare an Implementation Plan > and champion implementation of improvement activities. > > The draft charter of the At-Large Review Working Party was reviewed in its teleconference > on November 23, 2015 <https://community.icann.org/x/kcJYAw>. The draft > charter is now open for comments from RALO members.* You may download and > review the draft charter from this wiki > page: https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw > <https://community.icann.org/x/CcRYAw>*. To provide your input, please > log in to Confluence wiki and submit it on that page using the comment > function *by December 9, 2015 at 23:59 UTC**.* If you donât have a login > or have other issue using the wiki, kindly contact staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > . > > Regards, > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > Peregrine and Terri Agnew > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> > atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> > Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge > <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4d640a8da8.html --]]

1 0