June 2015 - lac-discuss-es - lists.icann.org

AUTO: Melody Palmer est� fuera de la oficina. (Volviendo lun 09/02/2013)
by Melody_Palmer＠heart-nta.org Jan. 22, 2024

Jan. 22, 2024

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: AUTO: Melody Palmer está fuera de la oficina. (Volviendo lun 09/02/2013) Desde: Melody_Palmer(a)heart-nta.org Estoy fuera de la oficina de lunes 08/19/2013 hasta el lunes 09/02/2013. Voy a responder a su mensaje rápidamente cuando vuelva. Nota: Esta es una respuesta automática a su mensaje "Re: [lac-discuss-es] =? Windows 1252? Q? RECORDATORIO_Invitaci = F3n_Reuni? == Windows 1252? Q? = F3n_/_LACRALO_agosto_/_Lunes_19_de_agosto_2013_a? == Windows 1252? Q? _las_23 = 3A00_UTC? = "Enviado el 19/08/2013 11:09:24 AM. Esta es la única notificación que recibirá mientras esta persona está ausente. _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/886ca5e725.html --]]

2 1

New ALS Application received
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org Oct. 2, 2015

Oct. 2, 2015

Dear all, This is to inform you that we received an ALS application from the Association Haitienne des Internautes. It is based in Haiti, and would be a member of LACRALO if accepted. Please find the application form in French attached. The EN translation will be posted upon receipt. Staff are preparing the Due Diligence. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann.atlarge Twitter: @ICANN_AtLarge

8 10

Métricas
by Alejandro Pisanty July 7, 2015

July 7, 2015

Colegas, hoy en la reunión mensual, presencial (f2) sostuvimos una breve discusión sobre métricas. A reserva de regresar esta discusión a su lugar en un Grupo de Trabajo, creo que vale la pena dejar claro cuál es el objetivo de las métricas. Éste está perfectamente entendido en la comunidad, y quienes dicen que no lo hacen por un interés propio de distorsionar la discusión. Lo que necesitamos es rendición de cuentas y transparencia entre nosotros mismos. Las personas y organizaciones que trabajan activametne deben ser identificadas. Las organizaciones y personas que no contribuyen ni participan deben decidir si van a participar o dejan de ser contadas. Y hay una franja intermedia de organizaciones y representantes que encuentran difícil participar pero tienen la voluntad de hacerlo. Entre éstas hay muchos tipos de situaciones: un representante que se enferma o tiene que dedicar tiempo a la familia o al trabajo que lo sostiene; un cambio de directiva o de mandato; y muchas más circunstancias. Un buen sistema de métricas sería sencillo, transparente, predecible, y difícil de falsificar. Haría un "triage", es decir, haría bastante evidente cuáles son las 5-10 organizaciones que regularmente participan y contribuyen, las 20 que están prácticamente abandonadas, y una franja intermedia de 10 o 15 con las que hay que trabajar con esperanzas de que recuperen su participación o abandonen la organización voluntariamente o por la vía de la decertificación. Esto asume ciclos de renovación de las certificaciones, que debemos instituir. Hay una clasificación de las participaciones que nos puede ayudar aún más en este proceso: 1. participación regular y consistente en todas las actividades, y contribución a aspectos sustantivos de política. Sus propuestas son incorporadas en resoluciones de LACRALO y tienen impacto en las políticas de ALAC y de ICANN. 2. participación esporádica y/o dedicada a asuntos de procedimiento reglaments, formatos de acuerdos pero no sus contenidos, etc. 3. participaciones esporádicas, poco enfocadas, y fundamentalmente conducentes a "hacer presencia" para elecciones y procesos de selección para la participación en eventos, especialmente si conllevan apoyos para viajes. Nuestra observación o medición de la participación de las organizaciones debe favorecer el tipo 1, desfavorecer el tipo 3, e impulsar que quienes hacen participaciones del tipo 2 pasen al nivel 1. Si podemos tener acuerdo alrededor de estos principios, el Grupo de Trabajo de Gobernanza y el de Métricas sólo tienen que producir una buena implementación y su trabajo será más confiable, predecible y alcanzable. ¿Hay algún desacuerdo con estos principios generales? Alejandro Pisanty -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Química UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3 2

Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
by jam＠jacquelinemorris.com June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Desde: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com Y mi aceptación de "principios generales", aunque "principios rectores" podría funcionar mejor. El 25 de junio 2015 13:15, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> escribió: > ..hence my deliberate use of the word 'baseline'. > > CAS > > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Jacqueline Morris < > jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com> wrote: > >> The devil, is always, however, in the details. >> On 25 Jun 2015 10:28, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Yes, we are now in the ballpark. I can support these for baseline. >>> >>> -Carlton >>> >>> >>> ============================== >>> Carlton A Samuels >>> Mobile: 876-818-1799 >>> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* >>> ============================= >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] >>>> >>>> Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? >>>> From: apisanty(a)gmail.com >>>> >>>> Colleagues, >>>> >>>> >>>> today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion >>>> on metrics. >>>> >>>> >>>> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, >>>> I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This >>>> It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not >>>> They made by self-interest to distort the discussion. >>>> >>>> >>>> What we need we are accountability and transparency between us >>>> thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be >>>> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute >>>> They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer >>>> counted. And there >>>> an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are >>>> difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there >>>> Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to >>>> spend time with family or work that sustains; changing >>>> directive or mandate; and many more circumstances. >>>> >>>> >>>> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and >>>> difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would >>>> rather obvious >>>> 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and >>>> They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip >>>> intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that >>>> recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or >>>> by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles >>>> certifications, we must institute. >>>> >>>> >>>> There is a classification of units that can help us further >>>> in this process: >>>> >>>> >>>> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and >>>> contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are >>>> LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy >>>> ALAC and ICANN. >>>> >>>> >>>> 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters >>>> Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc. >>>> >>>> >>>> 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally >>>> leading to "make presence" for elections and selection >>>> processes >>>> for participation in events, especially if they involve support for >>>> travel. >>>> >>>> >>>> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations >>>> should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who >>>> make appearances type 2 pass to level 1. >>>> >>>> >>>> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group >>>> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good >>>> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and >>>> achievable. >>>> >>>> >>>> Is there any disagreement with these general principles? >>>> >>>> >>>> Alejandro Pisanty >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >>>> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >>>> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry >>>> 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >>>> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD >>>> SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 >>>> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty >>>> UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, >>>> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 >>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >>>> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >>>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >>>> >>>> >>>> [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3e50f79172.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
by jam＠jacquelinemorris.com June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Desde: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com El diablo, es siempre, sin embargo, en los detalles. El 25 de junio 2015 10:28, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> escribió: > Yes, we are now in the ballpark. I can support these for baseline. > > -Carlton > > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] >> >> Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? >> From: apisanty(a)gmail.com >> >> Colleagues, >> >> >> today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion >> on metrics. >> >> >> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, >> I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This >> It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not >> They made by self-interest to distort the discussion. >> >> >> What we need we are accountability and transparency between us >> thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be >> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute >> They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer >> counted. And there >> an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are >> difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there >> Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to >> spend time with family or work that sustains; changing >> directive or mandate; and many more circumstances. >> >> >> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and >> difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would >> rather obvious >> 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and >> They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip >> intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that >> recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or >> by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles >> certifications, we must institute. >> >> >> There is a classification of units that can help us further >> in this process: >> >> >> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and >> contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are >> LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy >> ALAC and ICANN. >> >> >> 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters >> Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc. >> >> >> 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally >> leading to "make presence" for elections and selection >> processes >> for participation in events, especially if they involve support for >> travel. >> >> >> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations >> should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who >> make appearances type 2 pass to level 1. >> >> >> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group >> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good >> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and >> achievable. >> >> >> Is there any disagreement with these general principles? >> >> >> Alejandro Pisanty >> >> >> - >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry >> 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD >> SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 >> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty >> UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, >> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >> >> >> [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ca7fb3bcbe.html --]]

3 2

Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Desde: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Estimado Alejandro, Apenas termine ICANN 53, nos pondremos con ESTO y Todo Lo Demás En que AÚN SE ESTA Trabajando. Saludos cordiales Alberto Soto De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Alejandro Pisanty Enviado el: jueves, 25 de junio de 2015 24:35 Para: LACRALO CC: lista de discusión de LACRALO Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Hola, creo Que Estamos en posicion de declarar ONU consensus Sobre Estós lineamientos Ayer Sergio y Otros me manifestaron verbalmente Apoyo a la Propuesta. Alberto y Humberto, de verdad de verdad les pido instituir El Proceso Correspondiente. Estafa Podemos Consenso Este: 1. EXPLORAR La Situacion reales de las Organizaciones pecado Iniciar Procesos Formales; 2. Cuales EXPLORAR Serian Las reglas Formales aplicables; 3. Ayudar Inmediato de una las Organizaciones que lo necesiten Más. Saludos cordiales Alejandro Pisanty El Jue, 25 de junio 2015 a las 11:42 AM, <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com <mailto:jam@jacquelinemorris.com> > Escribió: [[--Translated Texto (en -> es) -]] Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Desde: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com <mailto:jam@jacquelinemorris.com> El diablo, es siempre, embargo de pecado, en los Detalles. El 25 de junio 2015 10:28, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com> > Escribio: > Yes, we are now in the ballpark. I can support these for baseline. > > -Carlton > > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 <tel:876-818-1799> > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty(a)gmail.com <mailto:apisanty@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] >> >> Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? >> From: apisanty(a)gmail.com <mailto:apisanty@gmail.com> >> >> Colleagues, >> >> >> today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion >> on metrics. >> >> >> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, >> I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This >> It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not >> They made by self-interest to distort the discussion. >> >> >> What we need we are accountability and transparency between us >> thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be >> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute >> They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer >> counted. And there >> an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are >> difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there >> Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to >> spend time with family or work that sustains; changing >> directive or mandate; and many more circumstances. >> >> >> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and >> difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would >> rather obvious >> 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and >> They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip >> intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that >> recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or >> by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles >> certifications, we must institute. >> >> >> There is a classification of units that can help us further >> in this process: >> >> >> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and >> contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are >> LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy >> ALAC and ICANN. >> >> >> 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters >> Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc. >> >> >> 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally >> leading to "make presence" for elections and selection >> processes >> for participation in events, especially if they involve support for >> travel. >> >> >> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations >> should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who >> make appearances type 2 pass to level 1. >> >> >> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group >> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good >> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and >> achievable. >> >> >> Is there any disagreement with these general principles? >> >> >> Alejandro Pisanty >> >> >> - >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry >> 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD >> SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 >> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty >> UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, >> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >> >> >> [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/005ac6b985.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Desde: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com ..hence mi uso deliberado de la palabra 'línea de base'. CAS ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planeación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos de entrega * ============================= El Jue, 25 de junio 2015 a las 9:41 AM, Jacqueline Morris <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > wrote: > The devil, is always, however, in the details. > On 25 Jun 2015 10:28, "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes, we are now in the ballpark. I can support these for baseline. >> >> -Carlton >> >> >> ============================== >> Carlton A Samuels >> Mobile: 876-818-1799 >> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* >> ============================= >> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] >>> >>> Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? >>> From: apisanty(a)gmail.com >>> >>> Colleagues, >>> >>> >>> today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion >>> on metrics. >>> >>> >>> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, >>> I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This >>> It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not >>> They made by self-interest to distort the discussion. >>> >>> >>> What we need we are accountability and transparency between us >>> thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be >>> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute >>> They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer >>> counted. And there >>> an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are >>> difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there >>> Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to >>> spend time with family or work that sustains; changing >>> directive or mandate; and many more circumstances. >>> >>> >>> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and >>> difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would >>> rather obvious >>> 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and >>> They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip >>> intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that >>> recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or >>> by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles >>> certifications, we must institute. >>> >>> >>> There is a classification of units that can help us further >>> in this process: >>> >>> >>> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and >>> contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are >>> LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy >>> ALAC and ICANN. >>> >>> >>> 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters >>> Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc. >>> >>> >>> 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally >>> leading to "make presence" for elections and selection >>> processes >>> for participation in events, especially if they involve support for >>> travel. >>> >>> >>> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations >>> should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who >>> make appearances type 2 pass to level 1. >>> >>> >>> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group >>> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good >>> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and >>> achievable. >>> >>> >>> Is there any disagreement with these general principles? >>> >>> >>> Alejandro Pisanty >>> >>> >>> - >>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >>> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >>> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry >>> 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >>> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD >>> SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 >>> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty >>> UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, >>> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 >>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >>> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >>> >>> >>> [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/285d025814.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
by apisanty＠gmail.com June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Desde: apisanty(a)gmail.com Hola, creo Que Estamos en posicion de declarar ONU consensus Sobre Estós lineamientos Ayer Sergio y Otros me manifestaron verbalmente Apoyo a la Propuesta. Alberto y Humberto, de verdad de verdad les pido instituir El Proceso Correspondiente. Estafa Podemos Consenso Este: 1. EXPLORAR La Situacion reales de las Organizaciones pecado Iniciar Procesos Formales; 2. Cuales EXPLORAR Serian Las reglas Formales aplicables; 3. Ayudar Inmediato de una las Organizaciones que lo necesiten Más. Saludos cordiales Alejandro Pisanty El Jue, 25 de junio 2015 a las 11:42 AM, <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com> escribió: > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? > Desde: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > > El diablo, es siempre, sin embargo, en los detalles. > El 25 de junio 2015 10:28, "Carlton Samuels" < > carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> escribiÃ³: > > > > Yes, we are now in the ballpark. I can support these for baseline. > > > > -Carlton > > > > > > ============================== > > Carlton A Samuels > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > > ============================= > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > >> > >> Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? > >> From: apisanty(a)gmail.com > >> > >> Colleagues, > >> > >> > >> today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion > >> on metrics. > >> > >> > >> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, > >> I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This > >> It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not > >> They made by self-interest to distort the discussion. > >> > >> > >> What we need we are accountability and transparency between us > >> thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be > >> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute > >> They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer > >> counted. And there > >> an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are > >> difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there > >> Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to > >> spend time with family or work that sustains; changing > >> directive or mandate; and many more circumstances. > >> > >> > >> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and > >> difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would > >> rather obvious > >> 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and > >> They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip > >> intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that > >> recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or > >> by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles > >> certifications, we must institute. > >> > >> > >> There is a classification of units that can help us further > >> in this process: > >> > >> > >> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and > >> contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are > >> LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy > >> ALAC and ICANN. > >> > >> > >> 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters > >> Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc. > >> > >> > >> 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally > >> leading to "make presence" for elections and selection > >> processes > >> for participation in events, especially if they involve support for > >> travel. > >> > >> > >> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations > >> should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who > >> make appearances type 2 pass to level 1. > >> > >> > >> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group > >> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good > >> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and > >> achievable. > >> > >> > >> Is there any disagreement with these general principles? > >> > >> > >> Alejandro Pisanty > >> > >> > >> - > >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > >> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > >> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry > >> 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > >> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > >> SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 > >> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > >> UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, > >> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > >> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > >> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > >> > >> > >> > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/528d851f1c.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Desde: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Sí, ahora estamos en el estadio de béisbol. Puedo apoyar estos para la línea de base. -Carlton ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planeación, Gobierno, Evaluación y plazos de entrega * ============================= El Miércoles, 24 de junio 2015 a las 10:57 AM, <apisanty(a)gmail.com> escribió: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? > From: apisanty(a)gmail.com > > Colleagues, > > > today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion > on metrics. > > > Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, > I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This > It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not > They made by self-interest to distort the discussion. > > > What we need we are accountability and transparency between us > thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be > identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute > They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer > counted. And there > an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are > difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there > Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to > spend time with family or work that sustains; changing > directive or mandate; and many more circumstances. > > > A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and > difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would > rather obvious > 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and > They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip > intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that > recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or > by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles > certifications, we must institute. > > > There is a classification of units that can help us further > in this process: > > > 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and > contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are > LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy > ALAC and ICANN. > > > 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters > Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc. > > > 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally > leading to "make presence" for elections and selection processes > for participation in events, especially if they involve support for > travel. > > > Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations > should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who > make appearances type 2 pass to level 1. > > > If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group > Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good > implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and > achievable. > > > Is there any disagreement with these general principles? > > > Alejandro Pisanty > > > - > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > UNAM Faculty of Chemistry > 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f9777fd74b.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: ALAC vote sobre la propuesta GTC-Mayordom�a final
by fatimacambronero＠gmail.com June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Fwd: ALAC vote sobre la propuesta GTC-Mayordomía final Desde: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com Para su información, ---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- De: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> Fecha: 25/06/2015 06:19 GMT-05: 00 Asunto: [ALAC] ALAC vote sobre la propuesta GTC-Mayordomía final Para: ALAC <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Me complace informar que el ALAC ha ratificado por unanimidad el Propuesta GTC-Mayordomía Final. El texto del informe se adjunta. Alan _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9bbc80b09e.html --]]

1 0