- lac-discuss-es - lists.icann.org

Re: orden del d�a de hoy
by myaguero＠msn.com Oct. 18, 2016

Oct. 18, 2016

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: orden del día de hoy De: myaguero(a)msn.com De Acuerdo! Saludos Enviado desde mi iPhone > El 18 oct. 2016, a las 08:39, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> escribió: > > Muchas gracias Carlos!! > > Maritza por favor agrégalos a la wiki. > > > Abrazos > > Enviado desde mi iPhone > >> El 18-10-2016, a las 10:37, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> escribió: >> >> Estimados, >> >> les adjunto dos links mas que no pude encontrar ayer sobre el proceso del GAC y la delegación de los códigos de país de 2 letras al segundo nivel. Estos links me los pasó el secretariado del GAC. >> >> Saludos >> >> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez >> +506 8837 7176 >> Skype: carlos.raulg >> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) >> Forwarded message: >> >>> From: Olof Nordling <olof.nordling(a)icann.org> >>> To: Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. <carlosraulg(a)gmail.com> >>> Subject: RE: [Ctn-crosscom] Todays agenda >>> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:07:46 +0000 >>> >>> Dear Carlos, >>> The GDD webpage for this matter is at https://www.icann.org/resources/two-character-labels/ but it doesn't take the form of any table. You can also get an overview of the steps foreseen regarding release of 2-char labels at a web page on the GAC website, notably at https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/Two-Letter+Second-Level+Domains . >>> Hope this is somewhat helpful. >>> All the best >>> Olof >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. [mailto:carlosraulg@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 7:54 PM >>> To: Olof Nordling <olof.nordling(a)icann.org> >>> Subject: Fwd: [Ctn-crosscom] Todays agenda >>> >>> Dear Olof, >>> >>> hope all is well on your side. As the discussion on the use of 2 -letter codes as Country and Territory names as a TLD warms up for the next ICANN meeting. I have a quick question for you: Where can I find a summary or table of what Governments answered about the delegation of the country 2 -letter codes as a Second Level Domain to the new gTLDs? >>> >>> Thank you very much for your help. >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez >>> +506 8837 7176 >>> Skype: carlos.raulg >>> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) >>> Forwarded message: >>> >>>> From: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org> >>>> To: ctn-crosscom(a)icann.org <ctn-crosscom(a)icann.org> >>>> Subject: [Ctn-crosscom] Todays agenda >>>> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:32:03 +0000 >>>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> Please find included latest version of the Progress report and Interim >>>> paper. >>>> >>>> Proposed agenda: >>>> >>>> - Welcome and Roll call >>>> >>>> - Progress report. Discussion recommendation 2 ( Alternative A >>>> or B, other) >>>> >>>> - Presentation Progress report to community >>>> >>>> - Hyderabad meeting: >>>> >>>> o F-2-f session WG >>>> >>>> o Other session (ccNSO- GNSO Council meeting, ccNSO GAC- meeting, >>>> ccNSO-Board meeting) >>>> >>>> - Draft Interim paper staff update >>>> >>>> - AOB & Closure >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Bart >>>> >>>> Changes Progres report >>>> The recommendations have been updated follwing the discussions of two >>>> weeks ago. Although a long discussion was held on the impact of >>>> closure of this WG , to date no alternatives were suggested. Please >>>> note that recommendation 1 and 3 were adopted 4 weeks ago. Two weeks >>>> ago the discussion focused on the alternatives and no conclusion was >>>> reached. If the progress report needs to be out in time for the >>>> Hyderabad meeting, this is a matter of urgency. >>>> >>>> Recommendations Progress Report >>>> In light of the need for further work, the complexity of the issue at >>>> hand, the aforementioned inconsistencies between various ICANN >>>> policies, and the limited mandate of the CWG on the use of Country and >>>> Territory Names as TLDs, the CWG makes the following recommendations: >>>> >>>> Recommendation 1 >>>> The CWG unanimously recommends that the ICANN community consolidate >>>> all policy efforts relating to geographic names (as that term has >>>> traditionally very broadly been defined in the ICANN environment to >>>> this point) to enable in-depth analyses and discussions on all aspects >>>> related to all geographic-related names at all levels of the DNS. This >>>> is the only way, in our view, to determine whether a harmonized >>>> framework is truly achievable. >>>> >>>> Recommendation 2 Alternative A >>>> The CWG could not agree unanimously on the following: >>>> Future work should take place with the authority of a policy >>>> development process under ICANNs Bylaws, with a clearly drafted >>>> Charter or scope of works that sets out how conclusions and >>>> recommendations will inform that policy development process. This >>>> addresses a key deficiency of this CWG, as it has not been made clear >>>> how the groups work can or will be incorporated in policy-making >>>> pursuant to ICANNs Bylaws. >>>> >>>> Some members of the WG raised the concern that issues that are in >>>> scope of both the ccNSO and GNSO policy development processes, for >>>> example how full names of countries and territories other than Latin >>>> scripts are dealt with, should be addressed through a coordinated >>>> effort under both processes. >>>> >>>> Recommendation 2 Alternative B >>>> To ensure that the conclusions and recommendations of a CWG will at >>>> one point have the authority of a policy developed through the >>>> relevant processes under ICANNs Bylaws, future work should take place >>>> with a clear view on how this work at some point will reach the >>>> authority of a policy developed as or relates to and provides input to >>>> formal policy development processes. With regard to the subject >>>> matter, the use of country and territory names as TLDs the CWG notes >>>> that this should be defined with respect to both the ccNSO and GNSO >>>> Policy development processes. Due to the overlapping definitions used >>>> under existing policies, additional policy developed by one group, >>>> impact and has an effect upon the policy developed for another group. >>>> This may be achieved through a clearly drafted Charter or scope of >>>> works that sets out how these policy development processes will be >>>> informed. This addresses a key deficiency this CWG has encountered, as >>>> it has not been made clear how the groups work can or will be >>>> incorporated in policy-making pursuant to ICANNs Bylaws. >>>> >>>> Recommendation 3 >>>> Future policy development work must facilitate an all-inclusive >>>> dialogue to ensure that all members of the community have the >>>> opportunity to participate. Again, we believe that this is the only >>>> way to determine whether a harmonized framework is truly achievable. >>>> >>>> Draft Interim Paper >>>> Staff has also been working on the interim paper. We have cleaned it >>>> up on the basis of the feed-back received to date, updating some of >>>> the sections and checking whether the research questions in section >>>> 4 of the paper (Methodology) are addressed in section 5. 1 on >>>> two-letter codes. If so that provides a starting point for the >>>> conclusion of no conclusion on 3-letter codes. >>>> As to section 4 methodology, it now includes a reference to the >>>> surveys/ questionnaires on two-and three letter codes. The results are >>>> included in Annex D. >>>> >>>> In addition, Annex C has been added: listing of the members, >>>> participants and observers of the WG >>>> >>>> We have also included the final section (6) the observations, >>>> conclusions and recommendations of the progress report. >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Ctn-crosscom mailing list >>>> Ctn-crosscom(a)icann.org >>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ctn-crosscom [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b68f2cd127.html --]]

1 0

Re: orden del d�a de hoy
by hcarrascob＠gmail.com Oct. 18, 2016

Oct. 18, 2016

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: orden del día de hoy De: hcarrascob(a)gmail.com Muchas gracias Carlos !! Maritza por favor agrégalos a la wiki. Abrazos Enviado desde mi iPhone > El 18-10-2016, a las 10:37, Carlos RaÃºl GutiÃ©rrez G. <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> escribiÃ³: > > Estimados, > > les adjunto dos links mas que no pude encontrar ayer sobre el proceso del GAC y la delegaciÃ³n de los cÃ³digos de paÃs de 2 letras al segundo nivel. Estos links me los pasÃ³ el secretariado del GAC. > > Saludos > > Carlos RaÃºl GutiÃ©rrez > +506 8837 7176 > Skype: carlos.raulg > Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) > Forwarded message: > >> From: Olof Nordling <olof.nordling(a)icann.org> >> To: Carlos RaÃºl GutiÃ©rrez G. <carlosraulg(a)gmail.com> >> Subject: RE: [Ctn-crosscom] Todays agenda >> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:07:46 +0000 >> >> Dear Carlos, >> The GDD webpage for this matter is at https://www.icann.org/resources/two-character-labels/ but it doesn't take the form of any table. You can also get an overview of the steps foreseen regarding release of 2-char labels at a web page on the GAC website, notably at https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/Two-Letter+Second-Level+Domains . >> Hope this is somewhat helpful. >> All the best >> Olof >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Carlos RaÃºl GutiÃ©rrez G. [mailto:carlosraulg@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 7:54 PM >> To: Olof Nordling <olof.nordling(a)icann.org> >> Subject: Fwd: [Ctn-crosscom] Todays agenda >> >> Dear Olof, >> >> hope all is well on your side. As the discussion on the use of 2 -letter codes as Country and Territory names as a TLD warms up for the next ICANN meeting. I have a quick question for you: Where can I find a summary or table of what Governments answered about the delegation of the country 2 -letter codes as a Second Level Domain to the new gTLDs? >> >> Thank you very much for your help. >> >> Best regards >> >> Carlos RaÃºl GutiÃ©rrez >> +506 8837 7176 >> Skype: carlos.raulg >> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) >> Forwarded message: >> >>> From: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org> >>> To: ctn-crosscom(a)icann.org <ctn-crosscom(a)icann.org> >>> Subject: [Ctn-crosscom] Todays agenda >>> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:32:03 +0000 >>> >>> Dear all, >>> Please find included latest version of the Progress report and Interim >>> paper. >>> >>> Proposed agenda: >>> >>> - Welcome and Roll call >>> >>> - Progress report. Discussion recommendation 2 ( Alternative A >>> or B, other) >>> >>> - Presentation Progress report to community >>> >>> - Hyderabad meeting: >>> >>> o F-2-f session WG >>> >>> o Other session (ccNSO- GNSO Council meeting, ccNSO GAC- meeting, >>> ccNSO-Board meeting) >>> >>> - Draft Interim paper staff update >>> >>> - AOB & Closure >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Bart >>> >>> Changes Progres report >>> The recommendations have been updated follwing the discussions of two >>> weeks ago. Although a long discussion was held on the impact of >>> closure of this WG , to date no alternatives were suggested. Please >>> note that recommendation 1 and 3 were adopted 4 weeks ago. Two weeks >>> ago the discussion focused on the alternatives and no conclusion was >>> reached. If the progress report needs to be out in time for the >>> Hyderabad meeting, this is a matter of urgency. >>> >>> Recommendations Progress Report >>> In light of the need for further work, the complexity of the issue at >>> hand, the aforementioned inconsistencies between various ICANN >>> policies, and the limited mandate of the CWG on the use of Country and >>> Territory Names as TLDs, the CWG makes the following recommendations: >>> >>> Recommendation 1 >>> The CWG unanimously recommends that the ICANN community consolidate >>> all policy efforts relating to geographic names (as that term has >>> traditionally very broadly been defined in the ICANN environment to >>> this point) to enable in-depth analyses and discussions on all aspects >>> related to all geographic-related names at all levels of the DNS. This >>> is the only way, in our view, to determine whether a harmonized >>> framework is truly achievable. >>> >>> Recommendation 2 Alternative A >>> The CWG could not agree unanimously on the following: >>> Future work should take place with the authority of a policy >>> development process under ICANNâs Bylaws, with a clearly drafted >>> Charter or scope of works that sets out how conclusions and >>> recommendations will inform that policy development process. This >>> addresses a key deficiency of this CWG, as it has not been made clear >>> how the groupâs work can or will be incorporated in policy-making >>> pursuant to ICANNâs Bylaws. >>> >>> Some members of the WG raised the concern that issues that are in >>> scope of both the ccNSO and GNSO policy development processes, for >>> example how full names of countries and territories other than Latin >>> scripts are dealt with, should be addressed through a coordinated >>> effort under both processes. >>> >>> Recommendation 2 Alternative B >>> To ensure that the conclusions and recommendations of a CWG will at >>> one point have the authority of a policy developed through the >>> relevant processes under ICANNâs Bylaws, future work should take place >>> with a clear view on how this work at some point will reach the >>> authority of a policy developed as or relates to and provides input to >>> formal policy development processes. With regard to the subject >>> matter, the use of country and territory names as TLDs the CWG notes >>> that this should be defined with respect to both the ccNSO and GNSO >>> Policy development processes. Due to the overlapping definitions used >>> under existing policies, additional policy developed by one group, >>> impact and has an effect upon the policy developed for another group. >>> This may be achieved through a clearly drafted Charter or scope of >>> works that sets out how these policy development processes will be >>> informed. This addresses a key deficiency this CWG has encountered, as >>> it has not been made clear how the groupâs work can or will be >>> incorporated in policy-making pursuant to ICANNâs Bylaws. >>> >>> Recommendation 3 >>> Future policy development work must facilitate an all-inclusive >>> dialogue to ensure that all members of the community have the >>> opportunity to participate. Again, we believe that this is the only >>> way to determine whether a harmonized framework is truly achievable. >>> >>> Draft Interim Paper >>> Staff has also been working on the interim paper. We have cleaned it >>> up on the basis of the feed-back received to date, updating some of >>> the sections and checking whether the âresearch questionsâ in section >>> 4 of the paper (Methodology) are addressed in section 5. 1 on >>> two-letter codes. If so that provides a starting point for the >>> conclusion of no conclusion on 3-letter codes. >>> As to section 4 methodology, it now includes a reference to the >>> surveys/ questionnaires on two-and three letter codes. The results are >>> included in Annex D. >>> >>> In addition, Annex C has been added: listing of the members, >>> participants and observers of the WG >>> >>> We have also included the final section (6) the observations, >>> conclusions and recommendations of the progress report. >> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ctn-crosscom mailing list >>> Ctn-crosscom(a)icann.org >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ctn-crosscom lac-discuss-en la lista de correo lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/10538e3337.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: agenda de hoy
by crg＠isoc-cr.org Oct. 18, 2016

Oct. 18, 2016

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Fwd: agenda de hoy De: crg(a)isoc-cr.org Estimados, Les adjunto DOS enlaces Mas Que No Pude ENCONTRAR ayer Sobre el Proceso del GAC y La Delegación de los Códigos de país de 2 letras al Segundo Nivel. Estós me une los Paso El secretariado del GAC. Saludos Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg desplazamiento UTC actual: -6.00 (Costa Rica) Mensaje reenviado: > From: Olof Nordling <olof.nordling(a)icann.org> > To: Carlos RaÃºl GutiÃ©rrez G. <carlosraulg(a)gmail.com> > Subject: RE: [Ctn-crosscom] Todays agenda > Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:07:46 +0000 > > Dear Carlos, > The GDD webpage for this matter is at > https://www.icann.org/resources/two-character-labels/ but it doesn't > take the form of any table. You can also get an overview of the steps > foreseen regarding release of 2-char labels at a web page on the GAC > website, notably at > https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/Two-Letter+Second-Level+Domains > . > Hope this is somewhat helpful. > All the best > Olof > > -----Original Message----- > From: Carlos RaÃºl GutiÃ©rrez G. [mailto:carlosraulg@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 7:54 PM > To: Olof Nordling <olof.nordling(a)icann.org> > Subject: Fwd: [Ctn-crosscom] Todays agenda > > Dear Olof, > > hope all is well on your side. As the discussion on the use of 2 > -letter codes as Country and Territory names as a TLD warms up for the > next ICANN meeting. I have a quick question for you: Where can I find > a summary or table of what Governments answered about the delegation > of the country 2 -letter codes as a Second Level Domain to the new > gTLDs? > > Thank you very much for your help. > > Best regards > > Carlos RaÃºl GutiÃ©rrez > +506 8837 7176 > Skype: carlos.raulg > Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) > Forwarded message: > >> From: Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org> >> To: ctn-crosscom(a)icann.org <ctn-crosscom(a)icann.org> >> Subject: [Ctn-crosscom] Todays agenda >> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:32:03 +0000 >> >> Dear all, >> Please find included latest version of the Progress report and >> Interim >> paper. >> >> Proposed agenda: >> >> - Welcome and Roll call >> >> - Progress report. Discussion recommendation 2 ( Alternative >> A >> or B, other) >> >> - Presentation Progress report to community >> >> - Hyderabad meeting: >> >> o F-2-f session WG >> >> o Other session (ccNSO- GNSO Council meeting, ccNSO GAC- meeting, >> ccNSO-Board meeting) >> >> - Draft Interim paper staff update >> >> - AOB & Closure >> >> Kind regards, >> Bart >> >> Changes Progres report >> The recommendations have been updated follwing the discussions of two >> weeks ago. Although a long discussion was held on the impact of >> closure of this WG , to date no alternatives were suggested. Please >> note that recommendation 1 and 3 were adopted 4 weeks ago. Two weeks >> ago the discussion focused on the alternatives and no conclusion was >> reached. If the progress report needs to be out in time for the >> Hyderabad meeting, this is a matter of urgency. >> >> Recommendations Progress Report >> In light of the need for further work, the complexity of the issue at >> hand, the aforementioned inconsistencies between various ICANN >> policies, and the limited mandate of the CWG on the use of Country >> and >> Territory Names as TLDs, the CWG makes the following recommendations: >> >> Recommendation 1 >> The CWG unanimously recommends that the ICANN community consolidate >> all policy efforts relating to geographic names (as that term has >> traditionally very broadly been defined in the ICANN environment to >> this point) to enable in-depth analyses and discussions on all >> aspects >> related to all geographic-related names at all levels of the DNS. >> This >> is the only way, in our view, to determine whether a harmonized >> framework is truly achievable. >> >> Recommendation 2 Alternative A >> The CWG could not agree unanimously on the following: >> Future work should take place with the authority of a policy >> development process under ICANNâs Bylaws, with a clearly drafted >> Charter or scope of works that sets out how conclusions and >> recommendations will inform that policy development process. This >> addresses a key deficiency of this CWG, as it has not been made clear >> how the groupâs work can or will be incorporated in policy-making >> pursuant to ICANNâs Bylaws. >> >> Some members of the WG raised the concern that issues that are in >> scope of both the ccNSO and GNSO policy development processes, for >> example how full names of countries and territories other than Latin >> scripts are dealt with, should be addressed through a coordinated >> effort under both processes. >> >> Recommendation 2 Alternative B >> To ensure that the conclusions and recommendations of a CWG will at >> one point have the authority of a policy developed through the >> relevant processes under ICANNâs Bylaws, future work should take >> place >> with a clear view on how this work at some point will reach the >> authority of a policy developed as or relates to and provides input >> to >> formal policy development processes. With regard to the subject >> matter, the use of country and territory names as TLDs the CWG notes >> that this should be defined with respect to both the ccNSO and GNSO >> Policy development processes. Due to the overlapping definitions used >> under existing policies, additional policy developed by one group, >> impact and has an effect upon the policy developed for another group. >> This may be achieved through a clearly drafted Charter or scope of >> works that sets out how these policy development processes will be >> informed. This addresses a key deficiency this CWG has encountered, >> as >> it has not been made clear how the groupâs work can or will be >> incorporated in policy-making pursuant to ICANNâs Bylaws. >> >> Recommendation 3 >> Future policy development work must facilitate an all-inclusive >> dialogue to ensure that all members of the community have the >> opportunity to participate. Again, we believe that this is the only >> way to determine whether a harmonized framework is truly achievable. >> >> Draft Interim Paper >> Staff has also been working on the interim paper. We have cleaned it >> up on the basis of the feed-back received to date, updating some of >> the sections and checking whether the âresearch questionsâ in >> section >> 4 of the paper (Methodology) are addressed in section 5. 1 on >> two-letter codes. If so that provides a starting point for the >> conclusion of no conclusion on 3-letter codes. >> As to section 4 methodology, it now includes a reference to the >> surveys/ questionnaires on two-and three letter codes. The results >> are >> included in Annex D. >> >> In addition, Annex C has been added: listing of the members, >> participants and observers of the WG >> >> We have also included the final section (6) the observations, >> conclusions and recommendations of the progress report. > >> _______________________________________________ >> Ctn-crosscom mailing list >> Ctn-crosscom(a)icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ctn-crosscom lac-discuss-en la lista de correo lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9c4da0360d.html --]]

1 0

Presentaciones Llamada LACRALO 17 de octubre 2016
by myaguero＠msn.com Oct. 18, 2016

Oct. 18, 2016

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Presentaciones Llamada LACRALO 17 de octubre 2016 De: myaguero(a)msn.com Estimados Miembros de la Comunidad, En La wiki de La Llamada Del da de sí hoyya encuentran Disponibles las Presentaciones Realizadas: https://community.icann.org/display/LACRALO/2016-10-17+LACRALO+Monthly+Tele… Gracias por su atencin. Saludos, Maritza [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3a67dc9294.html --]]

1 0

Presentaciones llamada LACRALO 17 de octubre 2016
by Maritza Y. Aguero Minano Oct. 18, 2016

Oct. 18, 2016

Estimados miembros de la Comunidad, En la wiki de la llamada del día de hoyya se encuentran disponibles las presentaciones realizadas: https://community.icann.org/display/LACRALO/2016-10-17+LACRALO+Monthly+Tele… Gracias por su atención. Saludos, Maritza

1 0

???????? = Windows-1252 Recordatorio q = = = 3A_Encuesta_de_rev windows-1252 q = ISI F3n_At-Large =
by myaguero＠msn.com Oct. 18, 2016

Oct. 18, 2016

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto:???????? = Windows-1252 Recordatorio q = = = 3A_Encuesta_de_rev windows-1252 q = ISI F3n_At-Large = De: myaguero(a)msn.com Estimados Miembros de LACRALO, Les enviamos ONU Recordatorio con relacin al asunto f de la Referencia. El Plazo para Completar la Encuesta vencer el da 21 de octubre. Gracias y saludos, Maritza -------------------------------------------------- -------------------- Fecha: Lun 17 Oct 0000 21:30:45 el año 2016 (UTC) De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Para: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Asunto: RECORDATORIO: Tome la Encuesta de Revisión de At-Large! Message-ID: <20161017213045.DCA5961F04B(a)mm.icann.org> [[--Translated Texto (en -> es) -]] Asunto: RECORDATORIO: Tome la Encuesta de Revisión de At-Large! De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Queridos todos, Este Es Un Recordatorio de la Encuesta de La Opinión de alcance. Esta es tu Oportunidad de Ayudar a mejorar la Eficacia de la Organización de la comunidad de alcance. Por favor, tome la Encuesta Antes del 21 de octubre de 2016, Hacen Oír Su Voz! Encuesta is available in 3 idiomas: Inglés: http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/ Français: http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-fr/ Español: http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/ Atentamente, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie peregrino, Terri Agnew y Yeşim Nazlar El personal de Políticas de la ICANN en Apoyo de la comunidad de alcance De: El personal de la ICANN At-Large <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Fecha: Martes 13, de septiembre de 2016 17:48 una Para: "lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Asunto: Tome la Encuesta de Revisión de At-Large! Queridos todos, Ayudar a Hacer At-Large En Una parte Más Eficiente y Eficaz de la comunidad de la ICANN - Todos estan invitados a Participar en la Encuesta de Opinión de alcance: http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/ La Revisión de At-Large se Lleva un cabo por la consultora con sede en París, ARTÍCULOS <http://www.items.fr/> Que Actúa Como el examinador independiente. Tomando (No Más de) 30 Minutos para Participar en la revisión A Través de la Encuesta en línea ahora <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/> Será Una Valiosa contribution Para El Éxito of this Proceso de Revisión Importante. Los artículos internacionales, ciudades inteligentes, energía inteligentes, infraestructuras digitales, aplicaciones digitales, cultura digital, de datos grande <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/> items.fr consultoría estratégica, la innovación digital, Marketing Consulting, ciudades inteligentes, la energía inteligente, infraestructuras digitales, aplicaciones digitales, cultura digital, grande Los artículos internacionales, ciudades inteligentes, energía inteligentes, digital ... <http://www.items.fr/> www.items.fr ARTÍCULOS consultoría estratégica internacional en un mundo digital. Ciudades inteligentes. inteligente de la energía Si Usted Es El Representante De Una Estructura At-Large (ALS), la ONU PARTICIPANTE regularmente en las Reuniones de ICANN, Una information privilegiada de la ICANN o de la ONU recién llegado al Mundo de la Gobernanza de Internet, su Opinión nos Interesa! ARTÍCULOS compartirán la Evaluación y los Resultados de la Encuesta preliminar Durante la Reunion ICANN57 Hyderabad.Le instamos una cola llene la Encuesta <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/> a la brevedad Posible, del haga escuchar su voz!Esta es tu Oportunidad de compartir SUS Puntos de Vista Sobre Lo Que Funciona, Lo que no Funciona tan bien, y Las Mejoras Que se podrian Hacer. Los artículos internacionales, ciudades inteligentes, energía inteligentes, infraestructuras digitales, aplicaciones digitales, cultura digital, de datos grande <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/> items.fr consultoría estratégica, la innovación digital, Marketing Consulting, ciudades inteligentes, la energía inteligente, infraestructuras digitales, aplicaciones digitales, cultura digital, grande IMPORTANTE: Si TIENE UNA interrupción, No Puede Completar el Formulario, Asegurese de ir a la última page y enviar el Formulario Por Primera Vez. Sus respuestas seran then guardan y se pueden volver En Una Etapa posterior, utilizando El Mismo Dispositivo y Completar la Encuesta, al Hacer clic en "Enviar" Una Vez Más. Le sondeo sueros disponibles en Inglés en fin de semaine. Vous recevrez davantage information d'lorsque celui-ci Sueros en ligne. La Encuesta se encontrará disponible posteriormente Esta Semana en español. Mayor información Será notificada tan pronto mar posible. Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie peregrino, Terri Agnew y Yeşim Nazlar El personal de Políticas de la ICANN en Apoyo de la comunidad de alcance E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Página Web: atlarge.icann.org < https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @ < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0ceae83988.html --]]

1 0

Recordatorio: Encuesta de revisión At-Large
by Maritza Y. Aguero Minano Oct. 18, 2016

Oct. 18, 2016

Estimados miembros de LACRALO, Les enviamos un recordatorio con relaci�n al asunto de la referencia. El plazo para completar la encuesta vencer� el d�a 21 de octubre. Gracias y saludos, Maritza ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:30:45 +0000 (UTC) From: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: RECORDATORIO: Tome la Encuesta de Revisión de At-Large! Message-ID: <20161017213045.DCA5961F04B(a)mm.icann.org> [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: RECORDATORIO: Tome la Encuesta de Revisión de At-Large! De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Queridos todos, Este es un recordatorio de la Encuesta de la opinión de alcance. Esta es tu oportunidad de ayudar a mejorar la eficacia de la organización de la comunidad de alcance. Por favor, tome la encuesta antes del 21 de octubre de 2016, hacen oír su voz! Encuesta está disponible en 3 idiomas: Inglés: http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/ Français: http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-fr/ Español: http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/ Atentamente, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie peregrino, Terri Agnew y Yeşim Nazlar El personal de políticas de ICANN en apoyo de la comunidad de alcance De: El personal de ICANN At-Large <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Fecha: Martes 13, de septiembre de, 2016 a 17:48 Para: "lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Asunto: Tome la Encuesta de Revisión de At-Large! Queridos todos, Ayudar a hacer At-Large en una parte más eficiente y eficaz de la comunidad de ICANN - Todos están invitados a participar en la encuesta de opinión de alcance: http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/ La Revisión de At-Large se lleva a cabo por la consultora con sede en París, ARTÍCULOS <http://www.items.fr/> que actúa como el examinador independiente. Tomando (no más de) 30 minutos para participar en la revisión a través de la encuesta en línea <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/> será una valiosa contribución para el éxito de este proceso de revisión importante. ITEMS International, Smart Cities, Smart energy, digital infrastructures, digital applications, digital culture, big data<http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/> items.fr Strategic consulting, digital innovation, Marketing Consulting, Smart Cities, Smart energy, digital infrastructures, digital applications, digital culture, big ITEMS International, Smart Cities, Smart energy, digital ...<http://www.items.fr/> www.items.fr ITEMS International Strategic consulting in a digital world. Smart Cities. Smart energy Si usted es el representante de una estructura At-Large (ALS), un participante regular en las reuniones de ICANN, una información privilegiada de ICANN o un recién llegado al mundo de la gobernanza de Internet, su opinión nos interesa! ARTÍCULOS compartirán la evaluación y los resultados de la encuesta preliminar durante la Reunión ICANN57 Hyderabad.Le instamos a que llene la encuesta <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/> a la brevedad posible, haga escuchar su voz! Esta es tu oportunidad de compartir sus puntos de vista sobre lo que funciona, lo que no funciona tan bien, y las mejoras que se podrían hacer. ITEMS International, Smart Cities, Smart energy, digital infrastructures, digital applications, digital culture, big data<http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/> items.fr Strategic consulting, digital innovation, Marketing Consulting, Smart Cities, Smart energy, digital infrastructures, digital applications, digital culture, big IMPORTANTE: Si tiene una interrupción, no puede completar el formulario, asegúrese de ir a la última página y enviar el formulario por primera vez. Sus respuestas serán entonces guardan y se pueden volver en una etapa posterior, utilizando el mismo dispositivo y completar la encuesta, al hacer clic en "Enviar" una vez más. Le sondeo sueros Available in English en fin de semaine. Vous recevrez davantage información d'lorsque celui-ci sueros en ligne. La Encuesta se encontrará disponible posteriormente Esta Semana en español. Mayor información Será notificada tan pronto mar posible. Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie peregrino, Terri Agnew y Yeşim Nazlar El personal de políticas de ICANN en apoyo de la comunidad de alcance E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Página web: atlarge.icann.org < https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @ < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 0

wiki declaracion LACTLD y otros enlaces llamada de hoy
by Carlos Vera Oct. 17, 2016

Oct. 17, 2016

Estimados, podrian reenviar los enlaces por email y los chat igualmente para quienes participamos por telefono solamente? Saludos y gracias Carlos Vera ISOC Ecuador

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-es] Recordatorio - LACRALO llamada mensual. Lunes 17 Octubre 2016 - 23:00 UTC
by carlos dionisio aguirre Oct. 17, 2016

Oct. 17, 2016

Estimados, Un evento personal de emergencia me ha impedido compartir hoy con Uds. DISCULPAS. Enviado desde mi smartphone Samsung Galaxy.<div> </div><div> </div><div>-------- Mensaje original --------</div><div>De: "Maritza Y. Aguero Minano" <myaguero(a)msn.com> </div><div>Fecha: 16/10/16 14:40 (GMT-03:00) </div><div>Para: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org </div><div>Asunto: [lac-discuss-es] Recordatorio - LACRALO llamada mensual. Lunes 17 Octubre 2016 - 23:00 UTC </div><div> </div> Estimados El presente correo es para informales que la agenda para la llamada mensual ya se encuentra actualizada. En la presente llamada se expondrán los siguientes temas: 1. Presentación sobre la administración de funciones de IANA luego de haber expirado el contrato entre ICANN y el Gobierno de los Estados Unidos. Participación a cargo de León Sánchez (México), Socio de Fulton & Fulton y CCWG Co-Chair. 2. Presentación del Estudio de Mercado acerca de la industria de los DNS en América Latina y El Caribe. Participación a cargo de Rodrigo de La Parra, ICANN VP LAC. 3. Presentación sobre la perspectiva de los Derechos Humanos en Internet. Participación a cargo de Valeria Betancourt (Ecuador), Directora del Programa de Políticas de Información y Comunicación de la Asociación para el Progreso de las Comunicaciones - APC. Los detalles de la llamada los pueden encontrar en el siguiente enlace: https://community.icann.org/display/LACRALO/2016-10-17+LACRALO+Monthly+Tele… <https://community.icann.org/display/LACRALO/2016-10-17+LACRALO+Monthly+Tele…> <https://community.icann.org/display/LACRALO/2016-10-17+LACRALO+Monthly+Tele…> ICANN Adobe Connect room: https://participate.icann.org/lacralo/ <https://participate.icann.org/lacralo/> <https://participate.icann.org/lacralo/> Saludos, Maritza ________________________________ De: lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> en nombre de ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Enviado: martes, 11 de octubre de 2016 04:03 a. m. Para: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Asunto: [lac-discuss-en] Meeting Invitation: LACRALO Monthly Call on Monday, 17 October 2016 at 23:00 UTC **Please make sure you use the updated Adobe Connect URL shared below. Dear All, The next LACRALO Monthly Call is scheduled on Monday, 17 October 2016 at 23:00 UTC Spanish, Portuguese and French interpretations will be provided. For other times: http://tinyurl.com/j9uaokb The draft agenda (to be updated) and call details are available at: https://community.icann.org/x/pxO4Aw NEW Adobe Connect Link: https://participate.icann.org/lacralo/ Conference ID: EN 1638 ES 1738 PT 5393 FR 1838 Wiki workspace: https://community.icann.org/x/NJQi Please confirm your dial-out and preferred number to: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Thank you. Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine, Terri Agnew and Yesim Nazlar ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> [unknown.png] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org

1 0

RECORDATORIO: Tome la Encuesta de Revisión de At-Large!
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org Oct. 17, 2016

Oct. 17, 2016

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: RECORDATORIO: Tome la Encuesta de Revisión de At-Large! De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Queridos todos, Este es un recordatorio de la Encuesta de la opinión de alcance. Esta es tu oportunidad de ayudar a mejorar la eficacia de la organización de la comunidad de alcance. Por favor, tome la encuesta antes del 21 de octubre de 2016, hacen oír su voz! Encuesta está disponible en 3 idiomas: Inglés: http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/ Français: http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-fr/ Español: http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/ Atentamente, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie peregrino, Terri Agnew y Yeşim Nazlar El personal de políticas de ICANN en apoyo de la comunidad de alcance De: El personal de ICANN At-Large <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Fecha: Martes 13, de septiembre de, 2016 a 17:48 Para: "lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Asunto: Tome la Encuesta de Revisión de At-Large! Queridos todos, Ayudar a hacer At-Large en una parte más eficiente y eficaz de la comunidad de ICANN - Todos están invitados a participar en la encuesta de opinión de alcance: http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/ La Revisión de At-Large se lleva a cabo por la consultora con sede en París, ARTÍCULOS <http://www.items.fr/> que actúa como el examinador independiente. Tomando (no más de) 30 minutos para participar en la revisión a través de la encuesta en línea <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/> será una valiosa contribución para el éxito de este proceso de revisión importante. Si usted es el representante de una estructura At-Large (ALS), un participante regular en las reuniones de ICANN, una información privilegiada de ICANN o un recién llegado al mundo de la gobernanza de Internet, su opinión nos interesa! ARTÍCULOS compartirán la evaluación y los resultados de la encuesta preliminar durante la Reunión ICANN57 Hyderabad.Le instamos a que llene la encuesta <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/> a la brevedad posible, haga escuchar su voz! Esta es tu oportunidad de compartir sus puntos de vista sobre lo que funciona, lo que no funciona tan bien, y las mejoras que se podrían hacer. IMPORTANTE: Si tiene una interrupción, no puede completar el formulario, asegúrese de ir a la última página y enviar el formulario por primera vez. Sus respuestas serán entonces guardan y se pueden volver en una etapa posterior, utilizando el mismo dispositivo y completar la encuesta, al hacer clic en "Enviar" una vez más. Le sondeo sueros Available in English en fin de semaine. Vous recevrez davantage información d'lorsque celui-ci sueros en ligne. La Encuesta se encontrará disponible posteriormente Esta Semana en español. Mayor información Será notificada tan pronto mar posible. Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie peregrino, Terri Agnew y Yeşim Nazlar El personal de políticas de ICANN en apoyo de la comunidad de alcance E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Página web: atlarge.icann.org < https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @ < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/47cbe7d51f.html --]]

1 0