- lac-discuss-es - lists.icann.org

Re: R: R: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by apisanty＠gmail.com April 5, 2014

April 5, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: R: R: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: apisanty(a)gmail.com Verónica, esto sólo trae más burocracia con poco valor añadido, esp. si el grupos que se evaluarán son defensivas. Los incentivos equivocados están en su lugar. Alejandro Pisanty El sábado, 05 de abril 2014 a las 1:40 AM, Veronica Cretu <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> escribió: > Dear colleagues, greetings! > > I find this exchange of ideas, views and reflections extremely valuable! I > can only imagine what a wonderful face-to-face activity this might be with > at-large members brainstorming and 'designing' the future through the prism > of the history and current developments:)! > > Few reflections on some of the aspects, based on my experience of being on > this years' NomCom (and part of 2013 NomCom): > > - When it comes to the competency level of NomCom members (as this aspect > has been touched upon by Adam and Alejandro), I think it might be worth for > the NomCom to have a capacity/competency assessment tool that would allow > for a 'scanning' of what competencies are there within the committee > itself, and what competencies are needed. Before any 'new' NomCom is > appointed/selected, this evaluation has to be made, and appointments of the > new members would be in line with some of the missing > elements/competencies, etc. > > Each and every single member of NomCom brings in certain knowledge, > skills/expertise and experiences per different sectors (not only ICANN/IG > related). The degree to which NomCom manages to create or build synergy > between these valuable 'attributes' of the members, determines the quality > of the selection process indeed. > > - The same kind of assessment/approach should take place at the level of > the Board - without a clear picture of the key areas and competencies > needed, it is difficult to bring in the 'right fit' for the given context, > given realities and the type of future one aims at building/creating > for/within ICANN's ecosystem. > > So, having a Board Capacity Assessment Tool and a NomCom Capacity > Assessment Tool would indeed ensure the continuity of the structures, and > would continue on bringing in the 'right fits' whenever necessary. > Institutionalizing the approach could take 2-3 years, after some pilot > phase results would be available. > > A great weekend ahead everyone! > > With very best, > Veronica > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Adam Peake <ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp> wrote: > >> Hi Alejandro, >> >> On Apr 4, 2014, at 2:30 AM, Alejandro Pisanty wrote: >> >> > Adam, >> > >> > this reply of mine will only go to some lists (it is too much >> cross-posted.) >> > >> >> And there still is. It's quite a collection of addresses. >> >> >> > Your admission in the last sentence is the key to simplifying this >> discussion of the ICANN NomCom and giving it some realistic focus. >> > >> > You say that you often felt inadequate in judging the merits of >> candidates who were way above your capacity. You should have resigned at >> that very moment but let's skip that part and go into a more general >> statement. >> > >> >> >> I didn't quite say what you have interpreted me as saying. But it was a >> throw-away comment, and you got my meaning below: >> >> >> > The design of the NomCom foresaw an implementation in which every >> community that designates members of the NomCom would send a "senior >> statesperson", someone who would exert stewardship over the greater good, >> without disregarding that communities' own interests and driving >> principles. In practice this failed to happen. Instead frequently the >> communities designated non-independent, junior people who had to prove >> their merit to the community in the NomCom and could hope for some reward >> later on. >> > >> >> >> To a degree yes, too often I felt the NomCom delegate position wasn't >> much of priority to the sending group -- perhaps only welcome when someone >> realized it meant an extra person from their group being funded to attend a >> couple of meetings. On the other hand, there's usually a smattering of >> former board members or people with some equal experience in each >> committee. Though very few have experience in high-level recruitment, >> evaluation etc. >> >> People I've served with took their role seriously, worked hard, were >> honest, and produced overall good results. The process has improved over >> the years. This year's committee had a bit of training in a few relevant >> HR techniques (should have started years ago). NomCom membership needs an >> urgent reworking, other than that, I think it does what it's asked. >> >> Best, >> >> Adam >> >> >> > This breakdown in trust and resignation of stewardship has been toxic. >> There is nothing that can be written in the rules that can cause change >> towards a stewardship and earning-trust model. It has to be the action of >> the community itself that begins thinking less of how to get a larger size >> of the pie and more of how to make the pie better. >> > >> > Therefore I think that this is the worst of times for a major rethink >> of the NomCom and other processes that get Directors to the Board. Change >> may be needed, though what change is needed is a very open discussion. But >> the thing to focus on right now is the substitution of the NTIA's function, >> nothing more. If that implies other changes these must be very convincing. >> > >> > Yours, >> > >> > Alejandro Pisanty >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Adam Peake <ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp> wrote: >> > I've been involved in NomCom far too many times :-) And each year the >> community was asked for input on the criteria. >> > >> > ICANN is a large and complex organization: having experience of complex >> organizations, budgets, strategic planning, it part of the job. Doesn't >> mean it has to be a person's only skill, but in a broad aggregate it needs >> to be present. And smart people will learn, but you don't want too many >> learning on the job when they are voting on issues that affect millions and >> $millions. Look at the people NomCom has appointed. There's only one that >> fits the pure "large corporate board" category. >> > >> > Selection of NomCom members does need more thought. I often felt a >> fraud judging people on criteria I myself had little or no experience of. >> > >> > Adam >> > >> > >> > On Apr 4, 2014, at 12:31 AM, Roberto Gaetano wrote: >> > >> > > Carlton, >> > > >> > > I completely agree with you, the criteria given to NomCom have to be >> > > thoroughly revised. >> > > >> > > Experience on "large corporate boards" has been an indication given to >> > > NomCom in the past, but I believe that one of the key words in the >> ideal >> > > Director profile is "in aggregate". >> > > >> > > This means that while ideally a Director has to have an incredible >> knowledge >> > > and experience, this is meant in the sense that the Board, as a >> whole, needs >> > > to have this wealth of knowledge and experience, not necessarily each >> and >> > > every Director. So, it might well be that at certain moments there is >> not >> > > enough large corporate boards experience on the Board, and it will be >> > > legitimate to look for reinforcing this aspect, but this does not >> mean that >> > > all candidates that do not have such item in the profile should be >> > > discarded. To make an example, if "large corporate boards" is a need, >> > > "non-profit boards" is well another one. >> > > >> > > So the two big questions are: >> > > >> > > - How to cefine the requirements for NomCom >> > > >> > > - How to select the NomCom members (i.e. is the current >> mechanism >> > > the best one?) >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > >> > > Roberto >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com] >> > > Inviato: mercoledì 2 aprile 2014 02:56 >> > > A: Roberto Gaetano >> > > Cc: Sivasubramanian M; Kleinwächter, Wolfgang; >> > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; Spanish version of >> lac-discuss; >> > > Discussion for At-Large Europe; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > Discuss; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; NA >> Discuss >> > > Oggetto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] R: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] >> [At-Large] >> > > VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection >> Process >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Roberto: >> > > >> > > I too believe what you're proposing is not just sensible but >> strategic and >> > > in the overarching At-Large interest. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Maybe its because of my position that on principle, I simply cannot >> accept >> > > that in matters of governance and when part of a distant group and >> with >> > > respect to decision-making, the representative should be obliged to >> 'take >> > > the whip' - meaning follow the instructions - of his/her group. This >> is my >> > > position regardless of the size of the electorate; whether popularly >> elected >> > > or not, I have greats doubts that one can ever be confined & judged >> as truly >> > > reflecting the wishes of the constituency. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Indeed at the onset, a few of us thought the liaison role properly >> > > configured may likely have a more sustainable interest for the >> At-Large than >> > > the single voting director. So while we are largely agreed, I have >> one >> > > quibble with your characterisation of the role of the NomCom; that >> set of >> > > criteria utilised for selection of directors. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > In your estimation of this new role for the Board, I would hope that >> space >> > > for more guidance is calculated so there is a balance in criteria >> between >> > > persons having experience on 'large corporate boards' than those >> without. >> > > And I say this in context of likely interpretation of the meaning of >> > > 'large'. For depending on who defines 'large', a whole set of likely >> > > participants from my side of the world will enter the process already >> > > disadvantaged. And that does not augur well for participation at >> that level >> > > for those of us at the edge of empire. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Best, >> > > >> > > -Carlton >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ============================== >> > > Carlton A Samuels >> > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 >> > > Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround >> > > ============================= >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Roberto Gaetano >> > > <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the >> Board >> > > with voting Directors, on par with the other supporting organizations. >> > > So I believe that I cannot be suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now, >> years >> > > later, argue that to fight for more Directors on the Board is a >> battle of >> > > the past, that has little meaning looking at the evolution of the >> > > organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model. >> > > The multi-stakeholder model is not a parliamentarian model where the >> > > stakeholder will get representation based on their relative >> "strength". The >> > > parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy, >> where the >> > > constitution has to be drafted. In a mature organization, with basic >> laws >> > > and behaviours already defined, the appointment of representatives by >> > > constituencies inevitably brings in the Board the petty interests of >> the >> > > different constituencies instead of having a sort of council of the >> elders >> > > that abstracts from the contingent interests looking for the common >> good. >> > > This has been the guideline that was attempted with the GNSO Review, >> albeit >> > > with only partial, although significant, results. >> > > It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get >> rid as >> > > much as possible of the system by which we have representative of >> "parties" >> > > that often have conflicting interests. >> > > I believe that we should go towards reducing the SO-appointed >> Directors, and >> > > have instead a larger share, possibly a super-majority, appointed by >> NomCom. >> > > The NomCom should also get a precise description of the skill set >> that is >> > > missing for that particular year, so that they can choose the names >> > > accordingly. >> > > Cheers, >> > > Roberto >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -----Messaggio originale----- >> > >> Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: >> euro-discuss- >> > >> bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M >> > >> Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 >> > >> A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang >> > >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- >> > >> lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > > afri-discuss@atlarge- >> > >> lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large >> Worldwide; na- >> > >> discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >> Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: >> 2014 >> > > >> > >> At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> > >> >> > > >> > >> Dear Wolfgang, >> > >> >> > >> The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to >> > > ensure an >> > >> independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but >> in the >> > >> process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared >> > >> responsibility in the selection process. >> > >> >> > >> A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would >> > > positively >> > >> demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- >> > >> stakeholder model of Governance. >> > >> >> > >> In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent >> and >> > >> four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that >> At-Large has >> > >> matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As >> you >> > > have >> > >> mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, >> > >> which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even >> > > more. >> > >> In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats >> which >> > > would >> > >> reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other >> Stakeholders >> > >> might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the >> > > Board, >> > >> because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. >> > >> >> > >> More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed >> by two >> > >> different processes: >> > >> >> > >> 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a >> candidate >> > > and >> > >> the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which >> could >> > >> sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist >> within >> > >> this AC at the moment. >> > >> >> > >> 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an >> internal >> > >> NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a >> > >> process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) >> > >> >> > >> Thank you. >> > >> >> > >> Sivasubramanian M >> > >> India >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < >> > >> wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> Hi, >> > >>> >> > >>> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to >> > >>> Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). >> Nothing >> > >>> more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. >> > >>> >> > >>> I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA >> > >>> transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are >> > >>> remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership >> nine >> > >>> voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November >> 6, >> > >>> 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine >> > >>> (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be >> > >>> established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of >> the >> > >> Initial Board". >> > >>> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- >> > >> en.htm# >> > >>> V >> > >>> >> > >>> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for >> > >>> two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, >> > >> chaired >> > >>> by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large >> Supporting >> > >>> Organisation >> > >>> (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. >> > >>> >> > >>> >> http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h >> > >>> tm#_toc523422641 >> > >>> >> > >>> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an >> > >>> At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six >> regional >> > >>> councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large >> Advisory >> > >> Committee" >> > >>> (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the >> > >>> establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the >> > >>> board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of >> ALAC >> > >>> was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar >> to >> > >>> the chair of the GAC). >> > >>> >> > >>> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for >> > >>> two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the >> > >>> horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the >> > >>> multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has >> > >>> to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong >> > >>> civil society role in policy development and decision making. >> > >>> >> > >>> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our >> silos >> > >>> both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and >> > >>> NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination >> and >> > >> collaboration with >> > >>> private sector, technical community and governments. A big >> challenge. >> > >>> >> > >>> Wolfgang >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> wolfgang >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> ________________________________ >> > >>> >> > >>> Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von >> > >>> Veronica Cretu >> > >>> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 >> > >>> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> > >>> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > >>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > >>> euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > >>> afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > >>> ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > >>> apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; >> > >>> na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >>> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large >> > >>> Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo >> > >>> and build up on it, I would also like to: >> > >>> >> > >>> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of >> > >>> the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and >> > >>> initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, >> so >> > >>> this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who >> can >> > >>> learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share >> > >>> the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and >> > >>> continue serve the community in the best possible ways. >> > >>> >> > >>> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her >> > >>> much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are >> > >>> important times for ICANN which will require several key >> competences, >> > >>> and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the >> > >>> world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations >> on >> > > the >> > >> community-at-large. >> > >>> >> > >>> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has >> > >>> been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience >> > >>> there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input >> > > from >> > >> members. >> > >>> >> > >>> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return >> home >> > >>> safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! >> > >>> >> > >>> With very best, >> > >>> Veronica >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> > >>> <ocl(a)gih.com >> > >>>> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>> Dear All, >> > >>>> >> > >>>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in >> what >> > >>>> was a very balanced election that required many rounds to >> > >>>> differentiate the candidates. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a >> > >>>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for >> > >>>> ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual >> > >>>> General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take >> > >>>> place in Los Angeles. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It >> is >> > >>>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of >> > >>>> options for the future of our community. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation >> > >> Committee. >> > >>>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list >> of >> > >>>> candidates. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process >> > >>>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been >> > >>>> challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons >> > >>>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of >> > >>>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, >> > >>>> the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and >> > >>>> would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the >> > >>>> challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on >> > >>>> the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community >> > >>>> selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to >> > >>>> share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board >> Colleagues >> > >>>> and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of >> > > ICANN. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Kindest regards, >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond >> > >>>> ALAC Chair >> > >>>> >> > >>>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: >> > >>>>> Dear All, >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process >> > >>>>> Committee >> > >>>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote >> > >>>> results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the >> > >>>> ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be >> > >> published. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat >> > >>>>> #15) >> > >>>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of >> > >>>>> the >> > >>>> family name) who ran for the position: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim >> > >>>>> * Sébastien Bachollet >> > >>>>> * Alan Greenberg >> > >>>>> * Evan Leibovitch >> > >>>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie >> > >>>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is >> > >>>> selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for >> > >>>> 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information >> > >>>>> about >> > >>>> the selection procedure, under: >> https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Regards, >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, >> > >>>>> Nathalie >> > >>>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew >> > >>>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >> > >>>>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% >> > >>> 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org >> > > <mailto:3cmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann.org> > >> > >>>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> > >>>> >> > >>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- >> > >> B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% >> > >>> >> > >> >> 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G >> > >>> isella%20Gruber,% >> > >>>> >> > >>> >> > >> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy >> > >> %20St >> > >>> aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org >> > > <mailto: >> aff%2520in%2520support%2520of%2520ALACmailto%3Astaff(a)atlarge.icann.o >> > > rg> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ >> > >>>>> At-Large mailing list >> > >>>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < >> > >>> http://atlarge.icann.org/> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >> > >>>> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > >>>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > >>>> <http://www.euralo.org/> >> > >>>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> -- >> > >>> *Veronica Cretu * >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova >> > >>> - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* >> > >>> >> > >>> *Member of the Steering Committee, * >> > >>> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* >> > >>> * >> > >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- >> > >> and-cu >> > >>> rrent-membership >> > >>> < >> > >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- >> > >> and-cu >> > >>> rrent-membership >> > >>>> * >> > >>> >> > >>> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet >> > >>> Governance Forum (IGF)* >> > >>> >> > >>> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 >> > >>> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* >> > >>> >> > >>> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation >> > >>> for Assigned Names and Numbering)* >> > >>> >> > >>> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members >> > >>> <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or >> > >>> veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: >> > >> 373 >> > >>> 067435000* >> > >>> _______________________________________________ >> > >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > >>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > >>> >> > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > >>> <http://www.euralo.org/> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> _______________________________________________ >> > >>> APAC-Discuss mailing list >> > >>> APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss >> > >>> >> > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy >> > >> India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> > >> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > >> >> > >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > lac-discuss-es mailing list >> > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> > > >> > > http://www.lacralo.org >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > > >> > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > lac-discuss-es mailing list >> > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> > >> > http://www.lacralo.org >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >> > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >> > Facultad de Química UNAM >> > Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >> > +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD >> > +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 >> > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty >> > Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, >> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 >> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >> > ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >> > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >> >> _______________________________________________ >> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > > > > --------------------------- Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Qumica UNAM Av.Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF México +52-1-5541444475 DESDE EL EXTRANJERO +525541444475 DESDE Mxico SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al Grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Unete a ISOC México, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/27217abc1b.html --]]

1 0

VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process
by ICANN At-Large Staff April 5, 2014

April 5, 2014

Dear All, Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process Committee (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be published. This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of the family name) who ran for the position: * Rinalia Abdul Rahim * Sébastien Bachollet * Alan Greenberg * Evan Leibovitch * Jean-Jacques Subrenat After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. You may review the results, as well as the detailed information about the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org%3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,%20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

16 24

Project CROPP
by Alberto Soto April 5, 2014

April 5, 2014

Dear Dev, Yesterday, I quickly gave my consent to the amendments made into the project in order to comply with the deadline. However, after carefully studying the changes that were made to the project I have the impression that the project would not be appropriate to fulfill the purpose of the trip regarding Haiti. For the above , I propose a modification which involves no change in costs, but it helps to pursue the goal sought . Indeed , I propose that Philippe Boland flies from Colombia (the country where he lives ) to Haiti because Philippe is a French native speaker which would facilitate the exposure of the topics. In turn, Javier Pallero would travel from Argentina to Dominican Republic. These are roundtrip flights and there will not be travel between Port au Prince and Santo Domingo . If it is impracticable to change itineraries , I ask you to replace Jose Arce by Philippe Boland on the trip. In short , we are reducing costs and increasing the level of understanding the presentations. I hope you can consider this request. Best regards Alberto Soto

2 1

Re: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by Kivuva＠transworldafrica.com April 5, 2014

April 5, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: Kivuva(a)transworldafrica.com Olivier, el usuario individual de Internet es un actor importante y nunca debe sentir poco representados. Como ha observado cristiana, "Los usuarios de Internet de todo tipo son incapaces de hacer oír su voz efectivamente ". Esto exige una mayor representación e incluso un segundo puesto en la junta. Esto debe ser una agenda de ATLAS II en Londres. Saludos Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya. Internet Society Sección de Kenya Secretario El 04/05/2014, Christian de Larrinaga <cdel(a)firsthand.net> escribió: > > As somebody outside this box but keeping half an eye out I am intrigued > by some recent comments from past board, nomcom and others on the issues > as they see them today. There is plenty of space where Internet users > of all sorts are unable to get their voice heard effectively. ICANN is > one place where this needs to be strengthened. > > But I urge those involved to look deeper than technocratic methods such > as Nomcom, HR or systematic processes to explain why problems are coming > up for air again. These process techniques take as read the culture, > interests and remit of an organisation as it is now and tend to enhance > it in some form. That is they reinforce existing structures and are not > effective or desirable levers to reform by themselves. > > ICANN has a structural challenge in that its board is bottom up whilst > its management is top down. This is possibly why Karl proposes to remove > the CEO/President from the board. It is also why there is tension > between ICANN as a manager and ICANN as mainly a community of > responsible organisations that manage Internet resources. > > If you want change in a board you need to drive change from the board > and attract board members who direct rather than manage. Is that what > ICANN as it is today wants? I wonder. > > If intermediaries dominate the landscape at ICANN and many argue this is > now the case then how does ICANN function in the public interest? At > Large is one attempt in that direction. But in face of the NTIA > challenge can it be argued that ICANN is multi stakeholder in the sense > that it represents the broad public interest? In particular if one > focuses on the board in that specific context. > > That seems a far deeper challenge than one you should delegate to HR as > an issue of "skillsets". > > > > Christian > > > Christian > > > Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote: >> Dear Wolfgang, >> >> thank you for this reminder of the history. >> >> I'd like to hear more from our Community on whether they think we should >> be pushing for a second director position now that we've had another >> successful round of selection of a Board Director. >> >> Fadi Chehadé mentioned today the Election in At-Large when speaking >> about the multi-stakeholder model at the Hudson Institute >> http://www.hudson.org/events/1144-the-future-of-internet-governance-a-discu… >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Olivier >> >> On 30/03/2014 11:32, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to Rinalia >>> (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing more to add >>> what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. >>> >>> I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA transition >>> discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are remembered. One orginal >>> idea was to give the At Large Membership nine voting seats. Article V, >>> Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, 1998) said in para. iv: >>> "Nine (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be >>> established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the >>> Initial Board". >>> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98-en.htm#V >>> >>> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for two >>> years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, chaired by >>> Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting >>> Organisation (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the >>> board. >>> http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.htm#_t… >>> >>> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an At >>> Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional >>> councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory >>> Committee" (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and >>> the establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the >>> board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC was >>> invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to the >>> chair of the GAC). >>> >>> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for two >>> voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the horizon. We >>> need a strong message from ATLAS II that the multistakeholder model - >>> which is now under tough discussion and has to face its "moment of truth" >>> - will work only, if you have a strong civil society role in policy >>> development and decision making. >>> >>> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos >>> both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and NPOC) >>> as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and >>> collaboration with private sector, technical community and governments. >>> A big challenge. >>> >>> Wolfgang >>> >>> >>> >>> wolfgang >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von Veronica >>> Cretu >>> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 >>> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >>> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >>> apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; >>> na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board >>> Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo and >>> build up on it, I would also like to: >>> >>> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of the >>> Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and initiatives. We >>> all continue building on our previous experiences, so this process >>> should >>> be a continuous exercise and include those who can learn from us - so, I >>> am >>> sure Sebastian will find good ways to share the wealth of expertise >>> gained >>> in his role as a Board member and continue serve the community in the >>> best >>> possible ways. >>> >>> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her >>> much >>> luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are important >>> times for ICANN which will require several key competences, and >>> awareness >>> of geo-political realities in different parts of the world. I trust >>> Rinalia >>> will be able to deliver on the expectations on the community-at-large. >>> >>> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has been >>> for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience there are >>> always things to learn from and improve based on the input from members. >>> >>> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home >>> safe >>> & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! >>> >>> With very best, >>> Veronica >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >>> <ocl(a)gih.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Dear All, >>>> >>>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what >>>> was >>>> a very balanced election that required many rounds to differentiate the >>>> candidates. >>>> >>>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a >>>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for ICANN >>>> as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual General >>>> Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take place in Los >>>> Angeles. >>>> >>>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is >>>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of >>>> options for the future of our community. >>>> >>>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee. >>>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of >>>> candidates. >>>> >>>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process >>>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been challenging >>>> due to the multiple instances of Ties. >>>> >>>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons >>>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of >>>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. >>>> >>>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, the >>>> Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and would like >>>> to reaffirm the full support of our community in the challenging months >>>> ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on the Board to >>>> "represent >>>> us" but as a candidate from our community selected to the Board by our >>>> community, he has proven himself to share his experience of Internet >>>> End >>>> Users with his Board Colleagues and we are grateful of his continued >>>> involvement in all matters of ICANN. >>>> >>>> Kindest regards, >>>> >>>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond >>>> ALAC Chair >>>> >>>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: >>>>> Dear All, >>>>> >>>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process >>>>> Committee >>>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote results >>>> of >>>> the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the ALAC/At-Large for >>>> 2015-2017 >>>> (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be published. >>>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) >>>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. >>>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of the >>>> family name) who ran for the position: >>>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim >>>>> * Sébastien Bachollet >>>>> * Alan Greenberg >>>>> * Evan Leibovitch >>>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat >>>>> >>>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie >>>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is selected >>>> as >>>> the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 is: >>>> Rinalia >>>> Abdul Rahim. >>>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information about >>>> the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie >>>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew >>>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >>>>> E-mail: >>>>> <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org%3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> >>>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >>>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% >>>> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> At-Large mailing list >>>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >>>>> >>>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org >>>>> <http://atlarge.icann.org/> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> EURO-Discuss mailing list >>>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >>>> >>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> *Veronica Cretu * >>> >>> >>> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova >>> - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* >>> >>> *Member of the Steering Committee, * >>> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* >>> *http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current-membership >>> <http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current…>* >>> >>> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* >>> *To the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)* >>> >>> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 >>> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* >>> >>> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* >>> *(Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering)* >>> >>> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members <http://www.icann.org >>> <http://www.icann.org/> >* >>> >>> >>> >>> *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or >>> veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: 373 >>> 067435000* >>> _______________________________________________ >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list >>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >>> >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> At-Large mailing list >> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >> >> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > _______________________________________________ > AFRI-Discuss mailing list > AFRI-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.afralo.org > > Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to this > list are more accurate: > http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html#… > ______________________ Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya twitter.com / lordmwesh _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/43f5486bc8.html --]]

1 0

Re: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by sana.pryhod＠gmail.com April 5, 2014

April 5, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: sana.pryhod(a)gmail.com Queridos todos, Me gustaría unirme a la evaluación de la Verónica de toda esta discusión extremadamente valioso! Muchos de los recién llegados necesitan más conocimientos sobre la historia de ICANN / At Large. Me gustaría proponer a prepararse para ATLAS en Londres serie de entrevistas con las personas más prominentes implicados - que sería dispuestos a preparar preguntas para ellos. Y aprecio altamente el artículo de Christopher - podemos traducirlo en Ruso? En cuanto a los miembros del Consejo. Sebastien era el primero de At Large, y él hizo un gran trabajo. En cuanto a mí, Cada miembro del Consejo tiene que tener la misma gran oreja y gran corazón para oír y comprender la voz de cada usuario de internet, ya que Sebastien tiene. No lo hago saber cómo podemos arreglarlo en nuestro ROP, pero estoy seguro de que tengo que encontrar la manera para hacerlo. En cuanto a segundo asiento en el Consejo de At Large. Estoy absolutamente seguro, que lo necesitamos. Miles de gracias a NomCom para Wolfgang - de nuevo con gran oreja y gran corazón))), el conocimiento profundo y gran experiencia! Por lo que yo entiendo, algunos en grandes iniciativas fueron ignoradas por la Junta - Y ahora se considera como errores. No quiero decir, que cada uno en Decisión grande tiene que ser aprobado por la Junta de forma automática. Sin embargo, la Junta tiene para entender nuestra forma de pensar - desde el punto de vista de la ordinaria Usuario de Internet. Realmente necesitamos más voces - que significa que tenemos que crear más amigable interfaz para ellos: desde tecnológica, política, lingüística y otras puntos de vista. Saludos cordiales, Oksana El sábado, 05 de abril 2014 a las 10:45 AM, Christian de Larrinaga <cdel(a)firsthand.net> escribió: > > As somebody outside this box but keeping half an eye out I am intrigued > by some recent comments from past board, nomcom and others on the issues > as they see them today. There is plenty of space where Internet users > of all sorts are unable to get their voice heard effectively. ICANN is > one place where this needs to be strengthened. > > But I urge those involved to look deeper than technocratic methods such > as Nomcom, HR or systematic processes to explain why problems are coming > up for air again. These process techniques take as read the culture, > interests and remit of an organisation as it is now and tend to enhance > it in some form. That is they reinforce existing structures and are not > effective or desirable levers to reform by themselves. > > ICANN has a structural challenge in that its board is bottom up whilst > its management is top down. This is possibly why Karl proposes to remove > the CEO/President from the board. It is also why there is tension > between ICANN as a manager and ICANN as mainly a community of > responsible organisations that manage Internet resources. > > If you want change in a board you need to drive change from the board > and attract board members who direct rather than manage. Is that what > ICANN as it is today wants? I wonder. > > If intermediaries dominate the landscape at ICANN and many argue this is > now the case then how does ICANN function in the public interest? At > Large is one attempt in that direction. But in face of the NTIA > challenge can it be argued that ICANN is multi stakeholder in the sense > that it represents the broad public interest? In particular if one > focuses on the board in that specific context. > > That seems a far deeper challenge than one you should delegate to HR as > an issue of "skillsets". > > > > Christian > > > Christian > > > Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote: > > Dear Wolfgang, > > > > thank you for this reminder of the history. > > > > I'd like to hear more from our Community on whether they think we should > > be pushing for a second director position now that we've had another > > successful round of selection of a Board Director. > > > > Fadi ChehadÃ© mentioned today the Election in At-Large when speaking > > about the multi-stakeholder model at the Hudson Institute > > > http://www.hudson.org/events/1144-the-future-of-internet-governance-a-discu… > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Olivier > > > > On 30/03/2014 11:32, "KleinwÃ€chter, Wolfgang" wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to > Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing more > to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > >> > >> I this context: DonÂŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA > transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are remembered. > One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine voting seats. > Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, 1998) said in para. > iv: "Nine (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be > established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the > Initial Board". > >> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98-en.htm#V > >> > >> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for two > years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, chaired by Carl > Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting Organisation > (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > >> > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.htm#_t… > >> > >> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an At > Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional councils > were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory Committee" > (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the > establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the board. The > NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC was invited to > serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to the chair of the > GAC). > >> > >> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for > two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the horizon. > We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the multistakeholder model - > which is now under tough discussion and has to face its "moment of truth" - > will work only, if you have a strong civil society role in policy > development and decision making. > >> > >> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos > both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and NPOC) as > well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and collaboration > with private sector, technical community and governments. A big > challenge. > >> > >> Wolfgang > >> > >> > >> > >> wolfgang > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> > >> Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von > Veronica Cretu > >> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > >> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; > na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large > Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > >> > >> > >> > >> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo and > >> build up on it, I would also like to: > >> > >> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of the > >> Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and initiatives. We > >> all continue building on our previous experiences, so this process > should > >> be a continuous exercise and include those who can learn from us - so, > I am > >> sure Sebastian will find good ways to share the wealth of expertise > gained > >> in his role as a Board member and continue serve the community in the > best > >> possible ways. > >> > >> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her > much > >> luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are important > >> times for ICANN which will require several key competences, and > awareness > >> of geo-political realities in different parts of the world. I trust > Rinalia > >> will be able to deliver on the expectations on the community-at-large. > >> > >> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has been > >> for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience there are > >> always things to learn from and improve based on the input from members. > >> > >> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home > safe > >> & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > >> > >> With very best, > >> Veronica > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com > >wrote: > >> > >>> Dear All, > >>> > >>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what > was > >>> a very balanced election that required many rounds to differentiate the > >>> candidates. > >>> > >>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > >>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for ICANN > >>> as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual General > >>> Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take place in Los > >>> Angeles. > >>> > >>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > >>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > >>> options for the future of our community. > >>> > >>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee. > >>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > >>> candidates. > >>> > >>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > >>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been challenging > >>> due to the multiple instances of Ties. > >>> > >>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > >>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > >>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > >>> > >>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, the > >>> Board Member selected by At-Large is SÃ©bastien Bachollet and would like > >>> to reaffirm the full support of our community in the challenging months > >>> ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on the Board to > "represent > >>> us" but as a candidate from our community selected to the Board by our > >>> community, he has proven himself to share his experience of Internet > End > >>> Users with his Board Colleagues and we are grateful of his continued > >>> involvement in all matters of ICANN. > >>> > >>> Kindest regards, > >>> > >>> Olivier MJ CrÃ©pin-Leblond > >>> ALAC Chair > >>> > >>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > >>>> Dear All, > >>>> > >>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process > Committee > >>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote results > of > >>> the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the ALAC/At-Large for > 2015-2017 > >>> (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be published. > >>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) > >>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > >>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of the > >>> family name) who ran for the position: > >>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > >>>> * SÃ©bastien Bachollet > >>>> * Alan Greenberg > >>>> * Evan Leibovitch > >>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > >>>> > >>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > >>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is selected > as > >>> the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 is: > Rinalia > >>> Abdul Rahim. > >>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information about > >>> the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > >>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew > >>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > >>>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% > 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > >>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > >>> > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% > >>> > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> At-Large mailing list > >>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >>>> > >>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < > http://atlarge.icann.org/> > >>>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list > >>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >>> > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/ > > > >>> > >> -- > >> *Veronica Cretu * > >> > >> > >> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > >> - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > >> > >> *Member of the Steering Committee, * > >> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > >> * > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current… > >> < > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current… > >* > >> > >> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* > >> *To the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)* > >> > >> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > >> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > >> > >> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* > >> *(Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > >> > >> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members < > http://www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> >* > >> > >> > >> > >> *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > >> veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: 373 > >> 067435000* > >> _______________________________________________ > >> EURO-Discuss mailing list > >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >> > >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> > >> > >> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > At-Large mailing list > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/34b4fe0122.html --]]

1 0

Re: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by cdel＠firsthand.net April 5, 2014

April 5, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: cdel(a)firsthand.net Como alguien fuera de esta caja, pero manteniendo un ojo hacia fuera Estoy intrigado por algunos de los comentarios recientes de la junta anterior, Comité de Nominaciones y otros, sobre los temas como ellos los ven hoy. Hay un montón de espacio en el que los usuarios de Internet de todo tipo son incapaces de hacer oír su voz con eficacia. ICANN es un lugar donde esto debe ser fortalecido. Pero yo insto a los participantes a mirar más allá de los métodos tecnocráticos tales como Nomcom, recursos humanos o procesos sistemáticos para explicar por qué los problemas vienen a tomar aire de nuevo. Estas técnicas de proceso toman como leer la cultura, intereses y competencias de una organización como lo es ahora, y tienden a mejorar en alguna forma. Son ellos los que refuerzan las estructuras existentes y no son palancas eficaces o deseables para reformar por sí mismos. ICANN tiene un desafío estructural en que su consejo es de abajo hacia arriba, mientras que su gestión es de arriba hacia abajo.Esta es posiblemente la razón por Karl propone eliminar el CEO / Presidente de la Junta. También es por eso que hay tensión entre ICANN como gerente y la ICANN como principalmente una comunidad de organizaciones responsables que gestionan los recursos de Internet. Si usted quiere el cambio en una tabla que necesita para impulsar el cambio de la placa y atraer a los miembros de la junta que dirigen más que gestionan. ¿Es eso lo ICANN como lo es hoy quiere? Me pregunto. Si los intermediarios dominan el paisaje en ICANN y muchos sostienen que esto es ahora el caso, entonces ¿Cómo funciona la ICANN en el interés público? En Grande es un intento en esa dirección. Pero ante la NTIA desafío se puede argumentar que la ICANN tiene múltiples partes interesadas en el sentido que representa el interés público general? En particular, si uno se centra en el tablero en ese contexto específico. Eso parece un reto mucho más profundo que uno debe delegar en recursos humanos como una cuestión de "conjuntos de habilidades". Cristiano Cristiano Olivier Crepin-Leblond MJ escribió: > Dear Wolfgang, > > thank you for this reminder of the history. > > I'd like to hear more from our Community on whether they think we should > be pushing for a second director position now that we've had another > successful round of selection of a Board Director. > > Fadi Chehadé mentioned today the Election in At-Large when speaking > about the multi-stakeholder model at the Hudson Institute > http://www.hudson.org/events/1144-the-future-of-internet-governance-a-discu… > > Kind regards, > > Olivier > > On 30/03/2014 11:32, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. >> >> I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the Initial Board". >> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98-en.htm#V >> >> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, chaired by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting Organisation (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. >> http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.htm#_t… >> >> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory Committee" (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to the chair of the GAC). >> >> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong civil society role in policy development and decision making. >> >> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and collaboration with private sector, technical community and governments. A big challenge. >> >> Wolfgang >> >> >> >> wolfgang >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von Veronica Cretu >> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 >> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> >> >> >> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo and >> build up on it, I would also like to: >> >> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of the >> Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and initiatives. We >> all continue building on our previous experiences, so this process should >> be a continuous exercise and include those who can learn from us - so, I am >> sure Sebastian will find good ways to share the wealth of expertise gained >> in his role as a Board member and continue serve the community in the best >> possible ways. >> >> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her much >> luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are important >> times for ICANN which will require several key competences, and awareness >> of geo-political realities in different parts of the world. I trust Rinalia >> will be able to deliver on the expectations on the community-at-large. >> >> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has been >> for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience there are >> always things to learn from and improve based on the input from members. >> >> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home safe >> & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! >> >> With very best, >> Veronica >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>wrote: >> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what was >>> a very balanced election that required many rounds to differentiate the >>> candidates. >>> >>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a >>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for ICANN >>> as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual General >>> Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take place in Los >>> Angeles. >>> >>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is >>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of >>> options for the future of our community. >>> >>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee. >>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of >>> candidates. >>> >>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process >>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been challenging >>> due to the multiple instances of Ties. >>> >>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons >>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of >>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. >>> >>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, the >>> Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and would like >>> to reaffirm the full support of our community in the challenging months >>> ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on the Board to "represent >>> us" but as a candidate from our community selected to the Board by our >>> community, he has proven himself to share his experience of Internet End >>> Users with his Board Colleagues and we are grateful of his continued >>> involvement in all matters of ICANN. >>> >>> Kindest regards, >>> >>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond >>> ALAC Chair >>> >>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: >>>> Dear All, >>>> >>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process Committee >>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote results of >>> the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 >>> (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be published. >>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) >>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. >>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of the >>> family name) who ran for the position: >>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim >>>> * Sébastien Bachollet >>>> * Alan Greenberg >>>> * Evan Leibovitch >>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat >>>> >>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie >>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is selected as >>> the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 is: Rinalia >>> Abdul Rahim. >>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information about >>> the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie >>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew >>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >>>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org%3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> >>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% >>> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> At-Large mailing list >>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >>>> >>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org <http://atlarge.icann.org/> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list >>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >>> >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> >>> >> -- >> *Veronica Cretu * >> >> >> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova >> - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* >> >> *Member of the Steering Committee, * >> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* >> *http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current-membership >> <http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current…>* >> >> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* >> *To the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)* >> >> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 >> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* >> >> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* >> *(Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering)* >> >> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members <http://www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> >* >> >> >> >> *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or >> veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: 373 >> 067435000* >> _______________________________________________ >> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > At-Large mailing list > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d9d103894b.html --]]

1 0

Re: R: R: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by veronicacretu＠gmail.com April 5, 2014

April 5, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: R: R: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com Estimados colegas, saludos! Me parece que este intercambio de ideas, opiniones y reflexiones de gran valor! Yo Sólo puedo imaginar lo que una maravillosa actividad cara a cara este podría ser con -en general los miembros de intercambio de ideas y 'diseñar' el futuro a través del prisma de la historia y los acontecimientos actuales :)! Pocas reflexiones sobre algunos de los aspectos, a partir de mi experiencia de estar en Comité de nominaciones de este año (y parte de 2013 NomCom): - Cuando se trata de el nivel de competencia de los miembros del Comité de nominaciones (ya que este aspecto ha sido tocado por Adán y Alejandro), creo que podría valer la pena para el Comité de Nominaciones de tener una herramienta de evaluación de la capacidad / competencia que permitiría para un "escaneo" de qué competencias hay dentro del comité sí, y qué competencias son necesarias.Antes de que cualquier "nuevo" Comité de nominaciones es nombrado / seleccionado, esta evaluación tiene que hacerse, y los nombramientos del nuevos miembros estarían en línea con algunos de los desaparecidos elementos / competencias, etc Todos y cada uno de los miembros del Comité de Nominaciones trae ciertos conocimientos, habilidades / conocimientos y experiencias por diferentes sectores (no sólo ICANN / IG relacionado). El grado en que NomCom logra crear o construir sinergia entre estos valiosos 'atributos' de los miembros, determina la calidad del proceso de selección de hecho. - El mismo tipo de evaluación / enfoque debería tener lugar en el nivel de la Junta - y sin una idea clara de las áreas y las competencias clave necesario, es difícil de llevar en el 'más adecuado' para el contexto dado, dada la realidad y el tipo de futuro se pretende construir / crear de / dentro del ecosistema de la ICANN. Por lo tanto, tener una herramienta de Evaluación de la Capacidad Junta y una capacidad NomCom Herramienta de evaluación sería de hecho garantizar la continuidad de las estructuras y continuaría en traer los "ataques correctas" cuando sea necesario. Institucionalización del enfoque podría tardar 2-3 años, después de un piloto resultados de fase estarían disponibles. Un gran fin de semana por delante todo el mundo! Con lo mejor, Verónica El viernes, 04 de abril 2014 a las 4:31 AM, Adam Peake <ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp> escribió: > Hi Alejandro, > > On Apr 4, 2014, at 2:30 AM, Alejandro Pisanty wrote: > > > Adam, > > > > this reply of mine will only go to some lists (it is too much > cross-posted.) > > > > And there still is. It's quite a collection of addresses. > > > > Your admission in the last sentence is the key to simplifying this > discussion of the ICANN NomCom and giving it some realistic focus. > > > > You say that you often felt inadequate in judging the merits of > candidates who were way above your capacity. You should have resigned at > that very moment but let's skip that part and go into a more general > statement. > > > > > I didn't quite say what you have interpreted me as saying. But it was a > throw-away comment, and you got my meaning below: > > > > The design of the NomCom foresaw an implementation in which every > community that designates members of the NomCom would send a "senior > statesperson", someone who would exert stewardship over the greater good, > without disregarding that communities' own interests and driving > principles. In practice this failed to happen. Instead frequently the > communities designated non-independent, junior people who had to prove > their merit to the community in the NomCom and could hope for some reward > later on. > > > > > To a degree yes, too often I felt the NomCom delegate position wasn't much > of priority to the sending group -- perhaps only welcome when someone > realized it meant an extra person from their group being funded to attend a > couple of meetings. On the other hand, there's usually a smattering of > former board members or people with some equal experience in each > committee. Though very few have experience in high-level recruitment, > evaluation etc. > > People I've served with took their role seriously, worked hard, were > honest, and produced overall good results. The process has improved over > the years. This year's committee had a bit of training in a few relevant > HR techniques (should have started years ago). NomCom membership needs an > urgent reworking, other than that, I think it does what it's asked. > > Best, > > Adam > > > > This breakdown in trust and resignation of stewardship has been toxic. > There is nothing that can be written in the rules that can cause change > towards a stewardship and earning-trust model. It has to be the action of > the community itself that begins thinking less of how to get a larger size > of the pie and more of how to make the pie better. > > > > Therefore I think that this is the worst of times for a major rethink of > the NomCom and other processes that get Directors to the Board. Change may > be needed, though what change is needed is a very open discussion. But the > thing to focus on right now is the substitution of the NTIA's function, > nothing more. If that implies other changes these must be very convincing. > > > > Yours, > > > > Alejandro Pisanty > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Adam Peake <ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp> wrote: > > I've been involved in NomCom far too many times :-) And each year the > community was asked for input on the criteria. > > > > ICANN is a large and complex organization: having experience of complex > organizations, budgets, strategic planning, it part of the job. Doesn't > mean it has to be a person's only skill, but in a broad aggregate it needs > to be present. And smart people will learn, but you don't want too many > learning on the job when they are voting on issues that affect millions and > $millions. Look at the people NomCom has appointed. There's only one that > fits the pure "large corporate board" category. > > > > Selection of NomCom members does need more thought. I often felt a > fraud judging people on criteria I myself had little or no experience of. > > > > Adam > > > > > > On Apr 4, 2014, at 12:31 AM, Roberto Gaetano wrote: > > > > > Carlton, > > > > > > I completely agree with you, the criteria given to NomCom have to be > > > thoroughly revised. > > > > > > Experience on "large corporate boards" has been an indication given to > > > NomCom in the past, but I believe that one of the key words in the > ideal > > > Director profile is "in aggregate". > > > > > > This means that while ideally a Director has to have an incredible > knowledge > > > and experience, this is meant in the sense that the Board, as a whole, > needs > > > to have this wealth of knowledge and experience, not necessarily each > and > > > every Director. So, it might well be that at certain moments there is > not > > > enough large corporate boards experience on the Board, and it will be > > > legitimate to look for reinforcing this aspect, but this does not mean > that > > > all candidates that do not have such item in the profile should be > > > discarded. To make an example, if "large corporate boards" is a need, > > > "non-profit boards" is well another one. > > > > > > So the two big questions are: > > > > > > - How to cefine the requirements for NomCom > > > > > > - How to select the NomCom members (i.e. is the current > mechanism > > > the best one?) > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Roberto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com] > > > Inviato: mercoledì 2 aprile 2014 02:56 > > > A: Roberto Gaetano > > > Cc: Sivasubramanian M; Kleinwächter, Wolfgang; > > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; Spanish version of > lac-discuss; > > > Discussion for At-Large Europe; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > Discuss; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; NA Discuss > > > Oggetto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] R: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] > [At-Large] > > > VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > > > > > > > > > Roberto: > > > > > > I too believe what you're proposing is not just sensible but strategic > and > > > in the overarching At-Large interest. > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe its because of my position that on principle, I simply cannot > accept > > > that in matters of governance and when part of a distant group and with > > > respect to decision-making, the representative should be obliged to > 'take > > > the whip' - meaning follow the instructions - of his/her group. This > is my > > > position regardless of the size of the electorate; whether popularly > elected > > > or not, I have greats doubts that one can ever be confined & judged as > truly > > > reflecting the wishes of the constituency. > > > > > > > > > > > > Indeed at the onset, a few of us thought the liaison role properly > > > configured may likely have a more sustainable interest for the > At-Large than > > > the single voting director. So while we are largely agreed, I have one > > > quibble with your characterisation of the role of the NomCom; that set > of > > > criteria utilised for selection of directors. > > > > > > > > > > > > In your estimation of this new role for the Board, I would hope that > space > > > for more guidance is calculated so there is a balance in criteria > between > > > persons having experience on 'large corporate boards' than those > without. > > > And I say this in context of likely interpretation of the meaning of > > > 'large'. For depending on who defines 'large', a whole set of likely > > > participants from my side of the world will enter the process already > > > disadvantaged. And that does not augur well for participation at that > level > > > for those of us at the edge of empire. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > -Carlton > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ============================== > > > Carlton A Samuels > > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > > > Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround > > > ============================= > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Roberto Gaetano > > > <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the > Board > > > with voting Directors, on par with the other supporting organizations. > > > So I believe that I cannot be suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now, > years > > > later, argue that to fight for more Directors on the Board is a battle > of > > > the past, that has little meaning looking at the evolution of the > > > organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model. > > > The multi-stakeholder model is not a parliamentarian model where the > > > stakeholder will get representation based on their relative > "strength". The > > > parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy, where > the > > > constitution has to be drafted. In a mature organization, with basic > laws > > > and behaviours already defined, the appointment of representatives by > > > constituencies inevitably brings in the Board the petty interests of > the > > > different constituencies instead of having a sort of council of the > elders > > > that abstracts from the contingent interests looking for the common > good. > > > This has been the guideline that was attempted with the GNSO Review, > albeit > > > with only partial, although significant, results. > > > It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get > rid as > > > much as possible of the system by which we have representative of > "parties" > > > that often have conflicting interests. > > > I believe that we should go towards reducing the SO-appointed > Directors, and > > > have instead a larger share, possibly a super-majority, appointed by > NomCom. > > > The NomCom should also get a precise description of the skill set that > is > > > missing for that particular year, so that they can choose the names > > > accordingly. > > > Cheers, > > > Roberto > > > > > > > > > > > >> -----Messaggio originale----- > > >> Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: > euro-discuss- > > >> bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M > > >> Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 > > >> A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang > > >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- > > >> lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > > afri-discuss@atlarge- > > >> lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; > na- > > >> discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > >> Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: > 2014 > > > > > >> At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > >> > > > > > >> Dear Wolfgang, > > >> > > >> The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to > > > ensure an > > >> independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in > the > > >> process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared > > >> responsibility in the selection process. > > >> > > >> A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would > > > positively > > >> demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- > > >> stakeholder model of Governance. > > >> > > >> In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent > and > > >> four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large > has > > >> matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you > > > have > > >> mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, > > >> which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even > > > more. > > >> In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats > which > > > would > > >> reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other > Stakeholders > > >> might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the > > > Board, > > >> because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. > > >> > > >> More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed > by two > > >> different processes: > > >> > > >> 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a > candidate > > > and > > >> the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which > could > > >> sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist > within > > >> this AC at the moment. > > >> > > >> 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an > internal > > >> NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a > > >> process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) > > >> > > >> Thank you. > > >> > > >> Sivasubramanian M > > >> India > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < > > >> wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to > > >>> Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing > > >>> more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > > >>> > > >>> I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA > > >>> transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are > > >>> remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine > > >>> voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, > > >>> 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine > > >>> (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be > > >>> established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of > the > > >> Initial Board". > > >>> http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- > > >> en.htm# > > >>> V > > >>> > > >>> We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for > > >>> two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, > > >> chaired > > >>> by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large > Supporting > > >>> Organisation > > >>> (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > > >>> > > >>> > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h > > >>> tm#_toc523422641 > > >>> > > >>> In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an > > >>> At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional > > >>> councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory > > >> Committee" > > >>> (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the > > >>> establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the > > >>> board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC > > >>> was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to > > >>> the chair of the GAC). > > >>> > > >>> In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for > > >>> two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the > > >>> horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the > > >>> multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has > > >>> to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong > > >>> civil society role in policy development and decision making. > > >>> > > >>> Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos > > >>> both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and > > >>> NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination > and > > >> collaboration with > > >>> private sector, technical community and governments. A big > challenge. > > >>> > > >>> Wolfgang > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> wolfgang > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> ________________________________ > > >>> > > >>> Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von > > >>> Veronica Cretu > > >>> Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > > >>> An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > >>> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > >>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > >>> euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > >>> afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > >>> ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > >>> apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; > > >>> na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > >>> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large > > >>> Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo > > >>> and build up on it, I would also like to: > > >>> > > >>> - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of > > >>> the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and > > >>> initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so > > >>> this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who > can > > >>> learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share > > >>> the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and > > >>> continue serve the community in the best possible ways. > > >>> > > >>> - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her > > >>> much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are > > >>> important times for ICANN which will require several key competences, > > >>> and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the > > >>> world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on > > > the > > >> community-at-large. > > >>> > > >>> - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has > > >>> been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience > > >>> there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input > > > from > > >> members. > > >>> > > >>> On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home > > >>> safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > > >>> > > >>> With very best, > > >>> Veronica > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > >>> <ocl(a)gih.com > > >>>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Dear All, > > >>>> > > >>>> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what > > >>>> was a very balanced election that required many rounds to > > >>>> differentiate the candidates. > > >>>> > > >>>> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > > >>>> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for > > >>>> ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual > > >>>> General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take > > >>>> place in Los Angeles. > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > > >>>> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > > >>>> options for the future of our community. > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation > > >> Committee. > > >>>> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > > >>>> candidates. > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > > >>>> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been > > >>>> challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. > > >>>> > > >>>> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > > >>>> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > > >>>> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > > >>>> > > >>>> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, > > >>>> the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and > > >>>> would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the > > >>>> challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on > > >>>> the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community > > >>>> selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to > > >>>> share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues > > >>>> and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of > > > ICANN. > > >>>> > > >>>> Kindest regards, > > >>>> > > >>>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > > >>>> ALAC Chair > > >>>> > > >>>> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > > >>>>> Dear All, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process > > >>>>> Committee > > >>>> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote > > >>>> results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the > > >>>> ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be > > >> published. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat > > >>>>> #15) > > >>>> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of > > >>>>> the > > >>>> family name) who ran for the position: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > > >>>>> * Sébastien Bachollet > > >>>>> * Alan Greenberg > > >>>>> * Evan Leibovitch > > >>>>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > > >>>>> > > >>>>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > > >>>> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is > > >>>> selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for > > >>>> 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information > > >>>>> about > > >>>> the selection procedure, under: > https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Regards, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, > > >>>>> Nathalie > > >>>> Peregrine and Terri Agnew > > >>>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > >>>>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% > > >>> 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > > <mailto:3cmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann.org> > > > >>>> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > >>>> > > >>> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- > > >> B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% > > >>> > > >> 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G > > >>> isella%20Gruber,% > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy > > >> %20St > > >>> aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > > <mailto: > aff%2520in%2520support%2520of%2520ALACmailto%3Astaff(a)atlarge.icann.o > > > rg> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>>> At-Large mailing list > > >>>>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > >>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > >>>>> > > >>>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < > > >>> http://atlarge.icann.org/> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>> EURO-Discuss mailing list > > >>>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > >>>> > > >>>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > >>>> <http://www.euralo.org/> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> *Veronica Cretu * > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > > >>> - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > > >>> > > >>> *Member of the Steering Committee, * > > >>> *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > > >>> * > > >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > > >> and-cu > > >>> rrent-membership > > >>> < > > >>> http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > > >> and-cu > > >>> rrent-membership > > >>>> * > > >>> > > >>> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet > > >>> Governance Forum (IGF)* > > >>> > > >>> *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > > >>> <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > > >>> > > >>> *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation > > >>> for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > > >>> > > >>> *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members > > >>> <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > > >>> veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: > > >> 373 > > >>> 067435000* > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> EURO-Discuss mailing list > > >>> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > >>> > > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > >>> <http://www.euralo.org/> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> APAC-Discuss mailing list > > >>> APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > > >>> > > >>> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy > > >> India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> EURO-Discuss mailing list > > >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > >> > > >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > > > > -- > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > > Facultad de Química UNAM > > Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > > +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 > > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > > Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > > ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4f5005932b.html --]]

1 0

Ayuda del EWG Entender Next Generation RDS Riesgo - Completar la Encuesta
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com April 5, 2014

April 5, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Ayuda del EWG Entender Next Generation RDS Riesgo - Completar la Encuesta De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Gracias Fátima. Es aún más importante para participar en la encuesta. El vínculo de trabajo para la versión en Inglés de la encuesta en línea es aquí: http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve… El instrumento de la encuesta imprimible puede accederse en: http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve… Nos aseguraremos de hacer circular el enlace a la versión en lengua española como pronto como esté disponible. Sería de gran ayuda si extraemos el vínculo de trabajo, lo envía hacia adelante y pedir a nuestras redes para participar en la encuesta. -Carlton ============================== Carlton Un Samuels Móvil: 876-818-1799 * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * ============================= > http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-04apr14-en.htm > ------------------------------ > RDS Risk Survey and Webinar: How will a Proposed Next Generation > Registration Directory Services (RDS) to Replace Whois Impact You? > (Available Until 15 May 2014) > > 4 April 2014 > > The *Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services (EWG) > <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40175189 > >*invites > you to participate in its recently launched Registration Directory > Service (RDS) Risk Survey. > > If you provide or use gTLD domain name registration data (today known as > Whois), please consider responding to this survey to share your unique > perspective on potential risks and benefits associated with the EWG's > proposed RDS, should ICANN choose to implement such as system to replace > Whois. > > Today, anyone can query Whois to identify the organization or individual > responsible for an Internet domain name, known as a Registrant, along with > their postal address, email address, and telephone number. The EWG was > asked to re-examine the purpose and provision of this information, > envisioning a clean-slate approach to meet global Internet community needs > with greater privacy, accuracy, and accountability. The EWG's proposed next > generation RDS would collect, validate and disclose registration > information for permissible purposes only, with some values remaining > public and others being gated - that is, returned only to authorized users > with legitimate purposes. > > At this point, the RDS is simply a proposal being refined by the EWG for > ICANN Board and community consideration. If you are one of the many > different individuals, businesses, and other organizations that consume > Whois data today, or a domain name Registrant, Registrar, or Registry that > provides Whois data today, please participate in this survey. This survey > is a chance to tell the EWG about the risks and benefits that the > recommended RDS might have for YOU. > > All risks and benefits identified through this survey will be published in > aggregated, anonymized form and used by the EWG to refine its > recommendations and as input to a full risk assessment. > *RDS Risk Survey attributes:* > > - RDS Risk Survey Availability Date: 15 March 2014 > - RDS Risk Survey address: > > http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve… > - RDS Risk Survey Close Date: *15 May 2014, 23:59 UTC* > > To read more, you may download a printable > PDF< > http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve… > >[PDF, > 1.93 MB] before returning to > > http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve…<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve…> > take the on-line survey. Translated versions of this survey will also > > be > > available shortly. > > *To learn more about this survey, please join the EWG for this interactive > > online workshop: How will Next Generation Registration Directory Services > > impact you?* > > *Date:* Wednesday, 16 April 2014 > *Time:* 19:00-20:30 UTC (time converter: > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=EWG+Workshop+Webin… > ) > > *Date:* Thursday, 17 April 2014 > > *Time:* 12:00-13:30 UTC (time converter: > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=EWG+Workshop+Webin… > ) > > Additional details on the interactive online workshop are available > here< > http://www.icann.org/en/about/learning/webinars/rds-workshop-04apr14-en.htm > > > . > > You may also learn more about the proposed next generation RDS at any time > by: > > - WATCHING this short introductory > video<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40175189> > - LISTENING to this longer > presentation<http://buenosaires48.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-rds> > - EXPLORING these > FAQs<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/faqs>, > or > - READING the EWG's Initial > Report< > http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report… > >[PDF, > 1.70 MB] and Status > Update Report< > http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/status-update-… > >[PDF, > 2.26 MB] > > *Background* > > In December 2012, ICANN announced the creation of an Expert Working Group > (EWG) on next generation gTLD Registration Directory Services, as a first > step in fulfilling the ICANN Board's directive to help redefine the purpose > and provision of gTLD registration data. The EWG's findings are expected to > serve as a foundation to help the GNSO create a new global policy for the > provision of gTLD registration data. > > A significant milestone was reached on 24 June > 2013< > http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-3-24jun13-en.htm > >with > the publication > <http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-3-24jun13-en.htm > >of > the Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory > Services<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services > >(EWG)'s > Initial Report and FAQs, opening a consultation period with the > ICANN community. The Initial > Report< > http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report… > >[PDF, > 1.70 MB] enumerated the users, purposes, data elements, recommended > principles and features, and proposed model to guide the development of a > next generation Registration Directory Service (RDS) to replace Whois. > > Prior to the ICANN Meeting in Buenos Aires, the EWG published its Status > Update Report< > http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/status-update-… > >[PDF, > 2.26 MB] to highlight the EWG's thinking on these and many other key > issues. It also provides a great deal more detail on the analysis that lay > behind the Initial > Report< > http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report… > >[PDF, > 1.70 MB]. > *What's Next?* > > The EWG is now completing its research and information gathering phase > before delivering its final recommendations to the ICANN Board. The RDS > Risk Survey is one of several research efforts undertaken being the EWG to > ensure that its final recommendations are supported by facts and informed > by current practices and input from all those potentially impacted by any > next generation system to replace Whois. > > The EWG expects to complete its recommendations in 2014, informed by > Community feedback and in-depth analysis of selected areas, including the > responses to this RDS Risk Survey. The EWG plans to deliver its final > report to the ICANN Board in June 2014. > *Questions* > > If questions arise about the RDS Risk Survey, please contact us at > Risk-EWG-Survey(a)icann.org. > > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2867ddb857.html --]]

1 0

Re: Resultados de la votaci�n: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selecci�n
by ocl＠gih.com April 4, 2014

April 4, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: Resultados de la votación: 2.014 At-Large Director Ejecutivo (asiento # 15) Proceso de Selección De: ocl(a)gih.com Estimado Wolfgang, gracias por este recordatorio de la historia. Me gustaría saber más de nuestra Comunidad de si creo que deberíamos estar empujando para un segundo puesto de director ahora que hemos tenido otro exitosa ronda de selección de un Director de la Junta. Fadi Chehadmentioned hoy la elección de At-Large al hablar sobre el modelo de múltiples partes interesadas en el Instituto Hudson http://www.hudson.org/events/1144-the-future-of-internet-governance-a-discu… Saludos cordiales, Olivier El 30/03/2014 11:32, "Kleinwchter, Wolfgang" escribió: > Hi, > > I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > > I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the Initial Board". > http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98-en.htm#V > > We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, chaired by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting Organisation (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.htm#_t… > > In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory Committee" (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to the chair of the GAC). > > In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong civil society role in policy development and decision making. > > Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and collaboration with private sector, technical community and governments. A big challenge. > > Wolfgang > > > > wolfgang > > > > ________________________________ > > Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von Veronica Cretu > Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo and > build up on it, I would also like to: > > - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of the > Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and initiatives. We > all continue building on our previous experiences, so this process should > be a continuous exercise and include those who can learn from us - so, I am > sure Sebastian will find good ways to share the wealth of expertise gained > in his role as a Board member and continue serve the community in the best > possible ways. > > - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her much > luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are important > times for ICANN which will require several key competences, and awareness > of geo-political realities in different parts of the world. I trust Rinalia > will be able to deliver on the expectations on the community-at-large. > > - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has been > for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience there are > always things to learn from and improve based on the input from members. > > On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home safe > & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > > With very best, > Veronica > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>wrote: > >> Dear All, >> >> I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what was >> a very balanced election that required many rounds to differentiate the >> candidates. >> >> Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a >> moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for ICANN >> as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual General >> Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take place in Los >> Angeles. >> >> Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is >> through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of >> options for the future of our community. >> >> Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation Committee. >> Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of >> candidates. >> >> Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process >> Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been challenging >> due to the multiple instances of Ties. >> >> The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons >> learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of >> recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. >> >> Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, the >> Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and would like >> to reaffirm the full support of our community in the challenging months >> ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on the Board to "represent >> us" but as a candidate from our community selected to the Board by our >> community, he has proven himself to share his experience of Internet End >> Users with his Board Colleagues and we are grateful of his continued >> involvement in all matters of ICANN. >> >> Kindest regards, >> >> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond >> ALAC Chair >> >> On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: >>> Dear All, >>> >>> Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process Committee >> (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote results of >> the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 >> (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be published. >>> This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) >> Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. >>> Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of the >> family name) who ran for the position: >>> * Rinalia Abdul Rahim >>> * Sébastien Bachollet >>> * Alan Greenberg >>> * Evan Leibovitch >>> * Jean-Jacques Subrenat >>> >>> After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie >> breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is selected as >> the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 is: Rinalia >> Abdul Rahim. >>> You may review the results, as well as the detailed information about >> the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. >>> Regards, >>> >>> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie >> Peregrine and Terri Agnew >>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >>> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org%3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> >> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7-B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi%20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20Gisella%20Gruber,% >> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy%20Staff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> At-Large mailing list >>> At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >>> >>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org <http://atlarge.icann.org/> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> >> > > > -- > *Veronica Cretu * > > > *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > > *Member of the Steering Committee, * > *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > *http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current-membership > <http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role-and-current…>* > > *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* > *To the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)* > > *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > > *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* > *(Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > > *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members <http://www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> >* > > > > *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: 373 > 067435000* > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org <http://www.euralo.org/> > > > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/12d9513028.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: ICANN Alerta de Noticias - RDS Encuesta de Riesgo y Webinar: �C�mo va a servicios de directorio de registro de pr�xima generaci�n propuestos (RDS) para reemplazar Impacto Whois usted? (Disponible el 15 de mayo de 2014)
by fatimacambronero＠gmail.com April 4, 2014

April 4, 2014

[[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Fwd: ICANN Alerta de Noticias - RDS Encuesta de Riesgo y Webinar: ¿Cómo va a servicios de directorio de registro de próxima generación propuestos (RDS) para reemplazar Impacto Whois usted? (Disponible el 15 de mayo de 2014) De: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com FYI, Para participar en el Webinar: Por favor regístrese a través de correo electrónico a alice.jansen @ icann.org por Martes, 15 de abril 2014 - 23:59 GMT para recibir los detalles de marcación de entrada. ---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- De: ICANN Alerta Noticias <communications(a)icann.org> Fecha: 04.04.2014 19:34 GMT-03: 00 Asunto: ICANN Alerta Noticias - RDS Encuesta de Riesgo y Webinar: ¿Cómo una Servicios propuestos Next Generation Directorio registro (RDS) para reemplazar Whois Usted Impacto? (Disponible el 15 de mayo de 2014) A: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com [Image: ICANN] <http://www.icann.org/> Alerta de noticias http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-04apr14-en.htm ------------------------------ RDS Encuesta de Riesgo y Webinar: ¿Cómo una generación siguiente propuesta Servicios de directorio de registro (RDS) para reemplazar Impacto Whois usted? (Disponible el 15 de mayo de 2014) 04 de abril 2014 El Grupo * Experto de Trabajo sobre Servicios de directorio de gTLD (EWG) < https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40175189>*invites a participar en su Directorio de registro recién lanzado Servicio (RDS) Riesgo Encuesta. Si usted proporciona o usa los datos de nombres de dominio de registro de gTLD (hoy conocido como Whois), tenga en cuenta la respuesta a la encuesta de compartir su única perspectiva sobre los posibles riesgos y beneficios asociados con el GTA de RDS propuestos, deben ICANN elegir implementar como sistema para reemplazar Whois. Hoy en día, cualquier persona puede consultar Whois para identificar la organización o individuo responsable de un nombre de dominio de Internet, conocido como un Solicitante de registro, junto con su dirección postal, número de la dirección de correo electrónico y teléfono.El EWG fue pedido que vuelva a examinar el propósito y el suministro de esta información, la aspiración a un enfoque de borrón y cuenta nueva para satisfacer las necesidades de la comunidad de Internet a nivel mundial con una mayor privacidad, la precisión y la rendición de cuentas. El EWG de propuesta siguiente RDS generación recogerían, validar y divulgar el registro la información sólo con fines admisibles, con algunos valores restantes pública y otros que se están urbanización cerrada - es decir, regresó sólo a usuarios autorizados con fines legítimos. En este punto, el RDS es simplemente una propuesta de ser refinado por el EWG para Junta directiva de ICANN y la consideración de la comunidad. Si usted es uno de los muchos diferentes individuos, empresas y otras organizaciones que consumen Hoy los datos Whois, o un nombre de dominio, el Registrador o del Registro que proporciona datos Whois hoy, por favor participar en esta encuesta. Esta encuesta es una oportunidad de decirle al EWG sobre los riesgos y beneficios que el RDS recomendadas podrían tener para usted. Todos los riesgos y beneficios identificados a través de esta encuesta se publicarán en forma agregada, anonimizados y utilizado por el EWG perfeccionando su recomendaciones y, como entrada en una evaluación completa de los riesgos. * RDS Encuesta de Riesgo atributos: * - RDS Encuesta de Riesgo disponibilidad Fecha: 15 de marzo 2014 - RDS Riesgo dirección de Encuesta: http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve… - RDS Encuesta de Riesgo Fecha de cierre: * 15 mayo de 2014, 23:59 UTC * Para más información, puede descargar una impresora PDF <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve…> [PDF, 1.93 MB] antes de volver a http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/rds-risk-surve… participar en la encuesta on-line. Las versiones traducidas de esta encuesta también ser disponible en breve. * Para obtener más información sobre esta encuesta, por favor únase a la EWG para este interactivo taller en línea: ¿Cómo de servicios de directorio de registro de Próxima Generación que afectar? * * Fecha: * Miércoles, 16 de abril 2014 * Hora: * 19:00-20:30 UTC (convertidor de tiempo: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=EWG+Workshop+Webin… ) * Fecha: * Jueves, 17 de abril 2014 * Hora: * 12:00-13:30 UTC (convertidor de tiempo: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=EWG+Workshop+Webin… ) Detalles adicionales sobre el taller interactivo en línea están disponibles aquí <http://www.icann.org/en/about/learning/webinars/rds-workshop-04apr14-en.htm> . También puede obtener más información sobre el RDS próxima generación propuestas en cualquier momento por: - OBSERVACIÓN esta breve introducción video < https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40175189> - Escucha esto ya presentación <http://buenosaires48.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-rds> - La exploración de estos FAQs <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/faqs> , o - Lectura inicial del EWG Informe <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.70 MB] y Estado Informe de actualización <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/status-update-…> [PDF, 2.26 MB] * Antecedentes * En diciembre de 2012, la ICANN anunció la creación de un Grupo de Trabajo de Expertos (GTA) sobre el próximo registro de gTLD generación de servicios de directorio, como un primer paso en el cumplimiento de la directiva de la Junta directiva de ICANN para ayudar a redefinir el propósito y el suministro de datos de registro de gTLD. Las conclusiones del GTE se espera que servir como una fundación para ayudar a la GNSO a crear una nueva política global para la provisión de datos de registro de gTLD. Un importante hito se alcanzó el 24 de junio 2013 <http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-3-24jun13-en.htm> con la publicación <http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-3-24jun13-en.htm> de el Grupo de Trabajo de Expertos en la Guía de gTLD Servicios <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services> (EWG) 's Informe y FAQs inicial, la apertura de un período de consultas con el Comunidad de ICANN. La inicial Informe <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.70 MB] enumeró los usuarios, los propósitos, elementos de datos, recomendados principios y características y modelo propuesto para guiar el desarrollo de un Servicio de directorio de registro de próxima generación (RDS) para reemplazar Whois. Antes de la reunión de ICANN en Buenos Aires, el EWG publicó su Estado Informe de actualización <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/status-update-…> [PDF, 2.26 MB] para resaltar el pensamiento del EWG sobre estas y muchas otras claves cuestiones. También proporciona mucho más detalle en el análisis que se extendía detrás de la inicial Informe <http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report…> [PDF, 1.70 MB]. * ¿Qué sigue? * El GTA está terminando su fase de investigación y recopilación de información antes de entregar sus recomendaciones finales a la Junta directiva de ICANN. El RDS Encuesta de riesgos es uno de los varios esfuerzos de investigación llevadas a cabo es la EWG que asegurar que sus recomendaciones finales se apoyan en hechos e informados por las prácticas actuales y las aportaciones de todas las personas potencialmente afectadas por cualquier sistema de próxima generación para reemplazar Whois. El EWG espera completar sus recomendaciones en 2014, informado por Retroalimentación de la comunidad y el análisis en profundidad de las áreas seleccionadas, incluyendo el respuestas a esta RDS Encuesta de Riesgos. El EWG tiene previsto entregar su informe final informar a la Junta Directiva de ICANN en junio de 2014. * Preguntas * Si surgen dudas acerca de la Encuesta de Riesgo RDS, por favor contacte con nosotros en Risk-EWG-Survey(a)icann.org. Este mensaje fue enviado a fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com desde: ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094 hasta 2536 Email Marketing by [image: iContact - Try It Gratis!] <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> Administre su Suscripción <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=13227880&l=6333&s=RZZO&m=93…> - * Fatima Cambronero * Abogada-Argentina Teléfono: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @ facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c6b8794f1d.html --]]

1 0